Labour MPs poised to rebel over planning bill amid concerns for nature
The Guardian understands that about two dozen Labour MPs are calling for ministers to force developers to build more than a million homes for which they already have planning permission before pushing through legislation that rolls back environmental protections for the most protected habitats in England.
Ministers are understood to be drawing up amendments to the most controversial part of the bill, part three, in an apparent scramble to head off a rebellion and quell the anger of respected wildlife groups, whose membership is many millions strong.
Sources close to the discussions said there were red lines that could not be crossed to make sure nature was protected.
Related: Ten jewels of English nature at risk from development and Labour's planning bill
Alexa Culver, an environmental lawyer with RSK Wilding, said ministers were expected soon to present 'appeasement' amendments on part three so they could claim the legislation was not regressive.
She said: 'We should assume that ministers won't have sought the advice of the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) on these amendments. I urge us all to call for a further legal opinion from the OEP so that misleading ministerial statements aren't allowed to stay in circulation for too long.'
The Guardian revealed on Tuesday that three separate legal opinions – including the OEP's – say the bill rolls back environmental protections, including for more than 5,000 of the most sensitive, rare and protected habitats in England, leaving them vulnerable to destruction. Wildlife charities are calling on the government to scrap part three and redraw the bill when it returns to parliament on Monday.
Beccy Speight, the chief executive of the RSPB, said: 'The government must stop portraying this planning bill as a win-win for nature and economic growth. It is not. A thriving natural world is essential to underpin both growth and a resilient future. It's not too late for the government to address the issues with part three of the bill, and put forward legislation that can actually deliver economic growth and restore nature at scale.'
Property developers have yet to build 1.4m homes for which they have planning permission. In a tactic known as landbanking, developers hold land with planning permission to secure higher values, according to recent research by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).
Chris Hinchliff, the Labour MP for North East Hertfordshire, said that rather than pushing through a bill that allowed developers to pay to sidestep environmental protections, ministers should force developers to start building the homes they already had permission for.
Hinchliff has submitted a number of amendments to the bill aiming to strengthen protections for nature. He said: 'This legislation strips back environmental protections and local democracy but does nothing to stop developers drip-feeding developments to inflate prices. The planning system consistently approves more homes than get built. The bottleneck isn't simply process, it's profit.'
The rebel backbenchers are working with the Green party and the Liberal Democrats to form a large group that hopes to scupper part three of the bill, which they say is the most damaging, when the legislation comes to parliament next week.
Part three allows developers to sidestep environmental obligations by paying into a nature restoration fund, for environmental improvements elsewhere at a later date.
Related: Destroying our natural wealth makes us poorer in every sense of the word
The planning and infrastructure bill is central to the government's growth strategy, with a target to build 1.5m homes by the end of this parliament to address the UK's housing affordability crisis and drive economic growth.
Ministers announced recently that they were consulting on a range of measures to get developers building, including considering a use-it-or-lose-it policy, which was recommended by the IPPR in its report in February.
IPPR research shows that planning rules have been loosened over the past two decades but building rates have decreased during that time.
Hinchliff said there should a fresh approach to deal with underperforming developers. 'I've proposed financial penalties for developers who don't build as promised, and new powers for councils to block developments from firms which repeatedly land bank,' he said.
Terry Jermy, the Labour MP for South West Norfolk, said: 'Ensuring that homes with planning permission get built in a timely manner is part of the solution to our housing needs. There's a housing shortage in the country, which is costing local councils and the government huge sums of money in emergency and temporary accommodation, and the dream of home ownership remains out of reach for many. Tackling landbanking needs to form part of the government's focus to bring about the change needed.'
Dr Maya Singer Hobbs, a senior research fellow at IPPR, said: 'Developers are not deliberately building slowly to stymie housebuilding, but they are not going to build at a rate that will reduce house prices – it's not in their interest to do this, and indeed they have legal obligations to shareholders that would prevent this. There might be a case to explore whether giving local authorities the power to apply a 'use it or lose it' approach to planning permission would speed up delivery.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Know your rights: An immigration resource guide for L.A.
Organizations across Los Angeles County are available to help immigrants and allies in the community. The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) is a nonprofit organization that advocates for immigrant rights in Los Angeles County and throughout the nation. It holds in-person and virtual weekly workshops. For more information, visit the organization's website or call (213) 353-1333. Long Beach Forward is a local nonprofit organization that offers community outreach sessions and educational workshops. You can learn about the next session by checking the organization's calendar, calling (562) 436-4800 or following its Instagram account. The East Los Angeles Occupational Center has prerecorded immigration rights and resources webinars on its website from Los Angeles Unified School District officials. The recordings are in English and in Spanish. RepresentLA is a public-private partnership that provides legal representation to immigrants in custody or in the community, as well as those who face deportation or are seeking relief. The organization hosts an immigrant workshop on the last Wednesday of every month from noon to 2 p.m. at the South Whittier Community Resource Center, 10750 Laurel Ave. The workshop covers topics such as avoiding scams, understanding your rights in immigration court and determining eligibility for family-based immigration and citizenship. The L.A. County Office of Immigrant Affairs has an online calendar of 'know your rights' and legal assistance workshops. The office's website also serves as a hub of information and immigration resources. Catholic Charities of Los Angeles conducts regular workshops as well as informational sessions on citizenship and applications related to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The organization has an online calendar that lists its monthly events. Los Angeles City Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez's office is collaborating with Mijente, CHIRLA, the Central American Resource Center and other advocacy groups to facilitate regular training as well as provide free red resource cards at local field offices. The office has partnered with Mijente and deployed a community defense organizer to train local leaders and build rapid response networks specifically in Council District 1. You can reach the council member's City Hall office at (213) 473-7001, the Glassell Park field office at (323) 709-1800, or the Westlake district office at (213) 314-6290. Children's Institute has an in-person 'Keeping Our Communities Safe' workshop in English and Spanish every Thursday from 3 to 5:30 p.m. During the sessions, the staff reviews constitutional rights, how to identify different law enforcement agencies and how to respond safely during different types of encounters with these agencies. The institute is at 2121 W. Temple St., Los Angeles. You can call your local rapid response network to report ICE activity and enforcement actions. Participating organizations document immigration enforcement and can send trained individuals to assist anyone who is being stopped or questioned by agents. These networks can also provide you were referrals, information, resources (such as food and financial assistance) and, in some cases, direct support if your loved one was detained by immigration enforcement agents. Here is a list of local rapid response contacts compiled by the ACLU of Southern California and California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice. There are several organizations and law offices who are offering their services, in some case at a low-cost, to those affected by immigration enforcement operations. Your options for legal help include: You can also search for an immigration lawyer through the American Immigration Lawyers Association online locator tool. How to spot a fake immigration attorney: Scammers try to confuse immigrants into thinking they're an attorney by calling themselves a notario, notary public, accountant or consultant, according to the Federal Trade Commission. In Latin American countries, a notario or notary public is an attorney or has legal training, but that's not the case in the United States. How to protect yourself from the scam: You can verify whether a lawyer is legitimate by searching for them on the State Bar of California website and determining if they have an active law license.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit
The UK Government is backing Scotland with billions in investment to grow the economy and create jobs, the Chancellor has said ahead of her visit to the country. Rachel Reeves said Labour is 'seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has to offer' in defence and energy. She will visit RAF Lossiemouth in Moray and the St Fergus gas plant in Aberdeenshire on Friday, exactly a week after she toured the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport. The Chancellor will meet 200 Boeing staff at the military site where three new E-7 Wedgetail aircraft are being made. The UK Government said its plans to increase defence spending to 2.6% will raise Britain's GDP by around 0.3%, while adding 26,100 jobs to the Scottish economy. It also pointed to its £200 million investment for Aberdeenshire's Acorn carbon capture project, which could create 15,000 new jobs while safeguarding 18,000 more. A final investment decision for the project is yet to be made. Ms Reeves said: 'We're seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has on offer. 'Whether it's in defence to keep the UK safe, or clean energy to power all corners of the country, this Government is backing Scotland with billions of pounds of investment to grow the economy and create jobs.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the Government is investing in defence to 'ensure Britain's security and deter our adversaries and drive economic growth'. He added: 'This investment is a massive jobs opportunity for Scotland – this 'defence dividend' is good news for Scotland, where it will help create skilled jobs, drive economic growth, and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management.' Maria Laine, Boeing's UK president, said: 'Boeing has a long-standing presence in Scotland including at RAF Lossiemouth, the home to the UK's P-8 Poseidon fleet and where the E-7 Wedgetail will be based when it enters service. 'As a key partner of the UK Armed Forces, Boeing welcomes the defence spending increase and has seen first-hand how defence infrastructure investments, such as the £100 million Atlantic Building and new E-7 facilities at RAF Lossiemouth, can deliver for local jobs, suppliers and UK national security.' Michelle Ferguson, director of CBI Scotland, added: 'Scotland's energy and defence sectors are vital to our economy, driving investment and supporting thousands of skilled jobs. 'The Chancellor's announcement of £200 million for the Acorn energy project is very encouraging, but businesses are eager for final approval to unlock its full potential and secure North Sea jobs. 'Increased defence spending will further boost Scotland's skilled workforce and create growth opportunities across key supply-chain. 'Close collaboration between the Scottish and UK governments will be essential to fully realise these benefits, driving forward national security and Scotland's transition to a resilient, low-carbon economy.' Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce urged the Chancellor to drop the energy profits levy (EPL), the so-called 'windfall tax' on oil and gas companies, which has a headline rate of 78%. Chief executive Russell Borthwick said: 'If we stick to course on the accelerated decline of the North Sea, then we'll only have a few short years and not prosperous decades of future oil and gas from our own waters. 'Instead, we'll import more, pay more and suffer further consequences of jobs and businesses lost, just at the time we need them to support the energy transition. 'We know the Chancellor needs to find growth from somewhere within the UK economy. With oil and gas, there's no need to start from scratch or build out a nascent industry. 'Simply by removing the confiscatory EPL, letting investment flow into projects and stimulating activity in a sector which has been hammered by policy for too long, we can unlock significant growth in the UK economy.'
Los Angeles Times
8 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Costa Mesa invites residents to rezoning open house, but it's mostly the usual suspects
Attempting to draft a template for creating 'neighborhoods where we all belong,' Costa Mesa officials Wednesday kicked off a year-long visioning process for the citywide rezoning of major commercial and industrial corridors to allow for more high-density housing. An open house at the Norma Hertzog Community Center invited residents and city stakeholders to participate in the massive planning overhaul required for Costa Mesa to comply with a state mandate that it zone for an additional 11,760 residential units by 2029. Because many of the city's residential parcels are built out, accommodating that growth will require lots throughout the city to be rezoned for housing. Measure K, an initiative narrowly passed by voters in 2022, allows that to be done without triggering a popular vote. Although the measure passed more than two years ago, the city is just now beginning to drill down into the details of what development standards might be within those Measure K corridors, primarily along the city's Harbor and Newport boulevards and north of the 405 Freeway. 'Housing is one of the, if not the most important things in our lives. So, I'm glad you are all interested in housing and the future of housing here in Costa Mesa,' said Carrie Tai, the city's director of economic and development services, welcoming the crowd. After a brief introduction to the rezoning process and timeline (officials estimate they will be refining the zoning code updates by summer or fall of 2026) attendees were encouraged to circulate among and interact with a series of informational displays. The event drew about 70 participants, including many city planning staff and consultants with communications firm Kearns & West and planning firm Dudek. A dozen or more were current and former planning commissioners and council members, leaving just a handful of residents in the crowd, most of them not strangers to city meetings. Stations asked participants, in English and Spanish, to indicate what type of housing scenarios they've lived in, while another asked them to place stickers on their three top priorities for creating a good neighborhood, with options ranging from diverse housing types and outdoor space to mobility and having access to amenities. The format did not impress Costa Mesa resident Jay Humphrey, a senior and regular city council and planning commission meeting attendee who said a town hall forum with questions from and discussion among citizens would have been more informative. 'With this, I only know what I know — I don't know what he knows or she knows,' he said. ''The more you can get the community to be connected to the project, the more they participate, and the more they participate, the better we have it.' Cynthia McDonald, a local activist who campaigned against Measure K for precluding major rezoning efforts from a vote, agreed the city's consultant-driven process cuts out residents who may have professional backgrounds in legal or planning matters. She said she'd like to see a citizen's advisory committee contribute to the rezoning effort. City officials, however, contend they will seek to involve the public in a series of multiple meetings and discussions scheduled to take place throughout the community before the zoning code update is brought before the Costa Mesa Planning Commission and City Council for final approval. An Aug. 21 workshop at Costa Mesa City Hall, from 6 to 8 p.m. will focus on Harbor and Newport boulevards, and residents may attend an informational walking tour of the city's westside on Aug. 23, convening at the city's Senior Center at 10 a.m. A third meeting on Sept. 10 will tackle zoning issues in the city's north end, including SoBECA. One of Wednesday's interactive exhibits prompted visitors to write Post-it notes envisioning their ideal community. Suggestions in Spanish and English included more accessible bus stops, trees and mixed use developments as well as better walkability and bikeability. Those are all priorities for resident Marc Vukcevich, who campaigned for Measure K and has eagerly awaited the rezoning it allowed. 'The biggest thing for me is an abundance of housing with walkable amenities. That is, to me, what makes an amazing community,' he said. 'This is a mandate the state has on the city, and it has to be done within some reasonable timeline. It's the law, at the end of the day.' The meeting's end found Costa Mesa resident Andrew Kenny scrawling down his thoughts on a comment card. The 29-year-old, a college graduate attending Coastline College to study data science, came with girlfriend Christina Chyi, 26. The couple live in the city's South Pointe Apartments on Baker Street and believe something must be done to make housing more affordable for all. 'So many people have become accustomed to the idea that costs are just going up — it doesn't have to be that way,' said Kenny. 'With rezoning, more aggressive development and higher density development, a lot of those things could be alleviated.' Chyi, who worked in Newport Beach, said 'Costa Mesa was the closest place I could live that was 'more affordable,'' adding her own air quotes, given the median rent for a one-bedroom apartment hovers at $2,400 per month. 'We're just people who live in an apartment and figure it would be nice if apartments didn't have to be so expensive,' she said.
