Discussions on for trade pacts with EU, US: Commerce Secretary
Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal
said on Monday.
He said that the free trade agreements (FTAs) which India is doing are one of the key enablers to promote global capability centres (GCCs) in the country.
"...FTA with the UK was just announced (on May 6). with EU, which is going on, with the US, discussions are on," Barthwal said here at CII GCC Business Summit here.
India and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). They are targeting to conclude the first phase of the pact by fall (September-October) of this year.
Similarly, India and the EU are also negotiating FTA.
Live Events
In June 2022, India and the 27-nation EU bloc resumed negotiations for a comprehensive free trade agreement, an investment protection agreement and a pact on geographical indications (GIs) after a gap of over eight years.
It stalled in 2013 due to differences over the level of opening up of the markets.
India and the EU are targeting to conclude the free trade deal by the end of this year.
The secretary also said that today's agreements are different from the traditional FTAs, which were confined to traditional trade.
The new pacts are a more complex set of agreements which include services also, he said.
Now there is also an institutional mechanism in these pacts to look at issues like harmonsing regulations and standards; and resolving disputes, if any arises.
And these are important facets of GCCs, he said, adding modern FTAs will lead to the innovation corridor, which will facilitate GCCs in India.
The new trade agreements, Barthwal said, are addressing a whole gamut of issues, which could be one of the reasons why negotiations of these pacts take time to conclude.
He added that in the FTA with the UK, there is a chapter on innovation, which was not the case earlier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump Says Ukraine Should Not Target Moscow
Washington: US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Ukraine should not target Moscow, after the Kremlin charged that a new US plan to supply weapons to Kyiv along with sanctions threats against Russia would delay peace efforts. Trump on Monday gave Russia 50 days to strike a peace deal with Ukraine, voicing exasperation with Moscow, and announcing that NATO members would supply Kyiv with new military aid. In what would be an even more extraordinary shift, the Financial Times reported that Trump spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about providing US missiles to hit Moscow. But asked by reporters at the White House if Zelensky should look at striking the Russian capital, Trump replied: "No, he shouldn't target Moscow." Trump had taken office vowing to end the conflict swiftly and to stop the flow of billions of dollars of US weapons to Ukraine. The Republican put heavy pressure on Zelensky and initially touted his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Under pressure from Trump, Moscow and Kyiv opened talks on the conflict, which has ground on for more than three years, but the only concrete result has been prisoner exchanges. Russia has rejected calls for a ceasefire and launched a record number of drones and missiles at Ukraine in recent months. Moscow said it needed more time to respond fully to Trump's Monday announcement, but suggested it was not conducive to diplomacy. "It seems that such a decision made in Washington and in NATO countries and directly in Brussels will be perceived by Kyiv not as a signal for peace but for the continuation of the war," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. "President Trump's statement is very serious. We certainly need time to analyze what was said in Washington," he told reporters in Moscow's first reaction to the comments. Trump warned that if no deal was concluded, he would slap severe tariffs on Russia's remaining trade partners in a bid to impede Moscow's ability to finance its military offensive. Pumped up by huge state spending on soldiers and weapons, as well as by redirecting vital energy exports to the likes of China and India, Russia's economy has so far defied US and EU attempts to push it into a deep recession through sanctions. - Burden on Europe? - Most European allies have cheered the return of a hard US line, although Slovakia, led by Moscow-friendly populist Robert Fico, has resisted new EU sanctions on Russia. But EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas also called for the United States to help fund the new weapons. "We welcome President Trump's announcement to send more weapons to Ukraine, although we would like to see US share the burden," Kallas said after a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels. "If you promise to give the weapons, but say that it's somebody else who is going to pay for it, it is not really given by you." Trump has been pushing allies to step up defense spending -- and to buy from US manufacturers -- and has long said the United States shoulders too much of NATO's burden. Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden -- which joined NATO after Russia sent troops into Ukraine in 2022 -- all said they wanted to participate in Trump's plan. Sweden's Defense Minister Pal Jonson in a statement to AFP said his country "would contribute" and said Ukraine was in "great need of more air defense," given Russia's "constant bombings and attacks." - 'Game of chess' - Tens of thousands have been killed since Russia launched its offensive, with millions forced to flee their homes in eastern and southern Ukraine, which has been decimated by aerial attacks and ground assaults. In Moscow, residents dismissed Trump's statement as little more than politics. "It's a game of chess," Svetlana, an aviation engineer said. Trump "gave 50 days, and then there will be more... We are waiting for the next move of our president," the 47-year-old said. Ukrainian soldiers fighting in the east were hopeful but cautious about Trump's position. "I don't believe him. There have been too many promises that haven't been kept," said one soldier with the call sign "Shah." Others were worried it might be too little, too late. "Of course it's good, but at the same time, time has been lost. Those Patriots could have been sent sooner and could have helped a lot," another fighter called "Master" told AFP. Ruslan, a 29-year-old soldier, said: "If there is even the slightest chance to improve the situation for us and worsen it for them, then that's already positive." (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Trump wields tariffs to sway Putin on Ukraine. Heres how they might work, or not
WASHINGTON — Russian President Vladimir Putin has sacrificed an estimated 1 million of his soldiers, killed and wounded, in a three-year campaign to crush Ukraine. Now President Donald Trump is betting that his go-to economic weapon — tariffs — can succeed where Ukrainian drones and rockets haven't, and finally persuade Putin to end his war. Tariffs, which the U.S. president has called ' the most beautiful word in the dictionary,'' are taxes on imports. They are Trump's all-purpose fix — a tool he deploys to protect American industry, lure factories to the United States, tackle drug trafficking and illegal immigration, and raise money to pay for his massive tax cuts. On the campaign trail last year, Trump promised he'd negotiate an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 24 hours. But months have passed without a peace deal, and the president has recently expressed frustration with the Russians. 'We're very, very unhappy with them ... I thought we would have had a deal two months ago, but it doesn't seem to get there,' Trump told reporters Monday. So in addition to agreeing to send more weapons to Ukraine, he's once again unsheathing tariffs. He said Monday the U.S. would impose 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil, natural gas and other products if there isn't a peace deal in 50 days. The levies are meant to cause Russia financial pain by making its trading partners think twice before buying Russian energy. 'I use trade for a lot of things,'' Trump said, "but it's great for settling wars.' Trump did not spell out exactly how these "secondary'' tariffs would work, and trade analysts are skeptical. 'Unilateral tariffs are likely to be ineffective in influencing Putin's actions,' said Douglas Irwin, a Dartmouth College economist who studies American trade policy. "Financial sanctions in cooperation with European and other allies are much more likely to damage Russian economy, but whether they soften Russia's approach is also uncertain.'' The secondary tariffs idea isn't new. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut earlier this year introduced legislation that would impose a 500% tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, petroleum products and uranium. If Trump goes through with his threat, his 100% tariffs have the potential to disrupt global commerce and push oil prices higher. They might also complicate Trump's efforts to strike separate trade deals with countries like China and India. Since December 2022, when the European Union banned Russian oil, China and India have bought 85% of Russia's crude oil exports and 63% of its coal, according to the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a Finnish nonprofit. So they would likely be the two countries most affected by Trump's 100% import taxes. Trump has already tangled with China this year, and things did not go well. In April, Trump plastered a 145% levy on Chinese imports, and Beijing counterpunched with 125% tariffs of its own. The triple-digit tariffs threatened to end trade between the world's two biggest economies and briefly sent financial markets reeling. China also withheld shipments of rare earth minerals used in products such as electric vehicles and wind turbines, crippling U.S. businesses. After showing how much pain they could inflict on each other, the United States and China agreed to a ceasefire. A new 100% secondary tariff 'would blow up that deal,' said Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'China is particularly well-placed to hold out,' said Nicholas Mulder, a Cornell University historian. "All this would get us back to a position of full confrontation that would be uncomfortable for all sides.'' Hufbauer also noted that the secondary tariffs would also likely end 'any rapprochement with India'' — the world's fifth-biggest economy and one with which Trump is pursuing a trade deal. If Trump goes ahead with the tariffs, 'it would invariably lead to higher global energy prices,'' especially for natural gas, economists Kieran Tompkins and Liam Peach of Capital Economics wrote in a commentary Monday. Other oil-exporting countries have enough spare capacity to ramp up production and offset any loss of Russian oil exports in global market. But if they did, the world would have no buffer to rely on if there were an oil shock caused by, say, conflict in the Middle East — and prices could skyrocket. 'Removing that spare capacity would be akin to riding a bike with no shock absorbers,'' Tompkins and Peach wrote. After Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the United States and its allies slammed Russia with sanctions. Among other things, the U.S. froze the assets of Russia's central bank and barred some Russian banks from using a key international payments system run by Belgium. With its allies from the Group of Seven rich nations, it also capped the price that importers could pay for Russian oil. The sanctions were expected to crush the Russian economy, but they didn't. Putin put Russia on a wartime budget, and high defense spending kept unemployment low. Military recruits were given big sign-up bonuses and the families of the fallen received death benefits, pumping income into some of Russia's poorer regions. To keep its oil sales going, Russia deployed "shadow fleets,'' hundreds of aging tankers of uncertain ownership and dodgy safety practices that delivered oil priced above the G7 price cap. 'The experience of the G7 oil price cap against Russia showed how challenging the enforcement of measures against the Russian oil trade can be,' Mulder said. Last year, the Russian economy grew 4.1%, according to the International Monetary Fund. But strains are showing, partly because Putin' war has made Russia a pariah to foreign investors. The IMF forecasts growth will decelerate to 1.5% this year, and last month the Russian economy minister warned the country is "on the brink of going into a recession.'' Trump's tariffs could increase the pressure, in part by driving down Russia's energy exports — and the revenue the Russian government collects from an energy tax. 'To my knowledge, tariffs have never been applied as an explicit anti-aggression measure,' said Mulder, author of a 2022 history of economic sanctions. "I am skeptical that the secondary tariffs threat will be effective.'' For one thing, he said, it's unclear whether Trump will actually impose them after 50 days. The president has repeatedly announced tariffs against other countries, and then sometimes suspended or tweaked them. For another, the secondary tariffs would target countries — namely China and India — that might have some sway in Moscow. 'The United States needs cooperation and collaboration to bring Russia to the negotiating table,' said Cullen Hendrix, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute. "Threatening to harm the actors who actually have leverage over Moscow may backfire.'' writers Katie Davies in Manchester, England, and Chris Megerian in Washington, contributed to this report. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Trump announces 19% tariff on Indonesian imports, says US gets free export access under new deal
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday revealed a new trade agreement with Indonesia that includes a 19% tariff on Indonesian goods entering the United States, part of a broader push by the administration to renegotiate trade deals and slash the US trade deficit. The deal also includes significant commitments from Indonesia to purchase American goods, according to Trump. "Indonesia will pay the United States a 19% Tariff on all Goods they export to us, while U.S. Exports to Indonesia are to be Tariff and Non Tariff Barrier FREE," Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding that the US would gain full access to Indonesian markets. He claimed on Truth Social that Indonesia had agreed to purchase $15 billion in US energy products, $4.5 billion in agricultural goods, and 50 Boeing jets—though no timeline for these transactions was provided. The Indonesia deal mirrors a recent framework agreement with Vietnam and is part of Trump's strategy to impose higher tariffs unless countries strike bilateral trade deals with the US. The administration has set an August 1 deadline after which most US import tariffs will increase unless agreements are reached. Trump had earlier warned Indonesia of a possible 32% tariff unless a deal was reached. Similar letters were sent to over two dozen countries, including Canada, Japan, and Brazil, proposing tariffs ranging from 20% to 50%, including a 50% levy on copper. In Jakarta, Susiwijono Moegiarso, a senior official with Indonesia's Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, confirmed that the two countries are preparing a joint statement detailing the tariff levels and associated trade arrangements. 'We will inform [the public] soon,' he told Reuters via text message. While Indonesia is not a top-15 US trading partner, trade has grown steadily. In 2024, total bilateral trade reached just under $40 billion, with the US. running a goods trade deficit of nearly $18 billion. Indonesia's top exports to the US include palm oil, footwear, electronics, rubber, tires, and frozen shrimp. As Trump's tariff deadline looms, global markets are watching closely. The White House has so far secured limited deals with the UK, Vietnam, a partial tariff truce with China, and now Indonesia—while major trading blocs like the EU brace for an all-out trade war.
