Rents jump shocking 15% after NYC ditches broker fees
Rents shot up a shocking 15% in the week since the controversial FARE Act took effect, with the average rental in the Big Apple jumping from $4,750 to $5,500, according to an analysis by real estate analytics firm UrbanDigs.
6 New Yorkers have been sharing conversations with brokers like this one since the FARE Act was enacted on June 11.
Advertisement
'The Manhattan rental market has seen a sharp reaction,' said John Walkup, UrbanDigs' co-founder.
The FARE Act, which prohibits agents representing property owners from charging renters a 'broker fee,' also requires that all fees a tenant owes be included in rental agreements and real estate listings.
But the rising rents 'suggests that landlords may be attempting to incorporate broker fees into the rent, which would transfer the cost to renters in a less direct, but very real way,' added Walkup.
Advertisement
6 Walkup said the market reacted 'sharply' to the FARE Act.
UrbanDigs
The law change has created what insiders tell The Post is a 'shadow market' — apartments that aren't listed so landlords can still get tenants to cover the fee.
'We're going to be looking for apartments again like it's 1999 … where you have to know who to call and when to call,' said Jason Haber, co-founder of the American Real Estate Association and a broker at Compass.
'It's going to be an odyssey.'
Advertisement
6 Ricciotti said tenants have been asking if they can just pay the broker fee instead of the higher rent, which works out to more money over the long-term.
BOND New York Real Estate
And listings dried up overnight with an estimated 2,000 vanishing from website StreetEasy on June 11 — the day the FARE Act took effect — while UrbanDigs found available apartments dropped by an eye popping 30%.
6 A renter posted this screenshot of the two different asking prices.
Renters meanwhile have been sharing horror stories online, with receipts — like screenshots of conversations with brokers flat out telling them they get one price if they pay the broker fee and another, much higher rate, if they don't.
Advertisement
One New Yorker, for instance, was told by an agent the rent was going up $700.
6 Kebenae Tadesse said agents have still been trying to get tenants to pay the fee.
Helayne Seidman
Another said a landlord was asking $6,800 for a 3-bedroom with a broker fee — or $8,000 with no fee, which is illegal to advertise under the new law.
'We've been inundated with prospective tenants who have asked our agents for the option to pay our brokerage commission, directly and maintain the benefit of the lower pre-Fare Act rental terms, which unfortunately, we have to tell them is now illegal,' said Bruno Ricciotti, principal at Bond New York.
'It's so frustrating,' said Kebenae Tadesse, who had been trying to find a Brooklyn studio.
'Brokers have repeatedly said, 'Well, if I don't charge you this fee, the landlord is just going to put it into your rent,' she told The Post. 'It's discouraging.'
6 Rents went up by 15% on average since the FARE act went into effect.
goodmanphoto – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
When Tadesse called out a broker for trying to pass on the fee to her, the agent took down the listing, marking it as 'temporarily off market' on StreetEasy since June 11.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
The city and state's fiscal pain just got real —and it was all so avoidable
Albany and City Hall are now staring at some wicked fiscal headwinds, a key watchdog reports — but it's not like they weren't warned. The Citizens Budget Commission is flagging both the city and state's massive budgets, slamming them as 'unaffordable and unprepared' in light of federal funding cuts and a possible economic slowdown down the road. With passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which aims to (slightly) curb the growth of federal outlays, including aid to New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul is directing state agencies to cut $750 million from their budgets. When folks gripe, she'll just point her finger at Trump. Convenient, no? But about reckless and dishonest as can be. And she'll still have to find another $3 billion — and that's assuming no further cuts from Washington in the short term and an economy that remains robust. Plus, the long-term structural gap, CBC says, is now a monstrous $22 billion. It was all sadly predictable, but Hochul and state lawmakers nonetheless decided to blithely run up the tab — to a whopping quarter of a trillion dollars–plus — figuring they can blame the GOP when they have to make cuts or raise taxes. Take health care: Lawmakers boosted spending on it by 17%, even as the Empire Center's Bill Hammond predicted federal Medicaid cuts would shift over $3.3 billion in costs to the state. In April, budget expert E.J. McMahon slapped Hochul and the Legislature for 'whistling in the dark' instead of anticipating likely changes to the state's 'nearly out-of-control Medicaid program.' Now the gov's budget director won't rule out raising taxes, even though Hochul vowed she wouldn't. The CBC instead urges to keep her promise and instead shred her $2 billion 'inflation reduction checks' (i.e., reelection bribes), for starters. The group also called out the city's $116 billion spendapalooza and hit both Albany and City Hall for not squirreling away enough reserves. Whoever become mayor in November, it noted, will have to fill a $6 billon to $8 billion budget gap in just 16 days of taking office. It also ripped mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani's planned tax hikes to cover his ludicrous plans for $10 billion in new outlays. He'd be setting a record for irresponsibility. New Yorkers are now sure to be hit with some pain, whether it's spending cuts or tax hikes. The pols will try to shift blame, of course, but the public wouldn't be in this mess if their leaders had acted like adults from the start.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
City Council lefties tackle ‘affordability' by driving up grocery prices. Brilliant
'Affordability' is New Yorkers' No. 1 issue, per Gov. Kathy Hochul and Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani. So what did the City Council just do? It passed a measure (by a veto-proof majority) virtually guaranteeing grocery prices will shoot up — specifically, by requiring app-based delivery companies to shell out a minimum of about $21 an hour to delivery workers. The companies will just pass on their added costs to the public, driving business down in the process. The union representing the city's first responders say under the new rates, rookie FDNY EMTs — whose starting pay is $39,386 — will earn less than illegal-immigrant deliveristas. And who knows how many of these delivery workers will soon be out of jobs, thanks to this bill: When the council, in December 2023, bumped up the minimum wage to $18 for app-based restaurant delivery workers, menu prices jumped 12% and app fees spikes 58%. Consumers spent 10% more on deliveries the next quarter than during the same quarter the year before. (Inflation was just 4% in 2023.) But not only were customers screwed, so were the people the hike was supposed to help: the workers. For starters, the average tip amount plunged by $2.64. Worse, many lost their jobs: Active worker accounts on delivery apps fell 9% in Q1 of 2024 over Q1 in 2023; UberEats couriers sank by 12,000. This time, some in the industry are projecting the hikes will push up grocery-delivery costs by 46% on New Yorkers directly, and 13% on local grocery stores. Can you think of a more direct assault on 'affordability'? Actually, we can think of one — and it'll be plain as day if socialist Zohran Mamdani becomes mayor and tries to make the city 'affordable.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opendoor stock is another AMC or Gamestop
Opendoor stock is another AMC or Gamestop originally appeared on TheStreet. GameStop has been a dying business for more than a decade. Once it became viable to download video games directly to your device, the retail chain began its slow march to irrelevancy. Stock prices, however, do not have to correlate with a business's actual prospects. If people want to buy shares in a company that's in steady decline — really a managed death, in the case of GameStop — there's nothing stopping them from doing does have some positives. It has mostly short-term leases, which allows the chain to close down failing stores relatively quickly. That's positive for a CEO looking to wring any remaining value from the brand or one who wants to try finding something else to sell. GameStop has not been a brand with an idea toward making a major pivot. 💵💰💰💵 It's a dying business that has remained solvent partially by selling shares of its stock, which was driven high by Reddit groups. These groups, although they sometimes pretend otherwise, didn't buy shares becuse they believe this is a strong company that will make a huge turnaround. Instead, many bought shares because they believed they could manipulate the stock price higher. That worked, at least for a while, but it's rare that social media memes can actually push a stock price higher. Failing real estate business next target Opendoor is one of those business ideas that seemed promising, but which never really panned out. It's one of a number of companies, along with Zillow and RedFin, that attempted to disrupt the traditional real estate model. Under the traditional system, someone selling a home uses a traditional Realtor to list their home for sale. That professional looks at comparable sales and tries to get the seller the best price possible. In most cases, the buyer has their own Realtor as well, and when a deal gets made, the seller pays a commission of 3% to both the buyer's and their own Realtor. That's a total of 6%, which seems steep, so countless businesses over the years have tried to find a better model. Opendoor tried to do that by making sellers an offer on their home, before it gets listed. "When you work with us, you can explore the market knowing you already have an offer on your home. All of our selling options include a built-in cash offer from Opendoor," the company shared on its website. More experts: Fed official sends strong message about interest-rate cuts Billionaire fund manager sends surprising message on trade deficit Hedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming Greece Basically, the company was supposed to disrupt the real estate market by making it easier for people to sell their homes. Zillow had a similar idea, but the problem for both companies quickly became obvious. Buying a home directly left little wiggle room, so offers had to be low compared to what the seller might find on the open market. It was a business idea that simply did not pass the "real life" test. Opendoor makes a meme comeback Opendoor has undergone mass layoffs and continues to exist, but it's a shadow of its former ambitions. The company's stock has been trading below $1 since April and below $2 for much of the year. On Friday, July 18, it made a miraculous comeback. "Digital real estate platform Opendoor Technologies has recently exploded in popularity among retail investors, as its stock has jumped by 180% over the past week. The surge came after a bullish X post on July 14 by Eric Jackson, the head of EMJ Capital and an early Carvana bull, who shared a turnaround thesis for the struggling company and placed a long-term price target of $82 per share. Since that post, trading activity in Opendoor shares has soared by 140% compared to the previous month," Tipranks reported. The problem is that Opendoor's history has shown it's a niche business. It has sold about 3,000 homes for each of the past two years. There's no reason to believe that its business will grow meaningfully over the next few years, and while its stock may be worth more than the $0.78 it was trading for on July 11, an $82 target is a fantasy from an investor looking to make a media splash. He cited that the company will be the only player in iBuying after Zillow and Redfin have exited that market. What he doesn't say is that they stopped buying homes because it's capital-intensive and has a massive downside risk. Jackson provided cover for Reddit memes and other speculators to push Opendoor, despite its limited upside opportunity. Analysts agree on a broad basis that the company has limited potential."Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on OPEN the average OPEN price target of $0.83 per share implies 63.1% downside risk," Tipranks added. Much like GameStop and AMC, Opendoor has a limited business model. It might build a sustainable upside, but the opportunity isn't anywhere close to what many people thought years ago. Just because Reddit and social media have jumped on Opendoor using Jackson's prediction as cover does not mean this is a good stock with strong upside. It's another failing brand with a flawed business model and a stock price low enough to be manipulated. Opendoor stock is another AMC or Gamestop first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 20, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 20, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
