Pope Leo XIV signals continuity on fighting abuse with new head of child protection board
Verny, 59, replaces American Cardinal Sean O'Malley, the retired archbishop of Boston. O'Malley was the founding president of the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, an advisory group Pope Francis established in 2014 to advise the church on best practices to fight abuse and protect children.
As the abuse scandal spread globally during Francis' 12-year pontificate, the commission initially lost influence and its crowning recommendation — the creation of a tribunal to judge bishops who covered up for predator priests — went nowhere. After many years of reform and new members, it has become a place where victims can go to be heard and bishops can get advice on crafting guidelines to fight abuse.
Verny, who is currently the bishop of Chambery, France, has been a member of the commission since 2022 and heads the child protection council of the bishops conference in France, where the church has been rocked by revelations of decades and abuse by priests and bishops. He was among commission members who met with Leo last month.
The bishop has been responsible for doing an annual audit of the French church's centers for receiving victims, an initiative that was started after a devastating 2021 report into the French scandal estimated 330,000 children in France had been sexually abused over the past 70 years by church personnel.
Cardinal O'Malley praised the appointment, saying Verny has developed in-depth experience helping victims and working with law enforcement and civil authorities to ensure accountability 'for the serious failures of the church in France.'
In a statement, O'Malley also praised Leo for continuing to consider the commission a priority.
'The Holy Father's words and deeds in these early months of his pontificate assure the world that the Church will not grow complacent in her efforts to as best possible ensure the protection of children, vulnerable adults and all people in our communities,' he said.
Verny, for his part, praised O'Malley's leadership as courageous and having served as 'a moral compass' for the church, a reference to O'Malley's occasional statements of outrage when even Francis bungled an abuse case.
'I am committed, together with the members and personnel, to building on that legacy,' Verny said in a statement.
The American-born pope made the appointment the day before heading for a six-week vacation at the papal summer retreat south of Rome.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK lawmaker from Farage's Reform removes himself from the party
LONDON, July 5 (Reuters) - A British lawmaker from Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, James McMurdock, has removed himself from the party pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations relating to his business propriety, the right-wing party said on Saturday. McMurdock, one of five Reform lawmakers elected to join the UK's 650-strong parliament in the 2024 general election, will now sit as an independent, according to a statement on social media platform X from Reform's main enforcer of party discipline Lee Anderson. While the party - led by prominent Brexit campaigner Farage - has only a handful of lawmakers compared to the governing Labour Party's 403, it leads national opinion polls and gained noticeable ground from Labour in the local elections in May. "The allegations relate to business propriety during the pandemic and before (McMurdock) became an MP (Member of Parliament)," Anderson said in the statement. "At Reform UK we take these matters very seriously." McMurdock did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. The Reform statement said he has agreed to cooperate with any investigation following allegations which are likely to be published by a national newspaper.
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Shambles on the hard-Left: Jeremy Corbyn says 'discussions are ongoing' after Zarah Sultana quits Labour and boasts she will 'co-lead' new insurgent party… amid claims he is 'furious at being blindsided' by the MP
An insurgent threat to Labour was teetering on the brink of chaos today as its launch descended into squabbling. Zarah Sultana dramatically quit Labour last night and declared she would be 'co-leading' a new left-wing party with Jeremy Corbyn. The ardent pro-Palestinian MP is a long-term critic of Keir Starmer, and was already sitting as an independent after being stripped of the whip. But it seems the move caught Mr Corbyn by surprise, with the former Labour leader said to be 'furious and bewildered'. He finally commented on the development this afternoon to insist 'discussions are ongoing' - saying Ms Sultana would 'help us build a new alternative' but seemingly stopping short of endorsing her as a 'co-leader'. There also appears to be no decision on what the name of the new party would be, with options mooted including 'Real Change' and 'Peace and Justice Project'. Mr Corbyn has been hinting strongly that he wants to form a new party - with polls suggesting it could attract 10 per cent of the left-wing vote and inflict major damage on Labour. In an interview on Wednesday the 76-year-old claimed there was a 'thirst' among voters 'for an alternative view to be put'. The ardent pro-Palestinian MP is a long-term critic of Keir Starmer , and was already sitting as an independent after being stripped of the whip Mr Corbyn finally commented on the development this afternoon to insist 'discussions are ongoing' - saying Ms Sultana would 'help us build a new alternative' but seemingly stopping short of endorsing her as a 'co-leader' Mr Corbyn has sat as the independent MP for Islington North since being suspended by Labour in 2020 for downplaying the extent of anti-Semitism in the party under his leadership. He was expelled last year but retained his seat in the general election, since when he has been part of the Independent Alliance, a loose grouping of independent MPs with left wing political views. Posting on X last night, Ms Sultana that she was 'resigning from the Labour Party'. She said: 'Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country.' She said that 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and list 400,000 children out of poverty,' the former Labour MP added. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. 'Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much.' In a post on social media this afternoon, Mr Corbyn said: 'Real change is coming. 'One year on from the election, this Labour Government has refused to deliver the change people expected and deserved. Poverty, inequality and war are not inevitable. Our country needs to change direction, now. 'Congratulations to Zarah Sultana on her principled decision to leave the Labour Party. I am delighted that she will help us build a real alternative. 'The democratic foundations of a new kind of political party will soon take shape. Discussions are ongoing – and I am excited to work alongside all communities to fight for the future people deserve. 'Together, we can create something that is desperately missing from our broken political system: hope.' Appearing on ITV 's Peston on Wednesday - after opposing plans to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist group - he said he was working with groups 'all around the country' 'That grouping will come together. There will be an alternative view and there will be an alternative put there which is about a society that deals with poverty, inequality and a foreign policy that's based on peace rather than war,' he said. Asked if he would like to lead the party he said: 'I'm here to work, I'm here to serve the people in the way I've always tried to do.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Could Nigel Farage do worse as prime minister? You better believe it
Nigel Farage wants to be taken seriously as the leader of a potential party of government, so let us take him at his word: his ideas for government are terrible. He should be taken seriously because he has a good chance of being prime minister after the next election. It is no use saying, 'The election is probably four years away; anything can happen.' The things that might happen are just as likely to increase Farage's chances of winning as they are to decrease them. Incidentally, though, on the timing of the election, it was interesting that Morgan McSweeney, Keir Starmer's chief of staff, assumed it would be in 2028, four years after the last one. This was the normal pattern, before the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act that held sway between 2011 and 2022: if things were going well for a prime minister, they would go to the country a year before they had to. If things were going badly, they would run the full five years. Perhaps McSweeney had been so used to assuming a Starmer government would be gratefully acclaimed by the British people that, even when he wrote a memo last year about what could go wrong for Labour, he took 2028 as his target date for the election. The memo was leaked to Tim Shipman, political editor of The Spectator, who commented: 'I have had hints since that Starmer's team is already shifting its horizons to 2029 rather than 2028.' Anyway, the memo set out four issues on which Labour was vulnerable to Farage: being soft on net zero; immigration; failing to deliver change voters can feel; and becoming identified with a failed establishment. On each of those, McSweeney's warnings from last year have turned out to be 'prescient', as Shipman put it. It is, therefore, worth subjecting Farage's ideas to the kind of scrutiny that a potential party of government deserves. Last weekend, the Reform leader set out his plan to transform the parliamentary system. I say 'set out': what I mean is that he free-associated over lunch with a Sunday Times journalist, expounding a series of half-digested, contradictory 'radical' ideas of the kind usually found in below-the-line comments on the internet prefaced with, 'It's all perfectly simple…' He suggested that as prime minister he would appoint cabinet ministers from outside parliament, as in the US. 'The point about America is that you can have a senior cabinet position and you are held to account by a committee system that takes place on Capitol Hill and that is the equivalent of being in a court of law,' he said. 'That's accountability. Standing up in the House of Commons and telling a pack of lies, frankly, is not accountability.' He failed to explain how standing up in a committee and telling a pack of lies was any different. Then he contradicted himself, complaining that 'most' of the government's authority has been 'transferred to regulatory authorities and quangos'. This was quite wrong: 'The government has to be in the House of Commons. Why? I'll tell you why. Accountability.' Zigzagging from one fashionable nostrum to another, he said: 'We currently appoint cabinet ministers with zero experience of the areas. We swap them out after 18 months for somebody else with zero experience of the areas. None of it bloody works.' He said it was 'almost impossible for cabinet ministers to be good MPs anyway, because how could they be?', and said that it was 'interesting' that Gordon Brown made Digby Jones – 'a character that I like very much' – a business minister in the House of Lords. Yet he said, 'the make-up of the Lords is a bloody disgrace,' and he thought it should have 'an elected element based on the regions'. To sum up, then, he thinks cabinet ministers should be appointed from outside parliament, not even via the Lords, and should be accountable to the Commons through committee hearings – and that 'quangos' (I don't think he knows what a quango is) should be abolished. In other words, he has no idea. 'All of this needs to be thought through and debated more clearly,' he told The Sunday Times. His only workable argument – and it is admittedly a powerful one at the level of simplistic slogans – is: 'How could we do worse?' But that is a question that betrays a failure of the imagination. Voters only have to remember Liz Truss for a reminder that, dysfunctional as government may seem, it is always possible to do worse. Six weeks ago, Farage set out plans for huge tax cuts, raising the level at which people start to pay income tax to £20,000 a year. He claimed that this would be paid for by abandoning the net zero climate-change target, cutting the bill for asylum-seeker hotels, scrapping 'quangos' and tackling waste in public spending. None of those sources of revenue is credible: he was in effect proposing unfunded tax cuts comparable to those with which Truss blew up the financial markets. As McSweeney feared, the Labour government may not be a huge success, but could Farage do worse? You bet he could.
