This company could save NASA's doomed Martian Sample Return mission
Lockheed Martin is trying to position itself as a savior for many NASA missions currently facing the chopping block at the hands of the Trump administration. The administration has already detailed massive budget cuts to NASA, which could include a complete shutdown of the Mars Sample Return mission, which Perseverance has been working on for the past several years.
However, Lockheed Martin — yes, the same company known for its extensive role in America's defense system — has come up with a fixed budget plan to save the Sample Return mission and bring back the collections Perseverance has already made.
Today's Top Deals
XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors
Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales
Best Ring Video Doorbell deals
Over the years, NASA has struggled to bring its plans for Mars exploration to life. While the Mars Sample Return mission was a great idea, its actual execution has been less than smooth, with the budget often skyrocketing above the original numbers NASA provided years ago when it started operating on the mission. The numbers have changed so much, in fact, that even before the Trump administration's shocking budget cuts, NASA was already looking at possibly canceling the MSR or finding cheaper alternatives. Thankfully, those cuts seem to have been relinquished for now, but it doesn't mean NASA is out of the fire just yet.
But Lockheed Martin's plan could make that unnecessary. According to a detailed post and video shared to Lockheed Martin's website, the company has come up with at least one way it could utilize existing services and vehicles to complete NASA's expensive Mars Sample Return mission. Further, the company says it would be able to pull it off for $3 billion, less than half NASA's current $7 billion projection.
If true, it could give NASA the extra hand that it needs to get the Mars Sample Return mission back on track. While Trump and others have put a renewed focus on actually getting humans to Mars, being able to understand the Red Planet better will be key to surviving there and creating a human colony that can thrive. That's why these samples are so important.
They could finally help us answer vital questions about the history of water on Mars, as well as determine the best places to land and colonize the planet. Of course, NASA and the U.S. government have to say yes to all of that first. But it's at least a nice plan that the bigwigs out there can mull over in the meantime. And, with a little luck, we could see the plans to can the Mars Sample Return turned on their head. And that would be a great thing to see.
More Top Deals
Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98
See the
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
What does Trump's tax law mean for your health insurance?
RFK Jr. has big plans for your food. Here are the facts. May 2, 2025
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Officials unveil high-powered contraption to fight dangerous issue at reservoirs: 'They tend to grow rampant'
Regional Water Authority personnel in Connecticut are doing their best Stanley Steemer impersonation. But instead of carpet cleaning, the team is using hot steam to battle invasive plants growing around reservoirs, according to WTNH News 8. "What I like about it is it seems to be controlling the seed bed as well as the plants that we're killing. The heat seems to be going into the surface layer of the soil," forester Casey Cordes said. The contraption looks like a carpet cleaner, with a hose connected to a hot steam machine. The workers are shown in footage shared by News 8, mushing up the invaders with water heated to 250 degrees Fahrenheit. The authority bought the equipment with a grant from the U.S. Forest Service, the TV station added. At issue are mugwort, stiltgrass, Japanese barberry, and other foreign plants that have taken root and spread quickly. The species have shallow root systems, so they don't hold soil well during heavy rains, which leads to erosion into reservoirs, per News 8. The troublesome weeds are also a problem for many homeowners. "They tend to grow rampant. They tend to take over areas in your yard or the edge of your yard. So, that gets the attention of a lot of homeowners," Cordes told the station. Columbia Climate School reported that the planet's overheating is aiding invasive species that take root in unwanted places. As conditions change in certain areas, native plants may not do as well as a new arrival, which can thrive and create an imbalance. The number of alien varieties, both plant and animal, is expected to jump 36% by 2050 as Earth continues to warm. An insect example is the emerald ash borer, which has destroyed 100 million trees in the United States since arriving from Asia. Which of these factors would most effectively motivate you to recycle old clothes and electronics? Giving me money back Letting me trade for new stuff Making it as easy as possible Keeping my stuff out of landfills Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The ash borer is among thousands of invasive species in the country that caused more than $20 billion in damages and losses annually from 2010 to 2020. That was a sharp increase from the $2 billion in yearly costs during the 1960s, according to a study published by ScienceDirect. In Connecticut, the steam treatment also avoids the use of harmful herbicides, which can leach into reservoirs, per News 8. Steam is likely not a viable option for most homeowners battling unwanted plant life. But there are planet-friendly ways to encourage native ones to grow. Native species are a boon to pollinators and, in turn, about 35% of the food supply, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Often, plants most people assume are weeds are actually native blooms that can be a part of a rewilded yard. Natural species require less work once established and don't need costly treatments and loads of water to maintain. A combination of steam and measures to encourage native plant growth could be a combination to tackle the unwanted and prolific outsiders plaguing reservoirs and backyards alike. "Deer are not going to eat them, insects are not going to eat them. So, they tend to run rampant in our forests," authority forester Joshua Tracy told News 8. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class
Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said it was 'agonizing' to vote for the tax cut bill President Trump signed on July 4. As details of the legislation come into focus, it's obvious why it might cause heartburn even for Republicans who passed it, with no Democratic votes. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as the law is clumsily known, will literally make the rich better off and the poor worse off. Some conservatives who want to pare the 'welfare state' may not care. But imposing austerity on millions of working-class voters is a stunning political risk for a party that is supposedly following President Trump's populist instincts. The law has two main elements. The first is a sweeping series of tax cuts and tax cut extensions that will generally benefit everybody but add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The second is a set of benefit cuts that are meant to reduce the overall cost of the bill. Those will hit working-class Americans and make the net effect of the bill punishing to them. The biggest part of the OBBBA is an extension of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017. Those were due to expire at the end of this year. The OBBBA makes the current individual income tax rates permanent. Those are not 'tax cuts' per se, since tax rates will be the same in future years as they are in 2025. But the law does prevent what would have been a de facto tax hike if the 2017 rates expired and the higher 2016 rates went back into effect. The law also includes some new tax breaks, such as the elimination of tax on income from tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. There's also a new tax break for some seniors and a much higher cap for deducting state and local taxes, which will mostly benefit wealthy homeowners who itemize deductions on their tax returns. The tax provisions generally benefit everybody, but the wealthy will gain the most. The average savings for all taxpayers will be about $2,900, compared with what the tax bill would have been if current rates expired, according to the Tax Policy Center. Those with incomes above $1 million would save nearly $60,000 on average. But the savings for workers with incomes below $30,000 would be less than $200 per year. Those provisions, at least, do no harm to most taxpayers. But the harm arrives when factoring in cuts to Medicaid, subsidies for people to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, and food aid known as SNAP. The healthcare cutbacks will leave an additional 16 million people without coverage by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Cutbacks to the SNAP program could reduce or eliminate food aid going to 22 million families, according to the Urban Institute. Those changes will leave millions of Americans worse off. When accounting for the tax changes and benefit cuts combined, people in the lowest income quintile, with incomes below $13,500, will lose an average of $600 per year, according to the Yale Budget Lab. The next quintile will lose $65 per year. The healthcare and food aid cuts will have little impact on top earners, for obvious reasons. The top quintile will gain $6,500 in after-tax savings from all of the law's provisions, while the top 1% will net more than $30,000. This is what economists call a 'regressive' policy change because the economic burden falls more heavily on those with lower incomes. 'The bill has four overriding characteristics,' Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center wrote recently. 'It is regressive, expensive, complicated, and it treats people who make roughly the same amount of money in very different ways.'Tax cut defenders often point out that the wealthy typically get the biggest tax cuts because they pay the most taxes in the first place. That's generally true. But the wealthy are a distinct minority, which means a regressive law such as the OBBBA dis-serves millions of voters, and possibly a majority of them. The bottom two income quintiles, for instance, include roughly 92 million taxpaying units, whether singles, married couples, or other designations. There are only 26 million taxpaying units in the top quintile. Maybe that's what Murkowski found so agonizing. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter on July 2. 'I know in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' Trump can point to working-class provisions such as the elimination of taxes on tip income and overtime pay, with limitations based on the type of work and the amount of income. Some workers will in fact benefit from those carve-outs. But tax analysts argue that favoring certain types of work in that manner violates the principle of 'horizontal equity,' the idea that similar incomes should be taxed in similar ways. To use the example of a restaurant, a waiter earning tip income would get a tax break that a cook paid hourly would not. That distorts the tax code, creates incentives to cheat, and generates legitimate grievances among the unlucky workers not gifted a tax break. The OBBBA is already unpopular, with 64% of Americans disapproving and just 35% approving, in one poll. The real vote will come in the 2026 midterm elections, when Americans will express whether they feel better off or worse off under unified Republican control of government. Getting Americans to like this law might be a more agonizing ideal than passing it. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.
