Hybrids vs EVs vs ICE: Which Car Actually Pollutes the Most?
View post: Your EV Battery Is Spying on You — New Research Exposes Yet More Hidden Privacy Risks
You can lease a 2025 Mazda3 for $349 per month for 36 months.
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a segment leader when it comes to EV charging speeds, outclassing competitors like the VW ID.4 with relative ease.
Car insurance is Honda's latest new product offering, but other carmakers offer it as well.
What They Don't Tell You About EVs, Hybrids, and Gas Cars
If you think switching to electric is a get-out-of-jail-free card for the planet, think again. EVs are cleaner and win the race. But they're no saints. And while gas-powered cars are still the biggest climate culprits, new data shows hybrids are still far better than ICE but over-hyped for long-term environmental and health costs. From particle pollution to greenhouse gases to lifetime public health impact, the real story behind your car's emissions is more complicated than any tailpipe test.
Head-to-Head: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
When you stack them side by side, electric vehicles come out ahead on lifetime emissions — but not by as much as some assume.
A mid-size gasoline car emits around 35.5 metric tons of CO₂ over 150,000 km. A diesel vehicle is slightly cleaner at 33 tons, due to better fuel economy. Hybrids perform better, landing at about 26.7 tons thanks to regenerative braking and smaller engines.
A standard EV charged on a typical grid mix produces about 17.5 tons—less than half of an ICE car. If you charge with 100% renewable electricity, that drops to 11.5 tons. But the manufacturing and battery footprint is larger: about 8.0 tons upfront vs. 5.5 for ICE cars.
Source: ICCT20 Lifecycle Comparison
Tire Dust, Not Tailpipes: A New Pollution Villain
Electric cars don't have tailpipes, but they still pollute. How? Tires and brakes.
Non-exhaust pollution — especially PM10 and PM2.5 particles from tire and brake wear — is a growing health concern. EVs are heavier, so they wear through tires faster, emitting more rubber dust. According to UK government figures, an EV sedan generates 950g of tire dust per year, compared to 800g for a gas car. Brake dust is lower in EVs thanks to regenerative braking, but total PM emissions are still close.
Source: ICCT20 Lifecycle Comparison
Fuel Efficiency and Real-World Range
In MPG terms, it's no contest: EVs average over 100 MPGe, compared to 40–50 MPG for hybrids and 25–30 MPG for gas cars. Range parity has improved too: most modern EVs offer 250–350 miles per charge, roughly matching gasoline tanks. But cold weather, cabin heating, and fast driving can knock EV range down by 20–30%.
Charging adds a wrinkle. Unless you have home charging, DC fast charging infrastructure varies wildly. That still favors hybrids and ICE vehicles on long trips.
What About Hybrid Longevity and Grid Impact?
EV batteries degrade over time, but slowly. Most retain 80% capacity after 150,000 km, and battery tech keeps improving. Hybrids, however, offer a best-of-both-worlds deal: no plug-in stress, fewer emissions, and longer range. They don't need infrastructure upgrades and put less strain on aging power grids.
Grid emissions matter too. In coal-heavy regions, EVs charge dirty. But in solar and wind-heavy states like California, they shine. Lifecycle emissions vary heavily by region and grid mix.
Verdict: The Greenest Car Isn't Always the Newest EV
EVs win on paper — but context is everything. If you're in a clean-grid state with access to home charging, they're the lowest-emission option. But hybrids – despite being over-rated in real-world compared to lab by a factor of 60% – punch above their weight, offering good emissions performance without the battery burden. And gas cars? They're toast — unless we're talking synthetic fuels, which aren't widely available yet.
So, what's best for the planet? Driving less. Car sharing. Public transport. But if you're buying, the smartest bet is the one that fits your real-world routine — not just a showroom spec sheet.
About the Author
Brian Iselin View Profile
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
27 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iPadOS 26 Changes Everything: Which iPad Should You Buy Now
The release of iPadOS 26 represents a significant evolution for Apple's iPad lineup, introducing features that bridge the gap between tablets and desktops. By aligning software capabilities across all models, this update shifts the focus to hardware differences, allowing users to choose the right iPad based on their specific needs. Whether you're a student, a creative professional, or someone who values portability, understanding these updates is crucial for making an informed decision. The video below from GregsGadgets gives us more details about the impact of iPadOS 26 on the iPad. Watch this video on YouTube. Key Features of iPadOS 26 iPadOS 26 brings a host of enhancements designed to maximize productivity and versatility, making the iPad a more powerful tool for a wide range of users. Notable updates include: Advanced Multitasking: A revamped multitasking system introduces window resizing, app tiling, and macOS-style traffic light controls, allowing seamless management of multiple applications. A revamped multitasking system introduces window resizing, app tiling, and macOS-style traffic light controls, allowing seamless management of multiple applications. Background Task Management: Resource-intensive tasks like rendering and exporting now run uninterrupted in the background, improving workflow efficiency. Resource-intensive tasks like rendering and exporting now run uninterrupted in the background, improving workflow efficiency. Enhanced Files App: New file organization tools, a more functional dock, and external audio controls simplify multitasking and file management. New file organization tools, a more functional dock, and external audio controls simplify multitasking and file management. Desktop-Like Features: Additions such as a menu bar and macOS-inspired apps like Preview and Finder bring a familiar desktop experience to the iPad. These updates elevate the functionality of even the entry-level iPad while allowing premium models to fully use their advanced hardware capabilities. Base iPad: Affordable and Capable The base iPad, priced between $300 and $350, offers excellent value for everyday users. With iPadOS 26, it now supports multitasking and desktop-inspired features, previously reserved for higher-end models. Powered by the A16 chip, it handles tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and light productivity with ease. However, there are some limitations. The base iPad features a non-laminated display, supports only mirrored external displays, and lacks advanced features like Apple Pencil Pro compatibility. Despite these trade-offs, it remains an ideal choice for students and casual users seeking an affordable yet capable device. iPad Air: The Perfect Balance At $600, the iPad Air strikes a balance between affordability and premium features. Its laminated, anti-reflective display offers superior image quality, while the M3 chip ensures smooth performance for demanding tasks such as video editing, graphic design, and gaming. The iPad Air supports advanced Apple Pencil Pro features, including magnetic charging and pressure sensitivity, making it a strong option for creative professionals. Additionally, it includes a faster USB-C port (10Gbps) and full external display support, allowing users to expand their workspace. For those seeking a versatile device with enhanced performance, the iPad Air is a compelling choice. iPad Pro: Unmatched Power and Precision Starting at $1,000, the iPad Pro is designed for users who demand the highest level of performance and features. Its OLED display delivers exceptional brightness, contrast, and HDR support, while the 120Hz ProMotion refresh rate ensures fluid visuals and low latency for Apple Pencil users. The M4 chip provides a significant performance boost over the M3, excelling in resource-intensive tasks such as 3D rendering, high-resolution video editing, and advanced gaming. Additional features include Face ID for secure authentication, a Thunderbolt USB-C port for ultra-fast data transfer, and a four-speaker audio system for immersive sound. Paired with the Magic Keyboard, which includes a haptic trackpad, the iPad Pro transforms into a true laptop replacement, ideal for professionals and power users. iPad Mini: Compact and Powerful For users who prioritize portability, the iPad Mini offers a unique solution. Priced at $500, it features an 8.3-inch compact design and the powerful A17 Pro chip, making it ideal for gaming, multitasking, and on-the-go use. While the iPad Mini supports Apple Pencil Pro, it lacks keyboard accessories, focusing instead on being a lightweight, tablet-first device. This makes it an excellent choice for users who value simplicity and convenience without sacrificing performance. Choosing the Right iPad for Your Needs With iPadOS 26 leveling the software playing field, selecting the right iPad now depends on your hardware preferences and budget. Here's a breakdown to help guide your decision: Base iPad: Best suited for casual users and students who need an affordable device with solid performance. Best suited for casual users and students who need an affordable device with solid performance. iPad Air: Ideal for professionals and creatives seeking a balance of power, display quality, and advanced features. Ideal for professionals and creatives seeking a balance of power, display quality, and advanced features. iPad Pro: Perfect for those requiring top-tier performance, premium features, and a laptop-like experience. Perfect for those requiring top-tier performance, premium features, and a laptop-like experience. iPad Mini: Great for users who prioritize portability and compact design without compromising on power. Apple's updated iPad lineup, combined with the enhancements of iPadOS 26, ensures there's a device tailored to every lifestyle. Whether you need a budget-friendly option, a versatile mid-range device, or a high-performance powerhouse, the iPad family offers something for everyone. Dive deeper into iPadOS 26 features with other articles and guides we have written below. Source & Image Credit: GregsGadgets Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPad, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Boeing and Airbus ground green plane projects
Two years ago, Boeing pulled an airliner out of the Victorville 'boneyard' in California — one of the giant desert storage lots for unwanted aircraft — and flew it 50 miles west to a classified plant for some radical surgery. The 25-year-old MD-90, which in its former life carried passengers for Delta Air Lines and China Southern, was to be the test bed for technology that would cut the greenhouse gases emitted by future aircraft. Its existing wings were to be cut off and replaced with long, thin versions supported by struts projecting from the bottom of a new, deeper fuselage. Boeing and Nasa, which was funding the work, had high hopes for the X-66A, as the plane was renamed. Or they did until four months ago, when the project was abruptly put on ice. Two months earlier, something similar happened to one of Europe's big environmental projects. In February, Airbus said it would 'pause' development of the ZEROe hydrogen plane, an aircraft with no carbon emissions that it had planned to have in service by 2035. The two manufacturers enjoy a near-duopoly in the airliner market, and delays to their flagship green programmes have sounded an alarm on airlines' plans to get to net zero — adding no additional carbon to the atmosphere — by 2050. 'The airline industry does in my view have a serious intent to meet net-zero targets but faces increased challenges in doing so', John Strickland, an independent aviation consultant, said. 'Alternative technologies are being pushed further out, which means an increased emphasis on the use of sustainable aviation fuel, which is still in limited supply.' The delays may also create another obstacle to the planned expansion of Heathrow. The airport said on August 1 that it would 'only deliver expansion in a way that is consistent with net zero 2050'. And some analysts believe the hold-up increases the chances of a challenge to Boeing and Airbus from new entrants more eager to take up the environmental mantle. Aviation is estimated by the International Energy Agency to account for 2.5 per cent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, with a slightly greater — 4 per cent — contribution to global warming thanks to the creation of vapour trails. In the UK, it has a greater share of direct emissions: 9 per cent this year, according to the Climate Change Committee, the government's independent advisers. That share is forecast to grow to 11 per cent by 2030 and 16 per cent by 2035. That global emissions share is also likely to increase. After a severe decline during the pandemic, flights are now increasing fast. Iata, the airline trade body, has said passenger numbers will grow nearly 6 per cent this year to just under 5 billion and could hit 16 billion by 2050. As other energy-intensive industries find ways to cut their carbon emissions — electricity replacing blast furnaces in steel, new technology for making cement, and electric vehicles for land transport — aviation's share of total CO₂ could, by some estimates, rise to 20 per cent by 2050. Carbon-cutting technology for aviation is proving slow to arrive. Most experts think battery-power will be limited to small commuter aircraft, but there are high hopes for hydrogen. Airbus had invested significantly, including a plan to test a hydrogen fuel-cell engine on a modified A380 superjumbo. But it paused work in February, saying progress on 'key enablers', in particular the production of large amounts of hydrogen from renewable energy, was 'slower than anticipated'. Boeing has been less interested in hydrogen, but said the X-66A could lead to a 10 per cent reduction in emissions. When it cancelled the project it said it would instead concentrate on other designs for thinner, more efficient wings. Neither manufacturer appears in any rush to bring out radical designs. Airbus's plan to replace its bestselling A320 family of aircraft envisages something familiar to passengers today, albeit with engines that can be powered by conventional fuels or 'sustainable' replacements. That plane is unlikely to enter service until 2035 at the earliest, and probably much later. Boeing, which has been beset by a series of crises in the past year, also appears to be in no hurry. At its quarterly results on July 29, chief executive Kelly Ortberg said: 'I don't think the market is ready yet for a new airplane.' • Boeing 737 Max 8: which airlines use the plane and is it safe? Slow progress on alternative technology means airlines' hopes rest on the rapid introduction of sustainable fuels — hydrocarbons not pumped from the ground, but made from plants or re-used oils, or directly synthesised. However, the current supply is tiny — a mere 0.53 per cent of total aviation fuel worldwide last year, according to Air Transport Action Group (Atag), which brings together airlines, airports and aerospace manufacturers. Atag's Waypoint 2050 report concluded that making enough sustainable fuel to hit net zero would require the construction of 5,000 refineries, costing $1.45 trillion over the next 25 years. IBA, the aviation consultancy, has forecast production of sustainable fuels will hit 18 million tonnes a year by 2035 — but that will be 23 million tonnes short of demand. Environmental campaigners are scornful. 'The only serious remedy [to increasing CO₂ emissions] is demand restraint,' Dr Douglas Parr, policy director at Greenpeace UK, said. 'Everything else — the nonsensical offset schemes, the utopian technology forecasts and now the implausible optimism surrounding 'sustainable' aviation fuel — is primarily a collection of elaborate misdirection techniques.' If aviation's emissions do grow as a proportion of the total, Airbus and Boeing could face societal pressure to do more. Nick Cunningham, managing partner at Agency Partners, an aerospace analysis firm, recently published a note on how 'complacency' on decarbonisation posed an 'existential risk' to the companies. Cunningham said planemakers were understandably reluctant to make large investments in new technology. 'Boeing does not at the moment have the financial resources to develop an all-new aircraft. Airbus has reason to be wary because some of its development programmes — the A380 and the A400M for example — ended up way over budget.' • Net zero by 2050 struggles with reality The Chinese aerospace industry could be a potential challenger. There are now 16 Comac C919s, the first modern Chinese airliner, in service, with a second, larger aircraft, the C929, expected to begin commercial flights towards the end of the decade. Cunningham said, however, that carbon reduction is not China's main goal. 'There could be a challenge from China, but for the moment it is concentrating on replacing imports of western aerospace equipment,' he said. One potential rival to the Airbus-Boeing hegemony is JetZero, a California-based company set up in 2021. It has ambitious plans to build a radical new type of passenger aircraft: a blended wing body, where the wings and fuselage are one smooth shape. The Northrop Grumman B-2 stealth bomber, used by the US Air Force in the recent attacks against Iran, is such a design. JetZero claims its design could cut emissions in half compared to conventional designs. It has secured backing from two big US carriers, United Airlines and Alaska Airlines, including a commitment from them to buy aircraft. The USAF has awarded it a development contract for a potential new transport aircraft. 'JetZero is extremely interesting,' Cunningham said. 'The backing it has from airlines and the air force give it credibility, and it has very ambitious production plans. Its design would be more efficient than conventional aircraft, and crucially it would lend itself to a switch to hydrogen fuel when that is adopted.'
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Gemini Deep Think : Solving Complex Applications in Math and Beyond
What if a machine could think as deeply as a human mathematician, solving problems so intricate they stump even the brightest minds? Enter Gemini Deep Think, an advanced AI model that has not only redefined what artificial intelligence can achieve but also challenged our understanding of reasoning itself. With its new performance at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO)—a stage traditionally dominated by human brilliance—this AI has proven it can rival the sharpest intellects in tackling complex algebra, geometry, and number theory. Yet, this achievement raises a pressing question: can such computational power ever balance its brilliance with real-world practicality? In this overview Sam Witteveen explores how Gemini Deep Think is reshaping the boundaries of AI reasoning, from its innovative use of parallel reasoning chains to its potential applications in fields like 3D modeling and algorithm design. But this isn't just a story of triumph; it's also one of trade-offs. While the model's ability to solve intricate problems with precision is unparalleled, its high computational demands and extended processing times reveal the challenges of scaling such technology. As we delve deeper, you'll discover not only the promise of this AI marvel but also the hurdles it must overcome to truly transform industries and redefine intelligence itself. What does this mean for the future of human and machine collaboration? Let's explore. Gemini Deep Think Overview The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is widely regarded as one of the most prestigious global competitions, challenging high school students to solve intricate problems in algebra, geometry, and number theory. For the first time in history, an AI model—Gemini Deep Think—has matched the performance of top human participants, scoring an impressive 35 out of 42 points. This achievement is a testament to the model's ability to engage in logical problem-solving and advanced mathematical reasoning, areas traditionally dominated by human intelligence. By excelling in such a rigorous competition, Gemini Deep Think has not only proven its technical capabilities but also highlighted the potential for AI to complement human expertise in solving complex problems. This milestone reflects a significant step forward in AI's evolution, showcasing its capacity to operate in domains that require deep analytical thinking. How Gemini Deep Think Pushes AI Boundaries Gemini Deep Think represents a significant advancement in AI reasoning by introducing innovative methodologies that set it apart from earlier models. One of its most notable features is the use of parallel reasoning chains, which allow the model to evaluate multiple solutions simultaneously and select the most effective one. This capability enables it to excel in tasks such as solving complex algebraic equations, generating structured outputs like 3D models, and addressing intricate coding challenges. The model's advanced reasoning capabilities, however, come with a trade-off. Solving complex problems can take between 10 to 20 minutes, reflecting its substantial computational demands. While this processing time underscores the sophistication of its algorithms, it also highlights the need for optimization to improve efficiency. The balance between computational power and practical usability remains a key area for development as AI continues to evolve. Gemini Deep Think Challenges Human Brilliance Watch this video on YouTube. Check out more relevant guides from our extensive collection on advanced AI models that you might find useful. Advancing Beyond Previous AI Models Gemini Deep Think builds upon and surpasses the capabilities of its predecessors, such as AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry. Unlike these earlier models, which relied heavily on specialized mathematical languages like Lean, Gemini Deep Think processes problems directly, offering greater flexibility and adaptability. This advancement allows it to handle a broader range of tasks, from solving mathematical benchmarks to tackling logical reasoning challenges across diverse domains. Despite its superior performance, the model's computational intensity presents a significant limitation. Its extended processing times make it less practical for applications where speed is critical, such as real-time decision-making or dynamic problem-solving environments. Addressing these limitations will be essential for making sure its broader applicability and integration into various industries. Potential Applications and Current Limitations The versatility of Gemini Deep Think opens up a wide range of potential applications across multiple fields. Some of the most promising use cases include: Generating structured outputs for industries like 3D modeling, animation, and game development. Solving complex mathematical benchmarks with a high degree of accuracy, aiding academic research and education. Enhancing logical reasoning in specialized domains such as coding, algorithm design, and software development. However, the model's limitations cannot be ignored. Its long processing times and high computational requirements pose challenges for industries that rely on rapid decision-making or real-time solutions. These constraints highlight the need for further refinement to make the model more practical and accessible for real-world applications. Without addressing these issues, its adoption may remain limited to niche areas where processing time is less critical. Future Directions and Integration As AI technology continues to advance, Gemini Deep Think is poised for broader integration into platforms such as AI Studio and Google Cloud. Through API access, developers could use its reasoning capabilities for specialized applications, ranging from academic research to industrial problem-solving. This integration would enable organizations to harness the model's advanced capabilities in a more streamlined and accessible manner. The future of AI development, however, depends on addressing key trade-offs. Balancing intelligence, speed, and cost will be essential to making models like Gemini Deep Think scalable and efficient. Achieving this balance will determine the extent to which such technologies can be adopted across diverse industries, from education and healthcare to engineering and finance. By refining its computational efficiency and reducing processing times, Gemini Deep Think could unlock new possibilities for AI applications. Its ability to perform high-level reasoning tasks with remarkable accuracy positions it as a valuable tool for solving some of the most complex challenges in science, technology, and beyond. Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence Gemini Deep Think represents a significant milestone in the evolution of artificial intelligence, showcasing its ability to perform advanced reasoning tasks with precision and accuracy. Its performance at the IMO underscores the potential of AI to rival human intelligence in domains that demand deep analytical thinking. However, the model's computational demands and extended processing times highlight areas that require improvement to ensure its practicality and scalability. As the field of AI continues to evolve, the focus will remain on optimizing efficiency, usability, and accessibility. By addressing these challenges, models like Gemini Deep Think could pave the way for fantastic advancements across a wide range of industries, shaping the future of artificial intelligence and its role in solving the world's most complex problems. Media Credit: Sam Witteveen Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
