Budget 2025 Cuts RNZ Funding To Pay For Local Journalism Initiatives
Although Budget 2025 allocates $6.4 million over four years to council, community and court reporting via NZ On Air, RNZ funding is being cut by $18.4 million over the same period.
The Better Public Media Trust welcomes Minister for Media and Communications Paul Goldsmith's recognition that funding local journalism is vital in a democratic society. But it is counter-productive to fund these initiatives at the expense of Radio New Zealand.
Although Budget 2025 allocates $6.4 million over four years to council, community and court reporting via NZ On Air, RNZ funding is being cut by $18.4 million over the same period.
'The way to address the crisis in the news sector is not to try and drive public service media into the same economic crisis as the rest of the commercial media sector,' said BPM spokesperson Dr Peter Thompson.
'The government could save itself considerably more money with a levy on digital advertising to support the provision of reliable, in-depth public interest news.'
'Funding the Local Democracy Reporting and Open Justice projects by taking money away from RNZ is robbing Peter to pay Paul,' he said.
'The government seems to think the funding increases for RNZ under the previous government were unduly generous but has forgotten that those increases were in response to almost a decade of frozen budgets that RNZ suffered under the preceding National government.'
BPM believes that public service media are an important component of New Zealand's media. Ensuring we have independent news media that can hold those in power to account is vital when the news media sector is in crisis and public knowledge is being undermined by online disinformation.
A recent Trust in News in Aotearoa New Zealand report, produced by the AUT research centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy, shows that in 2025 RNZ was the most trusted news brand in New Zealand. Given that the government has set targets for RNZ to improve audience reach, trust and transparency, cutting its funding is surely counter-productive.
'The fundamental policy problem is that the news sector has lost a significant proportion of its advertising share – hundreds of millions of dollars – to the online platforms. Addressing this structural deficit needs much more than $6.4 million over four years,' said Dr Thompson.
'There are serious flaws in the Fair Digital News Bargaining Bill, which has stalled, but there is another inexpensive option which would make a real difference – a levy on commercial revenue streams could put a significant amount of revenue back into the news sector.'
A one percent levy on digital advertising alone would raise around $18-20 million each year, which could support projects like Local Democracy Reporting and Open Justice, while increasing RNZ's budget.
BPM is reassured to see the government supporting public interest journalism with funding disbursed by NZ On Air, but this should be supported through a levy model, not by reallocating RNZ's funding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Education Ministry says new curriculums are much clearer
The Education Ministry said the new curriculums were much clearer about what needed to be taught each year. Photo: 123RF The Education Ministry says its staff have a clear understanding of what the term 'knowledge-rich' means. A ministry document from March warned its work on the new school curriculum was suffering because it did not have a clear definition of the term, which was central to the entire project. But the ministry's acting curriculum centre hautu (leader) Pauline Cleaver told RNZ's Midday Report it was not a problem. "It's fully understood by our team and our PLD [professional learning and development], alongside the curriculum that we've already produced is working really well and our response from teachers about the English curriculum for Year 1 to 8 and the maths is going really well. People are really seeing what a knowledge-rich curriculum looks like," she said. Cleaver said the already-published curriculums were examples of knowledge-rich. "It's really well structured, it's got clear content. The things that we want young people to know and the things that we want them to know how to do, they're sequenced in a year-by-year way so that the knowledge builds over time and they get a nice coherent learning pathway. That the learning is managed and taught in nice structured ways, such as you see through our structured literacy programmes and their teachers have real clarity on what needs to be taught and what students should be learning at any particular point on the pathway." She said the new curriculums were much clearer about what needed to be taught each year. But Principals Federation president Leanne Otene told RNZ the curriculum changes were chaotic and imploding. She said the government was changing too much, too fast and the training for teachers and principals was insufficient. "We've had multiple announcements, and they're disconnected initiatives and they are creating chaos," she said. Otene said primary schools were teaching new English and maths curriculums without sufficient training and without assessment tools to test children's achievement against the new curriculums. She said the key ideas underpinning the curriculum change, science of learning and knowledge rich were "mentioned everywhere, defined nowhere" PPTA vice-president Kieran Gainsford said at a recent meeting of subject association leaders, many were worried that the government had not provided a clear explanation of what it meant by terms like "science of learning" and "knowledge-rich curriculum". "It leaves schools and teachers in almost a hopeless position. If we're supposed to implement a new curriculum, we want to do a good job. We want to do the best for the young people in front of us. But if we're given such unclear guidance, that leaves us in a very difficult position to be able to do that," he said. Meanwhile, Cleaver told RNZ the ministry was using AI to help with background work on the curriculum. "We have used AI to help us synthesise a range of research, what other countries are doing, how we're comparing with the content we're choosing to make sure we're doing the best job possible. It's not a replacement for our writers. It's information that our writers can use to be more effective at making sure we get this right," she said. "It's not writing the curriculum now. We have real teachers, real educators writing the content." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
'Topping up $300 a week': How much money do property investors actually make?
Last year more than 50,000 property investors were making losses on their portfolios. (File photo) Photo: Unsplash/ Artful Homes A big chunk of property investors do not make money from their investments - and those who do are pulling in an average of less than $16,000 a year. RNZ revealed last year, more than 50,000 of the roughly 120,000 property investors in the country were making losses on their property portfolios. Now, new data released under the Official Information Act has shown even those with a profit were making a limited amount. In the 2024 tax year, the average rental income made across all entities reporting a profit was $15,680. Based on the average house price, that is a return of 1.7 percent. Individuals were making $13,240 and trusts $26,490. The year before, the average income was $15,590. A year earlier, it was $16,680 and in 2021, $14,800. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said it highlighted people were not investing in property for cash yields but for other reasons. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said capital gains was a motivator for investors. Photo: Supplied Those included being able to borrow from the bank to invest in property in a way that other investments were not able to, and the lack of tax on properties not captured by the bright line test. "The real motivation is capital gains - because the cash return means tenants aren't the main business, the house is. "Roughly, if your cash earning yield is 1.7 percent, and let's say the cost of equity is 10 percent - probably a bit higher in NZ, then investors are assuming house prices will increase by over 8 percent a year forever. "So we have this weird setup, that encourages people to make a pretty serious financial bet, through tax and banking regulation, and cultural norms." Including capital gains, investors would have made 6.6 percent a year on average over the past five years. In 2022, they would have had a 19 percent return, and in 2021, 15. percent, before recording total losses in the most recent two years. He calculated investors would have made an average $179,672 in the 2021/22 year, thanks to capital gains, and $111.464 the year before. But they would have lost almost $85,000 in the 2023 year and another $21,362 in the 2024. NZ Property Investors Federation spokesperson Matt Ball said he was not surprised by the data. "We have one rental property ourselves and I'm putting in $300 a week at the moment because I'm stuck on an interest rate of 6.65 percent. "But we've been doing that for the last year, 18 months. We'll make a loss just because that's how it is." He said property investment was not "winning Lotto". "It's hard work and to make money out of it you have to put in some effort. You can't just buy a place and sit down and watch the money roll in. "That's why if you can add a bedroom or upgrade it so you get a bit of rent of rent or whatever, do some work to it, that's the goal." He said 85 percent of property investors had another job. "I think if you could put the money into other investments you'd probably be getting a strong income… the leverage is the difference, I can't borrow $1 million to put into shares." Sarina Gibbon, general manager at Auckland Property Investors Association said some investors would be operating across multiple entities. "Since FY22, when interest deductibility started being phased out, the IRD hasn't been privy to the economic reality of investing, let alone reporting it accurately. It has been reporting legislated distortion. In FY24, landlords could only deduct 50 percent of interest costs. Cash-poor portfolios got pumped into the system and spat out as paper-rich operations. "So, no, the numbers are not surprisingly low; they are deceptively high. We are taxing revenue, not profit. This sort of tax distortion is nothing else but political theatre. Here's the irony, though: flawed as the policy was, it did rewire investor behaviour from accumulating to improving. "Sure, more deductible repairs and upgrades led to better-quality housing, but also higher rents. So the adversarial policy borne out of flawed design and bad leadership cornered investors into action to benefit their tenants and no one else." She said now investors could claim their home loan interest against their income again and interest rates had fallen, there was some breathing room. "In the long term, I expect investment to be more dynamic, yield-focused and taxable income from the investor cohort to grow." Property investment coach Steve Goodey said investors starting out would usually make losses but people who had been investing for a while would often have properties without mortgages. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Finance Minister Nicola Willis wants answers over high butter price
The price of a block of butter is now 120% higher than it was a decade ago, according to Stats NZ. Finance Minister Nicola Willis will be asking dairy giant Fonterra about the high retail price of butter in New Zealand. Willis told RNZ's First Up programme this morning it didn't seem quite right that butter seemed to be cheaper in Australian supermarkets. The price of a block of butter is now 120% higher than it was a decade ago, according to Stats NZ. In the year to June, it was up 46.5% to $8.60 for a 500g block. At her regular meeting with the co-operative this week she would be discussing what gets added to the cost by retail brands, including Fonterra's Anchor, and at the wholesale level. Finance Minister Nicola Willis. Photo: RNZ "My frustration has been when you sometimes go on to an Australian supermarket website and see that butter appears to be cheaper there than in New Zealand, that doesn't seem quite right. So that's exactly the conversation I want to have. "They'll have the opportunity to set out their case." It was well understood the main driver of prices for dairy products was international demand and pricing, Willis said. "But competition at the retail level does seem to have an effect on price, because organisations like Costco choose to have a really low price point on that product to get people in the door and the ultimate winner of all of that is the Kiwi shopper. "So I'm talking to Fonterra about what they're seeing in terms of the supermarket pricing behaviour, what the margins are." In May, Costco Auckland's special pricing saw queues out the door. Federated Farmers dairy chair Karl Dean has urged retailers to lower prices quickly when costs go down, and said there was probably very little Fonterra itself could do. "To put in it in perspective, there hasn't been any new players onto the domestic market in the last 10 years in terms of butter, other than the likes of Westgold - Westland have got their very premium product," he told RNZ's Morning Report programme last week.
