Letters: Despite good experience, S.F.'s building department is still problem-plagued. Here's a fix
However, the story also points outs the department's glaring shortcomings, namely that 'a typical multifamily applicant waits 627 days after approvals to obtain a full set of permits' and that 'the city's building code is 1,000 pages, with decades of lawmakers layering on requirement after requirement, while rarely getting rid of obsolete codes.'
Is this any way to run a city, or should I say ruin a city?
I propose that Mayor Daniel Lurie create a task force to whittle the city's building code down to something closer to the size of an average novel (300 to 400 pages), then assign it as a summer reading assignment to his entire staff.
Stan Barnett, San Francisco
Supervisor deserves recall
Regarding 'Did S.F. moderates 'rile up' Chinese Americans on recalls only to abandon them?' (Opinion, SFChronicle.com, May 4): Residents of San Francisco's District 4 are pretty forgiving: We didn't recall two supervisors who ended up in prison or those who voted in ways we disagreed with.
But previous supervisors met with residents in public meetings, heard their arguments, openly informed them ahead of time what they were planning and took the heat for their decisions.
Supervisor Joel Engardio did none of these when he decided to ditch the widely accepted weekend closure compromise to support entirely closing the Great Highway.
It's not just that Engardio proposed and endorsed Proposition K; it's the underhanded way he went about it that amounts to what many in the Sunset consider 'high crimes and misdemeanors' — to the point where a recall is warranted.
We can't wait until the next election. He doesn't think he did anything wrong, so he'll ignore us again with future important issues affecting our lives.
The Chinese American Democratic Club is quite correct, as quoted in the article, Engardio, 'has shown us time and time again that he isn't a leader.'
We need a supervisor now who honorably represents District 4.
John Higgins, San Francisco
Product misrepresented
Regarding 'How to know if a charity can be trusted with your money? This one thing can tell you' (No-Nonsense Money, SFChronicle.com, May 4): Cecilia Diem, director of the Center for Civil Society, claims in the story that Charity Navigator's ratings only indicate the financial transparency of nonprofit groups. This misrepresents our comprehensive evaluation framework, which specifically addresses leadership quality and operational effectiveness.
Our Encompass Rating System includes assessments across four areas influencing nonprofit success, and only one focuses on finance.
Diem also incorrectly claims that Charity Navigator's ratings 'aren't going to tell you anything about leadership or operations.' Our team relies on IRS research and analysis and evaluates organizational effectiveness using evidence-backed metrics.
Our Causeway Initiative offers estate planning solutions that leverage Charity Navigator's rating to ensure donations remain effective and aligned with donors' intentions.
While we appreciate the Chronicle's focus on informed charitable giving, perpetuating misconceptions about nonprofit evaluation tools undermines donors' ability to make truly educated giving decisions.
Michael Thatcher, president and CEO, Charity Navigator, New York
Be vigilant about tyranny
Winston Churchill called the Battle of the Bulge 'the greatest American battle of the war.' It was the last major German offensive launched against the U.S. Army in World War II in a snowbound forest in Belgium during the Christmas season of 1944.
In one of the bloodiest battles in the fight against tyranny, the Allied forces prevailed, eventually leading to the surrender by Germany on May 8, 1945, Victory in Europe Day.
In celebrating the 80th anniversary of this historic capitulation, Americans and Europeans would be wise to recognize that tyranny tends to fester and is never fully vanquished. It feeds on the indifference and passivity of those who would allow the emergence of an autocrat to go unchecked.
Jane Larkin, Tampa, Fla.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
16 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: What do freedom and liberty mean on this Independence Day?
Last month, at a D-Day Memorial event in France, 101-year-old veteran Harold Terrens said, 'Freedom is everything. I pray for freedom for the whole world.' President Dwight D. Eisenhower once said that the Founding Fathers 'proclaimed to all the world the revolutionary doctrine of the divine right of the common man." Proclaiming that all men are created equal and carry with them God-given rights to life and liberty was indeed a revolutionary idea 249 years ago. Unfortunately, not everyone in the world lives freely. The United Nations' Declaration of Human Rights states, 'All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.' Let us hope and pray that someday soon, every man, woman and child in the world will enjoy the same freedoms that we Americans enjoy this Independence Day. Pete Campbell, San Jose Honor founding ideals As we celebrate the 249th anniversary of Independence Day, we should ask ourselves the same question that President Donald Trump struggled to answer from the Oval Office recently: What does the Declaration of Independence mean to you? Unfortunately, Trump's response was a manifestation of his historical illiteracy — 'a declaration of unity and love and respect, and it means a lot.' It had nothing to do with the decision of the Founding Fathers to declare independence from British rule by seeking 'to dissolve the political bands' with an oppressive monarchy. Independence Day should serve as a reminder that thousands gave their lives to escape the bonds of a government where a single person held supreme authority. It is a day set aside to commemorate the birth of our nation and to celebrate its core principles of liberty and equality, something inexcusably outside of the president's grasp. Jim Paladino, Tampa, Fla. Community led the way Only after that did Supervisor Joel Engardio support a nonbinding resolution — Proposition G — which voters passed overwhelmingly. Let's be clear: Engardio did not start this movement. He was invited in after the heavy lifting was done. It's wrong for him to now take credit as a campaign talking point. Public education deserves more than opportunistic politics. Our children deserve leaders who lead from the start — not just when it's popular. Selena Chu, San Francisco Trash the new cans Regarding 'S.F.'s quest for a better trash can was plagued by high costs. Will this time be different?' (San Francisco, July 1): This story brings back memories of the original interminable squabbles over the cost and design of new San Francisco garbage cans. I recall the mock-ups as ugly and impractical. It is hard to believe, given the city budget deficit, that Public Works has decided to spend $3,000 each for 3,000 new cans. The chosen design looks like shiny stainless steel and is covered with multiple, vertical and elevated strips of metal. Imagine the difficulty cleaning the graffiti embedded in all those recessed areas. A sleek, simple and flat design should have won the day. Karen Cliffe, San Francisco Don't mince words Let's skip the cute names like 'Alligator Alcatraz' and call the Trump administration's new Florida immigration detention center what it is: a concentration camp. Prisoners at the real Alcatraz landed there after going through a trial, not just being rounded up by masked goons without warrants. Our country is headed in a bad direction, and it's important for us to speak about it truthfully. Siobhan Ruck, San Francisco
San Francisco Chronicle
3 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Medicaid supports my daughter's 24/7 care. What will happen if Congress cuts funding?
My 35-year-old daughter, Flannery, is severely disabled and receives primary care from a Federally Qualified Health Center in San Rafael. As a way of giving back for the incredible work it has done for Flannery, I have served on the board of Marin Community Clinics for the past seven years. I understand that under the Senate version of the tax and spending bill, Marin Community Clinics and 1,400 other health centers stand to lose 30% of their Medicaid and block grant funding. Millions of Americans will lose access to health care. People are going to die. It's that simple. Flannery was born with cerebral palsy, is nonverbal and quadriplegic. She requires round-the-clock assistance. She is also supported by the state Regional Centers system, which indirectly receives funding from Medicaid. I do not know what these cuts will mean for Flannery, but I know they will be disastrous. All to provide large tax cuts to the super wealthy. Martin Weil, Sonoma Pay too low Regarding 'S.F. gave these homeless nonprofits nearly $2 billion. The salaries of their execs might surprise you' (San Francisco, June 27): I found the story surprising, but not because of the shock promised. Rather, I noted the effort to put nonprofit leaders on blast with backward speculation, troubling. Capitalism creates homelessness. And our region's contributions to free enterprise have been particularly egregious, with wealth gaps enabling some of the highest rents in the country. Our tech industry flourishes by selling fitness apps, payroll software, cryptocurrency, and refrigerators with computer screens on the door. We venerate commodities, claiming innovation, judgment-free. But if you opt out of (or are not privileged to) a tech career, the assumption is that you should not have equal access to this economy. The story notes one nonprofit's wage differential between executives and workers. Had they been asked, I'm sure the organizations would have thoughtful responses about values and wage philosophies. Because nonprofits pay attention to wealth equity — and attitudes that conflate this work with self-sacrifice require us to bring the receipts. This story shows we need to reevaluate our collective values. Given the Bay Area's staggering homelessness crisis, if anything, our nonprofit leaders — and all workers in this industry — deserve higher pay. Kristin Hatch, development director, Homeless Prenatal Program, San Francisco Don't misuse CEQA Regarding 'This rich California city is losing its mind over a housing project — and it shows why new rules are needed' (Emily Hoeven, June 28): Emily Hoeven's column on Menlo Park highlights how the California Environmental Quality Act and local resistance can stall needed housing. But in South San Jose, we face the opposite: The law is being manipulated to fast-track dangerous sprawl. A developer is proposing 173 market-rate homes on a hillside previously zoned for 54 units at the end of Harry Road in an area with no sidewalks, narrow roads, high wildfire danger, and known landslide risk. This is not infill. It's speculative development disguised as a housing solution. Even worse, the developer is attempting to bypass a full environmental impact report, under 2019's SB330, despite the parcel bordering wildlife corridors that support biodiversity and provide natural buffers in an already climate-sensitive area. This is exactly the kind of CEQA misuse that reform should prevent — not enable. If California is serious about climate, safety and equity, then it must protect the public's right to question unsustainable projects — not gut the laws that give us a voice. Lisa Lubliner, San Jose Bicoastal emissions Regarding 'Bicoastal living isn't just for the ultra wealthy. Here's how creatives make it work' (Bay Area, June 24): The story struck me as remarkably tone deaf. Airline flights are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Ignoring this aspect in the reporting was a missed opportunity to discuss the repercussions of a bicoastal lifestyle. Liz Eva, Castro Valley
San Francisco Chronicle
4 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: It's not a story of rich people against housing in Menlo Park. Here's what is at stake
Regarding 'This rich California city is losing its mind over a housing project — and it shows why new rules are needed' (Emily Hoeven, June 28): Menlo Park has many neighborhoods with varying levels of housing. It is not just a wealthy town fighting low-income housing, as Chronicle Columnist Emily Hoeven would lead one to believe. And, I am not a NIMBY lunatic. Our downtown area is akin to a public square — a place to gather, to run errands and enjoy the ambiance of a small, suburban community. Most people access it by car because there is little public transportation, and the parking is located behind the storefronts. The success of our businesses comes from this access, which allows people from the entire area, and of a range of ages and abilities, to park and walk in downtown. The city's plan reduces the parking where more is needed. To replace this safe, accessible parking and the walkability of downtown with high-rise housing is a short-sighted, destructive and easy answer to state-mandated housing pressure. Virtually all downtown businesses line up against this plan; other locations, other options have been suggested. I encourage Hoeven to dig deeper next time, to work to undo bias and labels, and to present the full story in all its complications for our city and for the times in which we live. Lynne McClure, Menlo Park More planning needed Regarding 'This rich California city is losing its mind over a housing project — and it shows why new rules are needed' (Emily Hoeven, June 28): Chronicle columnist Emily Hoeven called the lawsuit opposing the city's downtown housing plan 'unhinged.' It's a striking word. When a journalist frames a perspective that way, it stops being a conversation and starts becoming an agenda. The group I'm involved with, Civifolia, doesn't support using the California Environmental Quality Act to block inclusive, climate-friendly housing. At the same time, sound governance requires more than clinging to one idea as conditions change. It calls for legally grounded, adaptable strategies designed for long-term success. Civifolia recommends four steps that Menlo Park can take to preserve local control and comply with state law: Add affordable housing-prioritized sites in eastern Menlo Park that were left out of the city's Housing Element for reasons inconsistent with fair housing goals. Work transparently with the state to address downtown site risks. Pursue redevelopment of the newly sold U.S. Geological Survey campus. Reevaluate large city-owned land near Burgess Park. This isn't a culture war, it's a planning challenge. And it demands solutions, not sides. Skyler Ellis, contributor, Civifolia, Menlo Park Who writes history of Trump? Regarding 'SCOTUS deals huge blow to judges' power to rein in Trump in birthright citizenship case' (Politics, June 27): The courts are the last check on the president, but as Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett admits, the judiciary, including the Supreme Court, doesn't have unbridled authority to enforce its decisions. Barrett has cautioned against an 'imperial judiciary,' emphasizing that while the executive branch has to follow the law, the judiciary's ability to force that compliance has limitations. Following Friday's U.S. Supreme Court rulings, I fear that history will document how President Donald Trump's three appointments to the Supreme Court had an enormous impact on the erosion of the rule of law and destruction of our democratic republic. It is becoming clear that all power may have been ceded to the executive branch — something that our founding fathers wished to prevent. I'd be hard pressed to refute the claim that we now live in a dictatorial autocracy. Will historians be intimidated and coerced by the president? If they acquiesce, Trump, discursively, may be able to write the future, what communication scholars call the rhetorical construction of history. And that, I worry, will take decades to correct and will result in the loss of what the Constitution guarantees all of us in the Bill of Rights.
