Ecolab Schedules Webcast and Conference Call on July 29, 2025
ST. PAUL, Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Ecolab will host a live webcast to discuss its 2025 second quarter results. A news release containing second quarter results is expected to be issued before market open on July 29, 2025.
Details for the public webcast are as follows:
About Ecolab
A trusted partner for millions of customers, Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) is a global sustainability leader offering water, hygiene and infection prevention solutions and services that protect people and the resources vital to life. Building on more than a century of innovation, Ecolab has annual sales of $16 billion, employs approximately 48,000 associates and operates in more than 170 countries around the world. The company delivers comprehensive science-based solutions, data-driven insights and world-class service to advance food safety, maintain clean and safe environments, and optimize water and energy use. Ecolab's innovative solutions improve operational efficiencies and sustainability for customers in the food, healthcare, high tech, life sciences, hospitality and industrial markets. www.ecolab.com
Follow us on LinkedIn @Ecolab, Instagram @ Ecolab_Inc and Facebook @Ecolab.
(ECL-C)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
15 Best Job Search Sites From Top Job Boards To Niche Players
The best job search sites can be hard to identify with countless job boards available online. getty The recent bankruptcy filings of Monster and CareerBuilder highlight just how quickly the job board industry is changing. With established brands disappearing from the digital recruiting landscape, selecting the best job search sites has never been more crucial. To be a successful job seeker, don't rely solely on one site. Instead, combine mega job boards with specialized and emerging platforms to maximize your reach. That's why I've compiled this list of the 15 best job search sites—to accelerate and simplify your job search. These platforms cast the widest net, offering millions of job listings across every industry and experience level. LinkedIn Jobs is the hiring engine of the world's largest professional networking platform. By leveraging your profile and connections, you can apply with a single click and gain insights into company culture, referrals and recruiter activity. Who it's best for: Professionals in any industry seeking broad exposure and networking opportunities. Cost: Free to job seekers with optional LinkedIn Premium for added insights. Pros: Unmatched recruiter access, valuable network connections, robust company research tools and AI résumé help. Cons: High competition, some jobs are duplicated from other boards and Premium features require a subscription. Indeed is one of the world's largest job search engines, aggregating millions of job openings from employer sites, job boards and recruiters. Its intuitive interface makes it simple to search, filter and apply, with many employers offering quick-apply options right on the platform. Who it's best for: Anyone seeking a wide range of jobs across industries and levels. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Massive job inventory, easy alerts, user-friendly interface and free résumé uploads. Cons: Many job postings are duplicates or outdated, sorting can be overwhelming, and there are limited filtering options for specialized roles. 3. ZipRecruiter ZipRecruiter uses AI to connect job seekers to thousands of employers and partner boards, delivering personalized job matches and real-time application feedback. Its "one-click apply," and Match Score system help streamline the process for busy applicants. Who it's best for: Anyone who values time-saving features and tailored job matches. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: AI-powered job matching, one-click application submission and notifications when your application is viewed. Cons: Some roles redirect to external sites, and there are occasional off-target matches. 4. Glassdoor Glassdoor is unique in pairing job listings with employee-driven company reviews, salary ranges and interview tips. Job seekers can evaluate company culture and compensation before applying, all within a single platform. Who it's best for: Candidates who care about company culture, pay transparency and employee feedback. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Extensive reviews and salary data, insider interview information and easy-to-use search. Cons: Not all jobs are listed directly, some reviews are outdated or vague and you must create a profile to view all content. Remote-First Job Boards These remote-focused platforms are among the best job search sites for flexible work arrangements. 5. FlexJobs FlexJobs is a membership-based site that specializes in remote, hybrid and flexible jobs, thoroughly vetted for legitimacy. Each listing is hand-screened to weed out scams and low-quality opportunities, providing peace of mind for remote job seekers. Who it's best for: Professionals seeking remote or flexible work or concerned about job listing scams. Cost: Paid membership for full access. Pros: 100% vetted listings, remote/hybrid focus and career resources and events. Cons: Monthly fee and some listings may appear for free on other sites. 6. We Work Remotely (WWR) We Work Remotely (WWR) is the largest job board dedicated exclusively to remote work. The platform covers tech, design, marketing and customer support, allowing you to browse listings or set up job alerts based on your skills and preferences. Who it's best for: Remote job seekers in tech, design and related digital fields. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: High volume of remote jobs, long track record, strong community, straightforward navigation and jobs from respected companies. Cons: Limited search filters with most roles requiring U.S. hours and less focus on non-technology roles. 7. focuses exclusively on remote jobs across multiple industries, including customer service, marketing and beyond. The site features a clean, easy-to-browse interface and is backed by the same team as FlexJobs. Who it's best for: Anyone searching for legitimate remote jobs in diverse fields. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Curated, 100% remote opportunities, covers a wide variety of roles and has remote work resources. Cons: A smaller number of jobs compared to mega-boards and fewer advanced search filters. 8. RemoteOK RemoteOK is a global aggregator that brings together remote jobs from all corners of the web, with a special emphasis on tech and digital roles. Its minimalist interface and real-time stats make it a favorite among digital nomads. Who it's best for: Digital nomads, tech professionals and anyone wanting worldwide options. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Huge selection of global tech roles, salary and remote policy filters and real-time application stats. Cons: Tech-heavy listings, can include duplicate or short-term contract roles and less variety in non-tech jobs. Technology And Startup Job Platforms These specialized platforms connect ambitious professionals with high-growth companies and innovative startups. 9. Wellfound Wellfound is the go-to platform for startup and early-stage company roles. With upfront salary and equity info, direct founder contact and a single profile for multiple applications, Wellfound streamlines the job search for startup-minded candidates. Who it's best for: Startup enthusiasts and tech talent seeking equity or growth opportunities. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Transparent salary and equity, founder access and a robust startup database. Cons: Limited to startup roles and fewer jobs in traditional industries or larger companies. 10. Dice Dice is a tech-industry mainstay, connecting IT, software and engineering pros with employers ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies. It features advanced skills filtering, salary estimates and even AI-driven job matching for technical roles. Who it's best for: IT, software and engineering professionals seeking U.S.-based roles. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Deep tech focus, detailed job filters and trusted by major tech employers. Cons: Less suitable for non-tech jobs, and some listings may be outdated. 11. Built In Built In is a hub for tech and startup jobs in major U.S. cities, blending curated job listings with industry news and company spotlights. It's designed to help candidates get to know company cultures and community life before applying. Who it's best for: Tech professionals and startup talent in U.S. metro areas. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Curated, city-specific listings, deep company profiles and community news. Cons: U.S.-centric and primarily focused on tech and digital roles. 12. YC Work at a Startup YC Work at a Startup is Y Combinator's talent portal, connecting job seekers with open positions at hundreds of YC-backed startups. With a single profile, you can apply to multiple companies and even be proactively contacted by startup founders. Who it's best for: Engineers, builders and anyone interested in working at high-growth startups. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Single profile for all applications, direct connections with founders and early access to new startup roles. Cons: Startup-only focus, most roles are technical and can be highly competitive. Emerging Job Sites These innovative platforms represent the next generation of job search technology, leveraging AI and automation to streamline applications while addressing specific pain points in the traditional hiring process. 13. Simplify Simplify is a job-hunting tool and Chrome extension that helps users apply for jobs faster by automatically filling out application forms and tracking submissions. It's beneficial for high-volume applicants, like recent graduates, and features AI résumé tailoring for popular job portals. Who it's best for: Students, new grads or anyone sending many job applications. Cost: Free Chrome extension with a premium option for additional features. Pros: Saves time on repetitive forms, tracks all applications and has AI résumé tools. Cons: Auto-apply may send generic applications, and the extension only works with specific portals. 14. Massive Massive is an AI-powered job platform designed for candidates who want to automate their job search at scale. Its bulk application system, built-in résumé tools and networking features help users reach more employers with less manual effort. Who it's best for: Ambitious job seekers wanting to automate and accelerate their search. Cost: A free tier is available for limited usage, with paid plans offered for high-volume applications. Pros: Bulk applications, AI matching, integrated tracking and résumé tools. Cons: Less customization per application, and employers may notice a bulk approach. 15. Bandana Bandana is a new job platform focused on helping hourly, frontline and working-class job seekers find better jobs close to home. Using a map-based interface, Bandana offers ultra-transparent details on pay, benefits and schedules for every listing. Who it's best for: Hourly and frontline workers seeking local, benefit-rich jobs. Cost: Free to job seekers. Pros: Map-based job search, transparent pay and benefits and targeted to working-class needs. Cons: Limited to select regions and industries and is still growing its employer network. Take Control Of Your Job Hunt With the right mix of traditional job boards and emerging tools, you can boost your visibility, streamline your job hunt and connect with employers faster. Whether you're just starting out, switching careers or looking for your next role, the best job search sites provide innovative ways to take control of your career journey. So, dive in, experiment and remember that the right opportunity is often just a click away.
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
ELV截止日期：Rosen Law Firm敦促損失超過10萬美元的Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV)股東與法律事務所聯絡以瞭解有關其權利的資訊
紐約--(BUSINESS WIRE)--(美國商業資訊)-- 全球投資人權益法律事務所Rosen Law Firm提醒投資人，一名股東代表在2024年4月18日至2024年10月16日期間購買Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV)普通股的投資人提起了集體訴訟。Elevance將自身描述為「一家為多個市場提供健康保險計畫的醫療保健公司」。 如欲瞭解更多資訊，請遞交 表格 、向Phillip Kim律師 寄送電子郵件 ，或致電866-767-3653聯絡我們。 指控內容：Rosen Law Firm正在調查對Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE: ELV)在其業務營運方面誤導投資人的指控。 起訴書指稱，被告做出了虛假和/或誤導性陳述及/或未揭露：在醫療補助(Medicaid)重新認定程序接近完成時，被告向投資人表示，其正密切監控與重新認定程序相關的成本趨勢，且Elevance與各州協商的保費費率足以因應繼續參加醫療補助計畫病患的風險和成本狀況。儘管被告承認醫療補助支出在上升，但仍多次向投資人保證，這已充分反映在Elevance的年度指引中。這些陳述存在重大虛假或誤導性。事實上，重新認定導致Elevance醫療補助會員的疾病嚴重程度和醫療服務利用率顯著上升，因為被移出醫療補助計畫的會員平均而言比保留資格的會員更健康。這一變化的程度並未反映在Elevance與各州的費率協商中，也未體現在其2024年的財務指引裡。訴訟稱，當市場瞭解真實詳情後，投資人蒙受了損失。 現在怎麼辦：您可能有資格參與針對Elevance Health, Inc.的集體訴訟。如果有股東希望擔任該集體訴訟的原告代表，則必須在2025年7月11日之前向法院提出申請。原告代表是指代表其他集體訴訟成員主導訴訟的當事人代表。您無需參與此案即有資格獲得追償。如果您選擇不採取任何行動，您也可以保持缺席集體訴訟成員的身分。如欲瞭解更多資訊，請點選 此處 。 所有代理均為勝訴後取酬。股東無需支付任何費用或開支。 關於Rosen Law Firm：與Rosen Law Firm不同，一些就此等事宜發表公告的法律事務所並不會實際提起證券集體訴訟。身為股東權益訴訟領域公認的領導者， Rosen Law Firm 一直致力於協助股東挽回損失、改善公司治理結構，並追究公司高階主管的違法行為責任。自成立以來，Rosen Law Firm已經為股東挽回了超過10億美元的損失。 請在LinkedIn： 、Twitter： 或Facebook： 上關注我們，以瞭解最新情況。 律師廣告。先前案例不保證可獲致類似結果。 免責聲明：本公告之原文版本乃官方授權版本。譯文僅供方便瞭解之用，煩請參照原文，原文版本乃唯一具法律效力之版本。
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Bank of America Securities Sticks to Its Buy Rating for Shell (SHEL)
In a report released on June 27, Christopher Kuplent from Bank of America Securities maintained a Buy rating on Shell (SHEL – Research Report), with a price target of $86.00. The company's shares closed last Friday at $70.98. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium for 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. According to TipRanks, Kuplent is a 2-star analyst with an average return of 0.1% and a 62.90% success rate. Kuplent covers the Energy sector, focusing on stocks such as Shell, Shell (UK), and Tenaris. In addition to Bank of America Securities, Shell also received a Buy from Wells Fargo's Roger Read in a report issued on June 25. However, on June 16, Bernstein downgraded Shell (NYSE: SHEL) to a Hold. Based on Shell's latest earnings release for the quarter ending March 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $69.23 billion and a net profit of $4.78 billion. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $72.48 billion and had a net profit of $7.36 billion
