How Modi govt's 4 Rajya Sabha picks signal shift in strategic template
Jain's books, such as Rama and Ayodhya (2013); Sati: Evangelicals, Baptist Missionaries, and the Changing Colonial Discourse (2016); The Battle for Rama: Case of the Temple at Ayodhya (2017); and Flight of Deities and Rebirth of Temples: Episodes From Indian History (2019), have provided intellectual depth to the Sangh Parivar's battle against Leftist historians and helped mobilise support base.Jain's presence in Parliament is meant to echo the ideological stance that increasingly guides current policies on education, heritage and more. In Jain, the government isn't simply nominating a scholar but inserting an ideological subtext into the legislative text.Sadanandan Master's nomination is equally telling. The BJP refers to him as a 'living martyr' for his resilience and continued activism despite his physical condition. Sadanandan Master is a survivor of political violence. He lost both legs in an alleged attack by CPI(M) workers in 1994 in Kannur district of Kerala. A school teacher by profession, he represents a grassroots legitimacy that the BJP desperately needs in southern India, especially Kerala and Tamil Nadu that have proven electorally resistant to the party's advances.More importantly, Sadanandan Master's inclusion in the Rajya Sabha suggests a recalibrated vision of representation—one that places premium not on identity politics but ideological loyalty and ground-level institution-building. He is not a crowd-puller but a cadre-builder. And in a party increasingly obsessed with the long arc of electoral sociology, that matters more. Modi, in his congratulatory post on social media, underlined the violence faced by Sadanandan Master. 'Violence and intimidation couldn't deter his spirit towards national development. His efforts as a teacher and social worker are also commendable,' shared the prime minister.advertisementThen comes Nikam, the prosecutor who became a household name during some of India's most significant anti-terror trials. From the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts to the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, Nikam has built his public persona around an unflinching image of the state's prosecutorial will. His nomination to the Rajya Sabha, reportedly backed by Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, fits neatly into the BJP's broader claim of being the custodian of national security.It's also a nod to Maharashtra's complex political dynamics, where the BJP needs both a nationalist narrative and loyal institutional faces to anchor its fight against an emboldened Opposition. Nikam is not just an accomplished lawyer; he is an emblem of the party's claim that India under Modi is stronger, more decisive and less tolerant of threats—internal or external. His legal acumen, combined with his TV-hardened image as the nation's go-to prosecutor, gives the party a potent voice in debates over terror, justice and criminal jurisprudence. In the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, Fadnavis had managed to get him ticket, but Nikam lost. His entry to the Rajya Sabha means the BJP getting a legal luminary to take on the likes of Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi in the Opposition benches.advertisementShringla, by contrast, represents the quiet bureaucracy of power. As foreign secretary and later G20 Sherpa, he played a pivotal role in executing India's muscular foreign policy during a time of global flux. His nomination is widely seen as driven by the Prime Minister's Office (PMO)—an attempt to embed a trusted technocrat into Parliament, someone who can actively shape legislative debates on foreign affairs, trade policy and geopolitical strategy.In many ways, Shringla's elevation marks a shift in how the Modi government views diplomacy. No longer insulated from politics, it is now being folded into the political project itself. Parliament is being repositioned as a platform where diplomats no longer report from the sidelines—they participate directly in the debates. In the Lok Sabha polls, the BJP couldn't give Shringla a ticket from his hometown of Darjeeling because of caste fine-balancing. Now, he is being rewarded for his work during India's G20 presidency.advertisement
Clockwise from top left: Ujjwal Deorao Nikam, C. Sadanandan Master, Harsh Vardhan Shringla, and Meenakshi Jain
Taken together, the four nominations offer a blueprint of the Modi government's strategic temperament. This is not a government in search of broader consensus. It's one that believes its third term represents not just electoral legitimacy but ideological inevitability. And that belief is shaping the kind of Parliament it is building—not just through elections but selective curation. The Rajya Sabha, often mocked as a place for defeated politicians or ageing notables, is being reimagined by the government as an instrument of deep influence. Not through noise but through alignment—of ideas, expertise and long-term narrative reinforcement.At the same time, this isn't a radical departure from the past. If one examines the Modi government's earlier nominations, a pattern becomes clear. The selection of Rakesh Sinha, Swapan Dasgupta and Justice Ranjan Gogoi between 2018 and 2020 were early signals of this strategy. Sinha and Dasgupta brought ideological voice; Gogoi, fresh off the Ram Janmabhoomi case verdict, brought institutional value. That nomination was unprecedented—a chief justice moving to the Upper House mere months after retirement. But in hindsight, it looks like a prototype. Gogoi was the first indication that the Modi government was no longer going to treat Rajya Sabha nominations as ceremonial. They would now be tactical.advertisementWhat has changed in 2025 is that the tactical has become structural. No longer are there deviations. All four current nominees are specialists in statecraft. All are capable of speaking not just to their domain but to the deeper ideological grammar that governs the Modi era of policymaking. The cultural historian reinforces the civilisational state. The RSS insider extends the party's grassroots circuitry. The prosecutor strengthens the narrative of national security. The diplomat brings foreign policy into direct political consciousness. None of them are generalists. All are instruments of a larger project.The contrast with Congress-era nominations could not be starker. Then, the nominated category was used as a space to accommodate civil society, to showcase symbolic inclusiveness or to rehabilitate loyalists who had lost electoral favour. There was occasional brilliance—think of former chief election commissioner of India M.S. Gill or economist Bhalchandra Mungekar—but rarely was there strategic consistency.In the Modi era, especially now in its third term, nomination is no longer an act of reward. It's about institutional convergence. Education, law, grassroots outreach, and diplomacy are four of the most powerful levers in a modern state. By placing individuals aligned with its worldview at the intersection of these four domains, the Modi government is shaping not just what Parliament does but how India thinks and governs.One must remember that the Rajya Sabha was not designed for this kind of power play. But under Modi, it is increasingly being refashioned as a place of quiet transformation. When the Lok Sabha is about volume, the Upper House is about signal. And these four nominations are a signal in its purest form.If Modi's third term is about legacy—about laying down irreversible foundations—then this round of Rajya Sabha nominations marks a significant milestone. It's a reminder that in politics, the most consequential moves are often the quietest. No hashtags. No headlines. Just four names that could help shape the next decade of Indian statecraft from behind the benches.New governors, new signalsMeanwhile, the appointments on July 14 of Prof. Ashim Kumar Ghosh as the governor of Haryana, Pusapati Ashok Gajapathi Raju as the governor of Goa and Kavinder Gupta as the lieutenant governor of Ladakh reflect the Centre's calibrated political signalling with a clear RSS imprint.Ghosh is a scholar with deep RSS links. On the other hand, given his Sangh background in Jammu, Gupta's appointment suggests a focus on stability in Ladakh, which has been in the throes of political discontent over various issues.Raju, while now with the BJP, has retained close ties with Telugu Desam Party chief Chandrababu Naidu. His appointment signals careful coalition management of the National Democratic Alliance. The appointments show the BJP leadership is relying on loyalists who align with the Sangh's worldview while also navigating with precision the demands of coalition-era politics and regional power balances.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
States should frame land-for-land policies in rarest of rare case: SC
The Supreme Court has cautioned states against their "land-for-land" policies and said such schemes should be floated in rarest of the rare cases. Press Trust of India New Delhi The Supreme Court has cautioned states against their "land-for-land" policies and said such schemes should be floated in rarest of the rare cases. A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan further said a plea of deprivation of right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution to oppose the land acquisition by the state was unsustainable as it called the litigation pursued by Haryana as an eye opener" for all states. The bench was acting on a batch of pleas filed by the Estate Officer of Haryana Urban Development Authority and others challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court's 2016 decision that upheld the trial court decrees favoring oustees. We have made ourselves very explicitly clear that in cases of land acquisition the plea of deprivation of right to livelihood under Article 21 of the Constitution is unsustainable, Justice Pardiwala said in a 88-page verdict on July 14. The high court held displaced landowners, whose land was acquired by Haryana authorities for public purposes, entitled to benefit under the 2016 Rehabilitation Policy and not the older, more concessional 1992 scheme. The verdict was critical of Haryana's very unusual policy on land acquisition. Under it, if the government acquires land for public purposes, it provides alternate plots of land to the oustees. The top court observed only in rarest of rare cases the government might consider floating any scheme for rehabilitation of the displaced persons over and above paying them compensation in terms of money. "At times the State Government with a view to appease its subjects float unnecessary schemes and ultimately land up in difficulties. It would unnecessarily give rise to a number of litigations. The classic example is the one at hand, it added. It is not necessary that in all cases over and above compensation in terms of money, rehabilitation of the property owners is a must, the bench noted. Any beneficial measures taken by the Government should be guided only by humanitarian considerations of fairness and equity towards the landowners, it said. The dispute traces back to the land acquired by the Haryana government in early 1990s. While compensation was awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, a parallel state policy promised rehabilitation plots to those displaced. However, the oustees failed to apply in the prescribed format or deposit the required earnest money in line with the 1992 policy terms. Most of the lawsuits were filed 14 to 20 years after acquisition, seeking mandatory injunction under Section 39 of the Specific Relief Act. Dealing with the issues, the bench said the oustees couldn't claim a legal right to plots at the 1992 rates and the 2016 policy, as revised in 2018, would apply. It said oustees were criticised for filing civil suits after unjustifiable delays of over a decade, well beyond the three-year period under the Limitation Act. Though the top court found the suits technically non-maintainable, it exercised equitable jurisdiction to extend the benefit of the 2016 policy. The respondents (oustees) are not entitled to claim as a matter of legal right relying on the decision of that they should be allotted plots as oustees only at the price as determined in the 1992 policy, it said. The bench observed oustees were entitled at the most to seek the benefit of the 2016 policy for the purpose of allotment of plots as oustees. The apex court then granted four weeks to all respondents to make an appropriate online application with deposit of the requisite amount in accordance with the policy of 2016. "If within a period of four weeks any of the respondents herein prefer any online application in accordance with the scheme of 2016 then in such circumstances the authority concerned shall look into the applications and process the same in accordance with the scheme of 2016, it said. The bench clarified it would be up to the authority to examine whether the oustees were eligible for the allotment of plots or not. We make it clear that there shall not be any further extension of time for the purpose of applying online with deposit of the requisite amount, it said. Observing some of oustees might be rustic and illiterate and unable to apply online, the top court allowed them to apply by preferring an appropriate application or otherwise addressed to the competent authority with the deposit of the requisite amount. The bench ordered Haryana and HUDA to ensure land grabbers or other miscreants didn't form a cartel to benefit from the allotment of plots.
New Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Chhattisgarh deports 30 undocumented Bangladeshi immigrants
RAIPUR: Chhattisgarh on Tuesday deported 30 Bangladeshi nationals following an ongoing verification exercise in the state, with the individuals being sent back to their homeland. The undocumented Bangladeshi migrants were taken by flight to Guwahati, where they will be handed over to the Border Security Force (BSF), a police officer said. After initiating the necessary action and completing the process of deportation, all illegal immigrants will be sent across the border into the neighbouring country. The thirty immigrants found staying 'without valid documents' were traced from the districts of Raipur, Durg, Rajnandgaon and Raigarh. They were apprehended following intelligence inputs and some complaints received from local inhabitants about the foreigners staying illegally. According to a senior intelligence officer, some Bangladeshis had even procured Indian passports in Chhattisgarh, travelled to their country, and returned to the state. On Tuesday, the issue of Bangladeshi and Rohingya undocumented immigrants was raised by senior BJP MLA Ajay Chandrakar in the House, claiming that their strength is consistently on the rise in different districts of the state. Chandrakar claimed that illegal immigrants are accessing the benefits of government schemes after they secured documents illegally on the basis of 'false documentation' and the official machinery failing to enforce stringent regulations.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Centre lists eight new bills for the monsoon session of Parliament
For the monsoon session of Parliament, which begins on 21 July, the government has listed eight new bills to be introduced, including the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, and the Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill. The session is also set to witness the Opposition INDIA bloc parties demanding that the government brief Parliament on Operation Sindoor, India's foreign relations—especially with China, the proposed India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement, and US President Donald Trump's repeated claims that he used trade as a bargaining chip to persuade India and Pakistan to end their military conflict. On Tuesday, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, who is also the leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, met Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar. 'The Opposition wants a productive Rajya Sabha session from 21 July. For that to happen, several strategic, political, foreign policy, and socio-economic issues that are of great public concern need to be debated and discussed,' Kharge said in a post on X after the meeting. The government is also set to introduce the Geoheritage Sites and Geo-relics (Preservation and Maintenance) Bill, the National Sports Governance Bill, and the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill. According to the government's list of business, the Mines and Minerals Bill will seek to provide for the viable recovery of associated critical minerals, inclusion of contiguous areas in a lease for optimal and scientific mining of deep-seated minerals, and widen the scope of the National Mineral Exploration Trust. The Jan Vishwas Bill seeks to foster ease of doing business and promote ease of living. The Indian Institutes of Management (Amendment) Bill seeks to include IIM Guwahati in the Schedule of the Act. The Geoheritage Sites and Geo-relics (Preservation and Maintenance) Bill seeks to provide for the declaration, preservation, protection, and maintenance of geoheritage sites and geo-relics of national importance for geological studies. The National Sports Governance Bill aims to establish institutional capacity and standards for the governance of sports federations, as well as measures for the resolution of sports grievances and disputes. In addition to these bills, Parliament will also consider some of the pending bills, including the Income Tax Bill, which was referred to a Select Committee during the Budget session for further scrutiny. The government will also seek Parliament's approval for having extended President's Rule in Manipur. Some of the pending bills listed by the government for passage include the Bills of Lading Bill, the Carriage of Goods by Sea Bill, the Coastal Shipping Bill, the Merchant Shipping Bill, and the Indian Ports Bill.
