UK Oil Major Shell Says Not In Talks To Buy Rival BP
United Kingdom:
British oil major Shell said Wednesday it was not in talks with BP to acquire its rival, after the Wall Street Journal reported there had been preliminary discussions.
"This is further market speculation. No talks are taking place," a Shell spokesman told AFP, adding that the firm was focused on adding value by improving its performance.
BP declined to comment.
The Wall Street Journal said its sources indicated that the two firms had held "early talks" about merging their operations.
A tie-up between Shell and BP would be one of the biggest mergers ever in the oil and gas industry and would give it added heft against US oil majors ExxonMobil and Chevron, and France's TotalEnergies.
"All big companies will look hard at any acquisition opportunities in their industry that could greatly increase their size and scale," AJ Bell investment analyst Dan Coatsworth told AFP.
"But that doesn't mean deals will go ahead," he added, calling Shell buying BP "the perennial takeover rumour that won't go away".
City Index analyst Fawad Razaqzada told AFP that a Shell purchase of BP would trigger competition concerns, making it difficult to receive approval from regulators.
BP has struggled in recent years against its rivals.
In February, it abandoned its ambitious climate objectives to refocus on oil and gas in a bid to boost flagging profits.
BP's first quarter net profit fell by 70 percent to $687 million, while Shell beat analyst expectations with a 35 percent drop to $4.8 billion in net earnings.
Activist US investment fund Elliott, which recently built up a stake of more than five percent in BP and has been calling for strategic changes, also declined to comment when contacted by AFP.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
22 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Best of BS Opinion: Trump's citizenship rules may upend world order
Hello and welcome to BS Views, our newsletter that sums up today's opinion page. Our editorial as well as lead columnist weigh in on President Trump's proposed ban on birthright citizenship and its wider consequences. Our second columnist looks at what plagues India's manufacturing sector and how it might be fixed. The first major shock of the Trump presidency was an executive order banning 'birthright citizenship' in the US. As our first editorial points out, birthright citizenship is the norm in most countries that have inherited British common-law, including the US. President Trump's order faced legal pushback but the US Supreme Court has said that lower courts' decisions cannot amount to a nationwide overturning of the order. In short, the White House might be soon be able to start restricting birthright citizenship. The birthright citizenship law has held good since 1898, and has allowed the US to become a successful multi-ethnic society. That is what enrages some of Trump's followers who oppose the idea that that anyone can be American. If birthright citizenship is indeed rolled back, then it will be an epochal shift in American identity and in its role in the world. The Indian Railways is set to increase fares starting July, a move that is expected to pull in revenue of roughly Rs 700 crore this fiscal year. However, as our second editorial argues, this bump is unlikely to change the dynamics of the railways' revenue - given passenger fares account for less than a third of the total revenue - or help it fund infrastructure upgrades. Instead, losses are covered through cross-subsidies from freight operations and higher fares for premium travel, such as air-conditioned rakes. This, too, may be a losing proposition considering freight traffic has been losing out to road transport, while AC services account for a mere 5 per cent of passengers, forcing it to look to government grants and extrabudgetary support for capital expenditure. The real issue is the lack of clarity on its commercial and social objectives. Without rationalising these contrasting goals, the railways will struggle to become world-class. Our lead columnist Mihir S. Sharma wonders if the West's experiment with open borders is coming to an end, given President's Trump ban on birthright citizenship and European nations' realisation that their openness might have had unintended consequences. Some of his advisors' and party colleagues' are even willing to seek to void citizenship rights of naturalised Americans. What is worrying is that these ideas are finding echoes across the Atlantic. Germany's decision to open borders to asylum-seekers from West Asia have had a ripple effect in the continent's politics. In the UK, Brexiteers oversaw migration grow manifold from non-European nations, including India. As a result of populist backlash against what is seen as unbridled immigration, mainstream politicians across Europe are slowly closing the continent off, following hesitantly in Trump's footsteps about foreigners among their midst. India's manufacturing sector and it's role as a solution to persistent issues of employment and economic growth have long been the subject of debate. While the need of the hour is more local manufacturing, points out our second columnist Debashis Basu, it's share in GDP has actually slipped further. The much-touted Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme hasn't quite taken off. A genuine manufacturing ecosystem takes years of reform which, in India's case, has been sporadic. Had it taken off, he says, it could have addressed both joblessness and poverty. Instead, the government has focused on cash transfers and welfare schemes, killing any incentive to work. India's demographic dividend, Basu warns, is fast turning into a demographic liability.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
It took 16 hours to read Trump's 940-page, foot-high bill aloud. Now the long debate begins
Hours before a tumultuous nearing-midnight vote on President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, a Republican senator stood on the chamber floor and implored the plan's critics, "Read the bill.' The Peace Monument is seen in front of the US Capitol dome on June 29, 2025, as US President Donald Trump�s Big Beautiful Bill continues through the Senate. US senators debated into the early hours of Sunday Donald Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP)(AFP) After the dramatic 51-49 roll call late Saturday, Senate Democrats did exactly that. Unable to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill by Trump's Fourth of July deadline, the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the process. 'If Senate Republicans won't tell the American people what's in this bill, then Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. By Sunday midafternoon some 16 hours later, the clerk's reading of the nearly foot-high bill was done. And within moments, the Senate launched debate. But it's still going to be a while, at least 10 hours of speeches stretching late into the night. The slow-walking tactic points to difficult days ahead. 'It's taken a while to get here,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman, 'but we'll have a debate worthy of this great country.' Republicans, who have control of the House and Senate, are closer to passing Trump's signature domestic policy package, yet there is political unease. Democratic lawmakers immediately launched fresh challenges against it, decrying the way they say Republicans are hiding the true costs by using unusual budgeting. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget office Sunday estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill. It also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, more than with the House's approach. Republican holdouts remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had sent his colleagues home for the weekend. Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. But the tense scene as voting came to a standstill for more than three hours Saturday night let the internal discord play out in public. In the end, Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky opposed the motion to move ahead, joining all 47 Democrats. Trump noticed. He threatened to campaign against Tillis, who was worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' Later Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in 2026. Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, but have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. Renewed pressure to oppose the bill came from Elon Musk, who criticized it as 'utterly insane and destructive.' If the Senate is able to pass the package in the days ahead, the bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. Tax breaks and core GOP priorities At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a "death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries. The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Democrats can't filibuster, but can stall Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can muscle the bill through on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections. Without the filibuster, Democrats in the minority have to latch on to other tools to mount their objections. One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., forced a 2021 reading of a COVID relief package. Democrats also intend to use their full 10 hours of available debate time, now underway. And then Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package that would be considered in an all-night voting session — or all-day, depending on the hour. A roll call full of drama As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska. A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vice President JD Vance joined in. The talks dragged on. Then Vance led them all back in to vote. Later, Scott said he had met with the president, adding, 'We all want to get to yes.' Lee said the group "had an internal discussion about the strategy to achieve more savings and more deficit reduction, and I feel good about the direction where this is going, and more to come.'
Hindustan Times
4 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Getting along well': Donald Trump on trade ties with China
United States President Donald Trump signaled that things are going 'well' in China while talking about trade ties with the Asian country. Donald Trump's remarks come after the White House indicated positive developments in trade relations with China last week.(File/AFP) While talking about the trade deficit and ties with China, Trump said, "We're getting along well with China." He made the remarks while appearing on 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' show. 'I think getting along with China is a very good thing, but they are paying substantial tariffs," Trump added. Trump's remarks come after the White House indicated positive developments in trade relations with China last week. According to an official, both countries have come to a mutual understanding on key matters including such as speeding up the export of rare earth materials to the US, reported AFP. The US and China also agreed to temporarily ease the high retaliatory tariffs they had imposed on each other after negotiations in Geneva in May. Trump also bashed former US President Joe Biden and his administration for having a big trade deficit with China. '...We have a big trade deficit with China. Biden let it get up to a trillion dollars, think of it, a trillion dollars deficit with one country. He let them just take over the coals, we're not gonna do that. But we're doing a rare-earths deal but remember, we have all of the airplane parts, they can't fly their airplanes without us. So we had some cards also,' Trump said. 'We have a deal with China, it's a good deal hopefully for everybody. We had a deal with China where it was 145% tariffs, and I will tell you, everything stopped in China. I saw that. Everything stopped, and we did China a favour,' he added. Trump on TikTok deal President Donald Trump has disclosed that 'a group of very wealthy people' will soon purchase TikTok. He said that his government has found a buyer for TikTok, but he did not identify the firm, saying he will reveal so in 'about two weeks.' 'We have a buyer for TikTok… I'll need probably China approval and I think President Xi will probably do it… It's a group of very wealthy people,' he said.
