'Nightmare' Neighbour fined for rat infested garden in Melton Mowbray
Richard Bates, who lives in Melton Mowbray near Leicester, was approached by his local council in September 2024 over the overgrown vegetation at the front of his house.
He later got formal warnings and a fixed penalty notice, before council workers eventually moved in to tidy up the site.
They were tasked with clearing the 'very overgrown vegetation and any other items that could provide food and harbour vermin'.
While carrying out the work, they found a rat's nest in the garden, which Melton Borough Council described as a 'nightmare'.
On July 9 at Leicester Magistrates' Court, the matter was found proved in Bates' absence and he received a £500. More Trending
He was also ordered to pay £500 towards the council's costs and a victim charge of £200, while the council said he would also be recharged for the cost of the works.
Bates was found proved of failing to comply with a community protection notice.
Councillor Sarah Cox, portfolio holder for corporate finance, property and resources at the council, said: 'Even with support from our teams, the resident failed to adhere to the conditions set out to him, forcing us to take necessary action to keep the area clean and free of pests.
'We take issues such as anti-social behaviour very seriously.
'If a supportive approach fails, we will not hesitate to enforce and act to keep our communities a safe and thriving place to live.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Man made friend strip before 'parading' him through Welsh village naked
MORE: Afghan veteran warns data breach poses shadow threat 'for years to come'
MORE: Three minutes cut from 'raw' prison footage of the night Epstein died
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
19 minutes ago
- Spectator
Base instincts: unease on the garrisons housing Afghan refugees
Helping Afghan refugees escape Taliban retribution has not proved easy; ensuring their integration into their host countries more challenging still. In September 2021, a month after the United States completed its mass evacuation of refugees from Afghanistan, a serving female soldier was reportedly assaulted by a group of Afghan men at Fort Bliss in New Mexico. The incident caused a brief scandal but that was swiftly contained. Within six months, 76,000 Afghan evacuees had been processed and resettled into American communities. The UK has taken a different approach. As part of the Afghan resettlement programme, around 39,000 refugees have been brought here since the fall of Kabul. Some 2,300 Afghans, many of them young men, are housed not in civilian accommodation, but on active Ministry of Defence property, including housing estates reserved outside military bases. This means they live alongside serving military personnel and their spouses and children. In some garrison towns, significant blocks of military housing have been effectively turned over to this purpose. Soldiers and local government officials say that it is not always a harmonious arrangement. One soldier told me that groups of Afghan men stand outside family homes at all hours. Unregistered vehicles, he claimed, appear in the middle of the night, revving their engines. Women on the bases, the soldier added, have altered their dog-walking routes to avoid these groups, as some of the men react aggressively to dogs, even in some cases kicking them. On Facebook groups for military personnel in the areas surrounding these barracks, similar complaints are made. One post from Alanbrooke barracks in North Yorkshire recently claimed Afghan teenagers were ganging up to fight local teenagers. Another post on a page about Durrington barracks in Wiltshire alleges an Afghan teenager stole flowers from a memorial on a bench outside a local Tesco. These are two isolated incidences, of course, but they illustrate unease among communities about the handling of Afghan resettlement. Several soldiers I spoke to said that when concerns are raised and sent up the chain of command, they go unanswered. The assumption among personnel, whether or not it is correct, is that this intransigence is political, because senior members of the military establishment are unwilling to confront integration issues. Simon Diggins, a former colonel who served as defence attaché in Kabul between 2008 and 2010, told me that while successive governments worked hard 'to get people into the country', they did 'not put time and money into integration'. The country's largest military base is Catterick in North Yorkshire. With a population of more than 14,000 and covering over 2,400 acres, since last September it has been home to around 64 settled Afghan families, housed mostly in MoD properties that were intended as service family accommodation. Catterick is a town entirely shaped by the military and its history, and the names of the streets where many Afghan families find themselves reflect this. Amiens Crescent is named after the first world war battle where there were 22,000 British casualties; Aisne Road takes its name from the three battles where hundreds of thousands of Allied troops were killed or wounded. There were cans and crisp packets strewn outside the homes. Nearby Allenby Road – Viscount Allenby led the Egyptian Expeditionary Force against the Ottoman Empire – had become a fly-tipping site, with stained mattresses dumped on its grass verges. The litter and tipping were unpleasant, but it was unclear who was responsible for the mess. While locals asserted that littering had increased recently, I could see no sign of groups of Afghan men standing around on the streets being intimidating, as some locals claimed. One ex-serviceman in Catterick offered a more nuanced perspective on the Afghan resettlement. He told me the problem was not those who had served alongside the armed forces, but those who 'bring their friends and family over', as 'this is how it starts'. He was not the only soldier I spoke to who equivocated. Some military personnel felt the need to caveat their complaints about their new neighbours with assurances that they were not racist and that they valued their allies. Some spoke at length about their admiration for the Gurkhas and had positive things to say about other Commonwealth units and their families in the area ('Commonwealth soldiers bring their families as well and nobody has an issue with that,' one told me). The concerns expressed about recent Afghan arrivals is to do with the speed and scale of the change which military communities have faced. Many soldiers have chosen to vote against these rapid changes with their feet. Serving and former personnel told me of colleagues who have quit the army in response to the Afghan resettlement – specifically for the safety of their families. And now many of them are also planning to vote against what's going on at the ballot box. One captain explained that when he was leading a training exercise during the 2024 election, almost every soldier under his command said they were planning to vote Reform. That was not just confined to the lower ranks. A local in Catterick said that of the five senior officers he knew, four intended to vote Reform at the next election. Centrist politicians have long claimed that a vote for Reform is just a passing protest. But if those who have served in uniform see both main parties housing thousands of Afghans in homes which were designed for hard-pressed military families, this reaction is unsurprising. The armed forces are the spine of the state – called upon when the NHS, the police, border force and prison services are stretched beyond capacity. If they feel their fears are going unaddressed, then their quiet quitting should concern us all.
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Judge's seven-word rebuke of driver after car smash 'could have killed hundreds'
Jack Emmerson, 33, can continue driving after having eight points put on his licence despite crashing through level crossing barriers, leaving his vehicle on a busy railway line A judge scolded a reckless driver who smashed through a set of level crossing barriers before abandoning his car on the tracks. Jack Emmerson fled the scene and chose not to report the damaged vehicle on the railway line in Leicestershire in February, and was told his foolish actions "could easily have caused hundreds of deaths". Magistrates said they were horrified the 33-year-old's actions, estimated to cost £30,000 in damage and delay repayments, as he was sentenced. Police arrived to find Emmerson's Vauxhall Insignia blocking the line, with a train stopped nearby. The airbags had deployed in the car, and the front of the vehicle was badly damaged, Leicester Magistrates' Court heard. Skid marks showed the car had failed to make a bend and gone through the level crossing barriers. Prosecutor Leanne Ashcroft said Emmerson, 33, had been "driving at speed" and made "no attempt to navigate the bend in the road". The incident happened at about 5.45pm on Sunday, February 9, at the level crossing in Orston Lane near Bottesford in the north of the county, LeicestershireLive report. Ms Ashcroft said a witness had spotted Emmerson - who lives in Whatton, Nottinghamshire, three miles from the scene of the crash - get out of the car, which had "significant front end damage", and head off on foot along the railway tracks. She said there was also "significant damage" to the level crossing, valued at about £4,000. There were also further costs to Network Rail of about £26,125 due to the delays to trains on the line, which runs from Nottingham to Grantham, she said. Emmerson pleaded guilty to failing to report an accident, interfering with key infrastructure and driving without due care and attention. He was represented in court by Zara Cowan. She said: "He accepted that he took the bend at speed and he was unable to control the vehicle. This is his first accident he has ever had, so I'd ask you to take that into consideration." Ms Cowan said Emmerson lived with his father and had a 47-mile round trip to get to work every day. She said Emmerson already had three points on his licence and that anything more than eight more points for the latest offence would leave him unemployed and unable to give money to his father. The chairman of the bench, Jane Morton, told Emmerson: "I think 'horrified' is the only word for this - you could have killed hundreds of people. "You left the scene. You left your car on a level crossing. It's appalling." Emmerson was given an 18-month community order with 200 hours of unpaid work, 10 days on programmes recommended by the Probation Service and a 12-month mental health treatment requirement. He also has to pay £85 court costs and a £114 victim surcharge. He had eight points put on his licence, meaning he can still drive. Mrs Morton said: "You retain your licence on a thread. "If you do anything else, you know that no other bench will give you this opportunity. You will be banned and it will be lengthy."
South Wales Argus
12 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Enforcement of 20mph speed limits continues across Newport
The officers were not specifically deployed to catch speeding motorists, but to reinforce awareness that the 20mph restriction is still active, and that failure to comply may result in a summons. The reminder forms part of Operation Atal, named after the Welsh word for 'prevent.' GoSafe Wales has confirmed that enforcement of newly designated 20mph roads has not changed, despite recent consultation and media and political pressure advocating a return to 30mph limits. Following the introduction of the default 20mph speed limit across Wales in September 2023, enforcement in areas that previously had 30mph limits was temporarily paused. This allowed drivers time to adjust and gave authorities space to collect data on compliance and road safety. Meanwhile, 20mph zones in place prior to the change remained under active enforcement, once signage and traffic orders were verified. Going forward, road safety risk will determine where enforcement is considered. Educational operations will remain the first line of response, but formal enforcement will be applied where engagement proves ineffective or public concern is high. GoSafe Wales has enforced 20mph zones since 2021, particularly near schools and areas with vulnerable road users. New enforcement requests will be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking local risk factors into account. A spokesperson emphasized that enforcement will remain 'proportionate and fair,' supporting long-term behavioural change to improve road safety across Wales.
