Council sets out final list of roads which could revert to 30mph speed limits
The local authority invited residents to nominate roads they believe should have been exempted from the Welsh Government's decision to lower the nation's default speed limit to 20mph.
Earlier this year, the council said 16 stretches of road complied with government road safety advice and could revert to 30mph limits.
Members of the public were then invited to offer any objections or comments on those proposals, and the council received a total of 12 representations.
A new report shows that after further consideration of the objectors' claims, the council has decided two of the original 16 roads will remain at 20mph.
One is a stretch of Caerphilly Road, between Bassaleg and Rhiwderin, which an objector said now 'feels safer for pedestrians'.
The council said a lower speed limit was 'appropriate' for the road, which has 'narrow footways' and is an 'established walking route to school'.
The other road to remain at 20mph, following the review, is a section of Usk Road to the east of Caerleon.
An objector also raised concerns the route is 'well-used' by schoolchildren and people accessing the village.
In response, the council said people 'would feel unsafe about using the established route to walk to school safely' if the speed limit was increased to 30mph along a road which 'carries a high pedestrian footfall, including young vulnerable children and the elderly'.
According to the report, 'valid' objections were made in relation to other roads, but the council judged those cases met the government's criteria for exemptions, meaning they may be changed to 30mph speed limits.
These were a part of Bettws Lane, George Street Bridge, a part of Lighthouse Road, Tredegar House Drive, a part of Tregwilym Road, and Wharf Road.
There were no valid objections to council proposals to introduce 30mph speed limits on the other roads – namely a part of Bassaleg Road, Duffryn Drive, Duffryn Way, Frederick Street, Morgan Way, a part of Royal Oak Hill, Wern Industrial Estate, and a part of West Nash Road.
Cllr Rhian Howells, the cabinet member for assets and infrastructure, is expected to approve an officer's recommendation later this week to proceed with the speed limit changes on the agreed 14 stretches of road.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Business Secretary dismisses idea of ‘magic wealth tax' as ‘daft'
The Business Secretary has said the idea of a 'magic wealth tax' to raise funds is 'daft' amid speculation that the Chancellor could turn to such a measure to plug holes in the public finances. The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation she might target the assets of the wealthy in the next budget. Rachel Reeves has not ruled out the possibility of a new wealth tax but has been eager to highlight that she will stick to her commitment not to hike tax for 'working people'. Some in the Labour Party, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan, have called for a wealth tax. However, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismissed the idea. 'This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income – the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax,' he told GB News. 'But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy… that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. 'Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. 'There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that. 'And I say to people: 'Be serious about this.' The idea you can just levy everyone… What if your wealth was not in your bank account, (what if it was) in fine wine or art? 'How would we tax that? This is why this doesn't exist.'
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Safety Bodies Urge EU Not To Let US Vehicles Skirt Safety Rules
Independent European road safety bodies are concerned that the U.S. will skirt around the EU's ... More crash-safety regulations as part of any trade deal. Photo: Guido Kirchner/picture alliance via Getty Images. Europe's peak independent transport safety bodies have urged the European Union not to follow Japan's lead and allow U.S.-made vehicles to be sold to European customers without passing European safety regulations. The European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) has insisted that the EU should not allow American companies to sidestep EU safety regulations in the interests of lowered tariffs with the U.S. The Trump administration this week announced a trade deal with Japan, the centerpiece of which is a 15% reciprocal tariff on goods exported from Japan to the U.S. - which has American automakers concerned. But the fine print of the deal showed that American automakers would now be allowed to sell their vehicles into the Japanese market - without passing Japanese domestic crash or emissions regulations. News stories today hinted that the EU was preparing to sign a similar deal, allowing its automakers to export to the U.S. for a 15% tariff rather than building cars there, with the same circumvention of its crash-safety regulations, which are considered the toughest in the world. Autonomous emergency braking, ntelligent speed assistance and pedestrian protection are some ... More features mandated under EU law that are not mandatory in U.S. cars. Photo: Getty. In a statement released today, the ETSC expressed deep concern that the move could undermine years of crash-safety science and improvement and urged the EU to reject any such deal and insisted vehicle-safety standards were public protections, not trade barriers. 'We are deeply concerned by the trade deal reached this week by the governments of Japan and the United States, which reportedly removes domestic Japanese safety testing requirements for American-made vehicles exported to Japan,' the statement read. "This move sets a dangerous precedent - one that could undermine road safety in countries that have led the world in automotive safety regulation. 'Allowing vehicles to bypass proven national safety standards for the sake of trade expediency risks turning back the clock on decades of progress in reducing road deaths and serious injuries.' Signatories to the statement include the the Executive Director of the European Transport Safety Council (Antonio Avenoso), the Acting Director General of the FIA's Region 1 (Diogo Pinto), the Executive Director of Transport & Environment (William Todts) and the President of the International Federation of Pedestrians (Geert van Waeg). Others involved included leaders of the European Consumer Voice in Standardization, Cities and Regions for Transport Innovation and the European Cyclists' Federation. Leading the pushback were Michiel van Ratingen, the Secretary General of Euro NCAP (New Car Assessment Program) and the CEO of Global NCAP, Richard Woods. NCAP programs have been responsible for enormous steps forward in consumer awareness of vehicle crash safety and, more lately, in driver-assistance systems. 'Reports indicate that Japan will now allow U.S. vehicles to enter its market without being subject to Japan's specific crash testing or safety compliance requirements. We urge the European Union not to follow suit,' the statement continued. "Trade talks must not become a backdoor to regulatory weakening. Vehicle safety standards are not trade barriers; they are public protections backed by science and evidence. Weakening or bypassing them would lead to real and measurable harm - particularly to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists. "The EU has consistently adopted some of the world's most effective vehicle safety regulations, culminating in the General Safety Regulation that is currently in force. These rules mandate technologies such as automated emergency braking, intelligent speed assistance, and pedestrian protection - none of which are currently required for vehicles sold in the U.S. 'We urge EU leaders to maintain this position, and to state clearly that no deal on vehicles will be accepted unless all products placed on the EU market meet existing European regulatory requirements in full.'While the Trump administration has insisted that its tariff war would bring jobs back to America, it was the Toyota Motor Corp whose shares boomed on the Japanese tariff announcement, rising 13% to a seven-month high yesterday. The Big Three U.S. automakers called for caution on the tariffs yesterday, with the head of the American Automotive Policy Council (which represents Ford, GM and Stellantis) insisting they would harm American manufacturers, rather than helping them. 'Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tariff imposed on North American built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers,' the council's head, Matt Blunt, said in a statement. Auto Drive America, which represents automakers who sell imported vehicles in the U.S., had a different take, and urged Trump to reach similar deals with the EU, Mexico and South Korea. 'We share President Trump's vision to make the U.S. the worldwide center of automotive production, and our member companies need stability in order to create an environment where we can maintain our competitive edge both in the U.S. and on the global stage,' Auto Drive America said in a statement. The Trade War has been a collection of ups and downs that have driven automakers to despair, given that all U.S.-built cars contain at least 15% foreign-made parts. The irony is that American cars have been sold tariff-free in Japan for decades, but have failed to garner interest due to being too large and inefficient for Japanese tastes. Now, they'll be at least 15% more expensive to Japanese buyers.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Officials announce swifter-than-expected ban on traditional hunting practice: 'This is an important step for the future'
Officials announce swifter-than-expected ban on traditional hunting practice: 'This is an important step for the future' In England, Scotland, and Wales, lead ammunition is to be banned after a three-year phase-out period, starting in 2026, as announced by environmental minister Emma Hardy. According to the Guardian, the environmental concerns associated with lead have led to the ban. It was initially going to occur over a five-year phase-out but has been shrunk to just three years, meaning results will be visible even quicker. "Ammunition using lead has long been identified as a significant pollutant and a particular risk to waterbirds," the Guardian reported. "The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT) estimates that about 100,000 waterbirds in the U.K. die every year from lead poisoning." The damage associated with lead doesn't stop at the harm it causes waterbirds. A recent study spotlighted the effects of lead on humans, with a particular focus on its negative impact on children's cognition. These parts of the U.K. are not the only places with legislation tackling lead; in October 2024, the U.S. announced that cities have 10 years to replace their lead pipes. On the decision to make hunting less risky to untargeted animals by stopping lead ammunition from being used, Tim Bonner — CEO of farming-centered nonprofit Countryside Alliance — told the Guardian: "This is an important step for the future of shooting, which will benefit the countryside and rural economy." While backlash to the reduced phase-out schedule has included fears about replacing lead bullets with alternatives, the Guardian quoted Minister Hardy as saying: "Non-lead alternatives are readily available, and we'll continue to work closely with the shooting sector throughout this transition." The future is looking bright for both waterbirds and humans, as keeping this toxic metal out of our environment, including animals' bodies and waterways, can help prevent the harm created by lead and lead poisoning. To reduce possible ingestion of lead in your own life, the Environmental Protection Agency recommends "flushing" your system, or letting the faucet run for 15-20 seconds before using the water. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
