‘A huge victory': Vasquez touts nixing of public lands sell-off in Congressional bill
The Republican reconciliation bill that cleared the United States House of Representatives by a narrow margin this week no longer authorizes the sale of thousands acres of public land in Utah and Nevada.
U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM), who co-founded the Bipartisan Public Lands Caucus earlier this year, said the removal of that provision represents a 'huge victory' for all Americans concerned about public lands being sold to the highest bidder. Vasquez said in a statement he started the caucus with U.S. Rep. Ryan Zinke, a Montana Republican, to beat back these attacks on public lands.
'We committed to working across party lines to sit down and ensure the integrity of our land management system. We've worked together across the aisle to prevent this unprecedented public lands sell-off,' Vasquez said. 'We will continue to work together to ensure our lands are public, accessible and well managed.'
U.S. Reps. Vasquez (D-N.M.) and Zinke (R-MT) launch new bipartisan public lands caucus
The provision would have gutted protections for 500,000 acres of land near Zion National Park, along with critical habitat for threatened desert tortoises and other areas designated by Congress for conservation, according to New Mexico Wild, a conservation advocacy group. That could have meant the lands were turned into 'golf courses, luxury resorts or strip malls,' the group said in a statement Thursday.
Environmental groups nationally have applauded the removal of the provision, which Reps. Celeste Maloy (R-Utah) and Mark Amodei (R-Nevada) sponsored. New Mexico Wild's executive director Mark Allison said the bipartisan pushback was a factor in maintaining the land's protections, but he warned that this is the first of many fights in coming days to stave off efforts to privatize public lands.
'The fact that House Republicans were forced to retreat shows that when we unite to defend our birthright, politicians listen,' he said in a statement. 'But make no mistake — this fight is far from over. The same forces that tried to sneak this land grab through would love nothing more than to come after New Mexico's public lands next time.'
The reconciliation bill now heads to the Senate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Texas Democrats Fled the State to Fight Redistricting
The Texas Legislature was left today without the ability to pass any bills after the state's Democrats fled en masse. Republicans were planning to vote this week to approve a new political map that was drawn at the behest of President Trump to flip five U.S. House seats in favor of Republicans. Democrats, who lack the voting power to stop the map's approval, left the state to prevent the Legislature from achieving the quorum needed to conduct business. They said they were willing to remain out of Texas for weeks. Texas Republicans threatened to call for the arrest of the Democrats or strip them of their seats in the Legislature. But neither appeared likely. Instead, the state's attorney general said, the Democrats would eventually come back on their own because their jobs and families are in Texas. Here's what to know about the standoff. In the meantime, Texas Democrats have gathered in blue states to discuss plans to fight the redistricting. In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul vowed today to counter Trump's push for aggressive partisan redistricting with her own. 'If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us no choice; we must do the same,' she said. For more: Our chief political analyst, Nate Cohn, explained how the new Texas map would change the outlook for control of the House. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
FACT FOCUS: Trump says he's cut drug prices by up to 1,500%. That's not possible
Days after he sent letters instructing top pharmaceutical manufacturers to use a 'most favored nation' pricing model for prescription drugs, President Donald Trump told reporters on Sunday that he had cut costs by up to 1,500%. But Trump's grandiose claim is mathematically impossible. Here's a closer look at the facts. TRUMP: 'You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don't mean 50%, I mean 14 — 1,500%.' THE FACTS: This is false. Cutting drug prices by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications. The Trump administration has taken steps to lower prescription drug prices, but experts say there's no indication costs have seen such a massive drop. Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy at the University of Southern California's Schaeffer Center, called Trump's claim 'total fiction' made up by the Republican president. He agreed that it would amount to drug companies paying customers, rather than the other way around. 'I find it really difficult to translate those numbers into some actual estimates that patients would see at the pharmacy counter,' said Mariana Socal, an associate professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University who studies the U.S. pharmaceutical market. She added that Trump's math is 'really hard to follow.' Asked what Trump was using to back up his claim, White House spokesman Kush Desai said: 'It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people.' The White House provided a chart of price differentials for drugs in the U.S. and comparable countries, but did not offer any other evidence. On Sunday, Trump also described cuts to drug prices as a future development, not that already happened. 'So we'll be dropping drug prices,' he said. 'It will start over the next two to three months by 1,200, 1,300 and even 1,400%.' Prices for most prescription drugs — unbranded generics are the exception — are higher in the U.S. than they are in other high-income countries. This is in large part due to the way drug prices are negotiated in the United States. Trump made his recent appeal in letters to 17 pharmaceutical manufacturers, the White House announced last week. He asked them to reduce costs in the U.S. by matching the lowest prices of prescriptions drugs in other comparably developed countries. Some drugmakers have since indicated that they are open to cutting costs. This move follows an executive order Trump signed in May setting a 30-day deadline for drugmakers to electively lower prices in the U.S. or face new limits in the future over what the government will pay. The federal government has the most power to shape the price it pays for drugs covered by Medicare and Medicaid. It's unclear what — if any — impact the Trump administration's efforts will have on millions of Americans who have private health insurance. Socal pointed out that if drug manufacturers had cut costs to the extent Trump claims, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, especially given the heat they've taken over the years for their pricing practices. 'My expectation would be that they would make announcements — public announcements — and that those announcements would come way in advance of the actual effective dates when those price cuts would come into effect,' she said. Joyce agreed that there has been no indication of a substantial cut. 'Not at all, not at all, none whatsoever,' he said. 'And let alone 1,500.' ___ Find AP Fact Checks here:
Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Administrator Responds After Senator's Warning
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano has fired back at Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren over her criticism of the agency's changes and customer service in recent months. He defended the changes implemented under the Trump administration, saying the agency is "experiencing a customer service turnaround after four years of long wait times and record backlogs under the Biden administration." Why It Matters The Social Security Administration (SSA) has become the center of a national debate over the future of one of America's most vital safety net programs. Recent leadership and technology changes have prompted warnings from lawmakers, labor unions, advocates and former officials that millions of beneficiaries could soon face delays or interruptions in their monthly payments. At stake is the reliability of Social Security for more than 70 million Americans, especially older adults and people with disabilities, as the agency modernizes and manages its workforce under intense political scrutiny. Critics have focused their warnings on the rollout of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, office closures and staffing cutbacks, with Warren, of Massachusetts, previously raising alarms about access to benefits, transparency and program solvency for current and future retirees. A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, DC, March 26, 2025. A Social Security Administration (SSA) office in Washington, DC, March 26, 2025. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images What To Know A group of senators including Ron Wyden, Democrat from Oregon; Bernie Sanders, independent from Vermont; Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat; and Warren previously sent a letter to Bisignano, demanding answers on the SSA's recent adoption of AI-driven customer service tools. The senators raised concerns about problems reminiscent of past missteps, including a failed fraud-detection chatbot that reportedly yielded only two potential fraud claims from 111,000 attempts and recent disruptions to benefit access linked to the agency's technology changes. "This lack of communication from your agency undermines its efforts to improve services by sowing chaos and confusion, which breeds distrust in the agency and its leadership," the senators said. The letter also requests details on the AI system implementations and their impact, setting a response deadline of July 18. Bisignano on Monday issued a response shared with Fox Business, defending the agency's reforms and recent track record. "The SSA is experiencing a customer service turnaround after four years of long wait times and record backlogs under the Biden administration," Bisignano said in the letter reviewed by Fox ahead of its release. "While I welcome your recent interest in customer service at SSA and the myriad of correspondences you sent my predecessor and me since President Trump's inauguration on January 20, 2025, I'm struck by how little you corresponded with the agency to express concern about deteriorating customer service during the previous administration," Bisignano wrote to Warren. The SSA provided updated performance data last month: The average response time for phone calls dropped to 6 minutes from 30 minutes in the prior fiscal year; field office wait times decreased to 23 minutes; and removal of online service downtimes has benefited an additional 125,000 users in a single week, according to the agency's findings. "Across all of our service indicators, the evidence is clear: better management is improving the customer experience on the phones, in the field offices, and online. Nothing in the data supports the irresponsible allegations of mismanagement and a customer service crisis at SSA," Bisignano said in his letter. But not everyone is certain those numbers reflect actual wait times for Social Security recipients. "A simple search reveals average wait times now exceed one hour, even though the SSA dashboard still shows 18.5 minutes," Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "Much of that data excludes the volume of callback requests—many people are opting for callbacks instead of waiting on hold, and those are coming 1.5 to 2 hours later, if at all." Changes at the SSA developed under the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), formerly led by Elon Musk. DOGE's initiatives, including substantial staff cuts, access to Social Security databases and shifting most services online have sparked bipartisan concern. Former SSA Commissioner Martin O'Malley warned that these measures could soon interrupt Social Security payments, a break from tradition in over 80 years of continuous benefit delivery. "Ultimately, you're going to see the system collapse and an interruption of benefits, within the next 30 to 90 days," O'Malley said in March. Newsweek reached out to Warren's office for comment via email. What People Are Saying Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "With the current dispute on Social Security customer service wait times, it's more of a situation of "he said, she said." The recent news releases from the administration have focused on faster wait times and more cases being resolved. However, Senator Warren points to concerns her office has received over some of that data not being accurate, and Social Security field employees being highly stressed in maintaining the additional workload they've been asked to cover." Thompson also told Newsweek: "Like many of us, Warren wants to see accurate, honest data. We all support modernizing the program, but it's hard to reconcile claims of modernization with staff reductions and quiet efforts to push people into early retirement or resignation." What Happens Next Beneficiaries experiencing issues are urged to contact the SSA directly or reach out to congressional offices for assistance. Further updates are expected as lawmakers receive responses and new technology initiatives reach additional agency offices nationwide. "The suggestion of a meeting between legislators and the SSA could resolve some of these lingering questions over whether the new procedures to customer service are really decreasing wait times to the extent claimed or not," Beene said.
