'We all struggle' - Constituents back Reeves over Commons tears
Nick Simpson, 40, said it was "hard to see" Reeves being so visibly upset in public."We understandably demand a lot from our politicians, but we all can relate to struggling a bit sometimes, especially at work," he said."You need to have a cry every now and again, as you feel better afterwards and I can't remember a situation where I felt worse after crying and so I hope she feels better."Reeves did not say what caused her tears as she appeared with prime minister Sir Keir Starmer to unveil the government's 10-year plan for the NHS on Thursday.She said she had been dealing with "a personal issue", adding that "today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job."She said: "My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government and that's what I tried to do."
Kevin Lobley, from Leeds, agreed that she didn't have to share the reason for being upset, as "if she wants to cry then it's none of our business really"."I have some sympathy with her to a point, if there is something personal going on," he said.
Meanwhile, Sarah Kilner said that while everybody has bad days at work, there are different ways to handle it.She said: "I think it is really bizarre that an MP would be in such a state in that setting, but they do have a personal life so she doesn't have to let us know why."If I was at work and I was having a bad day, I wouldn't expect to have to tell anybody, but I also would try not to let anybody know."
Couple Tommy and Shirley Horner had mixed feelings about seeing a politician share her emotions so publicly.Mr Horner said he was "shocked" to see it in Parliament, as "in there they are supposed to have this calmness and be in touch with everything".But Mrs Horner felt sympathy when she saw Reeves crying and "felt terrible for her personally"."There was nobody comforting her when she was clearly crying, what's wrong with that, we're all human beings and we shouldn't be like that with each other," she said.
Katie White, Labour MP in the neighbouring constituency of Leeds North West and a friend of the chancellor, said Reeves has been facing "an incredible amount of pressure", especially after the government's controversial universal credit and personal independence payment bill passed its second reading on Tuesday.She said: "We all have difficult days, that's totally normal, it's human, and I think people sometimes forget that politicians, especially those at the top of their game, are human and are balancing life in the way we are all balancing life."There is an incredible amount of pressure on Rachel and those at the top of government. It's a difficult job trying to change the country, and it's right that there are tensions as it's hard to do this and there are difficult choices ahead, but we'll move forward as we've got strong leadership."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW NEIL: We've become an unserious country. We're rudderless, adrift in a sea of troubles rather than in command of our destiny. And our leaders are to blame.
By common consent, on the Left almost as much as on the Right, Keir Starmer has got off to the worst start ever of any incoming British Prime Minister swept to power with a large working majority, as he was a year ago yesterday. 'Can he get the show back on the road before more damage is done?' I asked a senior Labour minister this week. 'Yes, he can,' came the reply.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Council to make four-day week permanent for staff despite fury from locals who claim services have plummeted
A four day working week is set to become permanent at a Lib Dem-run council despite complaints from residents. South Cambridgeshire district council carried out a two-year pilot to test the controversial plan and concluded it saved money without harming services. Three universities monitored services during the first 27 months of the trial and said that nine out of 24 council services improved, 12 remained stable and three declined. But a resident survey found only 45 per cent supported it and said refuse collection, council tax services and the customer contact centre had all become worse in that time. The consultation response found that of the 13 services measured, nine got worse while four stayed the same, according to those who live in the area. Those to suffer included bin collections, the communications service, licensing matters and environmental health. A business survey found that of the ten services measured, one got worse, four stayed the same and five recorded no result. No increases in satisfaction for services were recorded. Elliot Keck of the Taxpayers' Alliance said the results were 'devastating' and the response of residents had been 'brutal'. 'South Cambridgeshire council has nowhere to hide after this bruising consultation completely collapses its case for the four day week,' he said. 'Wheeling out yet another piece of propaganda masquerading as an independent report will fool no one, given the overwhelmingly negative response from residents and frosty reception from businesses. 'Town hall bosses need to now face the music, apologise to local taxpayers and bring back the full-time council.' Mr Keck criticised the 'supposedly independent' report compiled by the three universities after a previous report was found to have been edited by the council's chief executive. Heather Williams, leader of the Conservative opposition, said the new report actually showed that resident satisfaction had fallen in every area since the trial began. 'This reaffirmed my view that this is not something we should be doing at the council. It's incredibly unfair that council tax is going up year after year,' she told the Mail. 'Now it's going up to fund council officers not to work a full week. Residents aren't council - we are legally bound to pay our council tax. 'This has to stop. Residents have had their say and we have to take what they say seriously.' In 2023, the council became the first local authority to trial staff working 80per cent of their contracted hours for full pay as long as they maintained full productivity. South Cambridgeshire has said it expects to save about £400,000 annually due to through lower staff turnover and relying less on agency workers. It also reported a 120per cent increase in job applications and a 40per cent fall in staff turnover and said initial indications were positive. A vote to make the move permanent is expected to pass on July 17 with fears more councils could follow suit. It comes at a time when other public sector workers are under increasing pressure and council tax bills soar. In 2023 it emerged that Liz Watts, the council's chief executive, had helped to edit a supposedly independent report on the scheme. It also emerged that she had been working on her PhD during the four-day week. Len Shackleton, a research fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, a free market think tank, told the Times there were 'clearly benefits' if staff were happier and stayed in their jobs. But he also questioned whether this was due to workers improving because they know they are under scrutiny. And he warned that rolling out the policy more broadly may also have an inflationary effect as workers in sectors where a four-day week is impossible may demand pay rises to compensate. 'If it works for South Cambridgeshire, good for them. But if this is used as a template for every council across the country, you might run into problems,' he added. Defending the policy, council leader Ms Smith said South Cambridgeshire was 'now offering more stable services, with improved wellbeing and performance'. She added: 'At a time when national satisfaction with councils is falling, our data shows we're bucking that trend.'
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Minister demands overhaul of UK's leading AI institute
The technology secretary has demanded an overhaul of the UK's leading artificial intelligence institute in a wide-ranging letter that calls for a switch in focus to defence and national security, as well as leadership changes. Peter Kyle said it was clear further action was needed to ensure the government-backed Alan Turing Institute met its full potential. In a letter to ATI's chair, seen by the Guardian, Kyle said the institute should be changed to prioritise defence, national security and 'sovereign capabilities' – a reference to nation states being able to control their own AI technology. The call for new priorities implies a downgrading of ATI's focus on health and the environment, which are two of three core subjects for the institute, alongside defence and security, under its 'Turing 2.0' strategy. 'Moving forward, defence and national security projects should form a core of ATI's activities, and relationships with the UK's security, defence, and intelligence communities should be strengthened accordingly,' Kyle wrote. Making clear that the Turing 2.0 strategy did not meet government requirements, Kyle indicated that he expected leadership changes at ATI. 'To realise this vision, it is imperative that the ATI's leadership reflects the institute's reformed focus,' he wrote in a letter first reported by Politico. 'While we acknowledge the success of the current leadership in delivering reform at the institute during a difficult period, careful consideration should be given to the importance of an executive team who possesses a relevant background and sector knowledge to lead this transition.' ATI is chaired by Doug Gurr, the former head of Amazon's UK operations and interim chair of the UK's competition watchdog. The institute is going through a restructuring under its chief executive, Jean Innes, which one in five staff have said puts ATI's credibility in 'serious jeopardy'. At the end of last year, ATI employed 440 staff, but it has since launched a redundancy process. Although the institute is nominally independent, it recently secured £100m from the government in a five-year funding deal. The letter said ATI's 'longer-term funding arrangement' could be reviewed next year. The government would maintain its current level of research and development from national security and defence for the next three years, Kyle wrote, and would increase the number of defence and national security staff embedded in the institute. Dame Wendy Hall, a professor of computer science at the University of Southampton and the co-chair of a 2017 government AI review, said ATI would cease to be a national institute under the government's proposed changes. 'If the institute focuses on defence and security it ceases to be a national institute on AI,' Hall said. 'It's not broad enough. If the government wants an AI institute that does defence and security then it should just call it that.' In February, the government indicated a focus on national security with its AI strategy by renaming its AI Safety Institute, established under the premiership of Rishi Sunak, the AI Security Institute. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Kyle's letter also referred to the government's 50-point AI action plan as a 'testament' to the UK's AI ambitions, The plan's targets include a 20-fold increase in the amount of AI computing power under public control by 2030, and embedding AI in the public sector. A spokesperson for ATI said the institute was focused on 'high-impact missions' that support the UK including in defence and national security. 'We share the government's vision of AI transforming the UK for the better, welcome the recognition of our critical role, and will continue to work closely with the government to support its priorities and deliver science and innovation for the public good,' said the spokesperson. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said the changes would be a 'natural next step' for ATI following the safety institute renaming. 'These proposed changes would not only ensure the Alan Turing Institute delivers real value for money – it would see it taking on a key role in safeguarding our national security,' said the spokesperson.
