
Dis-Chem pulls CeraVe from shelves over copycat claims
Dis-Chem has pulled Nutriwomen's Dermacare line from its shelves after a year-long dispute at the Advertising Regulatory Board over alleged copycat packaging.
L'Oréal South Africa alleged that Dermacare copied the branding of its CeraVe skincare line, and the Advertising Regulatory Board found in its favour.
Nutriwomen argues it isn't bound by the ARB's authority. Despite appeals, the ARB upheld its ruling.
For more financial news, go to the News24 Business front page.
Dis-Chem has pulled Nutriwomen's Dermacare skincare line from its shelves after a year-long dispute over alleged copycat branding.
The dispute began in May last year with L'Oréal South Africa alleging Dermacare copied the branding of its CeraVe skincare line, citing similarities in font, colour, design, and product information layout.
In the original complaint to the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB), L'Oreal argued that the Dermacare packaging intentionally exploited the advertising goodwill that the well-known French brand had grown in the South African market since its local introduction in 2022.
The ARB had ruled in favour of L'Oréal South Africa, giving Nutriwomen three months to revise its Dermacare packaging.
While Nutriwomen argued it wasn't subject to the ARB's jurisdiction as a non-member, it engaged in the proceedings and appealed the decision in October 2024.
READ | L'Oreal SA claims rival copied its packaging — and watchdog agrees
The ARB ordered Nutriwomen again to either amend its packaging design or remove the product line from retailers' shelves by 16 January 2025. It further instructed ARB members not to advertise Dermacare products until the designs had been amended.
Photographic evidence submitted to the ARB in May appeared to show that Nutriwomen had not amended the packaging design.
It also showed that Dis-Chem had continued to sell the products in their infringing packaging at its outlets and online platforms long after the January 2025 deadline.
L'Oréal provided the Advertising Appeal Committee (AAC) with photos taken between April and May that show Dermacare products in Dis-Chem stores in Sandton City and Mall of Africa.
'Dis-Chem first received a notification from L'Oreal on this matter on 20 January 2025 and notified all stores nationally to remove the affected Dermacare products from shelves, with a similar directive given to its online store,' a spokesperson told News24, explaining that it had received a similar directive from the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association of South Africa (CTFA) in March.
Dis-Chem is a member of the CTFA, which, in turn, is a member of the ARB.
Dis-Chem said it had not received any other prior communication from the ARB or CTFA in this regard, and that it 'has always abided by industry body regulations and rulings'.
Dis-Chem's online store still had some Dermacare products listed around noon on Monday.
'While the Dis-Chem website continued to show product visibility, this was an operational oversight that has subsequently been remedied,' Dis-Chem told News24 on Monday afternoon.
Jurisdiction
In its response to the most recent complaint, Nutriwomen argued that it was not bound by the ARB's rulings as it is not a member of the board, nor was it a member of the CTFA anymore. It had been bound by the previous rulings of the ARB by virtue of its indirect membership through its membership of the CTFA.
The ARB took note that Nutriwomen did not renew its membership to the CTFA for 2025 after its unsuccessful argument that the matter does not fall within the purview of the ARB.
CeraVe stated in its most recent submission that it considered Nutriwomen's arguments against the ARB's jurisdiction to be 'misleading and made in bad faith'.
The Advertising Appeal Committee (AAC) confirmed that Nutriwomen was in breach of its obligations, rejecting its jurisdictional objection. The AAC also concluded that Dis-Chem, as an ARB member through the CTFA, was responsible for ensuring compliance with its directives.
L'Oréal requested the following sanctions on Nutriwomen: immediate compliance with the ruling, pre-publication review of all future advertising, publication of a summary ruling at Nutriwomen's cost, and possible public listing as a defaulter.
The ARB granted two of the four requests and ordered that Dermacare products be pulled from retailers and that Nutriwomen submit proposals for amended designs with the original advertisement and the ARB's previous ruling, together with the most recent ruling to the Association for Communication and Advertising's (ACA) Advisory Service for pre-publication advice at its own cost.
It noted that while Nutriwomen can be held to previous rulings, the enforcement of the ARB's most recent ruling is complicated by it no longer being a member of CTFA.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
How South Korea's K-beauty industry is being hit by Trump tariffs
Cars and smartphones may rank among South Korea's biggest exports to the US, but few goods inspire a more devoted following than the Asian country's beauty products. K-beauty - a term that covers a wide range of skincare, makeup and cosmetics from South Korea - is lauded for its quality and value, driving soaring demand in recent years. The global appeal of South Korean culture has also helped propel the popularity of its cosmetics. US-based Pearl Mak tells the BBC that she was introduced to K-beauty products by her friends. South Korean serums are better-suited for her skin compared to some Western brands that tend to be more harsh, the 27-year-old graphic designer says. Now "95% of my skincare is made up of K-beauty products", she adds. Ms Mak is not alone in her preference for South Korean skincare brands. Americans spent as much $1.7bn (£1.3bn) on K-beauty products in 2024, according to industry estimates. That marks a more than 50% rise compared to the previous year. K-beauty products are often more attractively priced than their Western counterparts - but also feature ingredients that are not as commonly found in the West - from heartleaf to snail mucin. US President Donald Trump has now imposed a 15% import tax on South Korean goods traded between Seoul and Washington. It's less than the 25% levy that Trump had threatened, but many consumers are not taking any chances. The rise of Korean make-up in the West 'Flowerboys' and the appeal of 'soft masculinity' US K-beauty retailer Santé Brand saw orders spike by nearly 30% in April, right after Trump unveiled sweeping US import taxes on most of the world. "When the tariff announcements hit, customers got strategic with how they were going to weather the storm," Santé Brand's founder Cheyenne Ware told the BBC. "Consumers are preparing against the uncertainty." Another K-beauty retailer, Senti Senti, has been ordering more products since Trump started his tariff threats, says manager Winnie Zhong. This week, she received alerts from suppliers urging retailers to "stock up before tariffs". Both retailers said prices of K-beauty products are likely to increase as the levies push up costs across the industry. "Anyone telling you prices will stay flat through the next two years is naive," says Ms Ware. Prices are bound to rise, especially for smaller sellers of beauty products on platforms like Amazon, who operate with slim profit margins, economist Munseob Lee from the University of California San Diego says. Despite higher prices, the global popularity of South Korean culture means K-beauty products are likely to remain in demand in the US, he says. "Casual buyers might be turned off by the higher price, but fans won't find an easy substitute." Ms Zhong agrees. She thinks customers will still want to buy K-beauty products but price rises may mean they purchase fewer items than before. Higher prices are unlikely to stop Ms Mak buying her favourite products. "It depends on how much the price shoots up, but as of now, I am willing to pay more to purchase the same products," she says. 'No easy substitute' Big K-beauty brands are in a much better position to absorb the cost of tariffs than their smaller rivals, says South Korea-based business consultant Eyal Victor Mamou. These larger companies will be able to avoid major price rises for their customers as they have higher profit margins, he says. But smaller K-beauty firms that make their products in South Korea will struggle to keep a lid on costs, Mr Mamou adds. "It will take some time to take effect since most goods being sold in the short-run have already been commissioned at current prices, but we'll see it play out soon." In recent days, President Trump has struck deals with Japan and the European Union that will see their exports to the US subject to the same 15% tariffs as South Korea. That means countries that are home to some of the world's biggest cosmetics brands face the same levies as the K-beauty industry. Central to Trump's trade policies is his ambition to see more goods being made in America. But it's yet to be seen whether or not this will mean US buyers switch to American beauty products. Ms Mak says she doesn't see US-made products as attractive alternatives. "I do search for American-made alternatives often, but I have yet to find any that are as effective as the ones I use. So I wouldn't go for American products yet." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
16 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Iran Says It's Close to Resolving Gas Export Issues With Iraq
Iran and Iraq are close to resolving a dispute over disruptions to Iranian gas supplies and Baghdad's unpaid dues for the exports, Iran's Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad said Saturday. 'We will soon witness the resolution of both issues,' the state-run IRIB News cited Paknejad as saying after meeting with Iraq's Electricity Minister Ziad Ali Fadhil in Tehran.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Visa (V) Targets Africa's $1.5 Trillion Digital Economy With New Data Center
Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) ranks among the . On July 23, Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) launched its first data center in Africa in Johannesburg. The facility is part of a $1 billion ($57 million) investment in South Africa over the next three years, according to Michael Berner, head of Visa's Southern and East Africa division, who spoke at the event. A 2025 Mastercard-commissioned analysis by Genesis Analytics projects that Africa's digital payments economy would grow to $1.5 trillion by 2030, driven by swift improvements in internet penetration and financial inclusion. By enhancing the local financial ecosystem, expanding Visa Inc. (NYSE:V)'s VisaNet, and putting South Africa in line with global fintech growth trends, the facility positions the country as a digital hub. Visa Inc. (NYSE:V) is a global payments technology company that operates one of the world's largest electronic payment networks. While we acknowledge the potential of V as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None.