logo
SA must establish a clear separation of powers between the executive and parliament

SA must establish a clear separation of powers between the executive and parliament

Mail & Guardian09-05-2025
The government of national unity formed after the ANC lost its outright parliament majority in May 2024 general elections. Photo: @PresidencyZA/X
It is said that every cloud has a silver lining. With this in mind, the budget impasse raises policy issues that may need to be reviewed, particularly the lessons learnt in the past 31 years of South Africa's democracy.
At an outset, one must stress the importance of a cohesive cabinet that presides over the implementation of legislation and transformative policies if the country harbours the idea of development geared towards sustainable human dignity as enshrined in the Constitution.
The fluidity of the coalition government, euphemistically called the government of national unity, has exposed its shaky foundation given the differing ideological positions of its constituent members. These differences, especially on the necessity of redress and redistribution, are high risks that impede the functionality of the cabinet as a cohesive unit. It is a matter of common cause that the approval of the budget was the subject of a parliamentary vote, with a narrow majority voting in favour. The budget is not an end in itself; it is the means to support the implementation of legislation, policies, programmes and projects.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) did not support the vote. While this is understandable from a party politics point of view, it creates problems for the cohesiveness of the structure entrusted with the task of coordinating development, particularly for the vast majority of people who depend on public services. Is there a point in remaining a member of cabinet when you openly do not support its decisions? Can a developing country such as ours afford to have cabinet members who are opposed to its work? Unfortunately, the precarity of the position of the incumbent president makes it impossible for him to reign in what would ordinarily be deviant conduct.
These developments necessitate the need for deeper reflection on some provisions of the Constitution. Almost three decades since the adoption of the Constitution on 8 May 1996, the persistence of stubborn challenges that deprive many of their right to improved dignity of life justifies the review of some sections or provisions. For instance, in terms of section 91(3)(b) of the Constitution, the president 'may select any number of ministers from among the members of the assembly'. MPs who are appointed as ministers are not expected to resign their positions in the National Assembly. This creates a quandary in relation to section 80 of the Constitution, which empowers members of the National Assembly to litigate all or parts of an Act of parliament that they may deem unconstitutional.
While the budget impasse may not exactly be about the invocation of section 80, the potentiality of ministers, in their capacity as MPs (and openly exploiting the sectarian party interests), negating positions of the executive is real. As observed earlier, this may be exacerbated by the inability of the president to discipline members of his executive for the very members may go back to the National Assembly to either initiate or support the motion of no confidence against the president. The precarity of the government betrays claims of national unity. At best, the government is essentially a confederation of political parties that bitterly fought for a seat at the table.
The DA, whose leader is a member of cabinet, thus individually and as part of the collective accountable to parliament, has led court actions on the Employment Equity Act, the Basic Education Amendment Act, the Expropriation Act and the VAT hike. Even though laws remain enforceable until either rescinded or reviewed by the body that approved them or successfully challenged in courts of law, the recourse to courts by the DA effectively means its members in the executive will defy orders to implement approved legislation. What happens when ministers are expected to implement legislation in terms of section 92(2) of the Constitution but elect to exercise their constitutional right as MPs provided in section 80 of the Constitution to challenge what they consider to be constitutional flaws.
Even though the Constitution promotes the doctrine of separation of powers between the executive, the parliament and the judiciary, which is aimed at encouraging checks and balances, the fact that ministers continue to serve as members of the national assembly and enjoy certain privileges in that capacity, including the right enshrined in section 80 of the Constitution, effectively undermines the separation of powers.
As a developing country characterised by poverty and exclusion of the vulnerable who should be the main motive forces of democracy, South Africa cannot afford a dysfunctional, incoherent cabinet. That exacerbates what seems to be the intractable coordination malaise between the three spheres of government, and between adjoining provinces and municipalities. Various reports from the National Planning Commission paint a bleak picture of the negative effect of this incoherence, particularly on efforts aimed at spatial transformation.
The sobering question the nation needs to grapple with is the emergence of a strong case to review the Constitution to create a climate of perfect separation of powers mainly between the executive and parliament.
Dr Matheakuena Mohale is the public policy specialist based at Durban University of Technology. He writes in his personal capacity.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cyril Ramaphosa advised to adopt diplomacy amid US sanctions threat
Cyril Ramaphosa advised to adopt diplomacy amid US sanctions threat

IOL News

time6 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Cyril Ramaphosa advised to adopt diplomacy amid US sanctions threat

Government leaders who are members of the ANC have been cautioned to avoid being targeted by proposed US sanctioning bill. Image: IOL / Independent Newspapers President Cyril Ramaphosa and his ANC ministers should tone it down to avoid being the victims of the United States of America's bill, designed to sanction some of the party members, an international relations expert said. Dr Bongiwe Ngcobo of the University of South Africa's Thabo Mbeki African School of Public and International Affairs, commented following a growing pressure on South Africa from US President Donald Trump's administration and some of his country's parliamentarians. While Ramaphosa's administration was still trying to navigate the US's 30% tariff on the country and Trump's Executive Order, US Congressman Ronny Jackson proposed US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act of 2025, which seeks to impose sanctions against some ANC leaders accused of, among others, supporting China, Russia, and Iran, and mismanaging state resources. The US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee has already passed the bill and is now awaiting tabling at the full House of Representatives for a vote. US embassy spokesperson Rubani Trimiew declined to comment, saying the questions about the bill should be directed to the members of Congress who proposed it. Jackson did not respond to questions emailed to him on Friday. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The bill, which the South African Communist Party described in April as an imperialist agenda, accused Ramaphosa and former International Relations and Cooperation minister Naledi Pandor of being pro-Palestinian and Hamas and anti-Israel. Ngcobo, who described the bill as concerning, said the president and ministers have to be diplomatic in how they comment on issues that are sensitive to the US, as South Africa is still negotiating a trade deal and repairing its relations with the US. 'They have to be willing to compromise to gain bigger things that we are trying to achieve. 'Criticising Trump publicly will not benefit South Africa in any way, so they need to find a strategy to air their thoughts without being aggressive,' said Ngcobo. Ngcobo said that since South Africa is not a global influencer, it should take a beggar's approach. 'We are not Russia or China, we don't have the economic and military strength to counter the US, because even continentally, our influence is weaker than before. 'With the Democratic Republic of Congo, we could not mediate, and that peace was mediated by the US, which shows that we won't get much global support. 'This means that South Africa would have to beg,' she said. It remained unclear which individual ANC members would be the targets of the proposed act. However, the bill specifically mentioned Pandor, who is an ANC veteran, Ramaphosa, ANC president, party spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri, and Ebrahim Rasool, an ANC activist whom the US expelled as the ambassador. It blamed Pandor for saying in 2024 that Israeli-South Africans would be arrested for fighting in the Israeli Defense Forces in Gaza 'upon their return home and could strip them of their South African citizenship.' It said Pandor also encouraged protests outside the United States Embassy. 'Pandor called for the International Criminal Court to issue an immediate arrest warrant charging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with violations of international criminal law. 'On October 14, 2023, President Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa accused Israel of 'genocide' in statements during a pro-Palestinian rally. 'On October 8, 2023, the ANC's national spokesperson, Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri, said of the devastating Hamas attack, 'the decision by Palestinians to respond to the brutality of the settler Israeli apartheid regime is unsurprising," read the bill. The bill blamed the ANC for its ongoing attempt to rename the street where the United States Consulate in Johannesburg is situated after Palestine activist Leila Khaled. Its author, Jackson, took offense at ANC Deputy Secretary General Nomvula Mokonyane, who he quoted as saying, 'we want the United States of America embassy to change their letterhead to Number 1 Leila Khaled Drive'. It was reported that the US had rejected former deputy finance minister Mcebisi Jonas as a Ramaphosa-appointed special envoy following Rasool's expulsion from that country. Ngcobo said it was likely that the targets would be high-profile ANC leaders who had been vocal on the Gaza and South Africa's land expropriation issues. 'It would be key individuals whom they know the sanction would affect their operations. 'At this point, I am not sure who they are targeting,' she said. AfriForum, which had been accused of badmouthing the country in the US, welcomed the bill as a weapon to implement targeted sanctions against corrupt and extremist South African politicians. "AfriForum maintains that ordinary citizens should not be punished for the extremism and corruption of politicians. 'AfriForum has never advocated for sanctions that target South Africa as a whole. 'Therefore, the introduction of targeted sanctions against these politicians will be a welcome development,' said AfriForum's public relations head, Ernst van Zyl. Ramaphosa took a wait-and-see stance, saying the bill still has a long way to go before reaching the final stage, as after the House of Representatives vote, it will proceed to the Senate for final consideration. 'Our bilateral dealings and engagements with the United States will continue, and we'll talk about all manner of things - including this issue.' 'We are very positive that the outcome of our engagements with the United States will be comprehensive and all-encompassing, so we can return to good deals with the United States,' he said. On behalf of the ANC, Bhengu-Motsiri said: 'Remember, we come from a history where sanctions were imposed against the apartheid system. 'The ANC was also isolated by countries that worked closely with the apartheid regime, including the United States,' she said. Zimbabwe's Zanu–PF spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa said the sanctions, which started in 2000, failed to bring his country to its knees.

Kenny Kunene steps away from Joburg and PA roles
Kenny Kunene steps away from Joburg and PA roles

Mail & Guardian

time35 minutes ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Kenny Kunene steps away from Joburg and PA roles

Suspended Patriotic Allianc deputy president Kenny Kunene. (X) Suspended Patriotic Alliance (PA) deputy president Kenny Kunene has resigned from his roles in the City of Johannesburg. His resignation follows his official suspension from the PA pending an investigation into his relationship with murder-accused Katiso 'TK' Molefe, who was this week arrested for allegedly orchestrating Oupa Sefoka (DJ Sumbody's) murder in 2022. Kunene has agreed to 'cooperate with an investigation' and will step aside from his political role in the Patriotic Alliance until he is cleared of the allegations. He will also not act and work in any official capacity in the party while on suspension, its leader Gayton McKenzie said in a statement. Kunene tendered his resignation as Proportional Representation Councillor and transport MMC in the city of Johannesburg with immediate effect. 'I am stepping aside from public life, for a period, while my party satisfies itself to certain allegations that have been raised against me, which are unfounded, but I have nevertheless agreed it would be in the public interest for me to await the clearing of my name before considering a return to public service and duty,' Kunene said in a statement. This week, Kunene, who also owns the online publication African News Global, said the purpose of his visit to Molefe's property was to facilitate an exclusive interview on various topics for one of his journalists. He added that he only knew Molefe from a distance. Molefe was arrested for allegedly orchestrating DJ Sumbody's murder in 2022, and he was also on R100 000 bail for another murder case at the time of his arrest. The Democratic Alliance, which has been critical of the Patriotic Alliance following these recent revelations, said it notes Kunene's resignation, but demands investigations into the projects that Kunene was overseeing. These include a full investigation into all contracts and procurement processes at the Johannesburg Roads Agency (JRA), a full investigation into the contractors and procurement of the Lilian Ngoyi street repairs and a full investigation into contracts, appointments and procurement processes at the Metropolitan Trading Company (MTC). 'Should the executive mayor fail to respond to the DA within seven days, the DA will use all avenues at our disposal, including approaching law enforcement with the information available to us, to hold the executive mayor as shareholder representative himself responsible for the alleged irregularities at JRA and MTC,' the party's Johannesburg caucus leader Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku said in a statement.

EFF marks 12th anniversary with massive turnout in Khayelitsha
EFF marks 12th anniversary with massive turnout in Khayelitsha

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

EFF marks 12th anniversary with massive turnout in Khayelitsha

Thousands of Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) supporters gathered at Khayelitsha Rugby Stadium on Saturday, 26 July, to mark the party's 12th anniversary. Long queues stretched along Pama Road from early morning as people waited to enter the venue. They scheduled the main programme to begin at midday, and crowds of youth, elders, and children were already filling the venue hours before. Organisers set up a family-friendly play area, complete with jumping castles, tables, chairs, and paramedics on standby. Speaking with IOL , Khayelitsha resident Bathandwa Dywili said she hoped EFF leader Julius Malema would address key social challenges affecting the community. 'We hope the EFF president will speak about youth unemployment and underage drinking, which are widespread issues causing concern among young people,' she said. 'It would also be encouraging if he addressed other social problems that contribute to crime.' Julius Malema launched the EFF on 26 July 2013 after the ANC expelled him, where he had led the party's Youth League. Following disciplinary action for bringing the ANC into disrepute. Malema formed the EFF as a radical left-wing alternative, focusing on economic transformation. Rooted in pan-Africanist and Marxist-Leninist ideologies, the EFF quickly attracted support from youth and working-class communities. It entered Parliament in 2014 with 25 seats and has since grown into South Africa's third-largest political party. Twelve years on, the EFF remains known for its red regalia, militant slogans, and confrontational presence in Parliament. Saturday's gathering highlighted the continued loyalty and energy that surrounds the movement. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store