logo
Who works harder - the French or the Germans?

Who works harder - the French or the Germans?

Local Germany4 days ago
France's prime minister recently scolded his compatriots for not working enough, while the country's public accounts minister
went further and said
: "In France, we work 100 hours less per person than in Germany".
The comments come in the context of France's fraught budget debates - the 2026 Budget aims to save €40 billion to finally get a handle on the country's spiralling budget deficit and one of the measures proposed is
to axe two public holidays
.
But is it actually true, as minister Amélie de Montchalin says, that the Germans work harder than the French?
Judging by the country's respective stereotypes, you would think it is - while Germans are clichéd as hard-working, efficient and (dare we say it?) just a touch humourless, the French are widely seen as far more interested in having a good lunch, a long holiday and perhaps a romantic encounter than they are in work.
But stereotypes are not statistics, and here, the data tells an unexpected story.
Advertisement
De Montchalin's figures appear to be based on
OECD data from 2024
which shows that France worked an average of 666 hours per capita, compared with 724 hours in Germany. Both countries are slackers by European standards - the European Union average is 776 hours.
So case closed? Not quite.
This data uses the crude metric of dividing the total numbers of hours worked per year by the country's population - and that's the whole people including children, pensioners, the unemployed and other people not in the workforce.
This puts France at a disadvantage, because it it has a relatively high percentage of the population not in work, due to a combination of factors such as a long life expectancy which, coupled with an early retirement age, means that
around a quarter of the population is retired
.
France also has a higher unemployment rate than Germany, but it also has a higher birth-rate meaning that there are more children who are not (yet) in the workforce.
The OECD
also publishes more nuanced data
which looks at work hours divided by the total workforce - a more accurate measure of how hard each worker is actually working .
On this metric, France wins - French workers work 1,494 hours per year, while Germans work 1,340 hours a year. Once again, both are below the EU average of 1,570 hours a year. The European champions/suckers are Greece, where people work 1,882 hours per year.
Eurostat data backs up this picture, showing that on average French workers work 35.8 hours per week, while Germans work 33.9 hours per week (this data includes full time and part time workers).
Advertisement
Last year, France's
Conseil d'analyse économique
(council for economic analysis) published a study on the total number of working hours over time, comparing France, Germany, the UK and the USA.
It shows a uniform decline in the number of hours worked in Europe from the 1970s, a trend that was reversed 20 years later - since the mid-1990s, the number of hours worked has been rising in France, Germany and the UK.
So overall we can say that Germans are more likely to be part of the workforce than the French - but among those who do work, the French work more.
It is still true that the French lunch break is widely observed, though, in fact the country's workplace code specifies that
it is illegal to eat while at your desk/work station
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU-Africa migration policy shift: Cooperation or coersion? – DW – 07/21/2025
EU-Africa migration policy shift: Cooperation or coersion? – DW – 07/21/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

EU-Africa migration policy shift: Cooperation or coersion? – DW – 07/21/2025

New hardline EU immigration policy could see development funding cut unless African nations prevent migrants from leaving. Some experts are warning its counterproductive, undermines sovereignty and fuels resentment. The European Union (EU) Commission has proposed conditioning development aid for African and other third countries on their cooperation with migration enforcement. Under its Global Europe instrument, aid allocations may now depend on how well a country cooperates with returns, readmissions, and border controls. Internal EU documents cited by the Financial Times and Reuters state that countries that do not comply with deportation agreements could see aid slashed. The move has led to criticism from humanitarian organizations, with Oxfam calling it a "distortion of the EU's development goals" and a "short-term political fix" to deeper structural issues. The policy shift comes amid mounting pressure within Europe to curb irregular migration across the Mediterranean and Sahara routes. The pressure is particularly intense in countries like Germany, Italy, and Greece, where national governments face increasing domestic opposition to asylum seekers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Policy experts and scholars across Africa are condemning the policy shift, calling it coercive and neocolonial. The EU's approach, they argue, is likely to undermine both sovereignty and trust. "Stop your people from migrating or lose aid — sounds to me like a message of cohesion and not cooperation," Dr. Maria Ayuk, a postdoctoral researcher in peace and security at the Otto-von-Guericke University in Germany, told DW. "This reduces the African nations actually to border guards rather than equal partners in EU is securitizing and has over the years politicized migration." Ayuk added: "What the EU is doing is forcing Africans to keep people in Africa because they are afraid of the Africanization of Europe." While European policymakers often emphasize "pull factors" such as jobs and security, African analysts say greater attention is needed on the conditions driving people to migrate in the first place. "People will definitely have the urge to move," said Fidel Amakye Owusu, a Ghana-based geopolitical and security advisor. Some of the main drivers are "socioeconomic problems, rural-urban development gaps, abject poverty, conflicts, and unemployment," he told DW. Paul Ejime, a media and global affairs analyst, agrees: "They are leaving because the environment…is not conducive." Ejime also noted that "poverty, hardship, and instability" are pushing Africans to risk their lives in search of opportunity. "Shutting the door or building walls is not the solution." According to Ayuk, governance failures are a part of the problem. "We have several autocratic leaders that want to stay in power forever… These are the core issues we have to address," she told DW. Experts are of the consensus that Europe's trade practices and foreign interventions have directly contributed to instability and economic underdevelopment in Africa. These conditions, they argue, further drive migration. "Europe's extractive trade policies, arms exports, and selective interventions… have contributed to instability and insecurity, and of course underdevelopment, fueling the very migration it seeks to prevent," Ayuk said. "Most of the health personnel in these countries are in Europe and America. The health sector is poorly funded, under-resourced, and the personnel they have are leaving the country," Ejime noted. The problem is exacerbated by Europe's double standards: "They can open their doors for people from Ukraine…but when it concerns Africans, they tighten the rules." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The EU's tactic of conditioning development aid on cooperation with its migration objectives is also perceived as exploitative. "Yes, I think that the EU is tying aid to migration control," said Ayuk. "It weaponizes it and it shifts aid from solidarity to self-interest." She said that such an approach "undermines trust and mutual respect" between Europe and Africa. Ejime is also of the view that "Of course, they have always done that…At times they come up with conditionalities when they want to give you any support," he told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While sharply critical of the EU policy shift, the three experts who spoke to DW agreed that African governments bear significant responsibility for the crisis and the tough immigration policies towards their citizens. "Africa is the problem because it lacks the international agency," said Ayuk. "Those that are supposed to represent Africa do not represent the collective interest of Africa, but rather the individual interests of elites."Some experts are calling on African leaders to re-define the terms of negotiations with the EU. "Unfortunately, they are negotiating from a position of weakness. They are weak. The economies are weak. Politically, they are not even popular in their own countries and some of them are corrupt," Ejime said. "In the past, under slavery, Africans were forced to go abroad. Today, young people are the ones running the environment is not conducive." Despite their critiques, the experts believe Africa is not powerless — but maintain that, its strength can only come if it can mobilize political will. "Africa has the potential and leverage exists," Ayuk said, pointing to the continent's resources and regional blocs. "But Africa requires unified leadership and a shift from dependence to a self-defined development." Owusu sees a need to harness technology and ensure effective management of national borders. "Many African countries lack the technology to patrol all their borders… It is very difficult to manage such borders and control the flow of people." However, he warns that the EU's approach could be counter-productive for countries making genuine efforts. As Europe grows more insular in its migration policies, some African countries may begin to pivot toward alternative global partnerships. "With the rise of the BRICS countries and other Global South initiatives," said Owusu. "The more [the West] looks inwards for solutions, the more confrontational their policies become, and the more Africa moves towards the East." Owusu suggests that if Europe continues using development aid as leverage, Africa could deepen ties with emerging powers like China, India, Brazil, and Russia But Ejime proposed a different approach: "Africa needs to be strategic, maximize its own interest, and negotiate from a position of strength." He added, "If skilled workers go abroad, maybe there should be a kind of agreement or contract that sends money back to develop the health and education systems." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The experts agree that the current EU model that links aid to migration control, risks damaging long-term relations with Africa and fails to address root causes. "Migration should be managed, yes, but not securitized or politicized. We need reciprocal relations based on respect, equity, and justice," Ayuk said. Owusu also emphasised the need for mutual respect in achieving desired outcomes. "Europe must stop seeing Africa as the problem and start treating it as a partner," he told DW. Ejime turns the spotlight back on Africa and the need for effective leadership: "Africa is not zero-poor. It's poorly managed. And has been impoverished by bad leadership." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Ahead Of New Talks, Iran Blames Europeans For Nuclear Deal Collapse
Ahead Of New Talks, Iran Blames Europeans For Nuclear Deal Collapse

Int'l Business Times

time5 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Ahead Of New Talks, Iran Blames Europeans For Nuclear Deal Collapse

Tehran on Monday blamed European powers for the failure of the 2015 nuclear deal, accusing them of breaking their commitments ahead of renewed talks in Istanbul with Britain, France and Germany. The 2015 deal, reached between Iran and the UN Security Council's permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany, imposed curbs on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. But it unravelled in 2018 when the United States, during Donald Trump's first term as president, unilaterally withdrew from the accord and reimposed sweeping sanctions. The Europeans had pledged continued support for the deal, but the mechanism intended to offset US sanctions never materialised effectively and many Western firms were forced to exit Iran, which has since faced a deepening economic crisis. "The European parties have been at fault and negligent in implementing" the nuclear agreement, said Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baqaei. His remarks come ahead of a meeting Friday in Istanbul between Iranian officials and representatives from Britain, France and Germany to discuss the future of the nuclear deal. Ahead of those talks, Baqaei said Tehran would host a trilateral meeting on Tuesday about the nuclear issue and the potential reimposition of sanctions with Chinese and Russian representatives. In recent weeks, the three European powers have threatened to trigger the UN "snapback" mechanism to reimpose international sanctions on Tehran, accusing it of breaching its nuclear commitments. A German diplomatic source had told AFP on Sunday the E3 were in contact with Tehran and said "Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon". "That is why Germany, France and the United Kingdom are continuing to work intensively in the E3 format to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear programme," the source said. The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed country currently enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far beyond the 3.67 percent cap set by the 2015 accord. That is a short step from the 90 percent enrichment required for a nuclear weapon. Using the snapback clause was "meaningless, unjustifiable and immoral", Baqaei told a news conference, arguing that Iran only began distancing itself from the agreement in response to Western non-compliance. "Iran's reduction of its commitments was carried out in accordance with the provisions outlined in the agreement," he said. Western powers -- led by the United States and backed by Israel, Iran's arch-enemy -- have long accused Tehran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons capability. Iran has repeatedly denied this, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production. Tehran and Washington had held five rounds of nuclear talks since April, but a planned meeting on June 15 was cancelled after Israel launched a military strike on Iran on June 13, triggering a 12-day conflict. "At this stage, we have no intention of speaking with America," Baqaei said Monday. Israel launched on June 13 a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis, targeting key military and nuclear facilities. The United States launched its own set of strikes against Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz.

Ukraine updates: Kyiv ramps up attacks on Moscow – DW – 07/21/2025
Ukraine updates: Kyiv ramps up attacks on Moscow – DW – 07/21/2025

DW

time6 hours ago

  • DW

Ukraine updates: Kyiv ramps up attacks on Moscow – DW – 07/21/2025

Kyiv has intensified attacks inside Russia, targeting the capital Moscow for the second day running. Meanwhile, Russia continues to pummel Ukraine as EU leaders meet to discuss military aid. Join DW for the latest. Ukraine launched major drone attacks on Russia overnight, sowing chaos at the country's airports. Kyiv has increasingly targeted the Russian capital, launching at least 60 drones at Moscow over the weekend. EU and UK leaders from the Ukraine Contact Group have convened to discuss further military support for Kyiv. Beijing has slammed EU sanctions on Russia that affect Chinese interests, saying they will have "negative consequences" for the continued its massive drone and missile attacks on Ukraine as it seeks to break Kyiv's will 1,248 days into its invasion of the country. Ukraine's Air Force on Monday said it had downed 224 drones and missiles from a total of 424 Russian drones and 26 missiles fired upon the country overnight. Kyiv said another 203 Russian drones disappeared from their radar and were likely jammed electronically. Russia has launched several thousand drones and missiles at Ukraine in recent weeks in what is also seen as a snub of US President Donald Trump's declared intention of striking a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv. Authorities in Kyiv say at least one person was killed in the overnight attacks and at least two injured. Several buildings in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv — including a high-rise apartment complex, a supermarket and a kindergarten — were damaged in the attack. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko advised residents to remain in bomb shelters even as the entrance to one of them in a city subway station was targeted in the Monday morning Russian attack. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ukraine continued to defend itself against Russian aggression this weekend and increased its attacks on the capital Moscow, sowing chaos and closing down airports there. Russian media reported that thousands of passengers had been stranded after their flights were cancelled as a result of Kyiv's latest barrage of drones targeted Moscow. Russia's Defense Ministry on Monday said it had downed 117 drones overnight, following 172 that it downed the night prior. It also said that it had downed 30 drones in the Moscow region on Saturday night and another 30 on Sunday. The attacks on the capital were the heaviest since Russia launched its invasion of neighboring Ukraine on February 24, 2022. To transport passengers, authorities added extra train service from Saint Petersburg to Moscow. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv would increase its attacks deep inside Russia in an effort to force Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table. Zelenskyy has said he wants direct talks this week. Russia has so far ignored his call as well as US President Donald Trump's threat of serious consequences for Russia if it does not soon agree to a ceasefire. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Welcome to DW's coverage of the latest developments in Russia's war in Ukraine. On Monday, we start with Ukraine stepping up attacks inside Russia and increasingly targeting the capital Moscow, where airports were largely closed. China has also sharply criticized EU sanctions on some of its businesses in the bloc's effort to chip away at Beijing's support for Moscow. Stay tuned for the latest news and analysis from the ongoing war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store