logo
‘Important moment in evolution': Fossil preserves never-before-seen flight feathers in ‘first bird'

‘Important moment in evolution': Fossil preserves never-before-seen flight feathers in ‘first bird'

Yahoo21-05-2025
Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.
When a fossil preserves an animal's complete body in a death pose, seeing it is observing a snapshot in time. Several such fossils exist for Archaeopteryx — the earliest known bird — and now, a remarkable specimen that was off-limits to scientists for decades is offering previously unseen evidence about the first bird's ability to fly.
Researchers have long wondered how Archaeopteryx took to the air while most of its feathered dinosaur cousins never left the ground, and some argued that Archaeopteryx was probably more of a glider than a true flier. The first fossils of this Jurassic winged wonder were found in southern Germany more than 160 years ago and are about 150 million years old; to date just 14 fossils have been discovered. But private collectors snapped up some of these rarities, isolating the fossils from scientific study and hobbling investigations into this pivotal moment in avian evolution.
One such fossil was recently acquired by Chicago's Field Museum of Natural History and has provided answers to the longstanding question about flight in Archaeopteryx. Researchers published a description of the pigeon-size specimen in the journal Nature on May 14, reporting that ultraviolet (UV) light and computed tomography (CT) scans had revealed soft tissues and structures never seen before in this ancient bird. The findings included feathers indicating that Archaeopteryx could achieve powered flight.
While most Archaeopteryx fossil specimens 'are incomplete and crushed,' this fossil was missing just one digit and remained unflattened by time, said lead study author Dr. Jingmai O'Connor, a paleontologist and associate curator of fossil reptiles at the Field Museum.
'The bones are just exquisitely preserved in 3D; you really don't see that in all the other specimens,' O'Connor told CNN. 'We also have more fossilized soft tissues associated with our specimen than we've seen in any other individual.'
Field Museum fossil preparators and study coauthors Akiko Shinya and Constance Van Beek worked on the specimen for more than a year. They spent hundreds of hours scanning and modeling the positions of the bones in three dimensions; chipping away shards of limestone; and using UV light to illuminate the boundaries between mineralized soft tissue and rocky matrix.
Their preparation — a process that took about 1,600 hours in all, O'Connor estimated — paid off. The researchers detected the first evidence in Archaeopteryx of a group of flight feathers called tertials, which grow along the humerus between the elbow and the body and are an important component of all powered flight in modern birds. Since the 1980s, scientists have hypothesized that Archaeopteryx had tertials due to the length of its humerus, O'Connor said. But this is the first time such feathers have been found in an Archaeopteryx fossil.
The surprises didn't end there. Elongated scale shapes on the toe pads hinted that Archaeopteryx spent time foraging on the ground, as modern pigeons and doves do. And bones in the roof of its mouth provided clues about the evolution of a skull feature in birds called cranial kinesis, the independent movement of skull bones relative to each other. This feature gives birds more flexibility in how they use their beaks.
'It was one 'Wow!' after another,' O'Connor said.
The discovery of tertials in particular 'is an extraordinary finding because it suggests that Archaeopteryx could indeed fly,' said Dr. Susan Chapman, an associate professor in the department of biological sciences at Clemson University in South Carolina. Chapman, who was not involved in the research, studies bird evolution using paleontology and developmental biology.
'The preparators of the Chicago Archaeopteryx did an outstanding job of preserving not just the bone structure, but also the soft tissue impressions,' Chapman told CNN in an email. 'Because of their care, this near complete specimen provides never-before-understood insights into this transitional fossil from theropod dinosaurs to birds.'
However, Archaeopteryx could probably only fly for short distances, she added. Despite having tertials, it lacked certain adaptations for powered flight seen in modern birds, such as specialized flight muscles and a breastbone extension called a keel to anchor those muscles, Chapman said.
The museum acquired this Archaeopteryx specimen in 2022, and at the time, museum president and CEO Julian Siggers called it 'the Field Museum's most significant fossil acquisition since SUE the T. rex.'
As a link between non-avian theropod dinosaurs and the lineage that produced all modern birds, Archaeopteryx's evolutionary importance was unquestionable. But in some ways, the museum was taking a big gamble on that particular fossil, according to O'Connor. It had been in private hands since 1990, and its condition was unknown. When it arrived at the museum, scientists weren't sure what to expect, O'Connor said.
To say that the fossil exceeded their expectations would be an understatement.
'When I found out we were going to acquire an Archaeopteryx, I never in my wildest dreams thought that we were going to end up with such a spectacular specimen,' O'Connor said. 'This is one of the most important macroevolutionary transitions in Earth's life history, because this gives rise to the group of dinosaurs that not only survives the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, but then becomes the most diverse group of land vertebrates on our planet today. So this is a very, very important moment in evolution.'
The significance of such specimens underscores why scientific access should be prioritized over private fossil collection, Chapman added. When fossils are sold for profit and private display rather than for study, 'their preparation is often poor, thus losing irreplaceable soft tissue structures,' she said. 'Moreover, the value of such specimens to mankind's understanding of evolution is lost for decades.'
The Chicago Archaeopteryx likely preserves many other important details about bird evolution, O'Connor added. With an abundance of data already collected from the fossil and analysis still underway, its full story is yet to be told.
'There's going to be a lot more to come,' she said. 'I hope that everyone finds it as exciting as I do.'
Mindy Weisberger is a science writer and media producer whose work has appeared in Live Science, Scientific American and How It Works magazine. She is the author of 'Rise of the Zombie Bugs: The Surprising Science of Parasitic Mind Control' (Hopkins Press).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jurassic World Rebirth Post-Credits: Is There a Scene at the End?
Jurassic World Rebirth Post-Credits: Is There a Scene at the End?

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Jurassic World Rebirth Post-Credits: Is There a Scene at the End?

The Jurassic World franchise roars back to life with Jurassic World Rebirth, the latest installment directed by Gareth Edwards. With a fresh cast, new dinosaurs, and a horror-infused tone, the film stars Jonathan Bailey and Scarlett Johansson. But as fans settle into their seats, one question lingers. Does Jurassic World Rebirth include a post-credits scene teasing future sequels? Here are all the details regarding the credits scene in the movie. To answer, Universal Pictures and Edwards have chosen not to include any post-, mid-, or end-credits scenes in Jurassic World Rebirth. Unlike 2018's Fallen Kingdom, which used a credits tease to lead into Dominion, this film wraps up its story entirely before the credits roll. That doesn't mean the Jurassic saga is over; it's far from it. In fact, Rebirth is being positioned as a bold relaunch. The lack of a post-credits scene suggests the filmmakers didn't feel the need to tack on an extra moment to tease the future. Instead, the film's standalone story arc and fresh characters do the heavy lifting. Post-credits scenes have become a staple in franchise filmmaking, often setting up future continuations. However, Jurassic World Rebirth opts for a self-contained story. Screenwriter David Koepp and director Edwards focus on delivering a complete cinematic experience rather than dangling sequel bait. That said, the film's ending leaves room for continuation. With dinosaurs now confined to equatorial regions and corporations hunting them for genetic research, the door remains open for future stories, just without an explicit tease. Set five years after Dominion, Jurassic World Rebirth focuses on a world where dinosaurs are no longer widespread. Climate shifts have forced the remaining prehistoric creatures to tropical equatorial zones, where a pharmaceutical company aims to extract life-saving DNA from the three largest species: the Mosasaurus, Quetzalcoatlus, and Titanosaurus. The cast includes Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali as expert extractors on a dangerous mission, supported by Jonathan Bailey as a dino specialist and Rupert Friend as a villain with corporate motives.

Movie revieW: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' has few moments of fun
Movie revieW: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' has few moments of fun

Miami Herald

timea day ago

  • Miami Herald

Movie revieW: ‘Jurassic World Rebirth' has few moments of fun

LOS ANGELES, June 30 (UPI) --Jurassic World Rebirth, in theaters Wednesday, has some fun moments but they are never in service of anything significant. The premise is so overcomplicated that even "dinosaurs eating people" becomes mundane. Set several years after 2022's Jurassic World Dominion, on-screen text informs viewers that since dinosaurs escaped captivity, modern climate and diseases largely killed them again. The survivors migrated to tropical climates near the Equator, and travel to those regions has been prohibited. This leads to a fun image of an ailing brontosaurus causing traffic in New York, to which New Yorkers are more upset about the traffic than the dinosaur. The angle of the public losing interest in dinosaurs becomes a major thematic problem of the film. Martin Krebs (Rupert Friend) hires special ops freelancer Zora Bennett (Scarlett Johansson) to lead his secret, illegal expedition to obtain samples of the largest dinosaur hearts. Krebs' pharmaceutical company hopes to use those samples to develop medication for coronary diseases. They recruit paleontologist Henry Loomis (Jonathan Bailey) to accompany them on the expedition, and hire Duncan Kinkaid (Mahershala Ali) to captain their covert boat. "Running from dinosaurs" is a pretty innate story driver, so the more these films complicate putting people in that scenario, the more tenuous it gets. Medical research is spurious for two reasons. Even if one believes Krebs is developing heart medicine for the greater good, a movie is not going to solve heart disease. If they succeed in the film, we still don't have dinosaur hearts to harvest in real life. Deep Blue Sea used Alzheimer's research as its premise, but at least sharks exist today. Secondly, Jurassic audiences have already bought into extracting DNA from fossilized mosquitos to create dinosaurs. Rebirth is asking them to believe that those dinosaurs can also cure human diseases? Now they're just making stuff up. The notion that dinosaurs have become a mundane nuisance is also at odds with the conceit of making a blockbuster spectacle about dinosaurs. The in-film public has lost interest in dinosaurs, and yet they still made a seventh movie? Of course, in real life, the public never lost interest in dinosaurs, so it is a meta commentary on a phenomenon that doesn't exist. In Jurassic World Dominion, they finally made a movie where the dinosaurs got loose in the wild, and fans should be disappointed they're already walking it back. The team encounters mutant hybrid dinosaurs that In-Gen was breeding to spruce up their theme parks. The idea that people got tired of seeing the existing dinosaurs suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of the popularity of this franchise. Nobody ever got tired of seeing Tyrannosaurus Rexes and raptors. They just want to see them again, and see them as well done as Steven Spielberg did them. Stop making up fake dinosaurs. The T-Rex still gets the best sequence in Rebirth. When Rebirth attempts to serve up a sequence of majesty akin to the reveal in Spielberg's first movie, it's only a response to an artificial apathy towards dinosaurs. The mercenaries marvel at dinosaurs in their natural habitat, when the rest of the film should focus on a more organic dinosaur tale. Rebirth adds even more characters when Duncan responds to the distress call of Reuben Delgado (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), whose sailboat was capsized by a Mosasaurus in the ocean. Reuben's daughters Isabella (Audrina Miranda) and Teresa (Luna Blaise) are aboard too, with Teresa's stoner boyfriend Xavier (David Iacono). The script by David Koepp, who adapted the two Michael Crichton books for the first two Jurassic Park movies, can't even commit to the professionals on a mission. It has to throw in a regular family in peril and have them dragged along on the dinosaur mission. In Koepp's defense, by movie seven he's neither adapting a book nor crafting an original tale. He's stuck in a no man's land of corporate mandates and stringing together set pieces into some logical sense. It's a living. The cast appears to be having fun, as if reconciled to the fact that these are the roles available in Hollywood, so they might as well make the most of it. Zora has a way of explaining to men that they are unqualified for a task while letting it be their idea to let her handle the tough jobs. Cursory backstory is given about Zora losing a friend on a previous mission, and Duncan having a family tragedy that broke up his marriage. Director Gareth Edwards may be having the most fun using playful tricks to show the dinosaur action, given that the payoffs to those scenes are created in post-production with visual effects. Dinosaurs approaching behind a character's back can be a misdirect, and a Quetzalcoatlus may fly into frame showing a character's fate in its beak. Edwards even pulls off a dinosaur version of Michael Myers disappearing from view in Halloween. None of these are as effective as the simplicity of seeing glasses of water tremble with dinosaur steps in the original Jurassic Park. Some are blatantly telegraphed when a dinosaur wanders behind a large foreground object. But at least visually, Edwards is bringing a new approach to the franchise, even though it takes a convoluted route to get there. One sequence blatantly forgets its own rules once the story is ready to move on. Zora and Henry go to the trouble of rappelling down an entire cliffside, but once they reach the bottom, stairs of an ancient temple appear so the rest of the group can rejoin them. This shows the rappelling sequence was conceived with no idea how they'd get back up, or the others down. They just filmed the sequence and then decided all the characters had to be together again. Jurassic World Rebirth is not the worst Jurassic movie. That would be Dominion. Still, saving this franchise will require someone with clout and daring enough to remember they're still making these movies because people want to see dinosaurs. Just trust the dinosaurs. Fred Topel, who attended film school at Ithaca College, is a UPI entertainment writer based in Los Angeles. He has been a professional film critic since 1999, a Rotten Tomatoes critic since 2001, and a member of the Television Critics Association since 2012 and the Critics Choice Association since 2023. Read more of his work in Entertainment. 2025 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

‘Jurassic World Rebirth' review: Another embarrassing dino retread
‘Jurassic World Rebirth' review: Another embarrassing dino retread

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

‘Jurassic World Rebirth' review: Another embarrassing dino retread

movie review JURASSIC WORLD REBIRTH Running time: 134 minutes. Rated PG-13 (intense sequences of violence/action, bloody images, some suggestive references and language). In theaters July 2. Sixty-five million years. That is how long the 'Jurassic' film series has been schlepping along. I am quite certain of this. The audience is positively fossilized by the end of the seventh movie: 'Jurassic World Regurgitation.' Sorry. 'Rebirth.' It's 'Rebirth.' What a misleading title. The once-great franchise is hardly reborn from the amber this time. It's slammed by an asteroid yet again. The sheer inanity of 'Retread''s exposition is remarkable. We're informed that, during the past five years, humanity has grown weary of dinosaurs. Bored, tired, over it. Ten-ton ferocious lizards are spoken of like fidget spinners or Palm Pilots. And, in this half-decade, the previously extinct beasts came to the stark realization that North America does not have the ideal climate for them. Even though just one horrible movie ago they were excitedly galloping through the Great Plains. So, like Canadians in winter, they've mostly headed down to the equator. 4 'Rebirth' is little more than an embarrassing retread of old ideas. AP Per the usual schtick, some unlikable morons must jet from New York City to some perilous tropical island, even though they obviously shouldn't. The dumb-dumbs du jour are Scarlett Johansson's Zora, some sort of calculating mercenary, and Jonathan Bailey, as an exceedingly rare male model paleontologist named Henry. A pyrite Goldblum. These folks, some of the blandest characters in the entire 'Jurassic' series, will be paid $10 million to secure blood samples from the most massive air, water and land dinosaurs. Big Pharma needs the vials to cure heart disease. Extraordinary. 4 Zora (Scarlett Johansson) and Henry (Jonathan Bailey) are some of the weakest characters in the entire 'Jurassic' franchise. AP To kick off their journey on a chipper note, Zora and team leader Duncan (Mahershala Ali) somberly reminisce about their dead friends and family members. The depressing scene does not succeed in making us like them. In fact, it made me miss Téa Leoni from 'Jurassic Park 3.' They're eventually joined by Reuben (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo), a dolt who's taken his two daughters and one's stoner boyfriend, Xavier (David Iacono), on a sailing trip through waters known to be full of giant killer reptiles. Father of the year. Too much of 'Revile,' directed by Gareth Edwards of 'Rogue One,' splish-splashes in H2O. When our explorers are boating on the ocean for an interminable chunk, they are attacked by a finned creature — the Snoozeosaurus, an overconfident whale. Later, when the T. Rex chases Dad, the girls and the pothead up a chlorinated-looking river, they could be at a theme park in the Adirondacks. 4 Rupert Friend, Mahershala Ali and Bechir Sylvain are also along for the ride. AP For some cheap 'aww's, the little girl, Isabella (Audrina Miranda), picks up a cute pet dino and names her Dolores. All the while, the adventurers gather their specimens. Side characters die. Nobody seems to mind. Many of the dinos introduced are laboratory hybrids that, while designed to be scary, come off very fake. They don't realistically stomp around with 15,000 pounds of weight. Their scaly skin lacks texture. All of the special effects appear worse than they did 30 years ago. And the gobbledygook dialogue from David Koepp, the screenwriter of the fantastic original, is terrible even by the low standards of what's come recently before it. Gazing out at the wilderness, dazed and confused Xavier says, 'When an old person buys a bed, do they think: 'This is my deathbed'? Because that's what I'm thinking right now.' It's absolutely what I was thinking. 4 The series should've ended with the previous film — 'Dominion.' AP Rupert Friend plays a pharma rep who tags along. On set, Edwards likely yelled, 'Rupert, you're evil. Action!' The best part of the movie is John Williams' rousing old themes that bring us back to happier, more entertaining times. He hasn't composed the new score. That's Alexandre Desplat, whose generic and limp contributions could be from the public domain. Universal and Amblin should have ended this franchise after 2022's appalling 'Dominion,' in which the well was so dry that the main conflict was prehistoric locusts gobbling up crops. The premise has become an overgrown weed, and it's time to put it — and us — out of our misery. Early on in 'Revolting,' Henry says, 'Nobody cares about these animals anymore. They deserve better.' Yes. And they deserve better movies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store