Hegseth Makes Bonkers Claim About Iran Strikes Place in History
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has sparked online ridicule after boldly claiming that the U.S. attack against Iran was the most complex and secretive military operation in history.
The bizarre comment was made during a press conference in which the former Fox & Friends host lashed out angrily at the media for reporting on a leaked intelligence report suggesting the strikes may not have 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities.
Known as Operation Midnight Hammer, the strikes directed by Donald Trump on Saturday were carried out using deception, decoys, and bunker bombs to target Iran's key nuclear facilities.
But while the mission was militarily impressive, experts fear that the administration's decision to telegraph possible US involvement for days allowed Iran to stockpile some of its nuclear enrichment material before the attack took place.
Despite these concerns, Hegseth doubled down on Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear program had been 'obliterated', telling reporters: 'President Trump directed the most complex and secretive military operation in history, and it was a resounding success, resulting in a cease fire agreement and the end of the 12 day war.'
The comment about the attack's place in history sparked online ridicule from some, while others pointed out that other U.S. operations were arguably more secretive and complex.
'It is difficult to square that against other missions, such as the surprise D-Day landing in France in 1944 which involved hundreds of thousands of soldiers and led to the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, or a more recent example, such as the SEAL Team 6 mission that killed Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011,' former navy and Iraq veteran John Ismay, a reporter for the New York Times.
'According to Hegseth, Trump dropping bombs from 30,000 feet is somehow more complex than coordinating the largest amphibious invasion in world history,' wrote a social media user on X, in reference to the D-Day operation. 'These people aren't just rewriting history, they're burning the textbooks.'
'Pete needs to back off the kool-aid,' quipped another.
Taking out Bid Laden was a highly classified mission involving black ops planning, intelligence tracking, and a daring night-time raid.
The D-Day operation was even more elaborate, as it involved multi-level cooperation between U.S, Canadian, British, and French troops as well as more than 150,000 soldiers landing on five beaches, more than 11,000 aircraft, and more than 7000 ships.
It also included a top-secret plan to mislead Adolf Hitler about when an invasion would take place.
At the press conference on Thursday, Hegseth and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, gave the most detailed briefing yet of the planning and execution of the U.S. airstrikes.
They also pushed back on the leaked intelligence report, based on information just a day-and-a-half after the U.S. attack.
The early analysis by the Defense Intelligence Agency described the damage as 'limited' and said the strike may have set back the Iranian nuclear program by just a matter of months.
Hegseth said the agency itself had noted the assessment was a 'preliminary, low-confidence report that will continue to be refined.'
However, he and Caine offered no new assessments of the state of Iran's nuclear program or the full extent of the battle damage to the three targets: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan.
Instead, Hegseth referred to the comments of the nation's spy agencies and others who backed the president's view about the success of the strikes.
Among them was a statement from CIA director John Ratcliffe, who wrote: 'CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes.
'This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years. CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies fully informed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
22 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Breakdown in Trade Talks Between U.S. and Canada, Explained
Negotiations between the U.S. and Canada have broken down, with President Donald Trump announcing that he is 'terminating' all trade discussions with his northern neighbor. 'We are hereby terminating ALL discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump said on Friday. 'We will let Canada know the tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven-day period.' Trump's retreat from negotiations follows a long-standing back-and-forth between the two countries on trade, which kickstarted when Trump implemented the application of an additional 25% tariff on imports from Canada in February. ( Energy resources from Canada received a lower 10% tariff.) With tensions now reaching a high, spurred on by Trump threatening more tariffs on Canada, parties in both countries have voiced concern over where things currently stand. What led to the breakdown in negotiations of trade between the U.S. and Canada? Trump called Canada 'a very difficult country to trade with,' blaming the breakdown in progress on Canada's Digital Services Tax [DST], a levy on tech revenues generated from Canadian users, which is set to go into effect on Monday, June 30. Trump called the 3% digital services tax 'a direct and blatant attack' on the U.S. The Trump Administration has urged Canada to pause or eliminate the tax, which applies to any tech company making more than $15 million from Canadian internet users. In his social media post, Trump said the U.S. had 'just been informed' of the tax. The plan has, in fact, been in place since last year, but the first payments are only due to begin on June 30. The bill works retroactively, so large tech companies such as Apple, Google, and Meta stand to be hit with large payments. 'Here's the irony. To me, this looks like a power play from Canada, because they're making it retroactive… so Trump came along and said, 'No, no more deals—watch and learn,'' argues James Mohs, an associate professor of accounting, finance, and taxation at the University of New Haven. He likens the situation to two 'bullies' fighting each other on the block to see 'who's the biggest.' A June 11 letter from Republican members of the U.S. Congress urged Trump to pressure Canada into pausing the tax. 'If Canada decides to move forward with this unprecedented, retroactive tax, it will set a terrible precedent that will have long-lasting impacts on global tax and trade practices,' said the 21 members of Congress, further arguing that 90% of what Canada would collect under its Digital Services Tax Act would be from U.S. companies. Trump's announcement of stalled talks came a week after Canada's Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said that they would not delay implementation of the tax, despite mounting pressure. "This was voted by parliament so we're going ahead with the DST," Champagne told reporters on June 19. "[The Digital Services Tax] is not unique to Canada, by the way. Let's put that into context." In the Oval Office on Friday, Trump told reporters that the U.S. has "all the cards' in its relationship with Canada. "Economically, we have such power over Canada. I'd rather not use it," he seemingly warned. Speaking to Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Friday, for an interview of which the first part aired on Sunday morning, Trump delved into his decision to stop negotiations with Canada, saying the country is 'very nasty to deal with.' He stated that the negotiations would be paused 'until such time as they drop certain taxes,' seemingly referring to the DST. Trump also once again repeated his belief that 'Canada should be the 51st state.' Read More: Does Trump Still Plan to Annex Canada and Make It the 51st State? Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that though the Trump Administration knew of the Digital Service Tax, they had hoped that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's new Administration would, 'as a sign of good will,' pause it. 'We think it's badly unfair to do it retroactively,' Bessent said, stating that U.S. Trade Ambassador Jamieson Greer is likely going to open a 301 investigation on the tax, which would allow the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to investigate any potential harm on U.S. businesses. Colin Robertson, a former Canadian diplomat and current fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, says that Trump has 'thrown a grenade into the negotiations," but hope for a deal is far from lost. 'I look at this as part of the negotiating process. Trump is unpredictable, but my guess is that there are those in the U.S. who would like to see an agreement with Canada,' he says. 'I think that the interests on both sides are such that an agreement is possible and desirable—certainly [from] the Canadian side, but for the American side, also. I think they want to be able to show the rest of the world you can make a deal with your closest neighbor and ally. And if you can't do it with Canada, who can you do it with?' This is not dissimilar to how Trump does business, as he prioritizes gaining 'as much leverage as he can' before making a deal, Robertson argues. Mohs agrees, stating that this is all 'a negotiation tool, nothing more, nothing less.' How has Canada responded? In a brief exchange with reporters on Friday, Carney addressed questions about the breakdown in talks. 'We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," he said, firmly. The Canadian government also retaliated later on Friday, placing a steel quota on some imports, with a hefty 50% tariff on products that exceed that quota. The measure went into effect immediately, and is set to be reviewed in 30 days. 'This temporary trade measure will help stabilize the Canadian steel market by addressing the risk that steel originally destined for the United States is redirected to Canada,' stated the government's press release on the measure. 'The combination of tariffs imposed by the U.S. on all steel imports and global overcapacity, caused by non-market practices, has led many exporters to seek new markets.' Robertson sees this move as 'consistent' with what Canada has promised in the past. 'I think that all fits into [how] we had promised we would take action when Trump doubled the tariff from 25% to 50%,' he says, arguing that Canada, as 'the biggest steel exporter to the U.S.,' will likely lift these measures if they can get back to a trade agreement. At the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada on June 16, Carney had said that he and Trump were working towards finding a trade deal within 30 days, something Trump had agreed was 'achievable.' But the subsequent blow to their relations puts any deal on shaky ground. Goldy Hyder, CEO of Business Council of Canada, said that this back-and-forth has only escalated the uncertainty that businesses are struggling with. While change is happening on the geopolitical and economic scale, Hyder pointed out, geography never will change, and these neighboring countries need to find a way out of these stalled negotiations. '[Canadian] businesses are intertwined not just with the U.S., but also with Mexico. We have smart people, we have a lot of natural resources,' Hyder told Canada's CTV News. 'We've grown an economy that's working and can continue to grow, but it's challenging because business, of course, likes predictability and certainty, and it doesn't have a nationality that it's attached to.' Sharing a message to the governments of both the U.S. and Canada, Hyder urged: "Let's not get in our own way here." But some experts remain divided on whether or not Canada should pause the tax in order to appease Trump. Julian Karaguesian, a former adviser to Canada's Ministry of Finance, told CTV that Canada's Prime Minister and Finance Minister had 'different means' to 'delay the implementation' of the tax. 'It leads me to think that this was a tactic by Prime Minister Carney—putting a card on the table because, as President Trump said, [the U.S.] has more cards than we do, but we have some,' Karaguesian argued, pointing to Canada as a major energy producer with reserves of oil and gas. Karaguesian said Canada, as a 'natural resource superpower,' could, if backed into a corner, utilize this, and also build out other existing trade relationships with India, China, and beyond. 'It's not much at all,' Karaguesian said of the amount of money Canada might gain from the tax, emphasizing that the charge is not a tariff. 'The tax is part of our domestic policy, and every sovereign nation has a right to pursue domestic policies.' There's mounting tension on both sides, says Mohs, but "when it comes to business, a trade war is not going to work well for either Canada or the U.S.'
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Netanyahu says ‘opportunities have opened up' to free Gaza hostages following Iran operation
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said 'many opportunities have opened up' following Israel's military operations in Iran, including the possibility of bringing home the remaining hostages held in Gaza. Speaking at a Shin Bet security agency facility in southern Israel on Sunday, Netanyahu said, 'As you probably know, many opportunities have opened up now following this victory. Firstly, to rescue the hostages. Of course, we will also need to solve the Gaza issue, defeat Hamas, but I believe we will accomplish both missions.' Netanyahu's comments mark one of the first times he has clearly prioritized the return of the hostages over the defeat of Hamas. For months, Netanyahu has prioritized the defeat of Hamas in Gaza and talked about a 'total victory.' At the beginning of May, he called defeating Hamas the 'supreme objective,' not freeing the hostages. His comments Sunday mark a potentially significant change in how he has talked about Israel's goals in the war. He has repeatedly faced criticism from the families of hostages, opposition politicians and large segments of the Israeli public for not clearly placing the return of the hostages as Israel's primary goal. Reacting to his comments Sunday, the Hostages Families Forum Headquarters called for a single comprehensive deal to bring back all 50 hostages and end the fighting in Gaza. 'What is needed is release, not rescue. This difference of one word could mean the difference between salvation and loss for the hostages,' the forum said in a statement. Elsewhere in his speech, Netanyahu also said 'wider regional opportunities are opening up,' an apparent reference to efforts to expand the Abraham Accords that saw Israel normalize relations with several Gulf states. The comments by Netanyahu come amid increasing pressure on Israel from US President Donald Trump to make a ceasefire deal. Since the end of the conflict with Iran, negotiators have been pushing to restart stalled negotiations with Hamas in Gaza. Netanyahu held a high-level meeting on Gaza Sunday evening, according to two Israeli sources, meeting with some of his closest advisers, including Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer, Defense Minister Israel Katz and others, to discuss the latest on Israel's military operation in the Palestinian enclave. Dermer is scheduled to hold meetings with the Trump administration in Washington, DC, on Monday. Trump has made clear his desire to secure a ceasefire deal to end the war in Gaza and bring home the 50 hostages held by Hamas, at least 20 of whom are still alive. In a post on social media early Sunday morning, Trump pushed Israel to 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!' Trump had earlier thrown his support behind Netanyahu, calling his ongoing trial on corruption charges a 'POLITICAL WITCH HUNT' – the second time the president had called for an end to the prosecution of the long-time Israeli leader. With the conclusion of the operation in Iran – and Trump's sudden foray into Israel's legal system – Netanyahu has requested to postpone his upcoming trial sessions this week. After twice rejecting the requests, the court granted the delay following a confidential session in which the judge said there had been a change to the 'evidentiary structure' compared to the previous requests.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Tax Bill Hits Senate With GOP Torn by Competing Demands
(Bloomberg) -- Senate Majority Leader John Thune is rushing to meet President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline for pushing through his massive tax and spending bill, but first he has to work through a list of approximately eight Republican senators who have expressed opposition to portions of it. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Within the next two days, he needs to find a way to appease most of them. The South Dakota Republican has one of the least enviable jobs in Washington in the coming hours — trying to knit a compromise between factions of his party: one side pushing for more spending cuts in the legislation and senators who are threatening to withhold their support unless there is more funding for health benefits, renewable energy subsidies and other priorities. Thune can afford to lose only three his 53 members in the chamber, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie. Trump is closely watching the talks, quick to issue a harsh social media broadside to anyone who criticize his signature tax-cut legislation. Just ask North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, one of two Republicans who voted against a late-night Saturday procedural vote to begin debate on the legislation. Trump unleashed a series of scathing posts, threatening to primary Tillis. The president took personal swipes, calling him a 'talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!' before also getting in a jab at Rand Paul, the other GOP senator to oppose the vote to advance the bill. Tillis on Sunday announced he wouldn't be running for reelection, a decision that unshackles him from any need to show fidelity to Trump to preserve his political career. He's indicated he's likely to oppose the bill. Paul has said he is also likely to vote 'no' on the legislation based on the price tag and the inclusion of a $5 trillion debt ceiling increase. If both Tillis and Paul remain in opposition, Thune can only lose one more. Polls show that Americans are wary of the bill. A recent Pew Research survey found that 49% of Americans oppose the bill, while 29% supported it. Some 21% weren't sure what to think. Republicans in Congress broadly support the $4.5 trillion worth of tax cuts in the package, which extend the 2017 tax cuts and create new breaks for tipped and hourly workers, along with seniors and car buyers. But the $1.2 trillion worth of spending cuts have created numerous problems. Moderates including Tillis, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are pushing to scale back cuts to Medicaid benefits, warning that those reductions could come at a great political cost if millions of Americans lose health coverage as a result of the bill. Some 11.8 million people could lose access to insurance benefits over the course of a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office's most recent estimate. Murkowski and Tillis have also called to slow down planned phaseouts of solar, wind and other renewable energy credits that have spurred job creation in their states. Those asks are in direct opposition to demands from Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and others to bake in more Medicaid cuts in a bid to shrink the overall price tag of the bill. He says Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming will join with him to back an amendment to include faster health coverage cuts during an a marathon voting session slated to start late Sunday or early Monday. Trump has not delved into the details of the legislation. Instead, the president has pushed for speed, demanding that Congress deliver the bill to him by July 4. The House will also need to vote on the Senate-passed version before it can go the president's desk to be signed into law. Meeting the July 4 deadline is ambitious — but possible if Republican leaders can successfully navigate thorny fights. Senators are expected to remain in the Capitol Sunday into Monday for an overnight voting session. Final passage of the bill could come sometime Monday if Thune is able to cut deals with enough senators for passage. The House then will need to vote on the Senate package. That likely means Speaker Mike Johnson will have to wrangle House Republicans to support the Senate package. Several members have already signaled they aren't satisfied with aspects of the bill, but any further changes likely mean missing Trump's July 4 deadline and risking his ire. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
