
It took 16 hours to read Trump's 940-page, foot-high bill aloud. Now the long debate begins
Hours before a tumultuous nearing-midnight vote on President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, a Republican senator stood on the chamber floor and implored the plan's critics, "Read the bill.' The Peace Monument is seen in front of the US Capitol dome on June 29, 2025, as US President Donald Trump�s Big Beautiful Bill continues through the Senate. US senators debated into the early hours of Sunday Donald Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill, a hugely divisive proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP)(AFP)
After the dramatic 51-49 roll call late Saturday, Senate Democrats did exactly that.
Unable to stop the march toward passage of the 940-page bill by Trump's Fourth of July deadline, the minority party in Congress is using the tools at its disposal to delay and drag out the process.
'If Senate Republicans won't tell the American people what's in this bill, then Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.
By Sunday midafternoon some 16 hours later, the clerk's reading of the nearly foot-high bill was done.
And within moments, the Senate launched debate. But it's still going to be a while, at least 10 hours of speeches stretching late into the night. The slow-walking tactic points to difficult days ahead.
'It's taken a while to get here,' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the Budget Committee chairman, 'but we'll have a debate worthy of this great country.'
Republicans, who have control of the House and Senate, are closer to passing Trump's signature domestic policy package, yet there is political unease. Democratic lawmakers immediately launched fresh challenges against it, decrying the way they say Republicans are hiding the true costs by using unusual budgeting.
A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget office Sunday estimates the Senate bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, a nearly $1 trillion increase over the House-passed bill. It also found that 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law, more than with the House's approach.
Republican holdouts remain reluctant to give their votes, and their leaders have almost no room to spare, given their narrow majorities. Essentially, they can afford three dissenters in the Senate, with its 53-47 GOP edge, and about as many in the House, if all members are present and voting. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had sent his colleagues home for the weekend.
Trump, who has at times allowed wiggle room on his deadline, kept the pressure on lawmakers to finish. But the tense scene as voting came to a standstill for more than three hours Saturday night let the internal discord play out in public.
In the end, Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Rand Paul of Kentucky opposed the motion to move ahead, joining all 47 Democrats. Trump noticed.
He threatened to campaign against Tillis, who was worried that Medicaid cuts would leave many without health care in his state. Trump badgered Tillis again on Sunday morning, saying the senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.'
Later Sunday, Tillis issued a lengthy statement announcing he would not seek reelection in 2026.
Republicans are using their majorities to push aside Democratic opposition, but have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks.
Renewed pressure to oppose the bill came from Elon Musk, who criticized it as 'utterly insane and destructive.'
If the Senate is able to pass the package in the days ahead, the bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. Tax breaks and core GOP priorities
At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda.
But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a "death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries.
The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Democrats can't filibuster, but can stall
Using a congressional process called budget reconciliation, the Republicans can muscle the bill through on a simple majority vote in the Senate, rather than the typical 60-vote threshold needed to overcome objections.
Without the filibuster, Democrats in the minority have to latch on to other tools to mount their objections.
One is the full reading of the bill text, which has been done in past situations. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., forced a 2021 reading of a COVID relief package.
Democrats also intend to use their full 10 hours of available debate time, now underway.
And then Democrats are prepared to propose dozens of amendments to the package that would be considered in an all-night voting session — or all-day, depending on the hour. A roll call full of drama
As Saturday's vote tally teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.'
Several provisions in the package are designed for her state in Alaska.
A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vice President JD Vance joined in. The talks dragged on.
Then Vance led them all back in to vote.
Later, Scott said he had met with the president, adding, 'We all want to get to yes.'
Lee said the group "had an internal discussion about the strategy to achieve more savings and more deficit reduction, and I feel good about the direction where this is going, and more to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
36 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's IPO market eyes $2.4 bn in offerings in July on confidence revival
So far this year, India continues to the world's No. 2 IPO market with $5.86 billion raised, accounting for the 12 per cent of total proceeds globally, LSEG data shows Reuters Indian firms could raise some $2.4 billion through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in July, investment bankers said, raising hopes of a sustained revival in primary offerings after demand was dented by the US trade war and global geopolitical tensions earlier this year. That amount would mark the strongest month since December and would follow a robust $2 billion raised in June, though most of that was raised by one company, HDB Financial Services. Education loan provider Credila Financial Services, National Securities Depository Ltd (NSDL), surveillance firm Aditya Infotech and power-transmission-goods maker M&B Engineering are conducting roadshows and are expected to go public this month, bankers said. They spoke on condition of anonymity as the companies have yet to make the timing of their IPOs and other details public. The companies did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. India's IPO market had its best-ever year in 2024, with $20.5 billion raised, second only to the US, riding high on money inflows from domestic investors who have become wealthier on growth in the world's fifth-largest economy and were optimistic about more economic growth. This year was widely expected to be another record year but US President Donald Trump's trade war, tensions with Pakistan and in the Middle East took much wind out of those IPO sails. South Korean conglomerate LG Electronics' India unit and other companies ended up delaying their capital raising plans. Things now look to be getting back on track, particularly with the Nifty 50 and Sensex having regained lost ground to trade about 3 per cent off from their peaks. "The IPO market has come back.... The absence of most of the negatives is driving the market more than anything else," said Suraj Krishnaswamy, the managing director of investment banking at Axis Capital. So far this year, India continues to the world's No. 2 IPO market with $5.86 billion raised, accounting for the 12 per cent of total proceeds globally, LSEG data shows. A thick pipeline The largest offering this month is likely to be Credila, which has said it is seeking $584 million. NSDL, India's largest stock depository, is looking to raise $400 million, according to a banker. NSDL received its regulatory nod for a listing as far back as September but market sentiment trended lower not long after on concerns about slower growth for the economy and corporate profits. Details about the two firms' valuations and IPO dates could be announced soon, bankers said. Other major offerings in the pipeline are LG Electronics India's $1.8 billion IPO, and issues from JSW Cement and defence equipment maker SMPP worth around $470 million each, they added. According to PRIME Database, there are 143 Indian IPOs being planned worth a potential $26 billion. Of those, 73 have been approved by regulators. "We expect the upcoming months to be the best for Indian IPO market as compared to what we have seen so far this year," Bhavesh Shah, the managing director and head of investment banking at Equirus. Others, however, were more cautious in their optimism, saying that participation from high net worth individuals and ordinary retail investors is unlikely to be as strong as it was last year. "Investors have become far more selective and are now much more mindful about where they see higher potential for returns," said Umesh Agrawal, fund manager at 360 ONE Asset.


Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Jaishankar refutes Trump's India-Pakistan ceasefire claims: ‘Was in the room when JD Vance spoke to PM Modi…'
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has refuted Donald Trump's claim that he secured a ceasefire between India and Pakistan using trade negotiations, and dismissed rumours that the conflict affected India-US trade relations, PTI reported. He was speaking to Newsweek in Manhattan on June 30. Jaishankar is on an official visit to the US and will travel to Washington DC to participate in the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting on July 1 (today). After the interview, answering a question about Donald Trump's ceasefire claim and whether there was any negative impact on India-US trade, Jaishankar said, 'No, I don't think so.' "I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their trade-offs. I think they are very professional and very, very focused about it,' he added. Jaishankar further said that there is a national consensus in India that 'our dealings with Pakistan are bilateral'. Recounting the event as he saw it unfold on then, Jaishakar shared, 'And in this particular case, I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President (JD) Vance spoke to Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India if we did not accept certain things.' '…the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do. On the contrary, he indicated that there would be a response from us. This was the night before and the Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, we responded very quickly thereafter,' he said. 'And the next morning, Mr (Secretary of State Marco) Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk. So I can only tell you from my personal experience what happened. The rest I leave to you,' he added. On the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar asserted that it was an act of economic warfare meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, and stressed that India will not allow nuclear blackmail to prevent it from responding to terror emanating from Pakistan. 'India has had a string of terrorist attacks over the years emanating from Pakistan and in the wake of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, there was a sentiment in the country that 'enough is enough',' Jaishankar said. He added, 'The Pahalgam attack was an act of economic warfare. It was meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, which was the mainstay of the economy. It was also meant to provoke religious violence because people were asked to identify their faith before they were killed. So we decided that we cannot let terrorists function with impunity. The idea that they are on that side of the border, and that, therefore, sort of prevents retribution, I think, that's a proposition that needs to be challenged and that is what we did.'


Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk dares Donald Trump to ‘CUT IT ALL' after US President threatens to axe Tesla subsidies
Just as everything seemed better between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, the Tesla chief threw down the gauntlet after the United States President threatened to end Tesla subsidies, daring him to 'cut it all'. Reacting to Donald Trump's suggestion that the government efficiency department, DOGE, take a look at the subsidies that Tesla CEO's companies have received in order to 'save money', Elon Musk said, 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now.' Donald Trump's comments came after Elon Musk renewed his criticism of sweeping tax-cut and spending bill, vowing to unseat lawmakers who backed it after campaigning on limiting government spending. In a post on Truth Social, Donald Trump said, 'Elon Musk knew, long before he so strongly Endorsed me for President, that I was strongly against the EV Mandate. It is ridiculous, and was always a major part of my campaign. Electric cars are fine, but not everyone should be forced to own one.' Threatening to slash Tesla subsidies, Donald Trump said, 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' This wasn't the first time Donald Trump has threatened to cut off Tesla subsidies and contracts when their relationship soured and the brawl over the tax bill spill all over the social media. While the tensions eased when Elon Musk regretted having made some remarks about Donald Trump – probably referring to the one where the Tesla chief insinuated Donald Trump's involvement in sex offender Jeffrey Epstein case. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump…They went too far,' he said. After weeks of relative silence following his earlier feud with Trump over the legislation, Musk rejoined the debate on Saturday as the Senate took up the package, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on X. On Monday, he said lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill 'should hang their heads in shame!' 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Elon Musk added. Musk called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated 'that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!'