Stouffville Withholds Ticket Data as Automated Speed Camera Program Grows
● Councillors are fielding ongoing questions from residents about the program, including inquiries regarding the number of tickets issued and amount of revenue collected.
● Town Staff say disclosure of early figures could be misleading and are withholding data to preserve the 'integrity' of the program.
● A full report is expected in fall 2025, earlier than originally planned, to provide a more accurate picture of long-term trends.
● Councillors offered varying perspectives during a recent meeting, with some emphasizing personal accountability and others critiquing the long-term consequences of drivers' speeding habits.
● Mayor Lovatt says fines from the program are exceeding expectations and will help fund traffic calming and road infrastructure improvements.
Stouffville has scheduled activation of four additional Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) cameras by mid-to-late Q3 2025. The new cameras will form the second phase of the
Town's ASE program
, which launched on March 17, 2025, and are planned for the following locations:
'Coming Soon' signage has been placed at all four sites and will remain posted for at least 90 days before the cameras become operational.
Public reaction to Stouffville's ASE program has been divided, with some residents welcoming the cameras as a necessary step to improve road safety, and others expressing strong opposition. The Town has set up a dedicated email address (ase@townofws.ca) to field questions, address concerns, and provide direct information to residents.
During Council's May 21 meeting, Ward 4 Councillor Rick Upton noted that he and his colleagues are facing constant inquiries from residents about the program, including questions regarding the number of tickets issued and revenue collected to date.
Although preliminary data has been compiled, Town Staff say it is still too early to provide a full update on the program's performance. Becky Jamieson, Stouffville's Commissioner of Corporate Services and Town Clerk, emphasized the importance of protecting the 'integrity' of the program and said that detailed ticket statistics and financial figures are not yet available.
'When we refer to maintaining the 'integrity' of the program, we're speaking to the importance of presenting a full and accurate picture of the ASE initiative,' she said in comments to Bullet Point News. 'Releasing revenue or ticket data too early can be misleading, as initial figures are often artificially high due to driver unfamiliarity with the cameras and increased media and public attention at launch.'
In comments to Council, Jamieson referenced Newmarket 's ASE program, which has been in operation for nearly a year and only recently produced its first report for council consideration. Her team is currently reviewing early data and confirmed that a report will be presented to Stouffville Council this fall, which is earlier than the originally planned one-year assessment.
'This approach ensures the public receives a more balanced, meaningful snapshot of the program's impact and effectiveness, rather than a potentially distorted view based on launch-period anomalies,' Jamieson told us. 'We're committed to transparency and plan to share aggregate data once we believe it accurately reflects the program's intended outcomes, which are reducing speeding and improving road safety for everyone.'
During an April 29 Town Hall event, Mayor Iain Lovatt hinted at some early ASE results.
'They are working, they are slowing people down, and, unfortunately, they are working too well—because we're giving out a lot of tickets,' Lovatt told attendees. 'I've said publicly many times that I want this to be the biggest failure, because that means people are driving the speed limit, but that hasn't proven to be the case in the first six weeks.'
Lovatt said funds generated through the program have been earmarked for traffic calming and road infrastructure improvements, as directed by Council. He noted the revenue is expected to exceed initial projections, allowing for a broader range of measures to be considered.
One potential focus is Hoover Park Drive, which Lovatt described as exceedingly wide and poorly designed. 'From York-Durham to Ninth Line, it is a bit of a racetrack,' he said. Suggestions for improvements include replacing the current textured asphalt median with a fully raised, landscaped median to create a visual break and encourage slower driving.
Ward 6 Councillor Sue Sherban highlighted the history of speed limit reductions throughout the community, saying that roads originally designed for higher speeds have gradually been reduced largely in response to persistent speeding. In her view, drivers collectively bear responsibility for the resulting reliance on ASE cameras.
'These roads weren't built for 40 kilometres an hour,' she said, pointing to Ninth Line as an example of a major arterial road where current speed limits feel inconsistent with the road's scale and capacity. While acknowledging residents' frustrations and showing some empathy for concerns raised in emails, Sherban said it's important to recognize how the issue evolved.
'We've gotten ourselves into this situation,' Sherban said. 'If we did the original speed that the roads were made for, we would not be as frustrated as we are today in having to be the nanny state.'
Ward 1 Councillor Hugo Kroon voiced strong support for the ASE program, emphasizing that those who receive tickets are 'fully deserving' of them. Speaking candidly, he acknowledged his own history as someone with a lead foot and a background in motor racing, but said that did not diminish his view on accountability.
Kroon pushed back against claims from some residents that the program unfairly targets those who can't afford fines, calling that argument '100 percent incorrect.' Instead, he framed the tickets as a consequence for those who choose to ignore speed limits, putting both themselves and others at risk.
'I have absolutely no sympathy for that whatsoever,' Kroon said, adding that if financial penalties are what it takes to curb dangerous driving, he is in favour of the outcome.
According to York Region, ASE cameras help reduce vehicle speeds by about 10 km/h and improve speed limit compliance by approximately 25 percent. The Region also reports that ASE can cut collision rates by up to 48 percent.
'As often as we get emails from people who are frustrated and upset, I think the silent majority in our community are grateful,' Lovatt said. 'I've literally had people hug me, thanking me for…the tangible difference in reducing speeds on our streets.'
'It's the one thing that we have done that has actually worked for traffic calming,' Lovatt added. 'And we've tried a lot over the last six years.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
D.C. Council waters down I-82, affecting local restaurants
The D.C. Council voted Monday to gut Initiative 82, settling on what lawmakers billed as a compromise between fair-wage advocates and many in the restaurant industry — and sparking intense backlash. Why it matters: The city has struggled with I-82's implementation for years. The new measure aims to balance working wages with business survival — especially for independent D.C. restaurants, which are struggling. Driving the news: Eliminating the tipped minimum wage — as the original ballot measure promised — is off the table. Instead, the I-82 amendment introduced by Council members Christina Henderson and Charles Allen preserves the tipped minimum wage and stretches base wage hikes over the next decade at a fraction of the standard minimum wage (currently $17.95/hour). The measure passed 7-5 during a tense hearing that began with protestor interruptions and ended with a lockdown of council chambers as protestors shouted and banged on doors. 📅 New timeline: Now through July 2026, a $10/hour tipped wage (56% of regular minimum wage). That'll increase every two years, capping off at 75% of the minimum wage in 2034. Catch up quick: The hospitality industry struggled to adjust to I-82. Many cited skyrocketing labor costs that coincided with inflation, rising rents and plummeting patronage due to mass DMV layoffs. Workers complained of diminished tips, especially as businesses implemented service fees to cover costs. Meanwhile, the city has been inconsistent with I-82's rollout. Mayor Muriel Bowser recently pushed for a full repeal, which the council voted down. Friction point: Tempers in the council chambers ran high as I-82 supporters chanted, "Blood is on your hands." After the vote, the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington hailed the decision as a "win for the industry," one that "brings immediate relief to operators" in a statement sent to Axios. One Fair Wage, the primary lobby behind I-82, called it a "betrayal of democracy and a gift to the restaurant lobby" in another statement. Meanwhile, there was concern over going against voters' will. "The voters told us what they wanted. And this is not it," said Council member Brianne Nadeau, who voted against the amendment. "This council should stop telling voters they don't know what's best." How they voted: ✔️ For the amendment: Charles Allen, Christina Henderson, Brooke Pinto, Phil Mendelson, Kenyan McDuffie, Wendell Felder, Anita Bonds ❌ Against: Brianne Nadeau, Janeese Lewis George, Robert White, Matt Frumin, Zachary Parker What's next: The amendment aims to provide more wage transparency. Starting in 2026, pay stubs must list all sources — including tips, bonuses, service charges, etc.
Hamilton Spectator
18 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Insufficient turnout for ratification vote in Kanesatake
An attempt to use the courts to thwart Saturday's ratification vote for four community laws failed, but with only six percent of eligible voters casting a ballot, the vote was nevertheless nullified. The referendum on each proposed law received only 174 votes. With 2,724 eligible voters identified, that's a voter turnout of just over six percent, far fewer than the 20 percent threshold required for the vote to be considered valid. Had that threshold been met, a simple 50 percent plus one would have been the metric for a decision. The State of Emergency and Emergency Measures Law yielded 35 yes to 139 no votes; the Land Protection Law went 44-130; the Trespass Law 37-137; and the Code of Ethics 46-128. 'I'm disappointed but not surprised,' said MCK chief Brant Etienne, who has consistently been one of the strongest advocates for the laws. The timing of the vote was controversial, coming just two weeks before the MCK general election. In fact, the timing didn't help matters, Etienne said, because of limitations on campaigning during the election period. Ratification votes are not necessary to pass laws under the new Kanesatake Law-Making Process (KLMP), which is so far the only community law on the books. The community approval process requires only one method, which can be a secret ballot vote, but can also be at least three community meetings or a minimum of two workshops held in person or virtually. Etienne said because these are the first laws, Council opted to use a multipronged approach. 'The KLMP states that one of three consultation methods have to be used. We chose to use all three. The last one bit us in the butt, obviously,' he said. It will now be up to the next Council, he said, but he is concerned the next cohort of MCK chiefs may instead work to remove the KLMP itself. Since the vote on the four laws failed to meet the threshold, he argued, they were neither affirmed nor rejected. Etienne, who is a candidate for grand chief in the upcoming election, said he is in favour of passing the laws now anyways, but that there is insufficient support on Council to do so. 'I think 94 percent of the population not saying anything doesn't mean they don't want it. We hear from people every day saying they're unhappy with the lawlessness in the community, the lawlessness in the roads, they're unhappy with the environmental condition of the community, they're saying they don't like the way Council runs, they wish they had ethics,' he said, adding that these things have long been said and portraying these laws as the solution. Kanehsata'kehró:non had the opportunity to vote online using OneFeather or in person, and while there were more who voted in person, more than a third used the digital tool, according to Etienne. While the Custom Electoral Code, which governs Kanesatake elections, does not refer to online voting, the document is not the basis for ratification votes. These are outlined in the new Kanesatake Law-Making Process, which itself draws on several legal bases, including the Kanesatake Interim Land Governance Act (KILGA). Online voting was cited in legal actions launched in Federal Court against the Mohawk Council of Kanesatake recently. Most notably, MCK chief candidate Valerie Bonspille launched an application dated July 19, the same day of the in-person ratification vote, seeking an urgent injunction to halt it. Online voting had been open since July 5, two weeks earlier. Bonspille did not reply to a request for comment on the action. The first documents for the urgent motion, submitted at 4:08 p.m. on July 18, were submitted under the file number of a previous action launched by MCK chief candidate Amanda Simon, which was filed June 27 and targeted online voting in the general election, which was subsequently cancelled, but which also invoked the KLMP. Simon's name thus appears in the rationale cited in Justice Nicholas McHaffie's order denying Bonspille's motion, as well as email correspondence filed at Federal Court in which MCK's lawyer Nicholas Dodd, representing Dionne Schulze, accused rival counsel of sewing procedural confusion with the last-minute filing with the urgent request launched under Simon's file number. Asked by The Eastern Door about this, since on June 20 Simon had publicly demanded a retraction of the suggestion by Etienne that she had anything to do with the injunction request, Simon provided an email to Dodd dated July 23 from an articling student for law firm Pepper, Villeneuve-Gagné, which represented both Bonspille and Simon. The articling student said they were writing to clarify that the documents filed by the firm under Simon's file should have been issued in Bonspille's name with a new file number. 'Furthermore, we wish to confirm that Amanda Simon's name should not have appeared in the proceedings,' the articling student wrote. In responding to Bonspille's application on the ratification vote, which also asserted that the KLMP was illegally adopted, McHaffie noted that the motion was brought with less than 24 hours' notice and wrote that the 'applicant has provided no material or persuasive evidence regarding the urgency of this matter' to justify it. 'The applicant concedes that the process currently being followed complies with the Kanesatake Law-Making Process,' McHaffie wrote. 'The foundation for her motion is therefore the lawfulness of the Kanesatake Law-Making Process itself. However, the Kanesatake Law-Making Process was adopted five months ago, in February 2025.' He also noted that the notice of the ratification vote was distributed in June. According to McHaffie, counsel for Bonspille argued that she did not learn of the ratification vote until the MCK's statement of defence was filed on July 14 in the Simon action, which the justice found implausible and unsupported. He also wrote that the question of urgency aside, the application presented did not satisfy the requirements for an injunction. 'Given the limited nature of the evidence put forward by the applicant and the responding evidence filed, I cannot conclude that the applicant has demonstrated on the record before me a serious issue in respect of the legality of the Kanesatake Law-Making Process, based on the process leading to its adoption,' wrote McHaffie. Bonspille's application also presented online voting as unlawful based on KILGA, but McHaffie also dismissed this claim based on what was presented. 'Again, on the evidence before me, the applicant has raised no serious issue,' he wrote. McHaffie wrote that the decision should not be interpreted as weighing in on whether the Federal Court is the proper jurisdictional forum in regard to the KLMP, given the justice's conclusion that the injunction should not be granted. Finally, the justice ruled that Bonspille is responsible for paying for MCK's costs in the amount of $1,000. 'I agree entirely with the respondent,' wrote McHaffie, that the applicant should be responsible for the costs given the urgency and 'lack of merit of the motion.' marcus@ Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
18 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Kahnawake's cannabis moratorium ends with little progress
Though the Mohawk Council of Kahnawake (MCK)'s 45-day moratorium on retail cannabis sales lifts today, nothing is set to change in the community, with progress on the cannabis file and a decision about its future at a standstill without any Kahnawake Cannabis Control Board (KCCB) members. The MCK had implemented the moratorium on June 11, after tensions had grown in the community concerning the cannabis file. In late April, hundreds of Kahnawa'kehró:non organized a protest in town demanding that Council chiefs halt the process of issuing dispensary licenses, and by the end of June, the KCCB had no board members remaining, after board member Darlene Alfred and alternate board member Kary Robertson tendered their resignations alongside the departure of chairperson Tara Jacobs. Before the moratorium, the KCCB had been conducting consultations with community members who live close to proposed dispensary locations, paring down a list of potential dispensary owners who had applied for a license. The KCCB was planning to award three licenses, decided via a lottery system, following guidelines to ensure that dispensaries must not be located in close proximity to buildings such as schools. Many in the community continue to feel that opening dispensaries in Kahnawake could cause irreversible damage to the community, however regulated the industry might be. The issue brought together both the 207 Longhouse and the Mohawk Trail Longhouse, who have presented a united front in opposition to the plans. At the close of the moratorium period, the MCK released an open letter regarding the sale of cannabis in the community, also distributed by mail to community members. The letter thanks various groups, including the Longhouses, for engaging on the issue, and outlines a number of safeguards that are already in place for the proposed future of cannabis sale in Kahnawake. It outlines the requirements for dispensaries, including the geographical requirement to be at least 300 metres from residential areas, and outlines what measures would be taken to keep the industry regulated, such as prohibiting promotional advertising or enticements. It also details the vetting process and background checks that dispensary owners and their employees will be subject to and describes the intended positive financial effect that cannabis sales would have on the local economy. Joe Deom, a spokesperson for the Mohawk Nation at Kahnawake (207 Longhouse), said he remains unimpressed by the MCK's response. 'I don't think the community should stand for it,' he said. 'A large part of the community is totally against the sale of cannabis no matter how it is, no matter what form. The Longhouse hasn't changed our point of view either.' He said that there's been no meetings with the MCK during the moratorium, and said that while the letter describes the nuances of Council's cannabis legislation, it doesn't acknowledge the simple fact that a large proportion of the community doesn't want cannabis in Kahnawake. 'We've stated our position, and no means no, period,' he said. 'Our position hasn't changed.' MCK grand chief Cody Diabo said that he had hoped to get the open letter out 'a few weeks back,' but that there had been delays publishing the communication following the departure of some staff. 'We know it's kind of close coming out, but we didn't want to not post it, because there's information out there, and we wanted to just make people aware of what's been going on,' Diabo said. Diabo said that throughout the moratorium, he and other MCK chiefs had conducted engagements with community members to hear their thoughts about a regulated industry. 'The sentiments that we've heard are that it's either no to cannabis, or people are open to a community-owned (industry),' he said. 'We have to go back and engage the community, because currently there's no board members, so going forward not much can get moving until that's resolved.' He added that while there's no community meeting scheduled this month, he's looking at scheduling a special community meeting to discuss the issue at greater length. 'I would like to do a little bit more with info on our end that we can present to community members too, to say 'Okay, this is what we're hearing, if we were to move in this direction, this is what the cost would be, this is what we would have to look at,' and just see what the community has to say on it,' he said. He reiterated that nothing can progress without the KCCB. 'The board has to be there, so things are just on pause now,' he said. eve@ Eve Cable, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
