logo
Riot, repression and reform: Will Kenya finally change?

Riot, repression and reform: Will Kenya finally change?

First Post5 days ago
If the Kenyan government does not change course, it won't just endanger the country but also destabilise the region read more
(File) Riot police patrol on a road covered with rocks, during demonstrations to mark the historic 1990 Saba Saba (a Swahili word that means seven seven) protests for democratic reforms in the Kangemi slum of Nairobi, Kenya, Monday, July 7, 2025. AP
July 7, 2025, marked the 35th anniversary of the historic Saba Saba (Seven Seven) protests in Kenya. On that day in 1990, pro-democracy demonstrators filled the streets of Nairobi to challenge President Daniel arap Moi's one-party regime. This year, the anniversary was not a commemoration—it was a continuation.
In recent weeks, protests have swept across Kenya; these protests have met with lethal state violence and mass arrests. The question now looms larger than ever: can Kenya break the cycle of repression—or will it repeat history, yet again?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mayhem and Massacre Revisited
On June 25, 2025, 19 people were killed and hundreds injured as police opened fire on protestors. The demonstrations were sparked by the death of opposition blogger Albert Omondi Ojwang in police custody and coincided with the anniversary of the 2024 Finance Bill protests, during which at least 63 people were killed.
Just two weeks later, on July 7 (Saba Saba Day), Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) reported at least 31 more deaths, over 100 injuries, 532 arrests, and two forced disappearances. Police violence has become the state's default response to public dissent.
'Shoot the Legs': Ruto's Chilling Orders
President William Ruto, elected in 2022 on promises of reform, has instead responded to civil unrest with rhetoric of war. Blaming political opponents and labeling protesters as 'terrorists,' he declared:
'Those who attack our police… that is a declaration of war. We are going to deal with you firmly… They shouldn't kill them (protesters), but they should shoot their legs so they break, and they can go to hospital on their way to court.'
Such remarks shocked many Kenyans and underscored the regime's deepening authoritarian tendencies.
Broken Promises, Boiling Anger
Ruto rose to power vowing to uplift Kenya's struggling masses—but Kenyans today are more disillusioned than ever. Youth unemployment is rampant, inflation bites hard, and corruption remains pervasive. What fuels these protests is not just outrage over one death—but anger over decades of economic despair and political betrayal.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Protest as a Constant—and a Crime
Kenya's Constitution guarantees the right to protest under Article 37. This right is also enshrined in international treaties such as the African Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Yet, in practice, every Kenyan regime—from colonial rule to the current one—has criminalized protest. The cycle is tragically familiar: protest erupts, the state responds with brute force.
History of Repression and Resistance
1. Mau Mau Uprising (1951–1960): Anti-colonial revolt led by the Kikuyu, Meru, and Embu. Over 11,000 killed, 1 million displaced. It eventually paved the way for independence in 1963.
2. Jomo Kenyatta Era (1964–1978): Initial unity gave way to suppression of dissent. Protests followed political assassinations (Pinto, Mboya, Kariuki). The Kisumu Massacre (1969) saw security forces fire on protesters during Kenyatta's visit.
3. Daniel arap Moi Era (1978–2002): Moi turned Kenya into a de jure one-party state. Student uprisings, an aborted coup, mass detentions, torture, and the watershed Saba Saba protest of 1990 eventually forced a return to multi-party democracy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
4. Mwai Kibaki Era (2002–2013): Initial optimism faded amid corruption and electoral fraud. Post-election violence in 2007 killed 1,100 and displaced 600,000.
5. Uhuru Kenyatta Era (2013–2022): Controversial elections sparked mass protests. The 2017 election annulment by the Supreme Court was historic but followed by more clashes and deaths.
6. William Ruto Era (2022–present): Disputed elections, protests against economic hardship, and the Gen Z-led 2024 Finance Bill uprising all mark Ruto's troubled tenure. That uprising led to the storming of Parliament and dozens of deaths.
Back to Saba Saba, Once Again
Kenya is burning once more. The death of Albert Ojwang lit the fuse. On June 25, 2025, 16 people were killed across 27 counties. On July 7, another 31 fell.
But this is more than rage—it is remembrance. For many, these rallies aren't only protests. They're echoes of a long fight for freedom, democracy, and dignity.
Writing on the Wall
President Ruto is three years into his term. The next election is two years away. Between now and then, he must choose: reform or repression.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He must listen to the valid grievances of Kenya's youth, address inequality, curb police brutality, and begin the hard work of healing a fractured nation. The police's place is not on the streets terrorizing citizens—but in the barracks, serving the people.
If the government does not change course, it won't just endanger Kenya—it may destabilise the region.
The author is a multi-disciplinary thought leader with Action Bias and an India based impact consultant. He is a keen watcher of changing national and international scenarios. He works as President Advisory Services of Consulting Company BARSYL. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US appeals court keeps White House access limits on AP over ‘Gulf of America' dispute
US appeals court keeps White House access limits on AP over ‘Gulf of America' dispute

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

US appeals court keeps White House access limits on AP over ‘Gulf of America' dispute

A US appeals court has decided not to lift restrictions placed by President Donald Trump's administration on Associated Press (AP) journalists' access to the White House, Reuters reported on Tuesday. The restrictions were imposed earlier this year after the AP refused to use the term 'Gulf of America' instead of the traditional 'Gulf of Mexico,' as directed by Trump in a January executive order. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined a request from the AP to reconsider a June ruling by a three-judge panel that allowed the Trump administration to limit the AP's access to events in the Oval Office, Air Force One, and other locations under White House control. The Associated Press had argued in a lawsuit filed in February that the restrictions violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which protects free speech and press freedom. Trump's administration has said the president has full discretion over which media outlets can attend White House events. In a lower court decision, US District Judge Trevor McFadden, who was appointed by Trump, ruled in favour of the AP. He stated that if the White House allows some reporters access, it cannot block others based on their editorial choices or viewpoints. But that order was paused in June by a 2-1 decision from a DC Circuit panel. The two judges in favour of the pause, Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas, were appointed by Trump. The judge who disagreed, Cornelia Pillard, was appointed by former President Barack Obama. Reuters noted that the AP stylebook states the name 'Gulf of Mexico' has been in use for over 400 years. The news agency said it would continue to use the name while acknowledging the president's preferred term. Both Reuters and the AP previously criticised the access restrictions. They said these changes affect not only their coverage but also local news outlets and financial markets that depend on timely and direct reporting from White House events. The appeals court decision leaves the door open for the AP to take the case to the US Supreme Court.

'Everything In Flames...': Devastating Visuals From Ukraine After Russian Non-Stop Assault
'Everything In Flames...': Devastating Visuals From Ukraine After Russian Non-Stop Assault

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Everything In Flames...': Devastating Visuals From Ukraine After Russian Non-Stop Assault

Russian forces launched a wave of overnight aerial attacks on multiple Ukrainian cities, including Odesa, Sumy, and Kramatorsk. At least one child was killed and 24 others injured, according to AP. Fires broke out in residential areas, with cars, supermarkets, and apartment buildings heavily damaged. Ukrainian officials report that Iskander-M missiles and Shahed drones were used, overwhelming air defences. Watch Read More

Idaho murders: Bryan Kohberger to get one last chance to reveal details, but is he bound to speak?
Idaho murders: Bryan Kohberger to get one last chance to reveal details, but is he bound to speak?

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Idaho murders: Bryan Kohberger to get one last chance to reveal details, but is he bound to speak?

Idaho suspect Bryan Kohberger will get one final chance reveal details about the night of the murders and answer the grieving parents of the victims on Wednesday, according to CNN report. Kohberger pleaded guilty to burglary and four counts of first-degree murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin during his last hearing that was on July 2. The four were killed on November 13, 2022 off campus at the University of Idaho. Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty to burglary and first-degree murder of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin(AP) Kohberger's plea allowed him to avoid the death penalty and a murder trial. Before sentencing, he will be given a chance to address the court. Defendants often use this time to show remorse, apologize, or explain their actions, which the judge can consider during sentencing. However, legal analyst and trial attorney Mercedes Colwin said that it is unlikely Kohberger will say anything, according to a CNN report. Colwin said, 'What we can expect in sentencing would first be the victim impact statements by the families. We already know that there are several that are going to speak, which should be horrendous.' She added, 'I'm sure it's going to be gut-wrenching, and then he will be given the opportunity to address the court before the judge sentences him. That's where he can say, 'I'm sorry for what I've done,' which I don't expect any of that to take place.' Also Read: Why Bryan Kohberger pleaded guilty. Inside his sentencing details President Donald Trump wants answers Even President Donald Trump weighed in on the question of whether Kohberger will speak. On Monday, Trump said on Truth Social that the judge should make the 30-year-old 'explain why he did these horrible murders' before sentencing. At every previous court appearance, Kohberger has remained expressionless, silent, and unmoved while prosecutors described the chilling late-night killings—how he entered a home through a sliding door and fatally stabbed four young students while two survivors sent terrified texts about a masked figure walking down the hallway. Also Read: Idaho murders: What was Bryan Kohberger's motive? Expert shares chilling theory on 'rage that he built' Change-of-plea hearing Judge Steven Hippler asked Kohberger a series of questions during change-of-plea hearing. The judge asked, 'Are you pleading guilty because you are guilty?' Kohberger responded, 'Yes.' Then the judge asked, 'Did you on November 13, 2022, enter the residence at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho, with the intent to commit the felony crime of murder?' To which Kohberger answered, "Yes."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store