Democratic lawmaker's town hall repeatedly interrupted by audience members shouting about Gaza
Congressional newsFacebookTweetLink
Follow
A town hall hosted by Democratic Rep. Bill Foster of Illinois on Tuesday was repeatedly interrupted by audience members shouting about the ongoing war in Gaza.
The town hall comes as House members have returned to their districts for a weekslong district work period. The war in Gaza and US support for Israel has been a long-simmering political flashpoint, opening up divides within the Democratic Party. Many of the interruptions touched on the current starvation crisis in the enclave.
A UN-backed food security agency has warned that 'the worst case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza, its starkest alert yet as starvation spreads and Israel faces growing international pressure to allow more food into the territory.
Not long into the start of the event, one attendee disrupted remarks from the congressman and began shouting out criticism of funding to Israel, claiming that those funds could have gone to Americans. A moderator interjected and told the attendee that they would have to leave.
The audience clapped after the shouting stopped and the moderator directed the congressman to continue speaking. 'Look, it's a hard time for everyone,' Rep. Foster said afterward, 'when I wake up some mornings I just say, what the heck is going on, it comes out – that sort of tenseness comes out in different ways in different people and I have a lot of understanding for people that have a hard time dealing with it.'
Shortly after, another audience member yelled out, identifying themselves as a Palestinian American. 'Our people are dying in a genocide … they have been starving to death. There is no food, there's no aid. There is no nothing. I'm your constituent, you have done nothing. You have done nothing to represent us.'
After continued shouting, the moderator asked, 'Congressman, can you please answer the question that people are asking: What is your position on the war in Gaza?'
'I'm signed on to every ceasefire letter,' he began to say, before another interruption from a shouting audience member began.
It is unclear whether those shouting were removed from the venue, but in many instances the shouting eventually trailed off and then became more distant.
'I have voted for defensive weapons for Israel. I think that, for a number of reasons that's the right thing to do,' said Foster.
One audience member yelled out, 'Why is that the right thing to do?'
The moderator interjected, saying, 'Please let him answer the question, sir, and do not interrupt again.'
'Bibi Netanyahu, the leader of Israel, has done things to Israel that should never be forgiven,' the congressman said after he resumed speaking.
'The things that I admired most about Israel has been systematically destroyed by Bibi Netanyahu, you know the rule of law, undercutting it,' the congressman said, before being interrupted again by more shouting from the audience.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.
The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Smithsonian slated to restore Trump impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History said it is slated to restore the placard with information about President Trump's two impeachments after removing it from the exhibit last month. The museum said in a Saturday statement that the section will be 'updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history.' The Washington Post reported on Thursday, citing an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans, that the removal of the placard occurred as part of an internal content review the institution agreed to after pressure from President Trump's administration to get rid of the art museum director. The Smithsonian said on Saturday that the placard, part of the exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,' did not meet the institution's standards and argued no one within the administration asked the museum to remove the information. 'The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation. It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case,' the Smithsonian said in a statement. 'For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit,' the museum added. The placard, before being removed last month, detailed Trump's two impeachments and was featured as part of the exhibit since September 2021, the Smithsonian previously told The Hill. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025,' a Smithsonian spokesperson said. 'The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion,' the spokesperson added. 'Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance.' The president was impeached two times during his first White House term: once over a phone call where he allegedly asked Ukraine to investigate then-ex-President Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, and the other over his alleged role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He was acquitted by the Senate in both instances. The removal of the placard drew backlash from Democratic Party lawmakers. Trump signed an executive order in March, ordering the removal of 'divisive narratives' from the Smithsonian museums that are not compatible with the administration's views and 'remind' Americans 'of our extraordinary heritage.' 'As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories. As has been recently reported, in July, a placard was removed from the National Museum of American History's exhibit 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden,'' the Smithsonian said on Saturday. 'The intent of the Impeachment section of the exhibit is to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history,' the institution added.
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on
Fed-up Senate Republicans are starting to whisper about recess appointments again as Democrats stonewall them on nominees, cutting into the start of August recess. Why it matters: Senate leaders and the White House are still negotiating on a deal to end the standoff. But skipping town and letting President Trump speed-run his nomination list is an increasingly attractive option, some GOP senators told Axios. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) posted on Saturday. Recess appointments, as well as using the nuclear option to change chamber rules with a simple majority to expedite the confirmation process, are becoming real possibilities as talks drag into the evening. The Senate is in session on an August weekend voting on nominations, as Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the White House struggle to find a compromise. How it works: Recess appointments would give Trump leeway to jam through numerous nominees without having to go through the usual Senate confirmation process. The Senate would have to agree to adjourn with a majority vote, and the House also would have to come back into town and agree to adjourn and cancel scheduled pro-forma days. Those nominees would only be able to serve through the end of 2026 — and without payment. Zoom in: Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of uncontroversial nominees, per a source familiar. Democrats are also willing to commit to another batch later in the year — but only if it is formally written into an agreement that the deal is off if the White House so much as sends over another rescissions package. Republicans continue to point out that Democratic stonewalling is unprecedented. Typically, even the minority party ultimately allows some level of deference to the party in power and allows lower-level nominations to move more quickly.
