logo
Orissa HC acquits two in 2017 triple murder case, sets aside death sentence

Orissa HC acquits two in 2017 triple murder case, sets aside death sentence

CUTTACK: In a significant judgement, the Orissa High Court on Monday acquitted two men who had been sentenced to death for the brutal murder of a family of three in Angul district in 2017, citing lack of conclusive evidence.
A division bench comprising Justice Sangam Kumar Sahoo and Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra allowed the criminal appeals filed by Prakash Behera and Nandakishor Sethy, setting aside their conviction and death sentence pronounced by the additional sessions judge, Athamallik, on September 27, 2024.
Behera and Sethy had been convicted for the gruesome killing of a couple and their three-year-old son at Gambharimaliha village under Kishore Nagar police limits on October 9, 2017. Their throats were allegedly slit in what the trial court termed a 'rarest of rare' case warranting capital punishment.
The prosecution's story was that the accused unlawfully entered the home of Biranchi Naik with the intent to commit robbery and murder. They allegedly abducted Biranchi Naik and his minor son Ekalabya Naik, and later murdered his wife Tarani Naik. The accused reportedly stole cash and used a 'Katuri' (sharp-edged weapon), during the crime.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Orissa HC acquits two in 2017 triple murder case, sets aside death sentence
Orissa HC acquits two in 2017 triple murder case, sets aside death sentence

New Indian Express

time2 days ago

  • New Indian Express

Orissa HC acquits two in 2017 triple murder case, sets aside death sentence

CUTTACK: In a significant judgement, the Orissa High Court on Monday acquitted two men who had been sentenced to death for the brutal murder of a family of three in Angul district in 2017, citing lack of conclusive evidence. A division bench comprising Justice Sangam Kumar Sahoo and Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra allowed the criminal appeals filed by Prakash Behera and Nandakishor Sethy, setting aside their conviction and death sentence pronounced by the additional sessions judge, Athamallik, on September 27, 2024. Behera and Sethy had been convicted for the gruesome killing of a couple and their three-year-old son at Gambharimaliha village under Kishore Nagar police limits on October 9, 2017. Their throats were allegedly slit in what the trial court termed a 'rarest of rare' case warranting capital punishment. The prosecution's story was that the accused unlawfully entered the home of Biranchi Naik with the intent to commit robbery and murder. They allegedly abducted Biranchi Naik and his minor son Ekalabya Naik, and later murdered his wife Tarani Naik. The accused reportedly stole cash and used a 'Katuri' (sharp-edged weapon), during the crime.

Orissa High Court orders compensation for workers killed in 2013 landslide
Orissa High Court orders compensation for workers killed in 2013 landslide

New Indian Express

time5 days ago

  • New Indian Express

Orissa High Court orders compensation for workers killed in 2013 landslide

CUTTACK: In a significant ruling, the Orissa High Court has quashed the orders of the Nayagarh collector rejecting ex gratia compensation claims filed by the families of two labourers who died in a tragic landslide during road construction work in 2013. The court also directed the state government to pay compensation of Rs 1.50 lakh each to the bereaved families within two months, with 12 per cent annual interest for any delay beyond the stipulated period. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra delivered identical judgments on July 10 in two separate petitions filed by the families of the deceased Taleswar Jani and Krushna Chandra Mallik. The petitions were moved challenging the collector's rejection of their compensation applications dated June 17, 2022. The deceased, Jani and Mallik, had been engaged in a road construction project in Sirikibadi village under Banigochha police station in Nayagarh district. On July 17, 2013, while work was underway, a sudden landslide triggered by heavy rainfall claimed their lives on the spot. However, the collector had rejected the families' compensation requests, citing that the rainfall on the day of the incident did not meet the threshold required under the Odisha Relief Code for compensation due to natural disasters. The court ruled that the bereaved families are fully entitled to ex gratia compensation under the Odisha Relief Code. It directed the state to release `1.50 lakh to each family along with interest from the date of their applications. Failure to comply within two months would attract an interest penalty of 12 pc per annum.

Woman Leaves Man Due To Marital Issues, He Moves Court. Judges Say 'Wife Not a Commodity'
Woman Leaves Man Due To Marital Issues, He Moves Court. Judges Say 'Wife Not a Commodity'

News18

time16-07-2025

  • News18

Woman Leaves Man Due To Marital Issues, He Moves Court. Judges Say 'Wife Not a Commodity'

Last Updated: The Orissa High Court noted that the woman left him out of her own volition due to some marital disputes A man moved the Orissa High Court to secure the custody of her wife, who, along with their child, left his house over marital issues. Instead of relief, the man got to listen to harsh words from the court, which also imposed Rs 25,000 cost on him for filing the frivolous habeas corpus plea. The Orissa High Court noted that the woman left him out of her own volition due to some marital disputes. The Division Bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri Raman observed that the husband cannot compel the wife to act as per his dictum nor can he treat the 'wife as his commodity," Live Law reported. 'The fundamental right which is conferred upon every individual irrespective of the gender cannot be treated as one way traffic by a particular gender. The wife has a right to take an independent decision of her life and if she has chosen to dissociate her company from the husband, the husband cannot be permitted to abuse or misuse the power of the Court in issuing the writ of habeas corpus," the bench stated in its order. After leaving her husband, the woman and her child were living with her brother. However, the man alleged that she was held in wrongful detention by his brother-in-law. He also filed a complaint with the police about this allegation. After the petition was filed, police contacted the petitioner's wife to understand the reasons behind the habeas corpus plea. She cited marital discord as the reason for leaving. Once this was conveyed to the court, the bench strongly criticised the petitioner for misusing legal provisions to settle personal disputes and for treating his wife like a 'commodity". 'The application is frivolous and misconceived, and warrants not just dismissal but also the imposition of heavy costs," the court observed. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store