
Gerry Thornley: Talk of a breakaway rugby competition odd at such a perilous time for the sport
The founders and people behind R360 are former England international Mike Tindall, Stuart Hooper, who spent seven years as the director of rugby at Bath, player agent Mark Spoors and John Loffhagen, who was the chief legal adviser for LIV golf for a year.
Their proposal is to create two superclub competitions based on franchises, one between eight men's sides and one between four women's sides, which would compete initially in a seven-match season rising to 14 matches, to be run on consecutive weekends in two windows from April to June and then August to September.
Rounds would take place in a different city each week, with São Paulo, Barcelona, New York and Los Angeles all mentioned as potential venues to weeklong events, involving concerts. They want to hire the best 360 players in the world by doubling their salaries and claim to have interested backers from Formula 1 and the NFL, with eight franchises already agreed in principle at €55 million apiece.
READ MORE
They have conducted several meetings with player agents and representatives, and also the game's governing body, World Rugby. Players from countries, including Ireland, have signed non-binding heads of agreement and, potentially in some cases, contracts which are predicated on the premise that the R360 starts up by next September. For players in their late 20s or more, promises of doubling salaries would be an attractive end-of-career segue.
While the R360 has been in the planning for a while, and is reasonably well advanced, next September is a tight timeline and must count against the project taking off. It seems unlikely the unions and federations will give the R360 the green light, in which case World Rugby won't do either. In that scenario, it's harder to envisage players sacrificing their international careers.
It's also puzzling to see how the project could even begin to make a profit any time soon. Comparisons with the hugely lucrative, franchise-based Indian Premier League in cricket and LIV golf hardly seem remotely apt.
The IPL had a ready-made fan base in a country of one billion people, which dwarfs cricket's global popularity. It's hard to conceive of a major sport where its popularity is so concentrated in one country.
The Indian Premier League has been a massive success, but it takes place in a country where cricket dominates the sporting interests among the population of over a billion people. Photograph: Arun Sankar/AFP via Getty Images
LIV golf is backed by a trillion‑dollar petrochemical fund. Furthermore, when golfers on the LIV circuit pitch up at golf's Majors, they've tended to be less competitive and this would inevitably be the same were players to take a detour into a franchise-based mini league.
Imagine, say, franchises with amalgamated squads rolling into Dublin for a week, even ones with some leading Irish players, complete with new names and new strips, and tens of thousands of supporters buying into these teams as the R360 claims is the potential for this venture?
Rugby has tried something like this. They're called the Barbarians. They've held their place or worked, to a degree, thanks in large part to their longevity but they're not the attraction of yore for spectators.
That's just not the way rugby works. Supporters' loyalties have been generated over time, through family heritage and a strong sense of identity, be that local, provincial or national. It's hard to see R360 filling out Energia Park, much less the Aviva or Croke Park, and is even less likely to do so in the aforementioned cities in non-rugby territory.
Television money would also seem critical, but since the pandemic that has been a shrinking market, which is partly why rugby is facing such a perilous time. There is talk of the R360 initially being televised by Premier Sports, but they are not big spenders.
At best, this latest concept will not be a breakaway per se, but will be World Rugby-approved and somehow be squeezed into an already overcrowded calendar. At worst, it will cause a huge schism in the game which will do untold damage. Most likely, it won't happen and will serve as a working template for the next breakaway-type concept.
Because the drivers behind R360 are right about one thing, namely that the rugby keeps drawing from the same well, the international game, to fund pretty much everything else, including the club/provincial game, which save for the French Championship, is unsustainable.
There are too many self-serving, competing parts in rugby which are pulling in different directions. It seems ridiculous that every competition does its own deals, with no leverage from the World Cup down. The sport is ripe for the plucking, perhaps even by this R360, which is not entirely out of the question. And if not this one ...
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
Owen Doyle: For the good of the Lions tour, referees need to stop ignoring the rules of rugby
When Ronan O'Gara and Will Greenwood are right, and the match officials are wrong, it doesn't say much for the latter. My view is that of course it was a foul blow to the head of Mack Hansen . Waratahs' Fergus Lee-Warner was the guilty party just moments before teammate Darby Lancaster touched down in the corner. Referee Paul Williams and all of his supporting cast reviewed the incident. Their deliberations concluded that it was not dangerous play. The try stood when, clearly, it shouldn't have. It was a poor Lions performance in Sydney. Well, okay, maybe a bit better than that, but not by much. When Tadhg Beirne – strangely out of sorts – dropped a pass in the last minute, it mirrored what had gone on all day. I am referring to all the handling errors. Add that to being skinned at the breakdown and the 'quietly resolved' Joe Schmidt might just be thinking that this is a winnable series. Lions coach Andy Farrell spoke afterwards of the need to get out of the blocks faster and he is so right. Most of all, the performance was lacking intensity, lacking the ferocious physicality which must accompany them into the Test arena. It has to change or Schmidt could well have his day in the sun. The exception was the scrum, where the Lions pummelled the home team. Penalty after penalty was won, with their three tries originating from lineout mauls which followed. But, heck, is that what these Lions are about? Why not show belief, ambition and release the backs? With Sione Tuipulotu and Huw Jones in fine fettle, it bordered on the criminal. READ MORE Ireland impress as the Lions struggle Listen | 26:21 The Tests will be refereed by Ben O'Keeffe, Andrea Piardi and Nika Amashukeli. It is important to know whether or not they'll referee the same way as the New Zealand men have done so far. The game 'down south' (and to a lesser degree up here) sees referees ignoring blatant side entries and sealing off the ball at the tackle-breakdown. To some extent, the Lions joined in, so real clarity is needed here from World Rugby. Frenchman Pierre Brousset will handle the Brumbies match and both teams will want him to produce his A-game, which he certainly didn't in Australia v Fiji. French referee Pierre Brousset during the Champions Cup semi-final between Leinster and Northampton in May. Photograph: Laszlo Geczo/Inpho Against both Queensland and the Waratahs, scrum problems returned. There is a serious inconsistency in whether the referee penalises collapses immediately or resets it; plays on with no advantage, or plays on with advantage. Scrum penalty decisions, often questionable, have far too much influence on results. The lineout shenanigans, outlined here last week , continued. The very first throw of the match was as crooked as the proverbial dog's hind leg and was right in front of Williams. But he allowed play to continue until his TMO tipped him off. Throw-ins directly to the front man were one apiece, neither noticed by any official. Each team had a try correctly ruled out following TMO intervention. On both occasions a lifter inserted himself in front of the catcher as the maul formed – blatant obstruction. It's harder to pick up by the referee at ground level than you might think, but with a little awareness it is very doable. However, it's difficult not to be suspicious that some refs are leaving these decisions, including the throw-ins, to the TMO. So much is going to, or coming from the TMO, that their input is now becoming too close to dominating proceedings. Owen Farrell and that wonderful Lions player of yore, the never-to-be-forgotten Belvederian Tony O'Reilly, have something in common. Both were 33 years of age when they received late call-ups to perform at the high end of the game. O'Reilly's amazing try-scoring exploits still stand as a Lions record: six tries in 10 tests, 38 in all tour matches. Owen Farrell of the British and Irish Lions looks on during last Saturday's match against Waratahs in Sydney. Photograph:He was playing for London Irish when recalled to the Ireland team in 1970, against England at Twickenham, after a seven-year break. Unsurprisingly, it didn't work out. O'Reilly's chauffeur then returned him to his day job of leading the Heinz corporation, with some soft insults ringing in his years. 'Beans means has-beens', and 'you really landed in the soup this time' were as nasty as things got in those days. Farrell stood down from Test rugby after the 2023 Rugby World Cup, departing for Paris to play for Racing 92, on a tip-top financial deal. It was an unfortunate failure, due both to injury and a dip in form. Then, in early May this year, he suffered a concussion against Lyon in the Challenge Cup semi-final. He has not played since. It's impossible to think of any other player with a similar profile who has ever earned a call-up, anywhere. Andy Farrell assures us that his son is fighting fit, but can he really be Lions match-level fit? However this works out, the optics aren't particularly good, but that's not going to bother either Farrell. Publicly, all the Lions players will undoubtedly row in behind the decision of their coach. But privately? A guess suggests that some noses will be out of joint. Maybe he will come on and kick the series-winning points, but that's hardly the issue. It's a strange, completely unexpected rabbit that the coach has pulled out of his hat. If it works out in line with O'Reilly's performance, then Farrell junior can expect the slings and arrows of vile, detestable social media. Very different from amusing tinned-food reprimands. It would be a sorry way to finish a stellar international career. We can but wait and see, and hope.


Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Katie Taylor v Amanda Serrano 3: All you need to know including expected ring time and where to watch
What's happening? Katie Taylor fights Puerto Rican Amanda Serrano for the third time, following on from their bout in Texas last November, won by the Irish boxer. The pair are returning to Madison Square Garden in New York, the scene of their first meeting in 2022, the first women's fight to headline the iconic venue. This time around they headline MSG's first-ever all-women's professional boxing card. Their light-welterweight fight will be contested over 10 rounds, each lasting two minutes. READ MORE [ Katie Taylor narrowly defeats Amanda Serrano in brutal contest Opens in new window ] When is the fight? Taylor v Serrano 3 will take place on Friday (July 11th), with the pair expected to enter the ring at around 3.30am Irish time following the seven-fight undercard. Katie Taylor celebrates her win over Amanda Serrano at Madison Square Garden in New York in April 2022. Photograph: Gary Carr/Inpho What are their records? Taylor has triumphed in their two meetings to date, the first by a split decision in New York, the second by unanimous decision in Texas. Overall, Taylor's record since going pro in 2016 stands at 24 wins and just one loss, which came against Chantelle Cameron in 2023. For 36-year-old Serrano, who joined the professional ranks in 2009, her record reads 47 wins, one draw and three losses – a defeat to Frida Wallberg in 2012 and the two suffered at the hands of KT. Is there a title on the line? Taylor's undisputed light-welterweight title (WBC, WBA, IBF & WBO) and the Ring Magazine belt are on the line. How can I watch the fight? Similar to their last fight, Taylor v Serrano will be streamed live on Netflix, so anyone with an account will be able to watch. The stream of the Texas fight was a little touch-and-go, with viewers experiencing outages throughout, so let's hope they'll get it right this time around. Fast becoming our US boxing correspondent, Keith Duggan will also have news and reaction for us from the Garden on the night. Anything I should know ahead of the fight? After Taylor's victory last time out, things veered from the usual level of trash talking that is customary in the sport towards something more unsavoury. Serrano's coach Jordan Moldonado labelled Taylor 'so dirty', accusing the 39-year-old of leading with her head after Serrano picked up a nasty forehead gash in the fourth round. [ 'It is a rough sport': Katie Taylor floats above 'dirty' tactics allegation after win over Serrano Opens in new window ] While she didn't make the accusation herself, Serrano happily rowed in following the final bell: 'She does it in every fight. It's not the first fight. She kept headbutting me. But we knew that from the very beginning, from the first fight. That's what they do. She did it not only in my fight, she did it with Chantelle Cameron.' On a roll now, with the crowd at AT&T Stadium hurling a chorus of boos at Taylor, Serrano was emboldened to add: 'Everyone said the judges was gonna be shady.' True to form, Taylor rose above the remarks, but when the opening bell tolls on Friday they may well serve as fuel for her fire. What's the undercard? Ramla Ali v Lila Furtado (super-bantamweight) Chantelle Cameron v Jessica Camara (light-welterweight) Tamm Thibeault v Mary Casamassa (middleweight) Cherneka Johnson v Shuretta Metcalf (bantamweight)* Ellie Scotney v Yamilet Mercado (super-bantamweight)* Savannah Marshall v Shadasia Green (super-middleweight)* Alycia Buamgardner v Jennifer Miranda (super-featherweight)* *title fights


Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Andy Farrell still tinkering with player combinations ahead of first Test
A rising tide lifts all boats. While the understandable temptation for his players will be to individually seize the moment when the Lions play the Brumbies on Wednesday, in Andy Farrell 's eyes the best way of doing that is to put the collective first. All the signs are that Farrell and his assistants have picked the nearest thing yet to a shadow side for this encounter with the pick of the Aussie Super Rugby franchises 10 days out from the first Test. To that end Farrell wants his players to put the team first. 'You want to see them stay in every single moment of the game and I know that sounds harsh and almost impossible to do. But they understand 100 per cent now, and have done for a week or so, what is expected of them to be the best team-mate that they can possibly be. 'So that's what we're judging them on, the expectation of that and what it takes to be the best version of themselves, but also what it takes to be part of this team. And they understand that, because ultimately that's what is going to make us successful or not.' READ MORE Intriguing combinations abound, both familiar and unfamiliar, with the backrow still looking the most variable. Tadhg Beirne and Tom Curry have each played twice at blindside, the former after Henry Pollock was picked for the position against the Waratahs only to be withdrawn. Ollie Chessum in action for the Lions against Western Force. Photograph: Billy Sitckland/Inpho Now, as Farrell & co look for the right mix of mobility, breakdown threat, carrying and lineout ability – all the more so as Joe McCarthy is not a renowned ball-winner in the air – Ollie Chessum starts at blindside with Tom Curry at openside. Yet Chessum is not a proven lock/blindside hybrid in the manner of say Ryan Baird. Of his 19 Test starts for England, just two have been at blindside, with the remainder at lock. 'I think with Tadhg (Beirne) at six you've got a breakdown presence in the backrow. Ollie might be a little bit different as far as that's concerned, but the energy that he gives the likes of Tom Curry by the hits that he will make to make it open on the floor, I don't just think we've got backrowers who can pinch a ball. 'We've also got others in the pack and in the backs – I mean Bundee (Aki) is pretty renowned for that type of stuff – so it will be interesting to see the balance this week because we've played quite a fee different scenarios now so I'll be glad to see how this fits.' Maro Itoje's status as captain having been rubber-stamped by his energetic try-scoring display against the Queensland Reds, and Joe McCarthy, having done likewise against Western Force, look the likely secondrow pairing for the opening Test, although this will be the first time they pack down together. 'I think they will complement each other really well, both showing good form in their last game,' ventured Farrell. 'Continuity is pretty important to be able to add to that, I suppose there's no doubt that they would have listened to what everyone's been saying about their performances. It's up to them to make sure that they take a step forward.' Bundee Aki ahead of the game against the Waratahs on Saturday. Photograph:In constructing a team effectively from scratch, established and intuitive combinations are invaluable. The Lions' Test midfield always seemed likely to come down to a choice between the Sione Tuipulotu/Huw Jones Scottish pairing or the Bundee Aki/Garry Ringrose Irish duo. After 'Huwipulotu' were the choice against the Waratahs, Aki and Ringrose partner up for the Brumbies, the Lions' fifth midfield combination in five games. It still feels like one of these two familiar combinations will face the Wallabies in Brisbane rather than a mixture. 'Yeah, but we started with Bundee and Sione,' said Farrell. 'They've been carrying that partnership on in training also. We're one squad, people swapping in and out the whole time, so we're seeing different combinations the whole time. 'You'd say that this is a settled one, but there's still a different team to what they're used to playing with. So no, I wouldn't say it's just about a settled partnership. It's giving them an opportunity to play together that's going to be interesting. Others will get a chance on Saturday as well.'