Colorado's AG sues deputy, saying he illegally shared information with immigration agents
On June 5, Mesa County Deputy Alexander Zwinck allegedly shared the driver's license, vehicle registration, and insurance information of the 19-year-old nursing student in a Signal chat used by task force members, according to the lawsuit. The task force includes officers who work for federal Homeland Security Investigations, which can enforce immigration laws, the lawsuit said. After federal immigration officers told him in the chat that the student did not have a criminal history but had an expired visa, Zwinck allegedly provided them with their location and told her to wait with him in his patrol car for about five minutes, asking about her accent and where she was born. He let her go with a warning and gave federal agents a description of her vehicle and told her which direction she was headed so they could arrest her, the lawsuit said.
When Zwinck was told of the arrest, the lawsuit said he congratulated the federal agents, saying, 'rgr nice work.' The following day, one federal immigration agent praised Zwinck's work in the chat, saying he should be named 'interdictor of the year for the removal division of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.' Zwinck is also accused of violating the law again on June 10 by providing immigration officers with the photo of the license of another driver who had overstayed his visa, information about the person's vehicle, and directions to help them arrest the driver. After being told that immigration officers would 'want him,' Zwinck replied that 'We better get some bitchin (sic) Christmas baskets from you guys,' the lawsuit said.
The Mesa County Sheriff's Office declined to comment on the lawsuit. Spokesperson Molly Casey said the office is about a week away from finishing its internal investigation into the student's traffic stop and plans to issue a statement after it is finished. A working telephone number could not be found for Zwinck, who was placed on paid leave during the sheriff's office's investigation. Casey declined to provide the name of an attorney who might be able to speak on his behalf. The sheriff's office previously announced that all its employees have been removed from the Signal group chat.
Weiser said he was acting under a new state law that bars employees of local governments from sharing identifying information about people with federal immigration officials – a recent expansion of state laws limiting cooperation in immigration cases. Previously, the ban on sharing personal identifying information only applied to state agencies, but state lawmakers voted to expand that to local government agencies earlier this year. 'One of our goals in enforcing this law is to make clear that this law is not optional. This is a requirement, and it's one that we take seriously,' he said.
The law allows violators to be fined, but Weiser's lawsuit only seeks a judge's order declaring that Zwinck's actions violated the law and barring him from such actions in the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Britain seeks a crackdown on social media ads of human traffickers
LONDON: Britain says people who advertise fake passports or people-smuggling services on social medial could face up to five years in prison, in the government's latest effort to deter migrants from crossing the English Channel in small boats. The government said Sunday that anyone convicted of creating online materials intended to break UK immigration law will face prison time and a large fine. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the aim was to stop the 'brazen tactics on social media' used by smuggling gangs. 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country — whether on or offline — simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral,' she said. Assisting illegal immigration to the UK is already a crime, but officials believe a new offense — part of a border security bill currently going through Parliament — will give police and prosecutors more powers to disrupt gangs that send migrants on perilous journeys across one of the world's busiest shipping lanes. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said the crime gangs are a threat to global security and should be treated like terror networks. Since taking office a year ago, Starmer's center-left Labour Party government has adopted powers to seize the assets of people-smugglers, beefed up UK border surveillance and increased law-enforcement cooperation with France and other countries to disrupt the journeys. Despite that, more than 25,000 people have reached Britain by boat so far this year, an increase of 50 percent on the same period in 2024. Small boat crossings have become a potent political issue, fueled by pictures of smugglers piling migrants into overcrowded, leaky inflatable boats on the French coast. Opposition parties say the government's plans aren't working — though the government argues the problems built up during 14 years when the Conservative Party was in power, The Conservatives say Starmer should not have scrapped the previous government's contentious and expensive plan to send migrants arriving by boat on a one-way trip to Rwanda. 'This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing,' Conservative immigration spokesman Chris Philp said. The government says it will take time to clear a backlog of applications that has left thousands of migrants stuck in temporary accommodation — often hotels — without the right to work. The hotels have become flashpoints for tension, attracting protests fueled by a mix of local concern, misinformation and anti-immigrant agitation.
ArabGT
5 hours ago
- ArabGT
Tesla Hit with $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Crash
A courtroom in Florida may have just drawn a new line in the sand for autonomous driving. In a landmark ruling, a jury ordered Tesla to pay $243 million in damages following a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system. But beyond the headline figure, what really stands out is the message: when technology falls short, it can—and will—be held accountable. The tragedy claimed the life of Naibel Benavides Leon and left her former partner, Dillon Angulo, with lifelong injuries. Both were standing beside their parked Chevrolet Tahoe when a Tesla Model S, driven at high speed by George McGee, slammed into them. McGee had reportedly dropped his phone and was reaching for it when he ran a stop sign and red light—without any warning from the Autopilot system. The jury didn't let Tesla off the hook. While the driver bore a significant share of the blame, the court also held Tesla responsible—arguing that the design of Autopilot allowed for misuse, and that public claims from Elon Musk about its safety may have misled consumers. The verdict awarded $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages. Tesla was found liable for 33% of the total. For Tesla, this is more than just a legal blow. It's a moment of reckoning. The company pushed back, insisting the crash was due solely to human error and warning that this kind of ruling could slow progress in developing life-saving technology. 'No car—then or now—could have avoided this accident,' Tesla said in a statement. But for Dillon and the family of Naibel, this ruling was something else entirely: a recognition that something broke down when it mattered most, and that someone needed to be held responsible. Legal experts are calling it a turning point. Professor Alex Lemann of Marquette University noted, 'We've seen many fatal Autopilot crashes, but this is the first time Tesla has been hit with a major financial judgment. It changes things.' And it comes at a sensitive time. As Tesla navigates slowing EV sales and rising pressure to justify its massive market valuation, the spotlight is back on whether its bold promises about autonomy and AI are outpacing reality. At its core, this case raises a vital question: in a world racing toward automation, what happens when the machines we're told to trust fail us? The answer, at least in this Florida courtroom, is that someone must answer for it.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan sets up separate immigration counters for foreigners to boost tourism, investment
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has established separate immigration counters for foreigners at Lahore's Allama Iqbal International Airport to reduce clearance delays, an official said on Sunday, with the facility to be extended to airports nationwide. The development follows Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's directives to authorities this year to improve services at airports across Pakistan to facilitate passengers, businesspeople, tourists and overseas Pakistanis as part of the country's efforts to boost tourism and foreign investment. Pakistan, bolstered by a $7 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) program, is currently making efforts for export-led economic growth and has signed several agreements and memorandums of understanding with a number of countries, particularly those in the Gulf and Central Asia. 'Practical steps have been initiated to improve the immigration system and new immigration counters have been established for foreign passengers at Allama Iqbal International Airport, Lahore this week,' Mehmood Ali Khokhar, a Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) spokesperson, told Arab News. 'With these new counters, foreign travelers will no longer face unnecessary delays in immigration clearance.' Pakistan's travel and tourism market is projected to grow at an annual rate of 6.75 percent between 2025 and 2029 to reach an estimated market volume of $5.53 billion by 2029, according to Statista, a German online platform that specializes in data gathering. Similar immigration counters would gradually be established at all international airports across the country, according to Khokhar. This would also make the immigration process faster and easier for Pakistani citizens returning home. 'The purpose of these measures is to upgrade immigration services to meet international standards,' he added.
