logo
US Navy ships are languishing in repair yards

US Navy ships are languishing in repair yards

Minta day ago
The USS Helena was preparing to leave dock after more than six years of stop-start repairs when a young sailor was electrocuted and died. His death further delayed the return to action of a submarine that epitomizes the Navy's struggles to maintain its fleet.
Sonar technician Timothy Sanders had told his mother several times that he was concerned substandard repair work on the submarine would get someone hurt. A Navy report concluded that he died last May after inadvertently touching an electrical source left uncovered by repair workers, his mother said.
President Trump has called attention to U.S. shortcomings in building new naval vessels. The Helena's history of costly, sometimes chaotic repairs highlights another problem: America is also struggling to fix the ships and submarines it already has.
While Sanders' death is an extreme example of what can go wrong in U.S. shipyards, the shipbuilding and repair industries have long complained that a lack of experienced staff has led to mistakes and delays. Limited dry dock capacity and aging equipment are also challenges.
Timothy Sanders was a sonar technician who had expressed worries about substandard work on Navy vessels, his mother said.
The problems reflect a lack of investment in public yards after the Cold War-era and a broader decline in the American maritime industry. Those issues are now coming into sharp relief amid a greater focus on naval preparedness.
Naval experts are concerned that tardy or substandard work in repair yards will keep ships and submarines out of action during a potential war in Asia—a conflict expected to be fought in large part at sea.
Maintenance delays are already causing disruptions. The Marine Corps, for instance, has been prevented from deploying and training on schedule because of the poor upkeep of amphibious warships.
The importance of naval readiness was underscored Friday when Trump ordered two submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions," in response to comments by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
Repairing naval vessels often takes longer than scheduled. Roughly a third of surface ship maintenance wasn't completed on time last year, Navy officials have said. In recent years as much as two-thirds has been late, and officials have said improvement is needed to hit the Navy's combat-readiness target.
One submarine, the USS Boise, will have been out of action for 14 years before it is scheduled to head back to sea in 2029 after more than $1.2 billion worth of maintenance work.
Repairing ships on time has become a persistent challenge, Admiral Daryl Caudle, Trump's pick as chief of naval operations, told a Senate confirmation hearing in July.
'We need a better approach to how we're doing maintenance," Caudle said. The Navy could learn from cruise lines, he added, which typically have better ship availability.
Getting vessels back to sea quickly matters more than ever because the U.S. fleet has shrunk. In the late 1980s, the Navy had some 600 vessels. Today it has about 295.
Fewer vessels coupled with longer maintenance times creates a vicious circle. Available ships spend longer at sea, suffer more wear and tear, and then require greater attention back at dock.
A Navy official said maintenance times were improving, and that there were 49 construction projects under way—worth about $6 billion—that would bolster repair infrastructure.
The Navy is committed to addressing the findings of the probe into Sanders' death, and preventing future incidents, the official added.
The Navy's difficulties with ship repair increased in the 1990s, when the U.S. halved the number of public shipyards mandated to maintain nuclear aircraft carriers and submarines.
The four remaining government-owned yards were set up over a century ago, designed to build wind- and steam-powered ships. They suffer from aging infrastructure, with more than half their equipment past its expected service life, according to the Government Accountability Office.
A shortage of experienced workers is a major problem. With some shipyard welders earning roughly the same as fast-food workers, many have left the profession, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office. Inexperience reduces productivity and increases accidents, adding to delays, the CBO said.
To tackle the resulting backlogs, the U.S. needs to invest in more dry docks, naval experts say.
Delays in maintaining and fixing ships means the Navy has fewer vessels to deploy at times of increased activity, said Bryan Clark, a naval expert at the Hudson Institute think tank.
At one point in 2019, all but one of the Navy's six East Coast stationed aircraft carriers were stuck in docks. The USS Abraham Lincoln had to endure an extended, 295-day trip to the Middle East—the longest carrier deployment in the post-Cold War era—partly because its replacement suffered electrical issues that took longer than anticipated to fix.
Delays persist. U.S. destroyers took a combined 2,633 extra days to repair than planned last year, according to a Navy official. The figure was an improvement, they said, without giving comparable data.
The Navy has struggled to maintain its ships and submarines, such as the USS Helena, on schedule.
The USS Helena, a Los Angeles-class attack submarine first launched in 1986, has become a poster child for the Navy's maintenance problems. In recent years, the vessel has spent more time in dock than out at sea.
Submarines have a particularly strict cycle of inspections and maintenance, typically going into dry dock every two years for up to six months.
But the Navy has been behind on submarine repairs since the 2010s, when it decided to give priority to other tasks including overhauling aircraft carriers, Clark said.
To ease the backlog, the Navy in 2016 decided to send the Helena to shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls Industries' yard in Newport News, Va. The move was supposed to herald the return of private yards to repairing nuclear-powered vessels. However, HII hadn't done repair work in nine years and its skills base had atrophied.
Work on Helena, which started in late 2017, was initially slated to take months but the vessel ended up staying at the company's yard for several years.
Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent on everything from painting and cleaning to fitting new hull tiles that help avoid detection and adding underwater microphones, contract data shows.
Delays on the Helena were cascading, deferring work on other vessels, including the Boise.
The Navy said the Helena was the oldest submarine of its type in the fleet and the maintenance required was more complex than initially envisaged. HII declined to comment.
Helena was delivered back to the Navy in January 2022, HII said at the time. The vessel, however, soon needed further work done at a Navy yard.
On May 24 last year, Nicole Sanders was at home when she answered the door to see uniformed naval officers.
Her son had been killed by a 440-volt shock, almost four times the voltage that feeds a standard U.S. lightbulb, she said the Navy report found. The report hasn't been made public.
'It's akin to having an electrician come into your house and leave wires exposed," Sanders said.
After weeks of NCIS inquiries and grief counseling for the crew, Helena sailed to the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The visit coincided with the arrival in the area of a new Russian submarine.
Shortly after, the Helena left for Puget Sound on what would be her final voyage. Last month, the submarine was decommissioned.
'That long period of repair and maintenance ended up being a waste of time and money," said the Hudson Institute's Clark.
Write to Alistair MacDonald at Alistair.Macdonald@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India Calls Out Hypocrisy: Why It's
India Calls Out Hypocrisy: Why It's

India.com

time28 minutes ago

  • India.com

India Calls Out Hypocrisy: Why It's

30 जुलाई 2025 को भारत पर 25% टैरिफ और जुर्माना India-Russia Oil Trade 2025 : On Monday, 4th August , U.S. President Donald Trump criticized India for buying oil from Russia and making profits from it. In response, India strongly disagreed and said that such comments are unfair and wrong. India made it clear that it will do whatever is needed to protect its own interests and economy. On his social media platform, Truth Social, Donald Trump said in the evening that India is buying a lot of oil from Russia. He also claimed that India is making big profits by selling some of that oil to other countries. Trump also said that India doesn't seem to care about how many people are dying in Ukraine because of Russia's war. Because of this, he plans to increase the taxes (tariffs) India has to pay when selling goods to the U.S. by a large amount. Trump's latest criticism came just a few days after he said he would impose a 25% tax and some kind of extra punishment on India for buying defence equipment and energy (like oil and gas) from Russia. In a statement on Monday evening, India's Ministry of External Affairs explained that India started buying oil from Russia because the countries that normally sold oil to India (called traditional suppliers) began sending their oil to Europe after the Russia-Ukraine war began. Earlier that day, India's Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said that the world should be fair for everyone and not controlled by just a few powerful countries. (Note: 'Traditional oil suppliers' means the countries that India usually bought oil from in the past—like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and UAE.) India has been criticised by the US and European Union for buying oil from Russia after the war in Ukraine began. But on Monday, August 4th, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said that India started buying oil from Russia only because the countries it usually bought from began selling more to Europe during the conflict. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal also said that, at that time, the US itself had supported India's oil imports from Russia to help keep global energy markets stable. Donald post India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!! President DJT India has said that when it comes to buying energy, it looks at what is available in the market and the current global situation. On Monday,4th August, MEA spokesperson Jaiswal explained that India buys oil in a way that helps keep energy prices steady and affordable for people in the country. He said that India is buying oil out of necessity because of the global market situation. But it's surprising that the same countries blaming India are also doing business with Russia. The difference is, for them it's not a need like it is for India. According to reports and statements from the Indian MEA, the European Union is still engaged in significant business with Russia, even with sanctions in place. In 2024, the EU's trade in goods with Russia was valued at €67.5 billion (about ₹5,63,625 crore). A large portion of this trade included key materials like energy products, particularly Russian Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), which reached record import levels. They also traded in fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel, and machinery. Additionally, in 2023, the EU traded services with Russia worth €17.2 billion (about ₹1,43,620 crore). Similarly, the United States, while having a much lower total trade value, continues to import critical goods from Russia. These include materials essential for its nuclear and electric vehicle industries, such as uranium hexafluoride and palladium, as well as chemicals and fertilizers. These figures are often highlighted by the Indian government to emphasize that many countries continue to do business with Russia despite the public stance against the conflict. In comparison, India's own trade with Russia, while growing significantly, is primarily driven by a massive increase in its import of Russian crude oil. Speaking at the First BIMSTEC Traditional Music Festival in New Delhi on Monday evening, India's Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar said, 'The world today is going through difficult and uncertain times. People across countries want a fair system where all nations are treated equally, not one where only a few powerful countries control everything.' (Note: BIMSTEC stands for Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. It is a group of seven countries – Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Nepal, and Bhutan – that work together on regional issues like trade, security, and development.) He said that people often talk about making the world more balanced in politics and the economy. But he added that countries can also gain respect and pride by showing their rich culture—especially through their cultural strength. Last week, Trump said that from August 1, goods coming from India to the U.S. will face a 25% tax, along with an extra penalty. He gave several reasons for this: India buying oil and weapons from Russia, keeping high taxes on imports, and creating tough and unfair rules that make it hard for U.S. businesses to trade with India. On July 31, Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. If their weak economies fail together, it doesn't matter to me.' On Saturday, August 2nd, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke at a rally in Varanasi. He said that the global economy is facing many problems and is unstable. During such times, it's important to protect India's economy. He added, 'From now on, whatever we buy should follow one rule – we should only buy things that are made by hardworking Indians.' Stepping Up the Pressure Trump's announcement on July 31 about adding a 25% tax and an extra unknown penalty has worried many Indian exporters. Those selling low-profit items like clothes and shoes are especially concerned. They fear that these higher taxes could lead to fewer sales and even job losses. In his post on Monday, August 4th, Trump did not talk about the extra 'penalty' he had mentioned earlier. The 25% tax he announced for India is higher than the taxes the U.S. has set for other countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam, and some ASEAN nations. India and the U.S. have not yet agreed on a trade deal. One major issue is that India has not given enough access to American farm products. Another problem is that India continues to buy a large amount of oil from Russia. This has upset Trump, especially as he is angry with Russia over the war in Ukraine. These issues have created tension between India and the U.S. Trump wants the Russia-Ukraine war, which has been going on for three years, to end quickly. So, he sees this as a good time to put pressure on countries like India and China for buying goods from Russia—especially since both countries are in the middle of important trade talks with the U.S. According to the think tank GTRI, China—not India—is the biggest buyer of Russian oil. In 2024, China bought oil worth $62.6 billion (about ₹5,22,000 crore), while India bought $52.7 billion (about ₹4,39,000 crore). But Trump is not blaming China, possibly because of political reasons, and is unfairly targeting India instead. Drop in Oil Imports from Russia Over the past few months, as the U.S. and other Western countries increased pressure on India, Indian oil companies—especially government-run ones—had already started reducing their purchases of Russian oil. This happened even before Trump announced any extra tax or 'penalty' on India. Latest ship tracking data shows that in July, India received much less Russian oil compared to before. This oil was likely ordered in May or early June. People in the industry also said that government-run Indian oil companies have now stopped placing new orders for Russian oil, which had been India's main source of oil for almost three years. As per Indian Express, data from global tracking firm Kpler shows that India imported around 1.6 million barrels of oil per day from Russia in July. This is a 24% drop compared to June, and 23.5% less than July last year. The share of Russian oil in India's total oil imports also went down—from 44.5% in June to 33.8% in July. People in the oil industry and trade experts say that the fresh pressure and warnings from the U.S. and Europe in recent weeks have affected India's oil trade with Russia. This could be the start of Indian oil companies slowly moving away from buying oil from Russia. Until now, India had carefully balanced its need for energy with global political pressure. But now, one expert said, India has fewer choices. He added that Indian oil companies must prepare not only for business changes but also for major global political shifts. According to sources, the government and key groups—mainly oil companies—are discussing how to handle the situation and what options India has. By cutting Russian oil imports early, India has already sent a small message to show its stand. What happens next will mostly depend on how India's relationship with the U.S. develops, and whether Trump decides to take a tougher stand against Russia. If the U.S. and Russia make progress in talks over the Ukraine war, it could reduce the pressure on countries like India that buy oil from Russia. Is India Really Making Huge Profits? Trump has earlier spoken against India buying oil from Russia, but this is the first time he has said he is upset about India 'selling that oil for big profits.' To clarify, India does not sell crude oil to other countries. However, it does export refined fuel products like petrol and diesel made from that crude oil. Some people criticize India for buying a lot of oil from Russia at cheaper prices. They say India refines this oil into products like petrol, diesel, and jet fuel, and then sells these fuels to other countries, including European nations—even though Europe has banned direct imports of oil from Russia. India has said that it is not doing anything wrong by buying oil from Russia or selling fuel made from it. Russian oil is not banned, but the U.S. and its allies have only set a price limit on it. Also, since India buys crude oil from many different countries, it is hard to tell which fuel comes from which country's oil. It's important to note that while the US and Western countries want to reduce the money Russia earns from oil, they don't want Russian oil to be completely removed from the world market. That's why, instead of banning it with sanctions, they set a price limit on Russian oil when Joe Biden was president. Russia is one of the biggest oil producers in the world. If its oil is removed from the global market, prices everywhere could rise sharply. Countries like India say that by continuing to buy Russian oil, they have helped keep international oil prices stable. The Biden government was okay with letting Russian oil continue to be sold, as long as it was sold at a limited price. This price cap was meant to reduce Russia's earnings without causing oil prices to rise too much worldwide. But Trump has taken a tougher approach. He is now warning that countries buying oil from Russia, like India, may face financial penalties. (Note: The price cap was introduced to cut down Russia's income from oil sales—used to fund the war in Ukraine—while still keeping oil available in the global market to avoid a price hike.) What is a Price Cap on Russian Oil ? A price cap means setting a maximum price at which Russian oil can be sold. Here's how it works in simple words: The U.S. and its allies (like G7 and the European Union) decided to let Russian oil continue to be sold in the world market. But they said: 'You can't sell it for more than a fixed price — for example, $60 per barrel.' This cap was made to reduce the money Russia earns from oil (which it could use to fund the war in Ukraine) but still allow oil to flow into the market to keep prices low for other countries. So, India and other countries can still buy Russian oil, but if they want to use Western services (like insurance, ships, or banks), they must follow the price cap rule. If they pay more than the cap, they may lose access to these services or face other penalties. Summary: Goal: Reduce Russia's profits without causing oil shortages or high global prices. How: Set a maximum selling price for Russian oil. Limit: For example, $60 per barrel. Who set it: U.S., G7, EU, and allies.

With 1971 war ammo, Indian Army fires back at US over Russian oil hypocrisy
With 1971 war ammo, Indian Army fires back at US over Russian oil hypocrisy

India Today

time28 minutes ago

  • India Today

With 1971 war ammo, Indian Army fires back at US over Russian oil hypocrisy

As tensions rise over US President Donald Trump's warning against India's imports of Russian oil, the Indian Army took a not-so-subtle dig by revisiting a decades-old chapter in history to put the spotlight on American military aid to Pakistan during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation Army's Eastern Command shared a newspaper clipping dated August 5, 1971, detailing US weapons supplies to Pakistan in the lead-up to the war. The post was captioned, "This day, that year build up of war - August 5, 1971." The headline of the clipping read, "US arms worth $2 billion shipped to Pakistan since '54."advertisementThe article was about then Defence Production Minister VC Shukla's address in Parliament, mentioning that while France and the Soviet Union had denied selling arms to Pakistan, the US continued supplying weapons.#IndianArmy#EasternCommand#VijayVarsh #LiberationOfBangladesh #MediaHighlights"This Day That Year" Build Up of War - 05 Aug 1971 #KnowFacts.". $2 '54"@adgpi@SpokespersonMoD EasternCommand_IA (@easterncomd) August 5, 2025 Shukla also accused Nato powers of overlooking Islamabad's aggression in Bangladesh. The piece claimed that both the US and China had sold weapons to Pakistan at 'throwaway prices,' implying that Islamabad fought the 1971 war with American and Chinese Army's post comes just 24 hours after Trump threatened New Delhi with higher levies if India continued buying Russian oil. The mercurial leader said he would 'substantially raise tariffs on goods from India' beyond the current 25 per cent if India didn't back off its energy ties with PUSHES BACKIndia responded to Trump's threats with a sharply worded rebuttal, taking apart Washington's own double standards. New Delhi ponted out that the US had 'actively encouraged such imports' from Russia in the early months of the Ukraine war, when energy prices were Ministry of External Affairs also pushed back at the European Union's criticism of Indian crude exports, saying Indian purchases were 'a necessity compelled by the global market situation.'It added that several countries targeting India were themselves 'indulging in trade with Russia' even though 'such trade is not even a vital compulsion.'PAKISTAN GETS A PASSEven as Trump threatens India with steeper duties, he has gone soft on Pakistan. In his latest executive order, he reduced tariffs on Pakistani goods from 29 per cent to 19 per cent, while raising rates for dozens of other nations, including India. The announcement came just before the August 1 tariff relief follows a flurry of engagements between Islamabad and the Trump camp. On June 18, Pakistan's Army chief Gen Asim Munir enjoyed a private lunch with Trump at the White House, barely a month after a brief military conflict with in July, Trump branded India a 'dead economy' and announced a raft of trade deals with Pakistan. Even as Indian officials warily eyed the growing bonhomie between Islamabad and Washington, the US President suggested that India might one day buy oil from Pakistan, which added to the diplomatic frost in India-US ties.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Putin's alleged daughter Elizaveta Krivonogikh condemns Russian president, signals support for Ukraine
Putin's alleged daughter Elizaveta Krivonogikh condemns Russian president, signals support for Ukraine

Economic Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Putin's alleged daughter Elizaveta Krivonogikh condemns Russian president, signals support for Ukraine

TNN Elizaveta Krivonogikh, allegedly Vladimir Putin's daughter, now lives in Paris and works in an anti-war art gallery while criticizing the Russian president's actions in Ukraine Elizaveta Krivonogikh, the 22-year-old woman widely believed to be the youngest daughter of Russian President Vladimir Putin, has posted critical messages online condemning the man she says 'destroyed' her life and was responsible for taking 'millions of lives.'Krivonogikh, now living in Paris, shared the remarks on a private Telegram channel named 'Art of Luiza,' a reference to her artistic pseudonym Luiza Rozova. In the post, she wrote, 'It's liberating to be able to show my face to the world again.' She added, 'It reminds me of who I am and who destroyed my life.' Also read: Meet Elizaveta Krivonogikh, the secret daughter of Vladimir Putin Though she did not name Putin directly, Krivonogikh has not denied longstanding reports linking her to the Russian leader. Her identity first emerged in a 2020 investigation by the Russian media outlet Proekt, which reported on her 'phenomenal resemblance' to Putin. She was born in 2003 to Svetlana Krivonogikh, a woman identified as a former housekeeper for Putin. While Putin is not named on her birth certificate, she was given the patronymic 'Vladimirovna,' meaning 'daughter of Vladimir.' Artist shifts toward anti-war message amid continued criticism Following initial media attention, Krivonogikh's lifestyle, documented on Instagram and characterized by luxury, was spotlighted by Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in 2021. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine later that year, her public presence diminished, and her Instagram account was deactivated. She has since returned to the platform but initially withheld her identity in now appears to be distancing herself from her past, working at a Paris art gallery focused on anti-war pieces. She has also adopted a new pseudonym, Elizaveta Rudnova, reportedly referencing Oleg Rudnov, a deceased ally of President she has been outspoken in her condemnation of the war in Ukraine, some critics question her authenticity and argue she should not be in positions where she may interact with Ukrainians. In response, Krivonogikh wrote, 'Am I really responsible for the activities of my family, who can't even hear me?'In earlier posts, she reflected on her former lifestyle, expressing disillusionment with the wealth and notoriety that came from her family connections. Her public statements now reflect a shift toward advocacy and personal independence. Also read: Putin ready to meet Zelensky, but sends chilling nuke warning to Trump as deadline nears President Putin is also reportedly the father of two additional children, sons aged 10 and 6, with former Olympic gymnast Alina Kabaeva, though no official confirmation has been provided.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store