South Africans angered by Trump's 'genocide' claims
The talks between the two presidents Wednesday were aimed at repairing relations that have nosedived since Trump took office in January, later threatening high trade tariffs and expelling the South African ambassador.
"I am not happy," university student Nicole Mbhele told AFP. "He made it seem like we want to kill white people or white farmers for our land, or (for) wanting it back," she said.
A video aired during the meeting showed the leader of a fringe, radical opposition party chanting a song from the anti-apartheid struggle about "killing" white farmers.
Trump also repeated baseless allegations that South Africa was expropriating land from the minority white Afrikaners, descendants of Dutch settlers who own more than three-quarters of commercial farmland.
"Donald Trump does not have facts about what is happening in South Africa," said 25-year-old saleswoman Naledi Morwalle. He was making "false accusations about our country", she said.
"We are all facing all types and levels of crimes. Both blacks and whites," she said.
South Africans followed the meeting live on television and many were proud of the performance of the South African delegation, reinforced by four cabinet ministers and two top golfers.
While some said Ramaphosa could have been more adamant in rejecting Trump's baseless claims of a "white genocide", others noted his calm pushback that black South Africans suffer most from the high crime rate.
"I think our country did well and actually put the facts out there," said activist Ulrich Steenkamp. "Whether the world responds is up to them," he added.
The video played during the meeting, which also showed rows of white crosses in what Trump falsely said were graves of murdered white farmers, clearly rattled Ramaphosa, said analyst Thelela Ngcetane-Vika, of the Wits School of Governance.
"In the first half of the session President Ramaphosa was very well prepared, poised as a statesman, diplomatic... but when that video played, you could literally see his body language change, he became uneasy," she told AFP.
Ramaphosa should have provided data to disprove Trump's disinformation, she said.
An Afrikaans father, Authur Williams, told AFP the success of the talks would only be seen in any trade deals reached between the two major trading partners.
"I sincerely hope that economically we will come to an agreement where it's mutually beneficial and there are economic benefits for both parties," he said.
By Abdul Salim Nkosi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
38 minutes ago
- IOL News
The struggle for affordable, clean reliable power continues behind the scenes
This political dysfunction is a root cause of South Africa's electricity crisis, says the author. Image: Pexels As ordinary South Africans struggle to access clean, reliable, and affordable power, essential for a decent life and a functioning economy, a deeper, more entrenched power struggle continues behind the scenes. Over the coming weeks in this column, I will unpack this struggle and explore why South Africa continues to fail in establishing an efficient, effective electricity industry. We will examine the forces blocking progress and consider what a more functional energy future could look like, for the country and for the region. At its core, the power struggle is internal to the ANC. It is a contest between competing factions: between those committed to honest governance and those who enable patronage, corruption, and capture. It is also a struggle between those who support centralised state control of the economy, and those advocating for a more open, accountable, and decentralised system. The dominance of centralising forces, often corrupt and politically motivated, has led to state-owned entities, regulators, and oversight bodies becoming vehicles for power consolidation rather than service delivery. The result is familiar: institutional decay, private capital sidelined, and the majority of South Africans increasingly marginalised. This political dysfunction is a root cause of South Africa's electricity crisis. Without access to stable power, the economy cannot grow. Without growth, the tax base shrinks, the fiscus remains under pressure, and unemployment rises. The situation is exacerbated by a more isolationist United States and a weakening global economy, but the internal failures are primary. Consider how this unfolded. In 1998, government published its White Paper on energy policy, which included a plan to bring Independent Power Producers (IPPs) into the energy mix. But the policy was never backed with the political will needed to implement it effectively. Infighting among ANC factions undermined leadership at a critical time, creating uncertainty instead of the certainty investors require. With no clear path forward, investment stalled. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading From 1998 to 2005, Eskom was actively blocked from investing in new generation capacity. Then, in 2007 and again in 2008, load shedding emerged as a desperate tool to balance supply and demand. Ironically, some of the economic gains of the early 2000s, fiscal discipline and a push to deliver electricity access, only intensified demand, making the failure to invest in new capacity more damaging. In 2007/2008, government finally instructed Eskom to proceed with two new coal-fired power stations: Medupi and Kusile. Medupi's first unit was expected to be operational by 2010. But political interference soon followed. Chancellor House, the ANC's investment arm, became the BEE partner for Hitachi Power Africa, which was awarded the boiler contracts. The result: substandard workmanship, inadequate project management, missed deadlines, and cost overruns. Billions were lost in the process. Then came the Zuma presidency, May 2009 to February 2018, often referred to as South Africa's 'lost years.' One of Zuma's first moves was to split the Ministry of Minerals and Energy into two departments: Mineral Resources and Energy. Minister Dipuo Peters was appointed to head the Department of Energy, and Karén Breytenbach, an official from National Treasury, was tasked with establishing the Independent Power Producer Office. This marked a temporary turning point. The Renewable Energy IPP Procurement Programme was launched, and by 2011, the first request for proposals was published. Over the next five years, three successful bid windows followed, with the private sector investing approximately R220 billion in generation and grid assets. It remains one of the most successful public-private partnerships in South Africa's democratic history. Yet even as this progress unfolded, the broader machinery of the state was being captured. In 2015, Brian Molefe was appointed CEO of Eskom, and the power struggle intensified once more. The Renewable Energy programme stalled, confidence eroded, and the gains of the early 2010s were slowly reversed. The full story of South Africa's electricity crisis cannot be told without confronting the deeper political dynamics that shape it. It is not simply about capacity or megawatts, it is about institutional integrity, governance, and the political economy of energy. This column will continue to examine how these forces interact, and what it will take to move from a politicised energy system to a truly functional one. The solutions exist. The question is whether we have the political courage to implement them. Thomas Garner holds a Mechanical Engineering degree from the University of Pretoria and an MBA from the University of Stellenbosch Business School. Image: Supplied Thomas Garner holds a Mechanical Engineering degree from the University of Pretoria and an MBA from theUniversity of Stellenbosch Business School. Thomas is self-employed focusing on energy, energy related criticalminerals, water and communities. He is a Fellow of the South African Academy of Engineering and aManagement Committee member of the South African Independent Power Producers Association. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT
The Citizen
38 minutes ago
- The Citizen
When politicians and criminals blur lines
The presence of politicians near murder suspects and failure to act on Zondo's report signal deep systemic decay. Two recent events highlighted a perceived intermingling of South African politicians with the criminal underworld – and the ANC's utter inability to fix this. The first event was Kenny Kunene pitching up at the home of a murder suspect at the centre of a web of alleged politically tainted criminality. The second was former chief justice Raymond Zondo's critique of President Cyril Ramaphosa's failure to implement recommendations of the commission of inquiry into state capture. Kunene's stated reasons for being at Katiso Molefe's home were implausible to radio, TV and social media audiences. Even his long-time friend and political boss, fellow ex-convict Gayton McKenzie, knew the position was indefensible. ALSO READ: Why the ANC remains a safe haven for corruption Molefe was mentioned in KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's media conference on 6 July, where allegations were made about senior police machinations. Molefe should have been off-bounds for any media-savvy politician. Kunene has not only reinforced the common perception that politicians are not to be trusted. It goes deeper. In an environment where whistle-blowers are slain with impunity, the link to a murder suspect could give rise to more sinister inferences. Impunity is also at the heart of Zondo's concerns, where he detailed failures of the justice system. As chief justice, he found it painful to swear-in Cabinet ministers who had serious state capture findings against them. ALSO READ: Now we wait for accountability, Mr Mayor 'It was like the president was saying: 'I don't care what you have found about these people. I think they are good enough to be promoted.'' Zondo's words are a vote of no confidence in Ramaphosa by arguably the most respected judge in the country. Zondo lacks faith that crooks will be brought to book under Ramaphosa's presidency. Indeed, in South Africa, most culprits get away with murder and much else. Only around 6.8% of murder cases with arrests lead to convictions. In many cases, there are no arrests. So, the percentage of murder convictions per total number of murders (with and without arrests) will be lower. This picture contributes to the impunity with which criminals, including politicians, operate. In every sphere, crooks carry on because they know the chances of being convicted are slim. Proper implementation of Zondo's recommendations would have changed this perception. ALSO READ: The real national dialogue has begun On Monday, the Presidency reported 'significant progress' in implementing reforms. Ramaphosa claimed 48% completion of actions from Zondo's recommendations, adding that high-profile cases are scheduled for 2025-26. Given the lack of success in cases thus far, it is hardly reassuring to hear that cases are pending. Where are the significant arrests? Why did Ramaphosa choose for his Cabinet from people implicated in Zondo's report? Zondo has every right to feel disappointed. After sitting for four years, hearing 300 witnesses, producing 8 655 530 pages of documents and spending R1 billion of taxpayers' money, implicating more than 1 438 people, his team felt 'their efforts were for nothing'. Many South Africans will agree. Why are so many of the people implicated in the Zondo report now sitting in parliament instead of being in court or in jail? ALSO READ: RET faction gains ground as Ramaphosa falters And ex-con politicians link themselves to murder suspects. When politicians and criminals are indistinguishable from each other and the underworld are overlords, it's time to revolt.
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Trump says he may skip G20 summit in SA, cites policy disapproval
Earlier this year, secretary of state Marco Rubio boycotted a G20 foreign ministers' meeting in South Africa, which has the G20 presidency from December 2024 to November 2025. Washington, under Trump and former president Joe Biden, has complained about the case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice, where it accused Israel of genocide over its military assault in Gaza. Israel's assault has killed tens of thousands, caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and also led to accusations of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denied the accusations and cast its Gaza offensive as self-defence after a deadly October 2023 Hamas attack that killed 1,200 people and in which more than 250 were taken hostage. Diplomatic relations between the US and South Africa have also been strained under Trump due to the government's BEE policies to address the legacy of centuries of racial inequality. Ramaphosa, who has urged Trump to attend the G20 summit, rejected Washington's claims that South Africa will use its land policy to arbitrarily confiscate white-owned land. Reuters
