logo
Rachel Reeves admits she has no clue where Channel migrants will go instead of hotels

Rachel Reeves admits she has no clue where Channel migrants will go instead of hotels

The Sun12-06-2025
RACHEL Reeves yesterday admitted she has no clue where Channel migrants will go instead of hotels.
The Chancellor has vowed to scrap their 'costly' use within four years as part of her spending review — but could not say what would replace them.
3
3
3
Pressed on where arrivals would be housed, she passed the buck to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
Ms Reeves told Times Radio: 'Well, I'm not going to be providing accommodation.
"That's for the Home Office to do.
'But the wasteful spending on the most expensive form of accommodation is a terrible use of taxpayers' money.'
hotels to house asylum seekers.
The move allows Labour to claim it is 'ending' their use while still spending billions.
The Guido Fawkes blog said hotels in Bristol and Cardiff would be reclassified as 'normal' migrant accommodation.
Home Office sources strongly denied it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action
Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Met police arrest activists holding signs referring to Palestine Action

Twenty-nine people have been arrested after protesters gathered in central London holding signs referencing Palestine Action a day after the group was banned as a terrorist organisation. The direct action protest group was banned on Friday after a last-minute legal attempt to suspend the group's proscription under anti-terrorism laws failed. It means that, from Saturday, being a member of, or expressing support for, the organisation became a criminal offence, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The campaign group Defend Our Juries, which organised the demonstration, said 'a priest, an emeritus professor and a number of health professionals' were among those arrested. More than two dozen people gathered close to the statue of Mahatma Gandhi in Parliament Square, holding signs that appeared to express support for the group. At about 1.40pm, Metropolitan police officers began arresting people who were holding the signs. In a statement on X, the Met said: 'Officers have arrested more than 20 people on suspicion of offences under the Terrorism Act 2000. They have been taken into custody. Palestine Action is a proscribed group and officers will act where criminal offences are committed.' The force posted another update on X on Saturday evening to say 29 arrests had been made and added that those arrested remain in custody. A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said: 'We commend the counter-terrorism police for their decisive action in protecting the people of London from some cardboard signs opposing the genocide in Gaza and expressing support for those taking action to prevent it. It's a relief to know that counter-terrorism police have nothing better to do.' On Friday, the group wrote to the Met commissioner, Mark Rowley, to give him advance warning of the demonstration. Before officers made arrests, the Guardian spoke to some of the demonstrators. Tim Crosland, of Defend Our Juries, said: 'What we're doing here as a group of priests, teachers, health workers, human rights lawyers [is] we're refusing to be silenced. Because it goes to the core of what we believe in: that we oppose genocide – I didn't think that was that controversial – and we support the people who resist genocide. 'In theory we are now terrorist supporters and can go to prison for 14 years, which is kind of crazy. I think what we are here to do is just expose the craziness of that.' An environmental campaigner, Donnachadh McCarthy, said: 'To proscribe an organisation of peaceful direct action as terrorists is a huge red line for our democracy. It means that all the rest of us, whether we're climate activists, Greenpeace, women's suffragettes, disabled activists, it means that the government can now declare any act of property damage to be terrorism, which gives you a sentence of 14 years. 'This is worse than Putin's Russia. I don't say that lightly. It's 10 years for doing what we're doing today in Russia; it's 14 years in the UK, because of Yvette Cooper's outrageous betrayal of democracy, liberalism, and what is in my view a step towards fascism.' A retired priest, Sue Parfitt, 83, said the group's ban was 'a very dangerous move that has to be challenged'. 'We are losing our civil liberties, we must stop that for everybody's sake. Whatever you want to protest about,' she said. Cooper, the home secretary, announced plans to ban Palestine Action late last month, days after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton and defaced two military aircraft with spray paint. MPs voted in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday. The House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. UN experts, civil liberties groups, cultural figures and hundreds of lawyers have condemned the ban as draconian and said it sets a dangerous precedent by conflating protest with terrorism. The ban means Palestine Action has become the first direct action protest group to be banned under the Terrorism Act, placing it in the same category as Islamic State, al-Qaida and the far-right group National Action.

Home Secretary pledges blitz on delivery riders working illegally as she joins immigration officers on frontline raids
Home Secretary pledges blitz on delivery riders working illegally as she joins immigration officers on frontline raids

Scottish Sun

timean hour ago

  • Scottish Sun

Home Secretary pledges blitz on delivery riders working illegally as she joins immigration officers on frontline raids

THE Home Secretary has vowed to ramp up the arrests of illegal workers - as she joined teams on the frontline of Britain's immigration crackdown. Yvette Cooper teamed up with officers as they swooped on a Kent travellers' site targeting migrants suspected of working illegally as delivery riders. 2 Home Secretary Yvette Cooper Credit: Alamy 2 Deliveroo rider Credit: alamy But the suspects gave her the slip - with officers arriving to find they had already moved on. It comes as ministers ramp up a nationwide crackdown on gig economy abuse after The Sun exposed how migrants are working illegally as delivery riders while claiming taxpayer-funded support. Immigration Enforcement teams are now preparing to launch a fresh blitz across known hotspots, focusing on migrants suspected of working while living in free accommodation or receiving financial help. The law already allows asylum seekers to lose taxpayer-funded housing or payments if they are caught working illegally. But Ms Cooper will introduce new powers to toughen the rules and make it easier to cut off support when migrants abuse the system. The Government's new Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill will also force gig economy giants like Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat to carry out proper right-to-work checks on every rider to close loopholes and stop abuse. Ms Cooper told The Sun: 'These raids are part of a new intensive focus on the illegal working with delivery drivers and delivery riders, which is just a shocking abuse that is taking place, and we are determined to make sure that those rules are properly enforced.' Earlier this week, 20 Indian nationals were arrested in London during a raid on suspected cash-in-hand builders using illegally modified e-bikes. Further operations in the West Midlands and East of England have led to dozens more arrests in recent weeks. Director of Enforcement, Compliance and Crime, Eddy Montgomery, also said: "This next step of co-ordinated activity will target those who seek to work illegally in the gig economy and exploit their status in the UK. 'That means if you are found to be working with no legal right to do so, we will bring the full force of powers available to us to disrupt and stop this abuse. "There will no place to hide.'

Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour
Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Public sector reform may be the only route left for Labour

It is more than a quarter of a century since Tony Blair complained about the 'scars on my back' from two years of trying to reform the public sector. As the Cabinet Office supremo, Pat McFadden, noted in a speech on the same subject in December, Blockbuster Video and Toys R Us were still in operation at the time of Blair's comments, while Airbnb, WhatsApp and Spotify had yet to be born. Twenty-six years later, creative destruction has reshaped the private sector, in some ways unrecognisably, but the same old arguments swirl about modernising government. The case for public sector reform has become more urgent after the reversals of the past few weeks. A partial U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments, at a cost of almost £1.3 billion, turned out to be a mere appetiser for a near-total capitulation on attempts to cut welfare by nearly £5 billion. Those surrenders, plus a possible downgrade of the independent fiscal watchdog's productivity forecasts and other revisions, could blow a £30 billion hole in the public finances. After £40 billion of tax rises in October's budget — which put the UK on course for a record postwar haul of 37.7 per cent of GDP — the drums are beating to the rhythm of more taxes this autumn. Breaking a manifesto promise not to increase the burden on 'working people' could cost the chancellor her job. Cranking up taxes even further on businesses — which have swallowed £25 billion of extra national insurance contributions — and on capital gains, carried interest and inheritances would place another drag on already sluggish growth. Labour may have been handed an ugly fiscal picture by the Conservatives last year, but it is getting worse. Much valid criticism has been made of Rachel Reeves, Sir Keir Starmer and ­senior colleagues for their failure to persuade a recalcitrant parliamentary party of the need for realism in spending cuts. Although the winter fuel business was handled badly politically, reducing payments was right in principle, and £5 billion should have been just the start in controlling a benefits bill that is predicted to swell to £378 billion by 2030. The simple fact is that Labour is showing itself incap­able of getting the nation's costs down, and higher taxes would stifle the eco­nomy. Sharpening public sector productivity is the only plausible third way. Three articles we carry today offer a way forward. Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, argues that the present model of 43 county-based forces has not been fit for purpose 'for at least two decades' and should be replaced by 12 to 15 regional forces. He says this would reduce back-office duplication and allow the enlarged groups to make better use of technology. Rowley also makes the point that creaking social services are frequently forcing police officers to take on the role of social workers, especially in cases of children missing from local authority care. Penny Dash, the new chairwoman of NHS England, says the health service's dysfunctional bureaucracy makes her 'just want to cry'. There are examples of brand-new scanners lying idle, unused buildings on the NHS estate, operating theatre times routinely slipping and appointment letters being sent out to patients after they were due to be seen. Dash wants to open up data on NHS performance, including on individual doctors and teams, saying the institution should go 'really big on transparency'. Today we also report on the scandal of HS2, a rail project that could end up costing more than £100 billion despite suffering repeated delays. We reveal how contracts were struck with the private sector, on behalf of the taxpayer, that contained no element of risk. This meant that there was no incentive for many of the contractors to operate efficiently, as they were safe in the knowledge that if the costs over-ran, the taxpayer would pick up the tab. The new boss of HS2 has pledged to re­negotiate the contracts. His approach should be replicated across Whitehall. In truth Labour has so far taken the easy options for improving public sector performance, awarding workers above-inflation pay rises and increasing capital budgets. Sensible cabinet ministers now accept in private that those pay deals should never have been struck without some kind of union commitment to workplace reform. The next steps will now be harder, involving confronting vested interests, including Starmer's own backbenchers. Blair, with his record landslide in 1997, was prepared to sustain scars in pursuit of reform — and even he made ­limited progress. The big question is whether Starmer and his team are up for and up to the challenge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store