'No shame': Minns slams convicted rapist's bid to serve as MP from jail
But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error".
Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward.
However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week.
He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks.
Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid".
"Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said.
Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion.
"The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said.
"The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference."
He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained".
He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9.
The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion.
In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders.
"It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said.
"We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution.
"However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error."
The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect.
Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process.
"It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said.
"But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time.
"So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election."
Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault.
The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013.
He met both men through political circles.
On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible"
"However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said.
"Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive.
"This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace.
"Step aside."
Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion.
"I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated.
The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated.
"Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated.
It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5.
Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment.
Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail.
However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned".
Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday.
"I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said.
Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct".
If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama.
Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars.
But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error".
Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward.
However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week.
He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks.
Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid".
"Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said.
Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion.
"The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said.
"The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference."
He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained".
He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9.
The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion.
In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders.
"It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said.
"We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution.
"However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error."
The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect.
Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process.
"It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said.
"But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time.
"So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election."
Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault.
The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013.
He met both men through political circles.
On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible"
"However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said.
"Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive.
"This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace.
"Step aside."
Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion.
"I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated.
The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated.
"Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated.
It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5.
Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment.
Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail.
However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned".
Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday.
"I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said.
Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct".
If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama.
Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars.
But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error".
Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward.
However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week.
He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks.
Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid".
"Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said.
Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion.
"The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said.
"The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference."
He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained".
He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9.
The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion.
In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders.
"It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said.
"We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution.
"However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error."
The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect.
Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process.
"It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said.
"But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time.
"So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election."
Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault.
The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013.
He met both men through political circles.
On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible"
"However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said.
"Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive.
"This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace.
"Step aside."
Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion.
"I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated.
The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated.
"Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated.
It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5.
Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment.
Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail.
However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned".
Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday.
"I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said.
Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct".
If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama.
Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars.
But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error".
Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward.
However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week.
He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks.
Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid".
"Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said.
Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion.
"The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said.
"The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference."
He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained".
He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9.
The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion.
In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders.
"It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said.
"We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution.
"However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error."
The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect.
Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process.
"It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said.
"But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time.
"So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election."
Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault.
The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013.
He met both men through political circles.
On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible"
"However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said.
"Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive.
"This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace.
"Step aside."
Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion.
"I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated.
The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated.
"Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated.
It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5.
Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment.
Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail.
However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned".
Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday.
"I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said.
Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct".
If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama.
Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
House Oversight Committee subpoenas Justice Department for Jeffrey Epstein files, high-profile former officials for depositions
The House Oversight Committee has issued nearly a dozen subpoenas to the Justice Department and high-profile Democratic and Republican figures for files and information related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a major move that comes as many congressional Republicans call for more transparency around the case. The subpoena to the Justice Department calls for it to provide Congress any Epstein files in its possession, with victims' names redacted. It also calls for communications between former Biden administration officials and the Justice Department related to the case. Additionally, 10 individuals subpoenaed for closed-door depositions between August and October are: Former Attorneys General Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales; former FBI Director James Comey; former special counsel Robert Mueller III; former Secretary of State and first lady Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton. The Republican-led panel subpoenaed the six former attorneys general and two former FBI directors to speak with them about their time leading the DOJ and FBI that coincided with the then-ongoing criminal investigation into Epstein and his former associate Ghislaine Maxwell. CNN is reaching out to those subpoenaed. Demands for more information on Epstein have roiled Capitol Hill in recent weeks. The subpoena amounts to a show of defiance by some Republicans against House Speaker Mike Johnson — who has attempted to tamp down congressional efforts to push for the release of the so-called Epstein files, instead arguing President Donald Trump's administration should have time to act on the issue. The panel has separately subpoenaed Maxwell for a deposition — though it recently agreed to delay her testimony until after the US Supreme Court weighs her pending appeal of her conviction. Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison in 2022 for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. She has asked the Supreme Court to take up her appeal and overturn her sex-trafficking conviction. House Oversight Chair James Comer issued the subpoenas Tuesday after three Republicans joined with Democrats in a subcommittee vote late last month to release the files. As pressure has mounted, Johnson shut the door on the possibility of a House vote on releasing information on Epstein before the August recess and moved to send lawmakers home early after it became clear that the issue was not going to fade away. Johnson has said that he supports transparency and has argued that the Trump administration should be granted space to handle the matter before Congress intervenes, pointing to the Trump administration's push to unseal grand jury materials related to the case.
The Australian
4 hours ago
- The Australian
Chalmers' economic reform summit downgraded to red tape focus
Jim Chalmers has put a lot of effort into an economic reform roundtable that his government is now talking down as an ideas vehicle to cut red tape and drive housing productivity. Both the Treasurer and Anthony Albanese are lowering expectations to a point where major tax reform and proposals to rein in structural spending will be thrown in the 'too hard' basket. Chalmers can't be faulted for his energetic approach to the Prime Minister's productivity roundtable, which the Treasurer rebadged as an economic reform roundtable open to big tax, investment and growth policy ideas. By Friday, Chalmers would have met 75 chief executive and senior industry representatives. After meeting the Business Council of Australia this week, he would have met the BCA and ACTU twice since his June 18 National Press Club speech outlining Labor's priorities for 'economic reform in our second term'. From July 8 to August 15, Albanese government ministers will have held 41 ministerial roundtables that will feed in to Chalmers' three-day economic reform summit at Parliament House between August 19 and 21. There have been 900 submissions to Treasury ahead of the roundtable, which won't be publicly released. In addition to messaging the PM almost every day about the roundtable, Chalmers has also spoken with Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson for about 30 to 40 hours about ideas being floated to lift sluggish productivity. Despite Chalmers slaving away on what could have been a seminal moment for the second-term government's economic reform agenda, the roundtable is in danger of becoming a talkfest with generic promises of action. The 23 'core attendees', who include CBA chief executive Matt Comyn, former Treasury secretary Ken Henry, Tech Council of Australia chair Scott Farquhar, NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey, ACTU secretary Sally McManus, BCA chief Bran Black and opposition Treasury spokesman Ted O'Brien, will be joined by 24 others invited to specific sessions. New invitees include ATO commissioner Rob Heferen, Tesla chair Robyn Denholm and Macquarie Group managing director Shemara Wikramanayake. At the end of three days of talks – which will not be subject to Chatham House rules, meaning participants can speak their minds – Chalmers is not expected to unveil a communique or secure broad agreement across a range of economic reform proposals. Instead, he will give the nation an update on the top issues and commit to going away and working on them. Major tax reform is expected to play second fiddle to a new primary focus: deregulation, cutting red tape, and sparking productivity in the housing sector. There is no doubt all levels of government need to axe red and green tape that is stifling productivity and stalling economic activity and investment. But that surely could be progressed without so much rigmarole. An alliance of up to 30 business and industry groups is calling for the government to match decisive action taken by British Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer and slash red tape by as much as 25 per cent by 2030. Without speeding up approvals, Labor's housing, renewables, emissions reduction and net zero targets will fall short. After one term of not moving aggressively enough, Chalmers must bring governments with him and rid the country of red tape and slow bureaucratic processes.
The Advertiser
10 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'No shame': Minns slams convicted rapist's bid to serve as MP from jail
Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023. Lawyers for convicted rapist Gareth Ward have filed an injunction to stop his expulsion from parliament, which means he will remain MP for Kiama in the NSW Illawarra region while he awaits his sentencing behind bars. But Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig said the Supreme Court orders issued by Justice Sweeney were "non-binding upon the House" and the government would give the court the opportunity to rectify what he called "a significant constitutional error". Parliament returned on Tuesday and it was expected a notice of motion to expel the disgraced politician would be put forward. However, NSW Premier Chris Minns confirmed Ward's lawyers sought the injunction against Leader of the Lower House Ron Hoenig, with an urgent hearing to occur in the Supreme Court later this week. He warned there was a critical time factor at play, with parliament sitting from Tuesday for just one week before breaking again for five weeks. Mr Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday morning that "most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in Silverwater ... who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid". "Clearly he's got no shame," Mr Minns said. Mr Hoenig said he had received the orders from the Supreme Court but believed they did not stop the House from moving forward with the expulsion motion. "The orders made by the court yesterday afternoon, we say, have no effect and are not binding upon the House," Mr Hoenig said. "The House has an inherent power to conduct its own business, in accordance with the Constitution, unconstrained by any interference." He said the Crown Solicitors had been instructed to approach Justice Sweeney to "reconsider the orders that she had made to enable the House to conduct its affairs on behalf of the people unconstrained". He noted the case was listed for hearing on Friday, which is the last sitting day of the parliament until September 9. The Crown Solicitors had been instructed to try and get the case heard today rather than waiting until Friday, which may result in the parliament having to be recalled to deal with the expulsion motion. In a press conference, Mr Hoenig was asked whether the government planned to go ahead with the expulsion motion regardless of the court orders. "It is open to the House to conduct its affairs," he said. "We say that the court has no jurisdiction to prevent any member of parliament from moving a motion or any power to have the House conduct its affairs as it is entitled to under the Constitution. "However, we are talking about a separation of powers, we are talking about the Supreme Court of NSW, also a constitutional court, so we will give the court the opportunity to correct what we say is a significant constitutional error." The Minister said the affidavit from Ward's lawyers "asserted that the parliament had no jurisdiction to expel him", which Mr Hoenig said was constitutionally incorrect. Mr Hoenig said, in any debate on the expulsion motion, the parliament was free to consider waiting until Ward had exhausted the appeals process. "It's a matter for Parliament to consider, so it's my role to place the matter before the House for its consideration and for the House to consider it," Mr Hoenig said. "But as you would appreciate, the appeals process will take quite some time. "So if you run the appeals process through the Court of Criminal Appeal and then reserves its judgment, and then there's a special leave for the high court, the people of Kiama, for example, could be represented by somebody in custody right up until the next election." Ward, 44, has been in jail since last week after Judge Kara Shead SC granted a detention application to revoke his bail, after a jury found him guilty of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault. The Kiama MP since 2011 had faced a nine-week trial, which heard he sexually assaulted a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015, and touched and massaged an 18-year-old man in Meroo Meadow in 2013. He met both men through political circles. On the morning parliament returned NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman recommitted to supporting Ward's expulsion and working with the government "to get this done as quickly as possible" "However, Mr Ward's legal team should do whatever it takes to get a clear message to him - immediately resign," Mr Speakman said. "Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive. "This is about decency, accountability, and basic respect for the community. Mr Ward should spare the Parliament, spare the courts, and above all, spare the people of NSW any further disgrace. "Step aside." Last week, Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig sent a letter to Ward via his legal team notifying him of the parliament's plans to consider his expulsion. "I am sure you would appreciate that in view of the verdict of the jury convicting you of serious criminal offences that the House needs to consider whether your continued membership of the House requires it to act to protect the high standing of the Parliament so that it may discharge with the confidence of the community the great responsibility that it bears," the letter stated. The letter, seen by the Mercury, noted that Ward was in custody and would be unable to attend parliament when the expulsion motion is being debated. "Accordingly, I invite you to submit to me yourself or anyone on your behalf any statement or material you would want the House to consider prior to making any determination," the letter stated. It gave a deadline for submissions of 9am on August 5. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MPs seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of a crime punishable by five years or more imprisonment. Ward is facing a maximum penalty of 14 years' jail. However, changes to the law in 2000 state that a conviction is considered to mean "once you have reached the end of the appeals process ... and not had the conviction overturned". Ward confirmed his intention to appeal in a press release issued last Friday. "I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity," he said. Parliament also has the power to expel an MP for "unworthy conduct". If the expulsion is passed a byelection will be called for the seat of Kiama. Despite being charged with the offences in 2022, Ward was re-elected to the seat as an independent in 2023.
