Bureaucracy the main hurdle
The meeting was convened to review the new expert driven framework introduced by the Power Division. To achieve efficient and accountable governance, professionalization and decentralization have been adopted. He blamed the institutional inertia in blocking the much-needed reforms in the bureaucracy.
I am not sure whether he was speaking his heart out or was reading the prepared text as he has enjoyed very cordial relationship with the bureaucrats. It is indeed interesting that every ruler starts with the praise of the 'Baboos' but then finally turns against them at the end of their rule. Those who control the files have the final laugh. Worldwide, bureaucrats have been outdated for about half a century. Technocrats have taken over.
Confusion prevails over understanding of the role of these so-called experts who have been called in to replace the obsolete 'Baboos'. I remember my meeting with prime minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali on June 26, 2004. As Chairman Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) I was invited for my professional input into the Sui Gas project for supply of natural gas to Ziarat. After the formal discussions, I floated the idea of bringing in the 'technocrats' for better governance. Prompt came the reply, 'They are not elected'.
He was misguided by the aides in his Secretariat who surrounded him. I had to explain that technocrats replace bureaucrats not politicians. In a technology-driven complex environment of today 'generalists' cannot deliver they are replaced by individuals with technical background combined with management skills.
Jamali was a well-meaning honest politician; he decided to pursue the option of inducting technocrats in all technical ministries. Fortunately, I was able to leave guidelines for this switch to take place. On a happy note, we left his office around 3pm. On the 9pm news that night it was announced that Jamali had resigned.
Experts do bring technical know-how but cannot understand the bureaucratic loops and the file work unless they have been trained in management in their respective area of expertise,; only such a person qualifies to be a technocrat. Bhutto-style of governance is remembered till today. His file and paperwork were excellent. No 'Baboo' could hide behind the papers/procedures. Files were returned within 24 hours either with approval or written comments by the PM.
Every ministry had a night Section Officer who was responsible for late hours co-ordination as the PM worked round-the-clock. Through lateral entry several technocrats were appointed Federal Secretaries to efficiently run their ministries. Engr Masood Hasan headed the Defence Production Division; Nasim Ahmed was appointed Secretary Information while Dr Muhammad Ajmal, a prominent educationist, took over Education.
The PM is right; bureaucracy is the main hurdle. Institutional inertia is insurmountable. As three-time Chief Minister (CM) of Pakistan's largest province he has a team of loyalists who can bring about the much-sought change provided the 'Baboos' are willing to give up their grip over real power. The big question is: who will bell the cat?
After taking charge as Chairman PSF, in 2002, I decided to call on the minister. After exchange of pleasantries, I requested him to bring in technocrats to run the important ministry of science and technology (MoST).
He was very excited with the idea and asked me to prepare Job Descriptions (JDs) for the top three positions (Secretary, Additional Secretary, Joint Secretary). Within a few days I submitted the JDs but there was no response. As the matter was crucial for the ministry, I decided to meet the minister again.
On inquiry he told me that he had forwarded the JDs to the Secretary for a necessary action. Baffled, I asked him why on earth will the secretary give up his job to be replaced by a technocrat?
The minister had no answer. I could sense his reluctance to take on the 'Baboos'. My parting suggestion to him was to get approval of the President and hire technocrats for the three positions on open merit to set the ball rolling but he shied away. Till today MoST remains ineffective, several of its affiliated departments are either being shut down or without professional leadership.
Accountability remains a buzz-word only to please the galleries. Bureaucracy has been able to dodge all forms of checks to its un-limited authority. Major recommendations to reform the bureaucracy were prepared by Justice A. R. Cornelius Commission in the decade of the sixties. Justice Cornelius was himself a Civil Servant, who rose through the ranks of judiciary to reach the position of Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP).
He understood the importance of introducing accountability to contain executive abuse. His recommendations were hijacked by the powerful bureaucrats of their times before they could be implemented. Finally, his inputs were enacted in the 1972 interim constitution as article 216 for the formation of Administrative Accountability Courts. In the permanent 1973 version taxation was removed and a toned-done article 212 was included.
The courts were never established. Finally, in 1979, the entire article was removed through a Martial Law Act. Bureaucracy prevailed as always. Lt-Gen. Ghulam Jillani Khan as Governor Punjab proposed the idea of 'Citizen's Desks' for the redressal of public complaints but there was no implementation. According to Jillani Sb, the President wanted to preserve status-quo to prolong his rule, reforms were not part of his agenda.
Yes, indeed hurdles must be removed. It is not only Pakistan, all the 56 colonial states left by the British continue to suffer. De-colonization must take place. In a democratic country people are respected as customers. With well-entrenched bureaucracy it is an up-hill task which must be challenged with a firm resolve to serve not rule as has been the case. 'Kadam Baraho' is the standard slogans of the Sharifs.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PAC seeks remedy for post-200 unit billing
Junaid Akbar was elected unopposed as Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee in January 2025. Photo: Express/ File The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Tuesday took notice of the electricity tariff slab hike that penalises consumers for exceeding 200 units, directing the Power Division to propose a solution for inflated bills that persist for six months even after a single unit crosses the limit. The committee meeting, chaired by MNA Junaid Akbar Khan, reviewed audit paras related to the Ministry of Energy. Expressing concern, the chair demanded an explanation for the prolonged penalty on consumers who exceed the 200-unit threshold once. Officials briefed the committee on the status of Independent Power Producers (IPPs), revealing a sharp rise in installed capacity over the years. Committee member Shazia Marri questioned why provinces like Sindh and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa continue to endure up to 16 hours of load-shedding despite a surplus in electricity generation. The power secretary informed the committee that 58% of electricity users fall under the 200-unit slab, with subsidised rates now benefiting 18 million consumersup from 11 million previously. He acknowledged the issue of high bills lasting months for consumers who breach the limit once. "To increase the slab limit, a higher subsidy will be needed," he said, adding that the government aims to reform the system by 2027, shifting to direct subsidies using BISP data. The Energy Ministry also noted that the installed capacity of IPPs rose from 9,765MW in 2015 to 25,642MW in 2024, with annual capacity payments jumping from Rs141 billion to Rs1.4 trillion. Committee member Syed Naveed Qamar disputed the Power Division's claim that coal was the main driver of high electricity costs. Meanwhile, Junaid Akbar raised doubts over reports of 200% electricity generation from bagasse, calling the numbers unrealistic.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Bureaucracy the main hurdle
Modernizing governance is the biggest challenge faced by the government the 'Baboo'-friendly Prime Minister (PM) has spoken against his own loyalists. His cabinet includes powerful bureaucrats from Punjab and the former Chief Secretary who now sits as the Cabinet Secretary in complete harmony. The meeting was convened to review the new expert driven framework introduced by the Power Division. To achieve efficient and accountable governance, professionalization and decentralization have been adopted. He blamed the institutional inertia in blocking the much-needed reforms in the bureaucracy. I am not sure whether he was speaking his heart out or was reading the prepared text as he has enjoyed very cordial relationship with the bureaucrats. It is indeed interesting that every ruler starts with the praise of the 'Baboos' but then finally turns against them at the end of their rule. Those who control the files have the final laugh. Worldwide, bureaucrats have been outdated for about half a century. Technocrats have taken over. Confusion prevails over understanding of the role of these so-called experts who have been called in to replace the obsolete 'Baboos'. I remember my meeting with prime minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali on June 26, 2004. As Chairman Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) I was invited for my professional input into the Sui Gas project for supply of natural gas to Ziarat. After the formal discussions, I floated the idea of bringing in the 'technocrats' for better governance. Prompt came the reply, 'They are not elected'. He was misguided by the aides in his Secretariat who surrounded him. I had to explain that technocrats replace bureaucrats not politicians. In a technology-driven complex environment of today 'generalists' cannot deliver they are replaced by individuals with technical background combined with management skills. Jamali was a well-meaning honest politician; he decided to pursue the option of inducting technocrats in all technical ministries. Fortunately, I was able to leave guidelines for this switch to take place. On a happy note, we left his office around 3pm. On the 9pm news that night it was announced that Jamali had resigned. Experts do bring technical know-how but cannot understand the bureaucratic loops and the file work unless they have been trained in management in their respective area of expertise,; only such a person qualifies to be a technocrat. Bhutto-style of governance is remembered till today. His file and paperwork were excellent. No 'Baboo' could hide behind the papers/procedures. Files were returned within 24 hours either with approval or written comments by the PM. Every ministry had a night Section Officer who was responsible for late hours co-ordination as the PM worked round-the-clock. Through lateral entry several technocrats were appointed Federal Secretaries to efficiently run their ministries. Engr Masood Hasan headed the Defence Production Division; Nasim Ahmed was appointed Secretary Information while Dr Muhammad Ajmal, a prominent educationist, took over Education. The PM is right; bureaucracy is the main hurdle. Institutional inertia is insurmountable. As three-time Chief Minister (CM) of Pakistan's largest province he has a team of loyalists who can bring about the much-sought change provided the 'Baboos' are willing to give up their grip over real power. The big question is: who will bell the cat? After taking charge as Chairman PSF, in 2002, I decided to call on the minister. After exchange of pleasantries, I requested him to bring in technocrats to run the important ministry of science and technology (MoST). He was very excited with the idea and asked me to prepare Job Descriptions (JDs) for the top three positions (Secretary, Additional Secretary, Joint Secretary). Within a few days I submitted the JDs but there was no response. As the matter was crucial for the ministry, I decided to meet the minister again. On inquiry he told me that he had forwarded the JDs to the Secretary for a necessary action. Baffled, I asked him why on earth will the secretary give up his job to be replaced by a technocrat? The minister had no answer. I could sense his reluctance to take on the 'Baboos'. My parting suggestion to him was to get approval of the President and hire technocrats for the three positions on open merit to set the ball rolling but he shied away. Till today MoST remains ineffective, several of its affiliated departments are either being shut down or without professional leadership. Accountability remains a buzz-word only to please the galleries. Bureaucracy has been able to dodge all forms of checks to its un-limited authority. Major recommendations to reform the bureaucracy were prepared by Justice A. R. Cornelius Commission in the decade of the sixties. Justice Cornelius was himself a Civil Servant, who rose through the ranks of judiciary to reach the position of Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP). He understood the importance of introducing accountability to contain executive abuse. His recommendations were hijacked by the powerful bureaucrats of their times before they could be implemented. Finally, his inputs were enacted in the 1972 interim constitution as article 216 for the formation of Administrative Accountability Courts. In the permanent 1973 version taxation was removed and a toned-done article 212 was included. The courts were never established. Finally, in 1979, the entire article was removed through a Martial Law Act. Bureaucracy prevailed as always. Lt-Gen. Ghulam Jillani Khan as Governor Punjab proposed the idea of 'Citizen's Desks' for the redressal of public complaints but there was no implementation. According to Jillani Sb, the President wanted to preserve status-quo to prolong his rule, reforms were not part of his agenda. Yes, indeed hurdles must be removed. It is not only Pakistan, all the 56 colonial states left by the British continue to suffer. De-colonization must take place. In a democratic country people are respected as customers. With well-entrenched bureaucracy it is an up-hill task which must be challenged with a firm resolve to serve not rule as has been the case. 'Kadam Baraho' is the standard slogans of the Sharifs. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Panels formed to address issues facing gas sector
ISLAMABAD: The government has established four specialised panels to address key issues in the gas sector, including circular debt, LNG tariffs, unaccounted-for gas (UFG) losses, and the increasing share of LNG in the national gas system, official sources told Business Recorder. According to sources, a Committee on Implementing Structural Reforms in the Petroleum Sector— formed by the Prime Minister and chaired by the Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources— has convened multiple meetings to deliberate on these matters. The composition of the Committee is as following: Minister for Petroleum (Convener), Advisor to Prime Minister on Privatisation, National Coordinator on Energy Reforms, Lt General Muhammad Zafar Iqbal (retd) Secretary, Power Division, Secretary, Petroleum Division, Secretary, Cabinet Division/ representative and Chairman, OGRA. Pakistan faces LNG glut: minister The Minister for Petroleum emphasised that while the foundational work for the committee's assignment had been done through its Integrated Energy Study (Woodmac) conducted by the Petroleum Division, the present focus is to chalk out an implementation plan. He highlighted the importance of aligning the Committee's recommendations with the preparation of the Annual Delivery Plan (ADP) to be settled with LNG suppliers. The representative of Power Division commented that challenges need to be addressed and disruptions need to be looked into. The Chair responded that the tactical issues would be discussed later and, presently, the focus needs to be on sustainability of the gas sector and how LNG over supply/ less off-take is affecting it. The Secretary Petroleum framed the key issues to be addressed by the Committee, namely: rationalisation of gas tariffs (for both indigenous and imported gas), synchronisation of LNG demand with the power sector along with resolution of circular debt within the gas sector. He noted that most of the required data and foundational analysis is already available through the Woodmac study and will serve as the basis for the committee's deliberations. The Chair commented that Committee should focus on implementation as a Plan. The Committee needs to focus on 2026 ADP's preparation and to devised policy of Integrated Energy strategy for Pakistan. The Committee constituted a sub-committee comprising Secretary Power (Lead), DG Gas, MD SNGPL and a nominee from the Task Force. The chair can co-opt any member if he/she deems it necessary to effectively carry out the work and decided to constitute the following (ToRs) for the four sub-committees: Subcommittee 1: work out a comprehensive proposal to synchronise LNG demand of the power sector in a manner that ensures timely and adequate supply without causing abrupt fluctuations in demand. GCEP submission to Woodmac to be considered; and identify causes and propose solutions to avoid sudden changes in LNG requirements by the power sector that lead to diversion of LNG cargo to other sectors. Net Proceeds Differential (NDP) claims, if any, arising due to reduced off-take by Power Division to be considered. Sub-Committee -2 comprising Muhammad Ali (Lead), a nominee of KPMG, Islamabad and any co-opted member to formulate proposals to deal with circular debt stock in the gas sector. Sub-Committee 3 is on LNG tariff rationalisation. Its scope will formulate proposals for LNG tariff rationalisation by revisiting all compositions of tariff (terminal charges, importer margins and LNG service agreement charges etc.) RLNG demand maximization options to be proposed (especially in domestic sector). Sub-Committee 4- domestic gas tariff efficiency and transparency will address efficiency and transparency in tariff for domestic gas tariff including revenue requirements of the gas utilities, actual UFG losses taking into account growing LNG share in gas system, etc. Sui Companies Return on Assets formula revision to be considered to bring better efficiencies. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
