logo
Scots aren't having our voices heard – nuclear is one such case study

Scots aren't having our voices heard – nuclear is one such case study

The National01-06-2025
It was organised by Britain Remade, a lobby group headed by former Tory spad Sam Richards. He described Britain Remade as a 'cross-party campaigning group' that believes in economic growth and building infrastructure.
Britain Remade's campaign, 'New Scottish Nuclear Power', aims to reverse Scotland's ban on new nuclear power.
Also present were councillor Norman Hampshire, the leader of East Lothian Council (ELC) and chair of the planning committee, and Labour MSP for South Scotland Martin Whitfield.
READ MORE: Why the UK media 180 on Gaza is too little, too late
Richards boasted about the UK's nuclear power track record. In 1956, the world's first nuclear reactor, Calder Hall, was built in Sellafield, Cumbria. The plant produced plutonium for the UK nuclear weapons programme – electricity for the domestic market was a sideline. Throughout its 47-year life, it exposed workers and the public to higher levels of radiation than comparable reactors and it wasn't economically viable for long periods.
Sellafield is the site of Europe's worst nuclear accident – the 1957 Windscale fire, that led to the atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials throughout England, Wales and northern Europe. Sellafield has been a nuclear waste dump since 1959 and has been called Europe's most toxic nuclear site, a 'bottomless pit of hell, money and despair'. It's a reason Scotland has been dubbed the 'cancer capital of the world'.
That's a hell of a track record.
Richards blamed high electricity bills on the UK's failure to build more nuclear plants, claiming nuclear was the reason France had lower bills. Wrong. Nuclear power has never been economic. It requires government subsidies and there's no solution for radioactive waste disposal. French energy bills are lower because France didn't privatise its energy and thus retained the ability to cap costs. The French government owns 100% of Électricité de France (EDF), which runs the Torness plant and the UK's four other operating nuclear plants.
EDF should be showing far more concern about the safety of its UK plants. The Torness reactor has 46 cracks in its core which the ONR (Office for Nuclear Regulation) said could lead to a reactor meltdown and the release of radiation into the environment. EDF has extended the life of the plant to 2030.
Britain Remade's goal is to get the ban on nuclear lifted and to use the Torness site for new nuclear plants.
Whitfield trotted out two pro-nuclear talking points, both of which are easily refuted:
1. Nuclear power doesn't increase CO2.
Not so. There are carbon emissions from mining, transporting and processing uranium, from constructing power plants and from transporting radioactive waste to places like Sellafield. By contrast, renewable energy doesn't increase CO2, there's no mining required or toxic waste to dispose of, and Scotland is bursting with renewables.
2. Nuclear power creates skilled jobs for life.
The renewables industry also creates skilled jobs for life without shortening it – in engineering, project management, data analysis and renewable energy technologies – and doesn't endanger the health of workers or the local community.
Councillor Hampshire, who worked at Torness, said that although he 'had to support renewables', nuclear is needed for baseload power, which is the minimum power level on the grid.
Wrong again. Baseload power can be provided by any mix of generators, including variable wind and solar, if constant backup sources like tidal are provided. Furthermore, nuclear can't be easily switched off, so when it's present on the grid, much cheaper renewables are limited, which raises costs to the consumer.
Nonetheless, councillor Hampshire said he was lobbying hard for more nuclear power. He wants two Rolls-Royce SMRs (Small Modular Reactors) at the Torness site, claiming they're cheaper and quicker to build and said that many SNP MSPs support him.
I wrote about SMRs in February, showing they are more expensive than and just as dangerous as large nuclear reactors; will generate more radioactive waste and will turn communities into de facto long-term nuclear waste disposal sites.
Only two SMRs are operating in the world – in Russia and China. Both are performing at less than 30% capacity and have been plagued by cost and time overruns. According to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, these problems 'make it even less likely that SMRs will become commercialised.'
Despite these facts, councillor Hampshire vows to include SMRs in the next ELC Local Development Plan. We were told that a lot of work is going on behind the scenes to ensure Torness remains an active nuclear site – with the UK having to import energy, otherwise.
During the Q&A, Whitfield was asked what it would take to change Scotland's position. He replied 'a change of government' and questioned whether Scotland has the authority to ban nuclear power since energy policy is reserved to the UK. It does because the Scotland Act 1998 devolves planning to Scotland.
Nevertheless, Whitfield said this could and would be tested through the courts, although he later clarified there were no definite plans to mount a legal challenge to Scotland's authority to ban new nuclear power.
English Labour are pushing for more nuclear because they're funded by the industry. The industry expects a return.
Nuclear power is another issue crying out for direct democracy, where the Scottish people – not special interests who are in bed with the politicians – have the power to decide via a referendum whether they want it or not. There are many other issues, local and national, over which the Scottish people have no control – pylons in the Highlands, corporate tax haven 'freeports', the closures of Ardrossan Harbour and Grangemouth, the Loch Lomond Flamingo Land development, to name just a few.
If we're to stop special interests always crushing the interests of the people, we must demand our international human rights. That's why Respect Scottish Sovereignty (RSS) is urging as many as possible to sign PE2135, to enact the Direct Democracy/Self-Determination Covenant (ICCPR) into Scots law.
Leah Gunn Barrett
Edinburgh
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour is already making a difference, writes Labour chair Ellie Reeves
Labour is already making a difference, writes Labour chair Ellie Reeves

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Labour is already making a difference, writes Labour chair Ellie Reeves

One year ago, the British people voted for change — and today, we mark the first anniversary of a Labour government committed to delivering just that. Over the past 12 months, we have begun to turn the page on 14 years of Tory chaos and decline. And while it hasn't been easy, and we know there is much more to do, our Plan for Change is already making a difference. The first phase of this government was about taking immediate action to fix the foundations and stabilise our economy. Because of this action, Britain had the highest growth of any G7 economy in the first quarter of this year. Interest rates have been cut four times, lowering people's mortgages. Wages are rising faster than prices. NHS waiting lists are falling, with the delivery of four million extra NHS appointments. And breakfast clubs are being rolled out across the country, to give kids a healthy start to the day and to put more money in parents' pockets. Yes, we know the job is far from done and we won't sugarcoat the scale of the challenge. But if the first phase of this government was about taking immediate action to fix the foundations and clean up the mess the Tories left behind, the second phase is now about making working people better off. And as our focus shifts firmly to the future, we are going further and faster to deliver the change we promised. While the Conservatives and Reform UK risk the economy by making unfunded promises they cannot keep, we are working tirelessly to improve living standards for people across the country. Striving to build a renewed Britain, where your hard work is rewarded. Where your NHS is there when you need it. Where your community is safe, and your future is secure. That is the country we're building together. This is not about quick fixes. It's about rebuilding Britain — to make it fairer, stronger, and more secure. To put money back in working people's pockets and build a better future together. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.

Tram nostalgia won't solve our transport problems
Tram nostalgia won't solve our transport problems

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Tram nostalgia won't solve our transport problems

Last Thursday, Chris Curtis, Labour MP for Milton Keynes North asked the Transport Secretary what her department is doing to bring down the cost of building new tram systems. Curtis pointed out, using research by think-tank, Britain ReMade, that 'every French city with a population of over 150,000 has a mass rapid transport system,' while here in Britain similar sized towns have to make do with dull old buses and taxis. West Yorkshire, where I live, is the biggest urban area in Europe without a tram or metro system. There are plans to rectify this by spending £2.1 billion of government money on a tram system connecting Leeds to Bradford city centre and to link Leeds' main hospital to a large out-of-town shopping centre near Leeds United's football ground. Even if the cost of building the lines is halved, that's still over a billion pounds to build less than 20 miles of tramway. Should we be asking if this is the best way to spend the limited cash we have for transport infrastructure? If building tramways is so troubled and difficult, why do we persist with the idea that having trams on our city streets is such a good idea? The proposals for Leeds don't provide any benefit for 90 per cent of West Yorkshire's travellers and our obsession with trams misses the fact that, in most places, the distribution of people and jobs simply isn't suited to fixed rail mass transit systems. Trams, like other fixed rail systems, are an old technology. Leeds and Bradford built trams in the 1880s, discovered they had become loss-making and shut them down in the 1950s to prioritise cheaper, more flexible buses (and the private car). Since then waves of nostalgia have washed over our cities resulting in trams being seen as the only possible solution to urban transport challenges. The truth is, however, that building a tram network is an act of corporate indulgence, a sort of municipal 'keeping up with the Joneses'. Instead of moving to a new generation of transport, we are stuck with an expensive and inflexible 19th century technology. And people don't use trams much. Across the UK, just 8 per cent of journeys were made on public transport and tram systems amounted to just 3 per cent of those public transport trips. Even when we look at Manchester, with its substantial tram network, the share of journeys for this system amounts to less than 5 per cent. Manchester's trams also lose a lot of money, £39 million in 2023/24. If we get the 'tram building revolution' that Chris Curtis calls for, we will be spending billions on loss-making systems that, even optimistically, will amount for less than 10 per cent of passenger journeys. All while the roads where over 90 per cent of journeys take place are starved of both investment and maintenance. If we are serious about transport investment then we should concentrate on investments that the private sector is prepared to finance like air travel, taxi systems, roads and work from home initiatives as well as ending the long term underfunding of roads maintenance. It may be the case that, as Centre for Cities tells us, urban density would make mass transit less loss-making but right now few of England's towns are big enough or dense enough to justify tram systems. Perhaps a brave mayor will tell the government their city doesn't need a tram and would rather finance experiments in autonomous vehicles, air taxis, better road signalling technology and app-based systems like North Yorkshire's YorBus rather than a tram system that doesn't solve urban transport problems and costs a fortune.

10 signs the Tories and Reform had a terrible year - from Elon Musk to Partygate
10 signs the Tories and Reform had a terrible year - from Elon Musk to Partygate

Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

10 signs the Tories and Reform had a terrible year - from Elon Musk to Partygate

All eyes are on Labour's as it marks the end of a rocky first year in power but the Tories and Reform UK have had far from a smooth ride - here we take a look at their lowlights All eyes are on Labour's as it marks the end of a rocky first year in power but the Tories and Reform UK have had far from a smooth ride. This time last year, Rishi Sunak had just led the Tories to its worst election result in history. ‌ One Tory MP told me last month that the brazen former PM had still not apologised to her, or her colleagues, for calling an election in the summer, which saw many high-profile politicians lose their seats. ‌ She said anger was still rife towards him. When Parliament returned after the summer, the MP said Mr Sunak would walk around with a shield of his pals - like former deputy PM Oliver Dowden - to stop frustrated Tories interrogating him on why he led them to annihilation at the polls. A year on and Kemi Badenoch has done little to turn around the sad state of the Tory party. Keir Starmer has repeatedly branded the Conservative Party irrelevant, describing it as a "dead party walking" that is 'sliding into the abyss'. Meanwhile, Reform UK have been making big gains in the polls. But it has been far from a smooth ride for Nigel Farage - and as his party gains popularity, so too does the level of scrutiny that his councillors, MPs and himself come under. His plans being compared to a Liz Truss-style unfunded nightmare and a spectacular row with and resignation of one of the five Reform UK MPs elected last year has done nothing to help Mr Farage's ambitions to professionalise his party. Here we take a look at some of the rocky moments for the Tories and Reform UK since last year's 2024 election. ‌ Dire Tory leadership race... and conference After Rishi Sunak resigned as PM, he carried on as a caretaker leader for the Tories for a painful few months while the Conservative leadership race dragged on. Last Autumn's Tory party conference in Birmingham was a drawn out series of pitches at panel events from Kemi Badenoch, James Cleverly, Tom Tugendhat and Robert Jenrick. Cringey merch was littered across the conference centre, including hats featuring a slogan about a sex act. Kemi Badenoch, who went on to become leader, had an explosive time during the party conference. In the most memorable row, she was branded "hopelessly out of touch" after saying maternity pay is "excessive" and has "gone too far". ‌ Elsewhere during the conference she said between 5% and 10% of civil servants are "should-be-in-prison bad". This would mean between 25,000 and 50,000 were put behind bars. During the same month, she was mocked after claiming she became working class when she got a job in McDonalds. Tories keep dropping in polls Kemi Badenoch has ultimately struggled to make any progress at all in the Tories' standing in the polls. In fact, since the election, the Conservative Party's ratings have continued to fall - largely due to a rise in popularity for Reform UK. ‌ According to a YouGov poll last month, just 10% of the public believe Ms Badenoch looks like a prime minister in waiting, while 81% see the Tories as being in a weak state. It doesn't help that she got off to an extremely shaky start at PMQs, with scripted questions and gaffes galore. And a mega-poll by YouGov was equally bad news for the Tories. It showed Reform would win the most seats if a general election happened now. The party would secure 271 MPs, while Labour's 411 would crumble to just 178 and the Tories would find themselves in fourth spot with 46 spots, behind the Lib Dems ' 81 seats. Ms Badenoch's leadership has also been persistently undermined by Tory MP Robert Jenrick - who is in her Shadow Cabinet - and appears not to have realised the Tory leadership race is over. In February, it emerged his leadership campaign website, was still live despite it being months after Ms Badenoch became Tory leader. ‌ Badenoch says Partygate was overblown A day after becoming Tory leader, Ms Badenoch thought it would be a good idea to declare Boris Johnson a "great" Prime Minister and that the Partygate scandal was "overblown". In her first major interview since winning the contest to replace Mr Sunak, Ms Badenoch suggested the problem instead was with the Covid fines. During his time in No10, Mr Johnson became the first sitting PM to be sanctioned by police after he was found to have breached his own Covid rules. Despite being among dozens who resigned from his government in July 2022, Ms Badenoch told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg she thought Mr Johnson was "a great Prime Minister". She added that there were however some "serious issues", explaining: "Some of those things I think were perception issues, a lot of the stuff that happened around Partygate was not why I resigned. I thought that it was overblown. We should not have created fixed penalty notices, for example. That was us not going with our principles." ‌ She added that the public was "not wrong to be upset about Partygate", but said : "The problem was that we should not have criminalised everyday activities the way that we did." Elon Musk turns on Nigel Farage In an astonishing turn of events, tech billionaire Elon Musk - who was then a close pal of Donald Trump - turned on Nigel Farage in January, not long after the pair had met in the US. ‌ The Tesla and X owner dramatically called for Mr Farage to go in a huge embarrassment for the Reform UK leader. The billionaire claimed Mr Farage "doesn't have what it takes" and said the party needs a new person in charge. The unexpected call for change came just hours after a fawning Mr Farage branded him a "hero" and said his support makes his party "look cool". Musk posted on Twitter /X: "The Reform Party needs a new leader. Farage doesn't have what it takes." It followed weeks of cosying up together, with Mr Farage suggesting Musk could plough millions of pounds into his party. Musk suggested that then-Reform MP Rupert Lowe could be the best bet to succeed him. ‌ Kemi Badenoch hadn't met grooming gangs victims When the grooming gangs scandal hit headlines again earlier this year, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch was vocal in the discussion. But it emerged she had never actually met any survivors of grooming gangs and had no current plans to meet with any victims, nor had any asked to meet with her. At Prime Minister's Questions Keir Starmer, who had a private meeting with victims that morning, accused Ms Badenoch of "jumping on a bandwagon" - as she had failed to raise the issue in the Commons during her eight years as an MP. The Tories had strapped a wrecking amendment to Labour's Children's Safety bill, which would've taken it down entirely unless the government agreed to hold another national inquiry into grooming gangs. ‌ Ms Badenoch has since met with victims. Tory MP refers himself to watchdog In the latest Tory row, Tory MP George Freeman last week referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog following claims that he was paid by a company that helped him write questions to government departments. The former Science Minister has referred himself to the standards commissioner after emails came to light suggesting that he had lobbied the government on behalf of the environmental monitoring company GHGSat. ‌ Kemi Badenoch has been accused of not being firm enough on the issue. The Lib Dems called on her to 'come out of hiding' and immediately suspend the whip from Mr Freeman after he referred himself to the parliamentary watchdog, and accused her of 'following in Boris Johnson's footsteps' by so far refusing to do so. Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper MP said: 'Kemi Badenoch's deafening silence over this scandal shows she is following in Boris Johnson's footsteps when it comes to leading the Conservative Party. Her refusal to take action should come as no shock from someone who thinks the partygate scandal was 'overblown'." ‌ Reform UK's explosive civil war At last year's election, five Reform UK MPs were elected to Parliament. It didn't take long from five to go to four after a spectacular row between Rupert Lowe and Nigel Farage. In March, Reform UK reported the Great Yarmouth MP to the Metropolitan Police in March over alleged threats of physical violence against the party's chairman Zia Yusuf. He was suspended from the right-wing party. In May, prosecutors decided no criminal charges would be brought. The civil war appeared to begin after Mr Lowe branded Reform UK "a protest party led by the Messiah" and questioned whether Mr Farage would make a good Prime Minister in an interview with the Daily Mail. The party later then made the allegations about Mr Lowe's conduct to police. ‌ A very public row, with the pair slinging insults at each other, followed. Mr Lowe has since become an active critic of Reform UK and Mr Farage, with the axed MP this week launching his own party Restore Britain. Reform UK's total number MPs is now back up to five after Sarah Pochin won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election in May. Reform UK chair quits - then un-quits A bizarre row broke out in the top ranks of Reform UK in June, when party chairman Zia Yusuf quit and then un-quit his role. He dramatically resigned on social media just hours after criticising newly elected Reform MP Sarah Pochin for demanding a ban on the burka. ‌ Reform UK distanced itself from Ms Pochin's comments, confirming that a burka ban is "not party policy". Mr Yusuf waded in to say it was "dumb" for Ms Pochin to ask the question if it was not Reform policy, before quitting his position later that day. But two days later Mr Yusuf said his decision was a "mistake" and would return to the party to lead the party's "Doge" team, which is inspired by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, to cut waste and sending in Reform-controlled councils. The affair once again showed the unpredictability and individualist attitudes in the leadership of Reform UK. ‌ Reform compared to 'Liz Truss 2.0' Reform UK has and will likely continue to struggle to gain true credibility as a political party. It is surging in the polls but many see it as a protest piece. In May, Nigel Farage faced a backlash after setting out a raft of unfunded policies. Among them, the right-wing leader said his "biggest aspiration" was to lift the level at which people start paying tax to £20,000. The respected Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the party's pledge could cost between £50-£80 billion a year. ‌ Among Mr Farage's policies, the right-wing leader said his "biggest aspiration" was to lift the level at which people start paying tax to £20,000. He also committed to scrapping the two-child benefit limit, which Labour is examining as part of a child poverty strategy, restoring the winter fuel payments, and tax breaks for married couples. He claimed he'd be able to pay for the policies through scrapping net zero and diversity and inclusion programmes - but provided little detail. In response, Keir Starmer deliverd a major speech warning Nigel Farage's "fantasy" economics would lead to a Liz Truss -style economic meltdown. The PM labelled the Reform UK leader "Liz Truss 2.0" as he addressed workers in the North West after Mr Farage used a speech this week to unveil "uncosted" policies - running into the tens of billions. ‌ Farage in US - never in Clacton. first holiday Nigel Farage faced criticism in his first months as an MP after repeatedly jetting off to the US to support Donald Trump during the presidential campaign. The Mirror has documented many of his trips. The latest row over Mr Farage being out the country was in May, when the MP was branded a "part time leader" after the Brexiteer politician skipping a crucial debate on Mr Starmer's EU deal. He was absent despite criticising the UK-EU reset agreement in the press, calling it a Brexit"surrender". At the time, The Mirror asked him if his constituents deserved to be represented in a debate on the UK-EU deal, to which he said: "Where was the defence minister? Have you criticised him? "He was climbing Everest and we were doing a new defence pact with the EU. It was my first time away for three years." He was referring to veterans minister Al Carns, who was raising cash for veterans' charities with a record-breaking climb of Mount Everest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store