
Jaishankar refutes Trump's India-Pakistan ceasefire claims: ‘Was in the room when JD Vance spoke to PM Modi…'
Jaishankar is on an official visit to the US and will travel to Washington DC to participate in the Quad Foreign Ministers' Meeting on July 1 (today).
After the interview, answering a question about Donald Trump's ceasefire claim and whether there was any negative impact on India-US trade, Jaishankar said, 'No, I don't think so.'
"I think the trade people are doing what the trade people should be doing, which is negotiate with numbers and lines and products and do their trade-offs. I think they are very professional and very, very focused about it,' he added.
Jaishankar further said that there is a national consensus in India that 'our dealings with Pakistan are bilateral'.
Recounting the event as he saw it unfold on then, Jaishakar shared, 'And in this particular case, I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice President (JD) Vance spoke to Prime Minister (Narendra) Modi on the night of May 9, saying that the Pakistanis would launch a very massive assault on India if we did not accept certain things.'
'…the Prime Minister was impervious to what the Pakistanis were threatening to do. On the contrary, he indicated that there would be a response from us. This was the night before and the Pakistanis did attack us massively that night, we responded very quickly thereafter,' he said.
'And the next morning, Mr (Secretary of State Marco) Rubio called me up and said the Pakistanis were ready to talk. So I can only tell you from my personal experience what happened. The rest I leave to you,' he added.
On the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar asserted that it was an act of economic warfare meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, and stressed that India will not allow nuclear blackmail to prevent it from responding to terror emanating from Pakistan.
'India has had a string of terrorist attacks over the years emanating from Pakistan and in the wake of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, there was a sentiment in the country that 'enough is enough',' Jaishankar said.
He added, 'The Pahalgam attack was an act of economic warfare. It was meant to destroy tourism in Kashmir, which was the mainstay of the economy. It was also meant to provoke religious violence because people were asked to identify their faith before they were killed. So we decided that we cannot let terrorists function with impunity. The idea that they are on that side of the border, and that, therefore, sort of prevents retribution, I think, that's a proposition that needs to be challenged and that is what we did.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US Senate narrowly pass Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill
After hours of stalemate, the Republican-controlled US Senate on Tuesday to passed the Donald Trump's mega-bill on tax and spending. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed with Vice-President JD Vance casting a tie-breaking vote after more than 24 hours of debate. It now heads back to the House, or lower chamber, where it still faces more opposition. Trump had given the Republican-controlled Congress a deadline of 4 July to send him a final version of the bill to sign into law.


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
'One Big Beautiful Bill': Senate passes Trump's spending bill after marathon voting session; JD Vance breaks tie
The US Senate on Tuesday passed President Donald Trump's flagship spending bill after a marathon voting session that lasted more than 18 hours. The vote came after a prolonged "vote-a-rama" during which senators offered and debated numerous amendments to the nearly 1,000-page legislation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The bill, which Trump calls the "One Big Beautiful Bill", aims to extend his first-term tax cuts at a cost of $4.5 trillion, increase military spending, and fund mass deportations and border security. The legislation is expected to add over $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, as per a report by the news agency AFP. The Senate passage is seen as a significant step for the Trump administration, which is pushing to have the legislation signed into law by Friday, ahead of US Independence Day celebrations. However, the bill now faces a separate vote in the House of Representatives, where several Republican lawmakers have expressed concerns. Senators have been divided over provisions in the bill that would strip around $1 trillion in subsidised health care from millions of low-income Americans. Independent analysts, as quoted by AFP, say nearly 12 million people could lose health coverage by 2034 due to proposed cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Earlier, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt urged Republicans to "stay tough and unified" as the Senate slogged through the amendment process. Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticised the pace of proceedings, saying, "They've got a lot of members who were promised things that they may not be able to deliver on. And so they're just stalling. But we're just pushing forward amendment after amendment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They don't like these amendments. The public is on our side in almost every amendment we do." Senate Democrats focused their amendments on opposing cuts to health care, food aid programmes, and clean energy tax credits. Despite strong opposition from Democrats, Trump maintained support within the Senate, where Republicans hold a narrow majority. Republican Majority Leader John Thune could only afford to lose one more vote after conservatives Rand Paul and Thom Tillis publicly opposed the bill. The bill's next hurdle is the House of Representatives, where it may face stronger resistance. Some fiscal conservatives argue the bill does not cut spending enough, while moderate Republicans are worried about the impact on Medicaid. The bill has also led to internal rifts within the Republican camp. Trump's former adviser Elon Musk, who resigned as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in May, renewed his criticism of the bill. As voting began, Musk said, "debt slavery" and called for the creation of a new political party. He added, "Republicans campaigned on reduced federal spending only to vote for the bill," and said he would work to challenge lawmakers who supported the package. A vote in the House could take place as early as Wednesday. The 'Big, beautiful bill' includes a total of $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, based on the latest analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). It makes permanent the tax rates introduced in Trump's 2017 legislation, which are set to expire at the end of the year unless Congress approves. The bill also introduces new tax measures Trump had proposed during his campaign, including eliminating taxes on tips. The legislation rolls back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits. Democrats argue this move will significantly impact investments in wind and solar energy across the country. The bill outlines $1.2 trillion in spending cuts, mainly affecting Medicaid and food assistance programs. These cuts would come through new work requirements for able-bodied individuals, including some parents and older adults, stricter eligibility rules, and adjustments to how the federal government reimburses states. In addition, the bill allocates $350 billion for border and national security, including funding for deportation operations. A portion of this would be financed through new fees levied on immigrants.

Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Threatens Musk's Empire, Says He'd Be NOTHING Without Government Help
/ Jul 01, 2025, 09:30PM IST Donald Trump just threw major shade at Elon Musk on Truth Social, mocking the billionaire by saying that without U.S. subsidies, he'd have to 'close up shop and head back home to South Africa.' The former president didn't stop there—he even joked about shutting down SpaceX launches and hinted that his DOGE department should 'take a hard look' at Musk's empire. The drama's peaking—watch to see how this wild political feud is unfolding.