Hot dog spill shuts down Pennsylvania highway
A truckload of hot dogs spilled onto the Pennsylvania interstate after the truck carrying the franks had a mechanical failure, causing it to collide with a passenger car before scraping into a concrete barrier.
The barrier ripped the trailer open and spilled the hot dogs across Interstate 83.
Four people involved in the crash required medical attention, Shrewsbury Fire Company Chief Brad Dauberman told the Associated Press. None of the injuries were life threatening.
After the injured were tended to first responders were left picking up the dumped hot dogs off the highway.
Local officials called in a front loader to help scoop the hot dogs up and load them into a dump truck for disposal.
Dauberman told the AP that, despite the tedious work, the first responders still managed to find humor in the highway filled with hot dogs. He said his young daughter texted a photo to him showing a hotdog themed t-shirt.
He also said he learned a good deal about hot dogs during the morning excitement.
'I can tell you personally, hot dogs are very slippery,' Dauberman said. 'I did not know that.'
The crash wasn't as funny for the drivers trying to get to work on Friday morning. The crash caused significant traffic disruptions in both directions on Interstate 83, a major travel corridor in the region.
Jake Sitcosky, a Shrewsbury resident who was stuck on the highway, described the scene to Fox 43.
'We all came to a dead stop and I was wondering what was going on,' he said. 'Then I saw some emergency vehicles… and hot dogs all over the road.'
Emily Randall, another driver caught up in the chaos, told the broadcaster that she and other drivers had to reverse away from the crash to take detours.
'I was sitting in traffic for a good 20 to 30 minutes before I finally made it to Shrewsbury," she said.
She noted that the delay cost her business as she is a hair stylist who had to cancel early morning appointments due to the backup.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Hybrids vs EVs vs ICE: Which Car Actually Pollutes the Most?
How your battery's power consumption patterns could leak your location and identity View post: Your EV Battery Is Spying on You — New Research Exposes Yet More Hidden Privacy Risks You can lease a 2025 Mazda3 for $349 per month for 36 months. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease. Car insurance is Honda's latest new product offering, but other carmakers offer it as well. What They Don't Tell You About EVs, Hybrids, and Gas Cars If you think switching to electric is a get-out-of-jail-free card for the planet, think again. EVs are cleaner and win the race. But they're no saints. And while gas-powered cars are still the biggest climate culprits, new data shows hybrids are still far better than ICE but over-hyped for long-term environmental and health costs. From particle pollution to greenhouse gases to lifetime public health impact, the real story behind your car's emissions is more complicated than any tailpipe test. Head-to-Head: Greenhouse Gas Emissions When you stack them side by side, electric vehicles come out ahead on lifetime emissions — but not by as much as some assume. A mid-size gasoline car emits around 35.5 metric tons of CO₂ over 150,000 km. A diesel vehicle is slightly cleaner at 33 tons, due to better fuel economy. Hybrids perform better, landing at about 26.7 tons thanks to regenerative braking and smaller engines. A standard EV charged on a typical grid mix produces about 17.5 tons—less than half of an ICE car. If you charge with 100% renewable electricity, that drops to 11.5 tons. But the manufacturing and battery footprint is larger: about 8.0 tons upfront vs. 5.5 for ICE cars. Source: ICCT20 Lifecycle Comparison Tire Dust, Not Tailpipes: A New Pollution Villain Electric cars don't have tailpipes, but they still pollute. How? Tires and brakes. Non-exhaust pollution — especially PM10 and PM2.5 particles from tire and brake wear — is a growing health concern. EVs are heavier, so they wear through tires faster, emitting more rubber dust. According to UK government figures, an EV sedan generates 950g of tire dust per year, compared to 800g for a gas car. Brake dust is lower in EVs thanks to regenerative braking, but total PM emissions are still close. Source: ICCT20 Lifecycle Comparison Fuel Efficiency and Real-World Range In MPG terms, it's no contest: EVs average over 100 MPGe, compared to 40–50 MPG for hybrids and 25–30 MPG for gas cars. Range parity has improved too: most modern EVs offer 250–350 miles per charge, roughly matching gasoline tanks. But cold weather, cabin heating, and fast driving can knock EV range down by 20–30%. Charging adds a wrinkle. Unless you have home charging, DC fast charging infrastructure varies wildly. That still favors hybrids and ICE vehicles on long trips. What About Hybrid Longevity and Grid Impact? EV batteries degrade over time, but slowly. Most retain 80% capacity after 150,000 km, and battery tech keeps improving. Hybrids, however, offer a best-of-both-worlds deal: no plug-in stress, fewer emissions, and longer range. They don't need infrastructure upgrades and put less strain on aging power grids. Grid emissions matter too. In coal-heavy regions, EVs charge dirty. But in solar and wind-heavy states like California, they shine. Lifecycle emissions vary heavily by region and grid mix. Verdict: The Greenest Car Isn't Always the Newest EV EVs win on paper — but context is everything. If you're in a clean-grid state with access to home charging, they're the lowest-emission option. But hybrids – despite being over-rated in real-world compared to lab by a factor of 60% – punch above their weight, offering good emissions performance without the battery burden. And gas cars? They're toast — unless we're talking synthetic fuels, which aren't widely available yet. So, what's best for the planet? Driving less. Car sharing. Public transport. But if you're buying, the smartest bet is the one that fits your real-world routine — not just a showroom spec sheet. About the Author Brian Iselin View Profile
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
2025 Tesla Model Y vs. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5: 5 Key Differences
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease. Car insurance is Honda's latest new product offering, but other carmakers offer it as well. A pristine 2025 Mercedes-AMG G63 with just 2,200 miles is now for sale. This MANUFAKTUR-specced luxury SUV is a rare find, loaded with top-tier options and in immaculate condition. Battle of the electric SUV leaders The compact electric SUV segment has quickly become one of the most competitive areas in the automotive world, and two names dominate the conversation: the Tesla Model Y and the Hyundai IONIQ 5. Both models have helped define what mainstream electric crossovers should look like. Tesla's entry has been the world's best-selling EV for several years running, while Hyundai's IONIQ 5 has built a reputation as one of the most well-rounded and user-friendly electric SUVs on the market. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:10 Full screen Hyundai reveals stunning IONIQ 9 with over 330 miles of range Watch More For the 2025 model year, both vehicles remain compelling, but they cater to slightly different buyers. Tesla leans heavily into its software ecosystem, range, and minimalist design, while Hyundai focuses on charging speed, comfort, and practicality. Here are the five biggest differences between the Tesla Model Y and the Hyundai IONIQ 5. 1. Range and charging performance One of the first questions EV shoppers ask is how far they can go on a charge, and in this respect, the Tesla Model Y holds a slight edge. The Long Range all-wheel-drive version offers an EPA-estimated 327 miles of range, with real-world figures typically coming in close to that number. Charging speeds are capped at about 250 kilowatts on Tesla's Supercharger network, which translates to around 169 miles of range gained in just 15 minutes. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited — Source: Hyundai The Hyundai IONIQ 5 does not reach the same maximum range on paper, though it comes surprisingly close. Depending on trim and drivetrain, its EPA ratings span from 245 to 318 miles, and independent testing has shown the dual-motor Limited trim exceeding its official estimate, reaching 282 miles in the real world. Where Hyundai really shines is in charging. Thanks to its 800-volt electrical architecture, the IONIQ 5 can accept up to 350 kilowatts, adding as much as 178 miles of range in 15 minutes and reaching 80 percent charge in about 18 minutes under ideal conditions. The end result is a tradeoff: Tesla offers the longest single-charge driving distance, while Hyundai provides some of the fastest recharging times in the industry. 2. Interior design and technology Tesla and Hyundai take very different approaches to the cabin experience. The Model Y follows the brand's trademark minimalist style, dominated by a 15.4-inch central touchscreen that controls nearly every function in the vehicle. Physical buttons are almost entirely absent, and even the instrument cluster has been folded into the main display. Standard equipment includes dual wireless charging pads, a 16-speaker audio system, and access to Tesla's unique software ecosystem, which brings constant over-the-air updates and, for an extra cost, the brand's Full Self-Driving (Supervised) suite. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Tesla Model Y Juniper The Hyundai IONIQ 5, on the other hand, blends futuristic design with practicality. Its cockpit features two 12.3-inch displays—one for the gauge cluster and one for infotainment—along with physical climate controls and a mix of touch and button-based inputs. Unlike Tesla, Hyundai supports both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which remain key conveniences for many drivers. Higher trims add a surround-view camera, a head-up display, and vehicle-to-load capability, which allows the car's battery to power external devices or even a small campsite. While Tesla's cabin feels cutting-edge in its simplicity, Hyundai earns points for usability and features that are more familiar to most drivers. The two philosophies highlight the brands' different priorities: Tesla wants to streamline the driving experience into its software, while Hyundai aims to balance tech with everyday convenience. 3. Cargo and utility space Utility is another area where the two EVs diverge. The Tesla Model Y stands out with its generous storage capacity, offering 29 cubic feet of space behind the rear seats and a substantial 71.4 cubic feet when the second row is folded flat. On top of that, Tesla provides a 4.1-cubic-foot front trunk, which is large enough for grocery bags or small luggage. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Tesla Model Y Juniper The Hyundai IONIQ 5 is no slouch, but its cargo figures are more modest. Behind the second row, there is 26.3 cubic feet of space, and folding the rear seats expands it to 58.5 cubic feet. The frunk, meanwhile, is quite small and designed mostly to store the charging cable. While the IONIQ 5's cabin feels spacious and airy thanks to its flat floor and sliding center console, Tesla ultimately offers more raw volume for families who regularly haul gear. The Model Y also has an optional third-row seat in some configurations, though it remains more of an emergency-use solution than a true seven-passenger setup. Still, the added flexibility underlines Tesla's utility advantage over Hyundai. 4. Pricing, value, and incentives Pricing plays a critical role in the EV buying decision, especially as federal and state incentives come into play. For 2025, the Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD starts at $50,630, while the rear-wheel-drive Long Range version is priced at $46,630. Depending on configuration, the Model Y may qualify for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N — Source: 2025 Hyundai The Hyundai IONIQ 5 comes in at a slightly lower starting point, with prices beginning around $44,200. It also qualifies for the same federal credits in certain trims, which can bring its effective cost below that of the Model Y. Beyond sticker price, Hyundai adds value with its warranty coverage. Buyers receive a five-year, 60,000-mile basic warranty and a 10-year, 100,000-mile powertrain warranty, compared with Tesla's four-year, 50,000-mile basic coverage and eight-year, 120,000-mile limited battery warranty. When looking purely at upfront cost and long-term warranty, the IONIQ 5 comes out ahead. Tesla, however, balances the scale with its more extensive standard equipment list and software-driven features that continue to evolve long after purchase. 5. Ride comfort, styling, and driving feel Finally, there is the question of how these vehicles actually drive and feel on the road. The Hyundai IONIQ 5 has earned praise for its smooth ride, quiet cabin, and comfortable suspension tuning. It favors a relaxed, family-friendly demeanor over outright sportiness. The styling follows a retro-futuristic theme, with pixel-inspired lighting and sharp lines that make it one of the more distinctive EVs on the market. Inside, the flat floor and adjustable center console further emphasize spaciousness and comfort. 2025 Tesla Model Y — Source: Tesla The Tesla Model Y, by contrast, feels more athletic. Acceleration is brisk, with the Long Range AWD model reaching 60 miles per hour in just over four seconds. Steering is sharper, and the vehicle's stance makes it feel closer to a performance crossover than a family hauler. The tradeoff comes in ride comfort, where some drivers have noted that the suspension can feel firm and the steeply raked rear hatch compromises visibility. Both approaches will appeal to different buyers. Tesla caters to those who want speed and sporty handling from their EV, while Hyundai's IONIQ 5 is better suited for drivers who prioritize comfort and a relaxed daily commute. Final thoughts The Tesla Model Y and Hyundai IONIQ 5 are two of the strongest choices in the compact electric SUV market, but they excel in different areas. Tesla continues to lead in maximum driving range, cargo versatility, and access to its unmatched Supercharger network. Hyundai counters with faster charging, lower pricing, a longer warranty, and a more comfortable ride. 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5 Tesla Model Y Juniper Ultimately, the decision comes down to priorities. Shoppers who want the longest range possible, cutting-edge software, and extra cargo flexibility will find the Model Y hard to beat. Those who prefer a balance of comfort, user-friendly tech, and overall value will see the IONIQ 5 as a better fit. Both vehicles represent the direction the industry is heading, and both make a strong case for being the EV to park in your driveway in 2025. About the Author Elijah Nicholson-Messmer View Profile
Auto Blog
3 hours ago
- Auto Blog
BMW's Iconic E39 M5 Almost Had The Unlikeliest Engine
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. View post: Walmart Is Selling a 'Very Sturdy' $400 Carport for Just $200, and Shoppers Say It's 'Worth the Price' View post: Your EV Battery Is Spying on You — New Research Exposes Yet More Hidden Privacy Risks The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease. Transitioning to V8 power for the M5 was far from a simple decision for BMW If asked to name the most outstanding quality of BMW's E39 M5, most fans would point to its legendary V8 engine, a high-revving beast of a power plant that cemented this M5 as one of the best sports sedans ever made. But the E39 M5 almost never had a V8 at all. BMW North America is currently celebrating its 50th anniversary with several intriguing stories related to the company's history, and one of these involves the two engine types considered before the E39 M5 actually got a V8. 0:06 / 0:09 2026 Audi A6 Avant debuts to fight BMW 5 Series Touring Watch More I6 And V6 Turbos Were Considered For E39 M5 The last M5 before the E39, the E34, used a 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine with 340 horsepower. However, it had reached its development limit, so BMW began exploring other options for use in the E34's successor. 'We had two opportunities: a V8 or a turbocharged six-cylinder,' said the E39 M5 Project Leader, Alex Hildebrandt. At the time, the M division was led by Karlheinz Kalbfell. 'We were at the end of the energy crisis in Europe, and there was some doubt about whether this kind of car would find further demand on the market,' Hildebrandt said. 'Kalbfell was eager to play this card of fuel efficiency, which didn't mean we wouldn't have powerful engines but that the efficiency of the engines should be outstanding in comparison to the power. There was no way to come to that with a V8, because in the end, eight cylinders have to be fed. We had a lot of discussions about turbocharging, but at the time turbocharging mainly added fuel consumption and power at the upper end of the rev range, rather than torque in the middle.' By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. — Source: Bring A Trailer At the time, BMW was intrinsically linked to naturally-aspirated engines, so turbocharging would have been a significant step away from that. It wasn't until 2006 that the N54 arrived, the first mass-produced turbocharged gas engine from BMW. A turbo V6 was also proposed, which would have been even more shocking, given BMW's preference for inline six-cylinder engines. In the end, the V8 was decided to be the 'best technical solution' for the E39 M5. The 394-horsepower S62 ended up being a masterstroke, especially paired with the involving manual gearbox. E39 Was Perfectly Balanced, But An Even More Vicious M5 Was Coming Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Going with the V8 proved to be a great choice for the E39 M5. It could hit 60 mph in just 4.8 seconds, but this car wasn't only superb in a straight line. 'It's one thing to throw a V8 into a four-door sedan and make it go fast in a straight line,' said Scott Doniger, who became BMW North America's M Brand Manager. 'A heavy front end typically unbalances a sedan, but the M5 didn't feel like a heavy sedan. The package just worked holistically, with phenomenal handling balance under acceleration or braking, and especially in cornering.' By the time production ended in 2003, a total of 9,198 E39 M5s were sold in the USA, proving that the M5's move away from six-cylinder power was a good one. It was followed by the insane E60 M5, a more flawed car but one with a sensational engine. This one had a 5.0-liter V10 known as the S85, and it was inspired by BMW's Formula 1 experience. Producing 500 hp and revving to 8,250 rpm, it again threw out the M5 rulebook. However, the E60 was let down by complex technologies and a poor reliability reputation. Had BMW not taken the technical leap that it did with the E39 M5, it may not have been as willing to take the V10 risk with the E60. Source: Bring A Trailer About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile
