Buttigieg DOT ignored safety issues to build dozens of windmill projects near highways, railroads
At least 33 safety recommendations to place wind turbines well clear of the critical infrastructure were overruled in 2023 and 2024, according to a current department official, permitting the projects to be built close enough to possibly interfere with vital radio communications.
In March 2023, for example, the Commerce Department's National Telecommunications Information Administration informed an Illinois wind farm seeking regulatory approval that 'the turbine locations that fall within the one-to-three-mile boundary of these rails may be problematic for train communications in this area and present an undue risk.'
Advertisement
The Heritage Prairie Wind Energy Project had been under review for 45 days before DOT flagged the problem.
Nine months later, however, the Commerce Department issued another letter withdrawing the Transportation Department's previous concerns without explanation.
5 At least 33 safety recommendations originally made to place wind turbines farther away from the critical infrastructure were overruled between 2023 and 2024.
CAROLINE BREHMAN/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
Advertisement
'DOT continues to review and analyze the potential for harmful interference that might result from turbines placed within close proximity of rail, highway, and other transportation infrastructure, and reserves the right to make setback recommendations, or any other recommendation deemed necessary by the Department, on future projects,' the January 2024 letter stated.
The about-face came as the Biden administration was approving hundreds of billions of dollars in green energy tax credits for wind projects through one of the 46th president's signature legislative achievements, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is now launching a department-wide review of any wind farms near transportation infrastructure — and is accusing Buttigieg and former President Joe Biden of having let green energy objectives override safety concerns.
5 The Department of Transportation under then-Secretary Pete Buttigieg waived concerns to help approve dozens of windmill projects near America's highways and railroads, current DOT officials told The Post.
Getty Images
Advertisement
'Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg put climate religion ahead of safety — blatantly ignoring engineers who warned of the danger of constructing wind turbines near railroads and highways,' Duffy said.
'That's why I'm immediately implementing a higher standard of safety. What the past administration did is a shame, but it's a pattern for Biden and Buttigieg.'
Reps for Biden and Buttigieg did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
5 At least 1.2 miles of distance will now observed between wind farms and railroads or highways.
Getty Images
Advertisement
Current federal rules mandate at least 1.2 miles between wind farms and train tracks or roads after an independent study found that the former interfered with radio signals necessary to operate transportation infrastructure.
The Federal Aviation Administration will also start looking into potential affects on US airspace, which the Commerce Department's letter also referenced as a potential issue.
5 'Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg put climate religion ahead of safety — blatantly ignoring engineers who warned of the danger of constructing wind turbines near railroads and highways,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said.
AP
Another 140 wind projects were never given a safety recommendation at all by Buttigieg's DOT, a current department official noted, though it's not clear how many of those would have been placed within the 1.2-mile buffer.
The Post exclusively reported last week that the Transportation Department under Buttigieg approved more than $80 billion in diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, with Duffy charging his predecessor wanted to implement a DEI agenda 'while safety was ignored.'
In an interview with NPR Monday, Buttigieg defended his record as 'a tough regulator of airlines' after The Post also reported that industry officials claimed his department ignored their pleas to modernize air traffic control systems and address staffing shortages to improve safety.
5 The DOT's Office of Transportation for Research and Technology, then-headed by principal deputy assistant secretary Robert Hampshire, supported the changes involving wind projects, the pair of letters showed.
Christopher Sadowski
The DOT's Office of Transportation for Research and Technology, then-headed by principal deputy assistant secretary Robert Hampshire, supported the wind projects, the pair of letters showed.
Advertisement
In his June 2021 Senate confirmation hearing, Hampshire stated a primary policy goal of the department would be to 'advance equity by providing better jobs and better transportation options to underserved communities — including communities of color and rural communities.'
He added that the DOT would focus on ways to 'reduce the impacts of climate change by using more sustainable materials.'
Hampshire did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
42 minutes ago
- CNN
Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans
The US Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing to end certain abortion services to veterans, rolling back a Biden-era move to expand abortion rights. In a proposed rule filed Friday, the department said that it is seeking to revoke access to abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and the beneficiaries of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 'We take this action to ensure that VA provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families,' the department said in the filing. Under the Biden administration's rule, the department currently provides access to abortions when a pregnant veteran's life or health is at risk if their pregnancy were carried to term, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest — regardless of state laws. The proposed rule would allow abortions in cases where 'a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,' which, according to the filing, had been permitted even before the 2022 expansion. The Biden-era rule was part of the administration's efforts to expand abortion access after Republican-led states pushed ahead with restrictions in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that eliminated the federal right to an abortion. The VA argued at the time that it was necessary to give veterans access to abortions, saying, 'As abortion bans come into force across the country, veterans in many States are no longer assured access to abortion services in their communities, even when those services are needed.' But on Friday, President Donald Trump's VA slammed the Biden administration's rule, calling it federal overreach. 'The stated reason for (the expansion) was a reaction to a Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization … that itself was intended to prevent federal overreach and return to States control over the provision of abortion services,' the filing states. 'Yet, the last administration used Dobbs to do the exact opposite of preventing overreach, creating a purported Federal entitlement to abortion for veterans where none had existed before and without regard to State law.' Twenty states have banned or limited access to abortion. States where abortion is limited report higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, as well as greater economic insecurity. The proposed rule will now be open for public comment for 30 days starting Monday. In his first term, Trump made good on campaign promises and appointed Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Since that ruling, Trump has been keen to leave regulations over the issue to state governments. The Trump administration has overall been quiet on the issue of abortion in his second term. However, in June, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to rescind a 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures. CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi and Jen Christensen contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why your student debt balance may start climbing again this week
Millions of student loan borrowers are about to see a jump in their monthly payments. That's because an interest-free pause under the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan has ended as of Aug. 1. Emotionally intelligent people use the 2-week rule to motivate themselves and reach their biggest goals Exclusive: Google is indexing ChatGPT conversations, potentially exposing sensitive user data Cinemark is opening 6 new panoramic, 270-degree movie theaters in 2025, and 14 more next year. Is one coming near you? SAVE, rolled out in 2023 under the Biden administration, brought many borrowers' payments down to $0 a month, ensured borrowers' balances wouldn't grow as long as they made timely payments, and massively cut undergraduate loan balances. About 7.7 million federal student borrowers enrolled in the plan. But now, the end to a pause in interest under Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' means that interest will begin accruing once again on loans. In a press release earlier this month announcing the upcoming end to the pause, U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon called the SAVE program 'unlawful.' McMahon asserted: 'Congress designed these programs to ensure that borrowers repay their loans, yet the Biden administration tried to illegally force taxpayers to foot the bill instead. 'Since day one of the Trump administration, we've focused on strengthening the student loan portfolio and simplifying repayment to better serve borrowers. As part of this effort, the department urges all borrowers in the SAVE plan to quickly transition to a legally compliant repayment plan—such as the income-based repayment plan (IBR).' What should SAVE enrollees expect? Starting Friday, SAVE participants will see interest charges, even if they aren't making payments. The added interest means monthly bills will be higher, but how much higher depends on income. However, if they switch plans to the IBR plan McMahon referenced, borrowers may see their monthly bills rise drastically. While the SAVE plan calculated monthly payments based on 5% of a borrower's income, the IBR plan takes 10%. For older loans, it ticks up to 15%. (Student loan forgiveness for those with IBR plans was also recently paused under Trump.) Some experts believe the transition will pose a massive challenge for borrowers as they switch to other repayment plans. Nancy Nierman, assistant director of the Education Debt Consumer Assistance Program in New York City, said, per CNBC: 'In severe cases, it could result in people being forced to move, or they will just resign themselves to default and involuntary collections.' Are there any new plans in place? In addition to IBR plans, borrowers will have access to a new Republican-led plan, the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), but not until next July. Under this new plan, payments will range from 1% to 10% of a borrower's earnings, with bills rising the more they earn. Unlike IBR plans, RAP does not shield a portion of the borrower's income, and is based on total earnings before taxes. According to the National Consumer Law Center, the RAP plan is 'significantly more expensive for borrowers than the SAVE plan, but will also be more expensive than the other existing IBR plans for low-income borrowers.' What should SAVE enrollees do? The Department of Education said earlier this month that it will begin contacting SAVE enrollees about next steps and that participants should begin determining which plan best suits their needs. 'To compare available repayment plans, the Department encourages borrowers with loans in the SAVE plan to use the Loan Simulator to estimate monthly payments under available repayment plans, determine repayment eligibility, and learn which option best meets their repayment goals,' it said. The department also noted that in May, it resumed collections on delinquent loans, saying it has 'emailed more than 23 million borrowers to remind them of their legal obligation to repay their loans, as well as of the benefits of making regular progress toward repayment.'SAVE participants also have the option to stay in forbearance; however, the interest they accrue could be significant. Some experts say, in that case, making interest-only payments can help stave off mounting balances down the road. 'If you know it's going to really financially hurt you to start making payments, then just stay in forbearance,' Megan Walter, senior policy analyst at the National Association of Financial Aid Administrators, said per CNBC. 'If you can at least pay the interest, I would do that.' Borrowers who can't afford their monthly payments can also apply for forbearance or deferment. SAVE will officially shutter in July 2028. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Sign in to access your portfolio
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans
The US Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing to end certain abortion services to veterans, rolling back a Biden-era move to expand abortion rights. In a proposed rule filed Friday, the department said that it is seeking to revoke access to abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and the beneficiaries of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 'We take this action to ensure that VA provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families,' the department said in the filing. Under the Biden administration's rule, the department currently provides access to abortions when a pregnant veteran's life or health is at risk if their pregnancy were carried to term, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest — regardless of state laws. The proposed rule would allow abortions in cases where 'a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,' which, according to the filing, had been permitted even before the 2022 expansion. The Biden-era rule was part of the administration's efforts to expand abortion access after Republican-led states pushed ahead with restrictions in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that eliminated the federal right to an abortion. The VA argued at the time that it was necessary to give veterans access to abortions, saying, 'As abortion bans come into force across the country, veterans in many States are no longer assured access to abortion services in their communities, even when those services are needed.' But on Friday, President Donald Trump's VA slammed the Biden administration's rule, calling it federal overreach. 'The stated reason for (the expansion) was a reaction to a Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization … that itself was intended to prevent federal overreach and return to States control over the provision of abortion services,' the filing states. 'Yet, the last administration used Dobbs to do the exact opposite of preventing overreach, creating a purported Federal entitlement to abortion for veterans where none had existed before and without regard to State law.' Twenty states have banned or limited access to abortion. States where abortion is limited report higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, as well as greater economic insecurity. The proposed rule will now be open for public comment for 30 days starting Monday. In his first term, Trump made good on campaign promises and appointed Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Since that ruling, Trump has been keen to leave regulations over the issue to state governments. The Trump administration has overall been quiet on the issue of abortion in his second term. However, in June, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to rescind a 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures. CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi and Jen Christensen contributed to this report.
