
Conservative influencer announces she's leaving Texas to head back to California: ‘It is home for better or for worse'
White, 31, announced this week that she'll be returning to Los Angeles after living in Austin in hopes of being part of 'the solution' to help fix the ongoing issues instead of watching her home state 'burn' from a distance.
3 Conservative influencer Blaire White revealed she's moving back to California.
The Blaire White Project
'I was born there, so it is home for better or for worse,' the transgender social media star told her 1.5 million subscribers on YouTube.
'There are a lot of problems with California and a lot of people like to write off New York and California and say, 'Just let them go overboard, let them burn,' and I find that to be a very un-American perspective to hold.'
The YouTube star believes California is 'the most beautiful place in the world,' and shared it's a 'shame' that 'it's run by demons.'
'I want to be someone who's part of the solution. I want to be someone who doesn't run from problems,' White said.
'I moved to Texas in the middle of Covid. So I moved to Texas in crisis. The lockdowns weren't ending, so much trauma from that, so much craziness, so it was kind of like an evacuation.'
3 White, 31, announced this week that she'll be returning to Los Angeles after living in Austin in hopes of being part of 'the solution.'
Facebook / Blaire White
White also said that Los Angeles has now become 'ghetto and downtrodden,' but when she returns, she may seek political office in the future to help change the direction the city and state are heading in.
She was one of the many influencers and online personalities — including Joe Rogan — who fled California for Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic, amid the state's strict lockdown policies.
White was born in Corning, about 100 miles north of Sacramento, and has quickly gained popularity through her YouTube channel over the years for her outspoken political commentary and views on transgender rights and feminism.
3 The YouTube star believes California is 'the most beautiful place in the world,' and shared it's a 'shame' that 'it's run by demons.'
Facebook / Blaire White
'I am a transgender woman who lives my life and goes out every day as myself,' White told Newsweek in a 2017 interview.
'I have never been assaulted for being trans. I've never had anyone on the street say anything nasty to me about being trans. But I was assaulted for wearing a Trump hat. I think that speaks for itself.'
The YouTuber transitioned in 2015 while studying computer science at California State University, Chico.
Before starting on YouTube, she was a self-described 'social justice warrior' with left-leaning views, but said her views began shifting to the right during her college years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
42 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Law experts, observers raise questions as Ontario adds virtual courtroom restrictions
Ontario's lower courts are introducing restrictions on who can attend proceedings virtually after what they describe as an escalation of interruptions, a move that law experts and observers say raises questions about transparency. The Ontario Court of Justice released a new policy last week that would stop observers from accessing court proceedings online unless they receive authorization from the judge or justice of peace overseeing the case. Those interested in attending court cases are encouraged to show up in person, the policy says. It does not apply to proceedings at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The lower court attributes the move to a rise in deliberate disruptions of court proceedings referred to as 'Zoom bombings,' which is when participants disturb a virtual call with inappropriate content or messages. 'These disruptions are an impermissible attack on the integrity of the justice system and the administration of justice,' an interim policy notice said, adding that they often cause delays and can have negative effects for participants, court staff and jurists. Boris Bytensky, president of the Criminal Lawyers' Association, says changes to the observer policy were needed because of the 'despicable acts of disruption' caused by certain attendees in virtual courts. 'This is the only way to ensure that proceedings that are conducted by Zoom and bring the significant benefits to the system and to the parties that virtual proceedings offer are free from any unacceptable interference,' Bytensky said in an emailed statement. But some experts warn that the policy could be a step back when it comes to openness. Virtual court hearings on Zoom were first adopted in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic so court processes could continue amid government-mandated physical distancing rules. The continued use of videoconferencing technology in courtrooms since then has created a level of access people now expect, complicating the decision to change the policy, said Teresa Scassa, law professor at the University of Ottawa. 'At this point, the meaning of open courts or what is an open court has changed, and now you're taking away something that's there,' she said in an interview. While the new policy says physical attendance is still on the table, that is not an option for everyone, Scassa said. People with disabilities, those who don't drive and anyone who lives far away from courts do not always have the option to attend in person, she said. 'I have some sympathy for the challenges the courts are dealing with. But I do have some questions about whether the route that they've chosen is really the route that best respects the open court principles,' said Scassa. A small number of court proceedings only take place virtually. To observe these cases, the court says people need to request permission by emailing the court's communications officer — the same contact that media use to request access to virtual proceedings. Scassa said she has questions about how judges will decide who should and shouldn't get access: 'Does everybody get permission? Who gets denied permission? Is there some hierarchy?' The Ontario Court of Justice did not respond to a request for more information about the authorization process before deadline. Avid court observer Jenny Pelland said the court's new policy isn't surprising, as they've witnessed Zoom bombings many times over the past few years, especially in high-profile cases. 'I've seen some where it's been very graphic,' Pelland said in an interview, adding that the disruptions often display violent or pornographic content. Since the observer policy was announced, Pelland said courts have already been applying the rules differently, with some posting notices in the Zoom waiting room that public access is banned and others allowing access but requiring attendees to provide their full legal name or have their camera turned off. Such differences are not novel, with Pelland saying they've noticed limitations on access even in cases when they reached out to a judge or court clerk for permission in advance. 'For some courts in Ottawa, it's been almost impossible to log in for the past few months,' Pelland said. 'Some judges don't allow observers at all and it's not something new.' Alyssa King, associate professor of law at Queen's University, said understaffing is already a concern in Ontario courts, and adding more administrative burden for judges will cause inconsistencies in the way policies are applied across the province. 'It's not because anybody is acting in bad faith or trying to prevent the public from accessing the court,' she said. 'But they are people with a big workload and sometimes very high stress decisions that they need to make quickly … so any time you add to what they have to do administratively, that's tough.' A different process is still followed to allow access to virtual courts for victims and complainants. The court says they should get in touch with their local Crown attorney's office or victim witness assistance program. Jasminder Sekhon, director of community engagement, EDI and policy at Victim Services Toronto, said the court should consider updating its policies on that process to make sure it is more accessible and survivor-informed. 'Not just the victims should be able to apply, but also people should be able to apply on their behalf,' Sekhon said, adding that people who support survivors should also be considered to receive virtual access. For Linda McCurdy, a criminal defence lawyer based in Windsor, Ont., adding an extra step to prevent disruptions is a good way to preserve the integrity of the courts. 'I barely notice people in the court, but you really notice people on Zoom when they're doing stuff,' said McCurdy, adding that people tend to forget about formalities when calling in from their own homes. 'If you want to come and watch the proceedings, come to the court, come sit in the court. That's the way it's always been.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 25, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Los Angeles Times
43 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: How can LAUSD's gains continue if its one-time federal boost is used up?
To the editor: Congratulations to the Los Angeles Unified School District for its gains ('LAUSD test scores hit a new high, erasing pandemic lows with a second year of strong gains,' July 22). Yet it is important to recognize that the one-time federal money was spent on expensive labor-intensive programs (tutoring, summer school, classes during winter and spring break, intervention teachers and reading coaches) to address the harms of the COVID-19 pandemic. Supt. Alberto Carvalho, per the article, insists that 'the system in place should continue to build on the academic gains.' But with the money all spent, how can it? More clarity from the LAUSD on that point would be appreciated. Williamson M. Evers, Laguna NiguelThe writer is a senior fellow at the Independent Institute and a former U.S. assistant secretary of education for the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.


USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
'End of an era': Giuliana Rancic speaks out after E! News canceled
It's the #endofanera, according to longtime E! News host Giuliana Rancic. The former E! News host spoke out in a heartfelt Instagram post after the entertainment news program's cancellation was announced July 24, telling fans that "for 20 incredible years, E! News was my second home and family." Rancic starred on E! News from 2005 to 2021, joining as a cohost in 2006, including some hiatuses. Rancic, arguably one of the show's biggest stars alongside former on-air anchor Ryan Seacrest, left the show after the program's indefinite hiatus in March 2020 due, in part, to the network's suspension of all in-studio work amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The program will continue to air new episodes through Sept. 25. and E! plans to maintain its digital presence with its E! Online website. Staffers were informed of the cancellation on Thursday, July 24, and new episodes are expected to return next week. E! News to go off the air in fall 2025 in second cancellation "As the show comes to an end, I feel so fortunate to have been a part of this pop culture phenomenon that aired in over 100 countries and allowed me to travel around the globe meeting the most amazing and loyal viewers," Rancic wrote on Instagram. "Thank you to every single one of you for letting us into your homes every night," Rancic continued. "Anchoring E! News was my dream job and the professional honor of a lifetime #endofanera." The show returned in November 2022 after it was revived as a late-night news program, co-anchored by actress-singer Adrienne Bailon-Houghton and host Justin Sylvester, who found fame first on the "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills." After Bailon-Houghton departed, ex-"Entertainment Tonight" correspondent Keltie Knight joined Sylvester as cohost. "E! News," known for its punchy insider look at the entertainment industry, was originally hosted by reporter Dagny Hultgreen. Over the years, the newscast has featured on-air talent including Rancic, Seacrest, Jason Kennedy, Zuri Hall, Terrence Jenkins (better known as Terrence J), Maria Menounos and Catt Sadler. Some "E! News" correspondents will transition over to Versant, a spin-off of parent company NBCUniversal, although specific job opportunities have not been finalized. E! will continue to air its non-news programming, which includes reality-TV shows such as "Botched Presents: Plastic Surgery Rewind" and "Honestly Cavallari: The Headline Tour," as well as upcoming series "Kimora: Back in the Fab Lane" and "E!'s Dirty Rotten Scandals."