logo
SA must establish a clear separation of powers between the executive and parliament

SA must establish a clear separation of powers between the executive and parliament

Mail & Guardian09-05-2025
The government of national unity formed after the ANC lost its outright parliament majority in May 2024 general elections. Photo: @PresidencyZA/X
It is said that every cloud has a silver lining. With this in mind, the budget impasse raises policy issues that may need to be reviewed, particularly the lessons learnt in the past 31 years of South Africa's democracy.
At an outset, one must stress the importance of a cohesive cabinet that presides over the implementation of legislation and transformative policies if the country harbours the idea of development geared towards sustainable human dignity as enshrined in the Constitution.
The fluidity of the coalition government, euphemistically called the government of national unity, has exposed its shaky foundation given the differing ideological positions of its constituent members. These differences, especially on the necessity of redress and redistribution, are high risks that impede the functionality of the cabinet as a cohesive unit. It is a matter of common cause that the approval of the budget was the subject of a parliamentary vote, with a narrow majority voting in favour. The budget is not an end in itself; it is the means to support the implementation of legislation, policies, programmes and projects.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) did not support the vote. While this is understandable from a party politics point of view, it creates problems for the cohesiveness of the structure entrusted with the task of coordinating development, particularly for the vast majority of people who depend on public services. Is there a point in remaining a member of cabinet when you openly do not support its decisions? Can a developing country such as ours afford to have cabinet members who are opposed to its work? Unfortunately, the precarity of the position of the incumbent president makes it impossible for him to reign in what would ordinarily be deviant conduct.
These developments necessitate the need for deeper reflection on some provisions of the Constitution. Almost three decades since the adoption of the Constitution on 8 May 1996, the persistence of stubborn challenges that deprive many of their right to improved dignity of life justifies the review of some sections or provisions. For instance, in terms of section 91(3)(b) of the Constitution, the president 'may select any number of ministers from among the members of the assembly'. MPs who are appointed as ministers are not expected to resign their positions in the National Assembly. This creates a quandary in relation to section 80 of the Constitution, which empowers members of the National Assembly to litigate all or parts of an Act of parliament that they may deem unconstitutional.
While the budget impasse may not exactly be about the invocation of section 80, the potentiality of ministers, in their capacity as MPs (and openly exploiting the sectarian party interests), negating positions of the executive is real. As observed earlier, this may be exacerbated by the inability of the president to discipline members of his executive for the very members may go back to the National Assembly to either initiate or support the motion of no confidence against the president. The precarity of the government betrays claims of national unity. At best, the government is essentially a confederation of political parties that bitterly fought for a seat at the table.
The DA, whose leader is a member of cabinet, thus individually and as part of the collective accountable to parliament, has led court actions on the Employment Equity Act, the Basic Education Amendment Act, the Expropriation Act and the VAT hike. Even though laws remain enforceable until either rescinded or reviewed by the body that approved them or successfully challenged in courts of law, the recourse to courts by the DA effectively means its members in the executive will defy orders to implement approved legislation. What happens when ministers are expected to implement legislation in terms of section 92(2) of the Constitution but elect to exercise their constitutional right as MPs provided in section 80 of the Constitution to challenge what they consider to be constitutional flaws.
Even though the Constitution promotes the doctrine of separation of powers between the executive, the parliament and the judiciary, which is aimed at encouraging checks and balances, the fact that ministers continue to serve as members of the national assembly and enjoy certain privileges in that capacity, including the right enshrined in section 80 of the Constitution, effectively undermines the separation of powers.
As a developing country characterised by poverty and exclusion of the vulnerable who should be the main motive forces of democracy, South Africa cannot afford a dysfunctional, incoherent cabinet. That exacerbates what seems to be the intractable coordination malaise between the three spheres of government, and between adjoining provinces and municipalities. Various reports from the National Planning Commission paint a bleak picture of the negative effect of this incoherence, particularly on efforts aimed at spatial transformation.
The sobering question the nation needs to grapple with is the emergence of a strong case to review the Constitution to create a climate of perfect separation of powers mainly between the executive and parliament.
Dr Matheakuena Mohale is the public policy specialist based at Durban University of Technology. He writes in his personal capacity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliament forms Ad Hoc Committee to investigate serious allegations by KZN police commissioner
Parliament forms Ad Hoc Committee to investigate serious allegations by KZN police commissioner

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Parliament forms Ad Hoc Committee to investigate serious allegations by KZN police commissioner

The 11-member Ad Hoc Committee mandated to investigate the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, has three months to conduct its work and report to the National Assembly by not later than October 31. Image: Thobile Mathonsi / Independent Newspapers The National Assembly on Wednesday night unanimously agreed to form an Ad Hoc Committee tasked with investigating the serious allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. This decision comes after the adoption of a report from the portfolio committees on Police and Justice and Constitutional Development, which were requested to consider the appropriate approach to deal with the allegations. ANC chief whip Mdumiseni Ntuli announced that the 11-member committee will consist of four members from the ANC, two each from the DA and the MK Party, one member from the EFF, and two representatives to be recommended by other parties. Ntuli said the committee will report to the National Assembly by not later than October 31. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He said the committee's terms of reference included the alleged unlawful decision by Police Minister Senzo Mchunu to disband the Political Killings Task Team, the alleged unlawful removal of 121 case dockets from the Political Killings Task Team on the direction of Deputy National Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, and the alleged moratorium by Mchunu on filling vacancies within the SAPS Crime Intelligence Unit. Others are the nature and implications of the relationship between SAPS senior leadership and certain members of the public, whether the award of the R360 million contract to Vusumuzi Matlala's company for the provision of healthcare services to SAPS was irregular. The committee will also look into the alleged interference by the Investigative Directorate Against Corruption in police matters, including judicial issues, and also consider the need for legislative policy and institutional reform to restore public confidence in the criminal justice system. Parties have thrown their weight behind the Ad Hoc Committee. ANC MP Samuel Moela said the allegations made by Mkhwanazi cannot be left unexamined. 'General Mkhwanazi's assertion, if accurate, paints a disturbing picture of how certain elements might be undermining the integrity of law enforcement institutions for political or personal gain. 'Parliament has both the responsibility and the authority to get to the bottom of these claims, not for political point scoring, but to protect the democratic institutions so many South Africans fought to build,' Moela said. DA deputy spokesperson on police, Lisa Schickerling, said the evidence Mkhwanazi presented raised the greatest questions about the conduct of Mchunu, Sibiya, senior police officers, and even members of the judiciary. 'The National Assembly must hold the executive to account, even in the face of parallel investigations. We welcome the urgency with which this House has resolved to independently oversee the political and institutional dimensions of this crisis,' said Schickerling. MK Party's Sibonelo Nomvalo saluted Mkhwanazi for taking on the perceived untouchables by exposing criminal syndicates within the criminal justice system. 'Our clarion call is that Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi must appear before the Ad Hoc Committee in Parliament and expose all the police officers, prosecutors, judges, Members of Parliament, and all officials in the Department of Police who are in cahoots with criminals," he said. 'An allegation by Lieutenant-General Mkhwanazi against judges justifies our valid call for a lifestyle audit against judges. It is our firm belief that judges are human beings. They are not a paragon of morality, and therefore are corruptible honourable members,' Nomvalo said. EFF MP Rebecca Mohlala said the SAPS was a seriously compromised service, and its top brass enabled the capture of the institution for nefarious reasons. Mohlala said Parliament should get to the bottom of the allegations and reassert its role in providing oversight to the executive. 'We support the recommendation of the report for the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee to conduct an inquiry to get to the bottom of corruption,' she said.

KZN Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka denies involvement in NSNP tender irregularities
KZN Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka denies involvement in NSNP tender irregularities

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

KZN Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka denies involvement in NSNP tender irregularities

KZN Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka says complaints about the NSNP tender are being handled by relevant authorities and that the law will take its course if any wrongdoing is found. Image: Supplied KwaZulu-Natal Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka has addressed the allegations surrounding irregularities in the National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) tender process, amid calls for his resignation by the MK party and concerns by the Democratic Alliance in the province. This follows allegations from the NSNP that the R2.9-billion tender process was manipulated for political gain. In an interview with Newzroom Africa, Hlomuka acknowledged receiving complaints from various parties but emphasised that the accounting officer and relevant authorities are handling the procurement processes. 'We're receiving several complaints from various service providers, stakeholders, and other political parties. However, as an MEC in the Department of Education, having received those complaints, I also engaged the MEC for Finance in the province to look into the matter,' Hlomuka said. He added, 'If there are people who are fingered in terms of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), I think the law will take its course.' Addressing direct allegations that he registered a company involved in SNP tenders, Hlomuka clarified, "In 2015, I opened the company and I've been participating in several government and private services, but currently I don't own any company." He denied any current involvement, saying, "I am no longer part of the company. Hence, I'm not aware of its activities. If it has received any tenders, that information will come out in the investigation,'' he said. He denied any current involvement with the tender and stated he had not received any official report linking him to irregularities. When asked about calls for his resignation by the MK party by July 26, Hlomuka said, 'I was appointed by the premier of KwaZulu-Natal. If there's a need to resign for whatever reason, we'll wait for that advice from the premier who appointed me.' Hlomuka highlighted that as MEC, he does not manage the tender processes directly and that any complaints must follow official channels. 'We are told that the process is at the appeal stage, and those who feel unfairly treated must lodge their appeals. The MEC for finance has already indicated he is waiting for those appeals.' He urged patience as investigations continue, saying, 'Let's wait for the process, the investigation will tell us if that company has been awarded before or not.' In response to the allegations surrounding the NSNP tender process and related issues, the ANC in KwaZulu-Natal expressed concern about the widespread accusations circulating on social media platforms against its members. ANC KZN spokesperson Fanle Sibisi said, 'The ANC has noted with concern the widespread allegations of wrongdoing circulating on various social media platforms, levelled against its deployees.' Regarding the specific allegations of corruption against Hlomuka and Thanduxolo Sabelo, Sibisi said, 'We understand that this process is at an appeal stage where those who have made bids and seek to appeal must forward their appeals to the Treasury Department. The ANC has full confidence that the provincial government has adequate capacity to handle appeals in a just and transparent manner.' He urged patience and trust in due process: 'We call on the concerned role-players and the general public to allow this process to run its course.' On allegations involving Councillor Lungile Mthembu of Mandeni Local Municipality alleged to have solicited a bribe, Sibisi confirmed, 'The ANC has instructed the leadership of the General Gizenga Region to institute an investigation into this allegation and to bring a report to the provincial office of the ANC for further processing.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ However, Sibisi cautioned against what he described as a broader campaign to undermine the ANC's integrity. 'There seems to be a concerted campaign to impugn the integrity of the ANC and its leaders. This campaign, advanced by faceless individuals, not only defames these comrades but has the potential to cause instability.' He highlighted previous examples, stating, 'The case of the non-renewal of Ms Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma's contract is a practical example of how the names of both the concerned ANC leader and the ANC itself can be dragged through the mud based on baseless allegations.' 'The ANC firmly opposes any acts of criminality, especially when they involve public finances. However, we believe that the threshold for damaging someone's character through public allegations is unacceptably low. We must all recognise our responsibility to uphold the principles of our Constitution, which includes respecting individuals' rights to dignity, said ANC KZN Coordinator, Michael Mabuyakhulu. 'The ANC remains steadfast in its mission to build a better South Africa where all people, regardless of background or affiliation, are treated with dignity. We urge members of the media, the public, and social commentators to act responsibly, verify facts, and resist being drawn into campaigns that seek to sow confusion and division,'' said Sibisi. Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics

Controversial US bill targeting ANC leaders likely to pass, says former ambassador
Controversial US bill targeting ANC leaders likely to pass, says former ambassador

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Controversial US bill targeting ANC leaders likely to pass, says former ambassador

Former South African ambassador to Portugal, Dr Kingsley Makhubela, believes the controversial bill sanctioning ANC leaders will pass in the United States. Image: AFP A former South African ambassador and seasoned diplomat believes the controversial bill introduced in the United States Congress, seeking to review relations with South Africa and to impose sanctions on some leaders of the African National Congress, will pass. IOL reported on Wednesday that a bill which seeks to re-evaluate the bilateral relationship between the United States and South Africa, and identify government leaders who should be subject to sanctions, was passed by a US House Committee on Foreign Affairs this week. The US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025 was introduced in April by Ronny Jackson, a congressman from Texas. The bill, to become a law, will need to be approved by the House and Senate before being signed by President Donald Trump. The bill accuses South Africa of undermining the United States' interests by maintaining close relationships with the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation, nations that are Pretoria's strong allies and key trading partners. Former South African ambassador to Portugal, Dr Kingsley Makhubela, on Thursday told Newzroom Afrika that the Democrats have the numbers, and they might even get support from some Republicans. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading "Quite honestly, this bill is likely to pass. If you look at the numbers, both in the House and in the Senate, currently, the House consists of about 435 members and the Republicans are having 219, and I think the Democrats have 217, so it is likely to pass. This time last year, when this bill was first discussed during the (Joe) Biden administration, 61 Democrats voted for the bill to go through, which has similarities with what we are seeing now. "The only thing that you see now is that there have been added issues on this bill. For instance, there are questions of the relations with Taiwan playing its role, the question of the tension that arose because of Rasool's (former South African ambassador to the United States Ebrahim Rasool) expulsion, it plays into this bill. So this bill is likely to pass," he said. Makhubela said the bill is also framed around the United States' national security, and Americans often close ranks across the political divide once concerns about their national security are raised. Dr Kingsley Makhubela Image: File Earlier, Ernst van Zyl, head of public relations at AfriForum, said the ANC's "years of reckless and extremist diplomatic actions and rhetoric" are now bearing bitter fruit. 'From AfriForum's side, I do not see why punishing corrupt politicians is going to destroy a country's economy. That is going to be left to the ANC to explain how those politicians who are pushing destructive laws, when they are punished for the human rights abuses or corruption. How is that going to destroy the South African economy or going to affect negatively the average man on the street?" Van Zyl also told broadcaster Newzroom Afrika. According to a report by IOL earlier this year, the bill mandates a comprehensive review to identify South African government officials and leaders of the African National Congress who may be subject to sanctions for their alleged support of American adversaries such as China, Russia, and Iran. Commenting on X about the committee's approval of the bill, Jackson said: 'South Africa made its choice when they abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists. Today, my bill to fully review America's relationship with South Africa and give President Trump the tools necessary to hold their corrupt government accountable passed through committee. The days of allowing our so-called 'allies' to walk all over us are over!' The bill will now be debated and amended in the House of Representatives before a vote is held on it. The House of Representatives will then submit the approved bill to the Senate for final consideration. IOL News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store