Huge '$25 cap' cost of living change to help millions of Aussies pay for an everyday staple
It will be the second cap on medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) introduced by the Albanese government in three years, after it cut the maximum price of PBS prescriptions from $42.50 to $30.
'The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your health care,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.
'My government will continue to deliver cost-of-living relief for all Australians.'
PBS medicines would be capped at $7.70 for pensioners and concession card holders until 2030.
The bill's introduction is largely a formality, with its passage through the lower house all but assured thanks to Labor's massive 94-seat majority in the 150-seat House of Representatives.
The election promise is the Albanese government's next priority after it introduced childcare safety and HECS debt reduction legislation.
Federal Labor has been talking up plans to strengthen the PBS amid concerns the scheme will be targeted as a bargaining chip in US trade negotiations to ward off threatened pharmaceutical tariffs.
Albanese has repeatedly said the scheme was not up for negotiation.
Australia eased its biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports last week, but the prime minister has denied the move was linked to US trade talks.
He noted the decision followed a 10-year review of Australian biosecurity rules.
Beyond new legislation, conflict in the Middle East will likely prompt fierce debate on the parliamentary floor after Albanese said Israel had breached international law by blocking the flow of food aid into Gaza.
'Quite clearly, it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered, which was a decision that Israel made in March,' Albanese told ABC's Insiders on Sunday.
He stopped short of saying Australia would join France in recognising a Palestinian state, but said his government would decide at 'an appropriate time'.
'Hamas can have no role in a future state,' he said.
'Hamas are a terrorist organisation who I find, their actions are abhorrent.'
Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said Albanese failed to adequately condemn the role of the group in the ongoing conflict.
The government is also likely to come under pressure regarding transparency when parliament resumes, after a Centre for Public Integrity probe revealed only a quarter of freedom of information request responses returned by the government in 2023-24 were un-redacted.
By comparison, the Morrison government returned almost half of its FOI requests as complete documents in 2021/22.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
BT: £18m refund to EE, Plusnet customers after rule breach
You could be owed cash if you left your contract early 💷 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... BT has refunded £18 million to EE, Plusnet and BT customers after breaking contract rules Ofcom found over 1.3 million sales were made without clear pre-contract information At least 1.1 million customers may have been wrongly charged early exit fees Affected customers have been contacted, but some may still be owed money Where refunds weren't possible, BT donated £440,000 to 17 UK charities More than a million customers of multiple phone and internet providers could be due money back after a telecoms giant was forced to refund a massive £18 million — and you might be one of them. The payout to customers of EE, Plusnet and BT could follows an Ofcom investigation which found the latter broke consumer protection rules by failing to give customers key information about their contracts before signing up. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Since June 2022, telecom firms must provide clear details upfront — including contract length, speed, cost, and early exit fees — but BT failed to do so in at least 1.3 million sales. BT, which owns EE and Plusnet, was fined £2.8 million by Ofcom last year after breaching regulations designed to protect consumers and small businesses. (Photo: CHRIS J RATCLIFFE/AFP via Getty Images) | AFP via Getty Images At least 1.1 million customers were affected — and many may have been charged early exit fees unfairly after leaving contracts they never properly agreed to. The regulator demanded BT refund any customers who had paid such fees. Where refunds weren't possible — such as where the customer couldn't be contacted — BT was ordered to donate the equivalent to charity. So far, £440,000 has been given to 17 UK charities. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A spokesperson for BT said: 'We're sorry that pre-contract information and contract summary documents were not available to some of our customers in a timely manner. 'We have proactively contacted affected customers and refunded them where appropriate.' BT added that it has worked with Ofcom to fix its sales processes and ensure compliance going forward. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How to find out if you're owed a refund If you were an EE or Plusnet customer between June 2022 and early 2023 — and left your contract early — you could be due a refund. BT says it has proactively contacted those affected, but if you think you've been missed: Contact your provider directly (BT, EE or Plusnet) Check past bank statements for early termination charges Ask for written confirmation of whether your contract met the legal requirements If you've since switched providers or changed contact details, it's especially worth following up, as BT may have struggled to reach you. Are you struggling to make ends meet as costs continue to rise? You can now send your stories to us online via YourWorld at It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Children to be banned from having YouTube accounts as Albanese government backflips on exemption
Children will be banned from having YouTube accounts from December, with the federal government backflipping on an earlier decision to exempt the video platform from the national under-16s social media restrictions. The decision, to be confirmed by the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, and the communications minister, Anika Wells, on Wednesday, is likely to set off a furious reaction from the Google-owned YouTube, which will hold a major event for politicians in Parliament House on Wednesday night. YouTube argued it operated differently to other platforms and had been given an exemption to the world-leading under-16s social media ban by the former communications minister Michelle Rowland. But newly installed minister Wells has taken advice from the eSafety commissioner that the video platform should be included in the rules as it poses a threat to young people. 'The Albanese government is giving kids a reprieve from the persuasive and pervasive pull of social media while giving parents peace of mind,' Wells said, in announcing the move. 'There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children.' YouTube will be included as one of the age-restricted social media platforms, alongside Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, X and others. Last month, the eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, citing a survey of 2,600 children, said nearly four in 10 children had reported exposure to harmful content on YouTube – 'the most frequently cited platform in our research'. Inman Grant noted that children would still be able to view YouTube videos when logged out as the legislation was limited to preventing children from having accounts. The under-16s ban comes into force in December, with platforms to face fines of up to $49.5m if they fail to take 'reasonable steps' to stop children from opening accounts. Some major tech platforms have privately raised concerns about a lack of information about what they must to do to meet the 'reasonable steps' test, including what new barriers or verification methods they must add to their services. The government is expected to share more information and guidance about such steps in coming months. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it,' Albanese said. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' The government on Wednesday will table a set of rules in parliament about which online services will not be captured under the social media ban, making clear that gaming platforms, messaging apps and health services will not be included. YouTube had previously been given a carveout from the social media ban, with former minister Rowland telling parliament that the video platform would be lumped alongside the likes of ReachOut's PeerChat, Kids Helpline's MyCircle and Google Classroom, apps 'that can be shown to function like social media in their interactivity but operate with a significant purpose to enable young people to get the education and health support they need'. Meta, TikTok and Snapchat had strongly criticised the YouTube carveout, arguing that it functioned similarly to their services and should not be treated differently, calling for a 'level playing field'. TikTok called YouTube's exemption a 'sweetheart deal', and saying it was 'irrational and indefensible'. YouTube last week wrote to the government, vowing to consider legal action if it was included in the ban. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'YouTube is a video sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians,' a spokesperson said on Sunday. Albanese said on Sunday said the government would make its decision 'independent of any of these threats that are made by the social media companies'. Google on Wednesday night will hold its annual 'Google at Parliament House' event, a popular function spruiking Google products. Previous instalments have featured the Wiggles as entertainment, while invitations seen by Guardian Australia advertise local act the Rubens for this week's lineup. Invitations spruik that guests can 'hear from partners, businesses and meet some of Australia's most beloved YouTube Creators, including the Mik Maks and Never Too Small'. Large numbers of politicians and political staffers attend the event each year. Wells said the government remained committed to the legislation. 'We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are,' she said. 'There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online – but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Children to be banned from having YouTube accounts as Albanese government backflips on exemption
Children will be banned from having YouTube accounts from December, with the federal government backflipping on an earlier decision to exempt the video platform from the national under-16s social media restrictions. The decision, to be confirmed by the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, and the communications minister, Anika Wells, on Wednesday, is likely to set off a furious reaction from the Google-owned YouTube, which will hold a major event for politicians in Parliament House on Wednesday night. YouTube argued it operated differently to other platforms and had been given an exemption to the world-leading under-16s social media ban by the former communications minister Michelle Rowland. But newly installed minister Wells has taken advice from the eSafety commissioner that the video platform should be included in the rules as it poses a threat to young people. 'The Albanese government is giving kids a reprieve from the persuasive and pervasive pull of social media while giving parents peace of mind,' Wells said, in announcing the move. 'There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children.' YouTube will be included as one of the age-restricted social media platforms, alongside Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, X and others. Last month, the eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, citing a survey of 2,600 children, said nearly four in 10 children had reported exposure to harmful content on YouTube – 'the most frequently cited platform in our research'. Inman Grant noted that children would still be able to view YouTube videos when logged out as the legislation was limited to preventing children from having accounts. The under-16s ban comes into force in December, with platforms to face fines of up to $49.5m if they fail to take 'reasonable steps' to stop children from opening accounts. Some major tech platforms have privately raised concerns about a lack of information about what they must to do to meet the 'reasonable steps' test, including what new barriers or verification methods they must add to their services. The government is expected to share more information and guidance about such steps in coming months. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms so I'm calling time on it,' Albanese said. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' The government on Wednesday will table a set of rules in parliament about which online services will not be captured under the social media ban, making clear that gaming platforms, messaging apps and health services will not be included. YouTube had previously been given a carveout from the social media ban, with former minister Rowland telling parliament that the video platform would be lumped alongside the likes of ReachOut's PeerChat, Kids Helpline's MyCircle and Google Classroom, apps 'that can be shown to function like social media in their interactivity but operate with a significant purpose to enable young people to get the education and health support they need'. Meta, TikTok and Snapchat had strongly criticised the YouTube carveout, arguing that it functioned similarly to their services and should not be treated differently, calling for a 'level playing field'. TikTok called YouTube's exemption a 'sweetheart deal', and saying it was 'irrational and indefensible'. YouTube last week wrote to the government, vowing to consider legal action if it was included in the ban. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'YouTube is a video sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians,' a spokesperson said on Sunday. Albanese said on Sunday said the government would make its decision 'independent of any of these threats that are made by the social media companies'. Google on Wednesday night will hold its annual 'Google at Parliament House' event, a popular function spruiking Google products. Previous instalments have featured the Wiggles as entertainment, while invitations seen by Guardian Australia advertise local act the Rubens for this week's lineup. Invitations spruik that guests can 'hear from partners, businesses and meet some of Australia's most beloved YouTube Creators, including the Mik Maks and Never Too Small'. Large numbers of politicians and political staffers attend the event each year. Wells said the government remained committed to the legislation. 'We want kids to know who they are before platforms assume who they are,' she said. 'There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online – but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing.'
