logo
Stanley Fischer, economic and central banking titan, dies at 81

Stanley Fischer, economic and central banking titan, dies at 81

Axios02-06-2025
Stanley Fischer's resume as a top policymaker was remarkable. But it was his intellectual leadership and mentorship that made him a unique force in the last four decades of global economic policy.
The big picture: Fischer, a titan of economics and central banking who died this weekend at age 81, mentored generations of top economists and policymakers in his decades at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
He trained them on a school of economic thought that was intellectually rigorous — but hardly confined to abstract theory. Fischer's approach offered practical answers for policymakers navigating a recession or crisis.
His mentees included eventual Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke, former European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi, current Bank of Japan governor Kazuo Ueda — just the start of a who's who list of modern economic policy.
Fischer served in major leadership roles himself. He was the No. 2 official at the International Monetary Fund (1994-2001) and the Federal Reserve (2014-2017), as well as governor of the Bank of Israel (2005-2013).
Flashback: Fischer guided the IMF through the East Asian crises of the late 1990s, seeking to balance rescues of indebted nations with demands that they reform their domestic economies as a condition of aid.
While those reforms' results were painful at the time, affected countries — including Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and South Korea — boomed in the ensuing decade.
As head of Israel's central bank, he guided the nation through the Global Financial Crisis, which it weathered better than most countries.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ballooning U.S. National Debt Makes Short-Term Bonds A Wiser Choice
Ballooning U.S. National Debt Makes Short-Term Bonds A Wiser Choice

Forbes

time5 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Ballooning U.S. National Debt Makes Short-Term Bonds A Wiser Choice

The U.S. national debt is spiraling, and it's poised to reshape the bond market. The government is issuing Treasuries at a rapid rate, but demand is struggling to keep pace. This supply-and-demand imbalance may influence Treasury yields, making short-term bonds a potentially safer choice for fixed-income investors. Here's why short-term bonds, like the two-year, might be the smarter play in the current environment. The Debt Crisis And Treasury Yields The U.S. national debt has surged to $36.63 trillion as of last week, according to the U.S. Treasury's "Debt to the Penny" dataset. Recent legislative measures, including a December 2024 spending bill to fund the government and provide disaster relief, have contributed to a debt increase of approximately $1.13 trillion since September 2024, per data from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. This flood of new Treasuries is straining market absorption, as global demand—particularly from foreign investors—shows signs of waning. The resulting supply-and-demand dynamics could influence 10-year Treasury yields, which are at 4.46% as of last week, according to Trading Economics. While some forecasts, like The Financial Forecasts Center, suggest yields may decline to around 3.27% by February 2026, the persistent issuance of Treasuries could exert upward pressure if demand weakens further. Federal Reserve minutes from June 2025, as cited by CNBC, indicate a cautious approach, with most participants anticipating rate cuts, which could temporarily lower yields. However, the Fed's balance sheet, currently at $6.7 trillion, limits its ability to suppress yields through large-scale bond-buying without risking inflationary pressures. Market forces will likely dictate yield trends over the long term, and investors should prepare for potential volatility as sovereign risk grows. The Risks Of Long-Term Bonds At current yields of 4.46%, long-term bonds may not adequately compensate for potential risks. If yields rise due to increased Treasury issuance or shifts in market dynamics, bond prices will fall, particularly affecting longer maturities. The yield curve's recent behavior, with long-term rates holding firm despite anticipated Fed rate cuts, underscores this risk. Higher yields could also shift capital flows. A significantly higher Treasury yield, outpacing inflation—currently around 2.5% as of mid-2025 per latest Consumer Price Index numbers—or faltering GDP growth, could draw capital from equities in a volatile market BLS, 2025. Investors holding long-term bonds at today's yields could face price declines if yields increase, locking them into suboptimal returns. The Case For Short-Term Bonds In this climate, it's wise to focus on short-term bonds, particularly the two-year. These maturities are less sensitive to yield fluctuations, offering protection against price declines. Short-term bond funds, with durations of one to three years, are effective vehicles for navigating this environment. They also provide flexibility, allowing investors to reinvest at potentially higher rates if yields rise. In a recession, where Fed rate cuts might temporarily lower short-term yields, these bonds are likely to hold their value better than long-term counterparts. As market dynamics shift, short-term bonds position investors to balance safety and opportunity in a debt-driven market.

BONK Sinks 12% as Meme Token Sector Faces Heavy Sell-Off
BONK Sinks 12% as Meme Token Sector Faces Heavy Sell-Off

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BONK Sinks 12% as Meme Token Sector Faces Heavy Sell-Off

BONK experienced a steep 12% drawdown over the last 24 hours, declining from $0.0000317 to $0.0000276, while the broader CoinDesk Memecoin Index fell more than 8%. The price action unfolded within a broad $0.0000045 range, an intraday volatility of over 16%, with coordinated selling around the $0.0000322 level, where transaction volume surged to 1.03 trillion tokens, according to CoinDesk Research's technical analysis data model. The most severe downward movement was observed at 20:00 UTC on Tuesday, with BONK dropping precipitously on a single-hour volume spike of 2.59 trillion tokens. The selloff could be linked to traders pre-positioning ahead of the Federal Reserve's upcoming FOMC announcement. While technical support began forming around $0.0000280, sellers regained control, sending the token from $0.00002848 to $0.00002809, a 1.37% drop. Particularly notable was a five-minute interval from 10:47 to 10:52 UTC on July 30, when BONK fell 3.13% with over 60.6 billion tokens traded, underscoring the presence of aggressive automated liquidation activity, according to the model. Technical Analysis Highlights Price Range: $0.0000322 (high) to $0.0000276 (low), reflecting 16% intraday volatility. Resistance: $0.0000322 observed with 1.03T tokens traded during coordinated sell wave. Support: Critical zone near $0.0000280 tested multiple times under institutional pressure. Peak Selling Hour: 20:00 UTC on July 29 with 2.59T tokens exchanged. Flash Sell-Off: 3.13% drop in five minutes (10:47–10:52 UTC) with 60.6 billion tokens traded. Volume Behavior: Persistent imbalance between sell-side execution and buy orders. Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

A Few Questions for Aspiring Federal Reserve Chiefs
A Few Questions for Aspiring Federal Reserve Chiefs

Wall Street Journal

time35 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

A Few Questions for Aspiring Federal Reserve Chiefs

The discussion about President Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has been all about lower interest rates, with some hyperventilating about the Fed's independence and a kerfuffle over its renovation budget. Congress and the media should ask potential Fed chiefs to consider much deeper questions, including these: Should the Fed modify its 2% inflation interpretation of its 'price stability' mandate? Should the Fed aim for zero inflation, or a steady price level?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store