Mary Queen of Scots' political scheming revealed in decoded missing letters
In 2023, codebreakers decoded secret and previously feared lost letters written by the 16th century monarch.
Hidden in the French national library, the 57 letters were mistakenly labelled as Italian - until computer scientist George Lasry, computer scientist, astrophysicist Satoshi Tomokiyo, and German music professor Norbert Biermann found them.
The trio solved the cipher system used by Mary, Queen of Scots during her imprisonment to encrypt the messages.
Since the discovery, historians Alex Courtney and Estelle Paranque joined the project, unveiling fascinating insights into the letters' content - which are due to be published in a book in 2027.
They say the letters see Mary orchestrate a number of political schemes, including trying to manipulate Elizabeth I's spymaster, Francis Walsingham, according to The Times.
Most of the letters are addressed to Michel de Castelnau de Mauvissiere, the French ambassador to England, who was a supporter of Catholic Mary.
She asks him to feed information about her, including direct instructions on what to say.
'Honestly, if you read the letters that are not ciphered, I thought she was a moron,' Ms Paranque said at the Chalke history festival in Wiltshire, The Times reported.
'But our ciphers — if you really try to put yourself back in 1581, as if you don't know who is going to win … I was reading them and thinking, she's going to win. They're that clever.'
She also mentions her son, the future King James I of England, repeatedly, calling him 'my poor infant' at one point.
'She's very good at turning on the waterworks when, rhetorically, it might be the best strategy,' Mr Courtney said. 'She is a particularly adept player of the very weak hand that she has.'
The letters date from 1578 to 1584, a few years before Mary's beheading 436 years ago today – February 8th 1587.
Mary Queen of Scots was the cousin of Queen Elizabeth I. She was imprisoned for 19 years in various castles in England.
While in captivity, Mary communicated with her associates and allies, making extensive efforts to recruit messengers and to maintain secrecy.
After being found to be plotting against Elizabeth, letters in code written by Mary were found and she was deemed guilty of treason and executed in 1587.
Speaking at the time of the letters' discovery, Mr Lasry said: 'Upon deciphering the letters, I was very, very puzzled and it kind of felt surreal.
'We have broken secret codes from kings and queens previously, and they're very interesting, but with Mary Queen of Scots it was remarkable as we had so many unpublished letters deciphered and because she is so famous.
'This is a truly exciting discovery.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU's $250 billion-per-year spending on US energy is unrealistic
BRUSSELS/HOUSTON, July 28 (Reuters) - The European Union's pledge to buy $250 billion of U.S. energy supplies per year is unrealistic because it would require the redirection of most U.S. energy exports towards Europe and the EU has little control over the energy its companies import. The U.S. and EU struck a framework trade deal on Sunday, which will impose 15% U.S. tariffs on most EU goods. The deal included a pledge for the EU to spend $250 billion annually on U.S. energy - imports of oil, liquefied natural gas and nuclear technology - for the next three years. Total U.S. energy exports to all buyers worldwide in 2024 amounted to $318 billion, U.S. Energy Information Administration data showed. Of that, the EU imported a combined $76 billion of U.S. petroleum, LNG and solid fuels such as coal in 2024, according to Reuters' calculations based on Eurostat data. More than tripling those imports was unrealistic, analysts said. Arturo Regalado, senior LNG analyst at Kpler, said the scope of the energy trade envisioned in the deal "exceeds market realities." "U.S. oil flows would need to fully redirect towards the EU to reach the target, or the value of LNG imports from the US would need to increase sixfold," Regalado said. There is strong competition for U.S. energy exports as other countries need the supplies - and have themselves pledged to buy more in trade deals. Japan agreed to a "major expansion of U.S. energy exports" in its U.S. trade deal last week, the White House said in a statement. South Korea has also indicated interest in investing and purchasing fuel from an Alaskan LNG project as it seeks a trade deal. Competition for U.S. energy could drive up benchmark U.S. oil and gas prices and encourage U.S. producers to favour exports over domestic supply. That could make fuel and power costs more expensive, which would be a political and economic headache for U.S. and EU leaders. Neither side has detailed what was included in the energy deal - or whether it covered items such as energy services or parts for power grids and plants. The EU estimates its member countries' plans to expand nuclear energy would require hundreds of billions of euros in investments by 2050. Its nuclear reactor-related imports, however, totalled just 53.3 billion euros in 2024, trade data shows. The energy pledge reflected the EU's analysis of how much U.S. energy supply it could accommodate, a senior EU official said, but that would depend on investments in U.S. oil and LNG infrastructure, European import infrastructure, and shipping capacity. "These figures, again, are not taken out of thin air. So yes, they require investments," said the senior official, who declined to be named. "Yes, it will vary according to the energy sources. But these are figures which are reachable." There was no public commitment to the delivery, the official added, because the EU would not buy the energy - its companies would. Private companies import most of Europe's oil, while a mix of private and state-run companies import gas. The European Commission can aggregate demand for LNG to negotiate better terms, but cannot force companies to buy fuel. That is a commercial decision. "It's just unrealistic," ICIS analysts Andreas Schröder and Ajay Parmar said in written comments to Reuters. "Either Europe pays a super high non-market reflective price for U.S. LNG or it takes way too much LNG volumes, more than it can cope with." The United States is already the EU's top supplier of LNG and oil, shipping 44% of EU LNG needs and 15.4% of its oil in 2024, according to EU data. Raising imports to the target would require a U.S. LNG expansion way beyond what is planned through 2030, said Jacob Mandel, research lead at Aurora Energy Research. "You can add on capacity," Mandel said. "But if you're talking about the scale that would be necessary to meet these targets, the $250 billion, then it's not really feasible." Europe could buy $50 billion more of U.S. LNG annually as supply increases, he said. The EU has said it could import more U.S. energy as its plan advances to end Russian oil and gas imports by 2028. The EU imported around 94 million barrels of Russian oil last year - 3% of the bloc's crude purchases - and 52 billion cubic metres (bcm) of Russian LNG and gas, according to EU data. For comparison, the EU imported 45 bcm of U.S. LNG last year. Higher EU fuel purchases would, however, run counter to forecasts for EU demand to decline as it shifts to clean energy, analysts said. "There is no major need for the EU to import more oil from the U.S., in fact, its oil demand peaked a number of years ago," Schröder and Parmar said. ($1 = 0.8571 euro)
BreakingNews.ie
18 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
France calls on EU to pressure Israel to move on Palestinian two-state solution
France has called on the European Union to pressure Israel to agree to a two-state solution with the Palestinians, the latest escalation from France as it seeks an end to the deadly Gaza war days after pledging to recognise Palestine as a state. Jean-Noel Barrot, the French foreign minister, told reporters at the United Nations that while there is international consensus that the time for a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is now, world powers need to back up their words with actions. Advertisement 'The European Commission, on behalf of the EU, has to express its expectations and show the means that we can incentivise the Israeli government to hear this appeal,' he said. Mr Barrot spoke on the first day of a high-level UN meeting on a two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is being co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia. The unoccupied US delegation seat at the United Nations General Assembly on Monday (Richard Drew/AP) The conference, which was postponed from June and downgraded to the ministerial level, is taking place in New York as international condemnation of Israel's handling of the war in Gaza reaches a fever pitch. Both Israel and its closest ally, the United States, refused to participate in the meeting, which Mr Barrot said is being attended by representatives of 125 countries, including 50 ministers. Advertisement The aim of the conference, Mr Barrot said, is 'to reverse the trend of what is happening in the region – mainly the erasure of the two-state solution, which has been for a long time the only solution that can bring peace and security in the region.' He urged the European Commission to call on Israel to lift a financial blockade on two billion euros he says the Israeli government owes the Palestinian Authority; stop settlement building in the West Bank, which threatens the territorial integrity of a future Palestinian state; and end the 'militarised' food delivery system in Gaza by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has resulted in hundreds of killings. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds. Ahead of the meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise Palestine as a state at the annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly in September. The bold but mostly symbolic move is aimed at adding diplomatic pressure on Israel. Advertisement France is now the biggest Western power and the only member of the Group of Seven major industrialised nations to recognise the state of Palestine, and the move could pave the way for other countries to do the same. More than 140 countries recognise a Palestinian state, including more than a dozen in Europe. At the conference opening, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa called for all countries who have not yet recognised Palestine as a state to do so 'without delay'. 'The path to peace begins by recognising the state of Palestine and preserving it from destruction,' he said. Advertisement The other issue being discussed at the conference is normalisation between Israel and the Arab states in the region. Prince Faisal bin Farhan, the Saudi foreign minister, stressed that normalisation of relations with Israel 'can only come through the establishment of a Palestinian state'. With global anger rising over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation, US President Donald Trump on Monday called for increasing aid to Palestinians, a rare glimpse of daylight between him and Mr Netanyahu, who has said there is no starvation. Both Mr Barrot and Mr Farhan said on Monday that the US is an essential actor in the region and that it was the president in January who secured the only ceasefire in the 21-month war. 'I am firmly in the belief that Trump's engagement can be a catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the long term,' Mr Farhan said. Advertisement
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
A reckoning is coming for the higher education sector
What would the founders of our great universities think of the news that no fewer than 637,000 graduates are now claiming Universal Credit? Perhaps they would have agreed with the late Kingsley Amis, who in 1960 greeted the expansion of higher education with the words: 'More will mean worse.' We do not have to endorse such cultural pessimism to accept that the precipitous rise in the quantity of graduates has been accompanied by a dilution in the quality of degrees. The results can now be seen. Students are running up huge debts, expecting their studies to amply reward them. But instead they end up finding themselves on benefits. Britain's welfare system was not designed for a generation which has lost all inhibitions about what it no longer calls 'the dole'. But the bigger concern is the university system itself, now on the brink of bankruptcy. In yesterday's Telegraph James Kirkup argued that the vanishing of the 'graduate premium' in earnings, combined with the loss of many 'graduate jobs' to AI, is reducing the appeal of a degree. Squeezed by demographic decline, universities are now financially dependent on foreign students, who pay higher tuition fees. Driven by voters' anger over migration, however, governments have cut visas for overseas students. Some 40 per cent of universities are now running deficits. Add to this the folly of the likes of Edinburgh University, which is apologising for the views of its Enlightenment luminaries such as Dugald Stewart and David Hume. If the prospectus is mandatory self-flagellation and not-so-genteel poverty, it is time to consider university reform.
