logo
House convenes to take up Trump's "big, beautiful bill" after Senate passage

House convenes to take up Trump's "big, beautiful bill" after Senate passage

CBS Newsa day ago
Johnson says Senate's budget bill changes "went a little further than many of us would've preferred"
Washington — The House convened Wednesday to take up President Trump's Senate-passed massive domestic policy bill, to approve changes to the legislation ahead of a July 4 deadline to get the bill to the president's desk for his signature.
The House Rules Committee advanced the Senate's changes to the bill overnight, setting it up for a possible dramatic floor vote in the coming hours.
House Republicans are forging ahead quickly on the signature legislation of Mr. Trump's second-term agenda, which includes ramped-up spending for border security, defense and energy production and extends trillions of dollars in tax cuts, partially offset by substantial cuts to health care and nutrition programs. The House passed an earlier version of the bill in May.
The process kicked off with consideration by the House Rules Committee, before debate and a key procedural vote expected Wednesday that would set up the measure for final passage.
House Democrats dragged out the process on the Rules Committee overnight and early into the morning Wednesday by submitting hundreds of amendments to be debated in the committee, similar to the way Senate Democrats delayed final passage in the upper chamber by forcing the entire bill to be read on the floor and votes on dozens of amendments.
"All legislative tools and options are on the table," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, warned after the Senate vote Tuesday.
Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost of Florida said of their strategy that "the longer this bill in the ether, the more unpopular it becomes."
Democrats weren't alone in their resistance to the revised bill. GOP Reps. Ralph Norman of South Carolina and Chip Roy of Texas joined Democrats on the panel to oppose the rule, as a handful of hardline conservatives said they'd reject the Senate's changes.
"What the Senate did is unconscionable," Norman said. "I'll vote against it here and I'll vote against it on the floor until we get it right."
As Friday's deadline quickly approaches, it's still unclear if House Republicans have enough support to get it over the finish line as members continue to voice their discontent with pieces of the tax and spending package that squeaked through the Senate on Tuesday.
Several members on both sides of the aisle had their flights canceled or delayed by bad weather as they raced back to Washington for the vote, adding another layer of doubt around the bill's passage.
Republicans can only afford three defections, if all members are present and voting.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has spent weeks pleading with his Senate counterparts not to make any major changes to the version of the bill that passed the lower chamber by a single vote in May. He said the Senate bill's changes "went a little further than many of us would've preferred."
The Senate-passed bill includes steeper Medicaid cuts, a higher increase in the debt limit and differences with the House bill's green energy subsidies and the state and local tax deduction.
Other controversial provisions that faced pushback in both chambers, including the sale of public lands in nearly a dozen states, a 10-year moratorium on states regulating artificial intelligence and an excise tax on the renewable energy industry were stripped from the Senate bill before heading back to the House.
Johnson said Tuesday night he was having "lots of discussion with lots of members about lots of ideas" as several potential holdouts called for the bill to be reverted to the House-passed version. GOP leaders, however, said the House would vote on the Senate bill "as-is."
"It's important to recognize that much of what the House included in H.R. 1 when we initially passed it is still included," said Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, who chairs the Rules Committee.
Meanwhile, the White House was expected to continue to pressure House Republicans to get the bill across the finish line. In a Truth Social post
Wednesday morning, Mr. Trump urged the GOP to get the bill done, saying to his party, "don't let the Radical Left Democrats push you around."
"We've got all the cards, and we are going to use them," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next
After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next

CNN

time9 minutes ago

  • CNN

After settling with Trump, CBS News staffers fear what comes next

Paramount Global is being hammered for bowing to presidential pressure and settling a lawsuit that it likely could have beaten in court. But this convoluted episode is really more about the plaintiff, President Trump, than about Paramount. 'It is odd to call this a 'settlement' when the result of it is so unsettling,' veteran journalism professor Al Tompkins remarked. Employees at CBS News, which produces '60 Minutes,' feel the same way. 'There is great fear about what comes next,' a CBS News staffer told CNN on condition of anonymity. Even though Trump's '60 Minutes' lawsuit is now history, his bullying tactics will continue to challenge media companies for the foreseeable future. Get Reliable Sources newsletter Sign up here to receive Reliable Sources with Brian Stelter in your inbox. 'Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated,' the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression said Wednesday. 'This settlement will only embolden the president to continue his flurry of baseless lawsuits against the press — and against the American people's ability to hear the news free from government intrusion.' For newsrooms and other organizations targeted by Trump, the question becomes, fight or fold? One follow-up question might be: How do audiences react to outlets that fold? When Trump first sued CBS last fall, Rebecca Tushnet, the Frank Stanton professor of First Amendment law at Harvard Law School, told CNN the suit was 'ridiculous junk and should be mocked.' Tushnet – whose professional home is under multifaceted assault by the Trump administration – said in a follow-up exchange on Wednesday that Paramount's decision to settle was disappointing. 'The individual incentive in a budding authoritarian state is always to capitulate; that's the point of imposing costs on speech,' she said. 'It's disappointing that so many of our institutions are folding especially when individual citizens can see very clearly the dangers of this path.' Some CBS staffers have expressed similar views. Former CBS News correspondent Armen Keteyian echoed current staffers when he wrote on X, 'This Paramount settlement is the nadir for the network — a breach of the public trust Murrow, Cronkite, Hewitt and thousands of us worked decades to build.' Democratic lawmakers also heaped criticism on Paramount for settling; Sen. Elizabeth Warren said 'this looks like bribery in plain sight,' and Sen. Ron Wyden condemned the 'corporate execs who sold out our democracy,' promising action 'when Democrats retake power.' The bribery allegation stems from the fact that Paramount is trying to get the Trump administration to approve its pending merger with Skydance Media. Paramount insists that the settlement is not related to the FCC merger review process. Trump, however, recently spoke about the '60 Minutes' lawsuit and the merger hold-up as if they were self-evidently connected. When a reporter asked Trump what was holding up the merger on June 18, Trump answered by praising Skydance CEO David Ellison, then immediately repeated his talking points about the lawsuit. 'They're working on a settlement now,' he said. According to the terms of the settlement, which were announced late Tuesday night, Trump will drop the suit in exchange for $16 million toward his presidential library. The financial terms mirror the deal that Disney's ABC struck with Trump last December. 'Trump's presidential library will be a permanent monument to Paramount's surrender,' remarked Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. Other press freedom advocates called the CBS parent's decision a 'spineless' and 'shameful' capitulation. Veteran media reporter Paul Farhi said on X that it was 'fascinating how Paramount has borne the bulk of the criticism for agreeing to this payoff. As if Trump is a passive bystander who played no role.' The conservative editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, controlled by Rupert Murdoch, focused on Trump's conduct in a sharply critical piece on Wednesday night. 'The President is using government to intimidate news outlets that publish stories he doesn't like,' the Journal wrote. 'It's a low move in a free country with a free press.' Trump, who on Wednesday was focused on his sweeping agenda bill, has yet to personally weigh in on the Paramount settlement. But a spokesman for his legal team cast the deal as an example of him holding 'the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit.' The supposed 'wrongdoing' in this case, however, was just an edit to a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris last fall. Trump seized on the clunky editing of one particular question and answer, but TV networks edit interviews all the time, and those editorial decisions are protected under the First Amendment. One takeaway for journalists is to be 'transparent about how you do what you do,' Tompkins said. CBS resisted calls to release the full transcript of the Harris interview last fall, but eventually shared the transcript and tapes amid mounting political pressure. The tapes reaffirmed that Trump had a weak legal case. But the lawsuit gave him leverage over Paramount — and potentially Skydance, the CBS-owner-in-waiting, as well. David Ellison, son of the billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, was seen schmoozing near Trump at two different UFC matches earlier this year, stoking speculation that he was leaning on personal relationships to help get the merger approved. On Wednesday, Paramount pushed back on a New York Post report about a 'side deal' between Ellison and Trump involving TV airtime for public service announcements promoting Trump-aligned causes. 'Paramount has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement proposed by the mediator and accepted by the parties,' the company said. A spokesperson for Ellison had no comment on the matter, and there is no evidence of any such deal. But the report only intensified questions inside CBS News about how Ellison might approach owning the news division in the future. While journalists at '60 Minutes' and across CBS News are concerned about the situation, they ultimately want to move on and continue doing their jobs. 'This settlement is not a reflection on the essential and bold work of 60 Minutes of CBS,' Tompkins told CNN. 'It is a reflection of a vindictive president and corporate heads who did not value one of the fundamental principles that underpin the ownership of a news organization.' 'That principle,' he said, 'is stated as the second tenant of the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics: Act Independently.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store