logo
BRICS leaders slam Trump tariffs & unilateral sanctions, US President promises additional tariffs

BRICS leaders slam Trump tariffs & unilateral sanctions, US President promises additional tariffs

The Print07-07-2025
'We condemn the imposition of unilateral coercive measures that are contrary to international law, and reiterate that such measures, inter alia in the form of unilateral economic sanctions and secondary sanctions, have far-reaching negative implications for the human rights, including the rights to development, health and food security, of the general population of targeted states, disproportionally affecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations, deepening the digital divide and exacerbating environmental challenges,' the BRICS Leaders' Statement said, in a clear reference to the sanctions against Russia imposed by the Western nations.
Subsequently, US President Donald Trump snapped back at the statement, promising additional tariffs of 10 percent on 'any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American' policies of the grouping.
New Delhi: From condemning 'unilateral' sanctions to slamming tariffs, condemning the use of 'starvation' as a method of warfare as well as calling the airstrikes on Iran as a 'violation of international law', the BRICS leaders' statement, which India is a part of, has taken aim at a number of ongoing challenges.
'We call for the elimination of such unlawful measures, which undermine international law and the principles and purposes of the UN Charter. We reaffirm that BRICS member states do not impose or support non-UN Security Council authorized sanctions that are contrary to international law,' said the statement published Sunday.
The Leaders' Statement was published on the first day of the BRICS summit, hosted in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro. It is the first summit with Indonesia as a member of the grouping, which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Ethiopia, Egypt, Iran and the UAE.
The statement, which has found support from all 10 member-states, has commented on a number of current international issues, including the ongoing situation in West Asia, conflicts across the world, as well as economic matters.
The condemnation of the use of sanctions comes as both Russia and Iran–members of BRICS–are two of the most sanctioned countries in the world. The Western powers, particularly, the US and the European Union (EU), have imposed a number of sanctions on Moscow, following Russia's full-scale war with Ukraine. While the West has focused on reducing its dependence on Russian crude, India has become one of the largest buyers of energy from Moscow.
In the 2024-2025 financial year, India purchased roughly $56 billion worth of Russian energy, despite the prevailing Western sanctions on Moscow. New Delhi has maintained strong economic links with Russia, despite pressure from the US and the EU to cut off Moscow's economy due to the war with Ukraine.
Similarly China's own trade with Russia has grown since 2022. Iran, which faced a number of UN sanctions, saw the economic curbs lifted after it signed onto the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), with the permanent five members of the UN Security Council along with the EU. However, in 2018, the US decided to walk out of the deal and unilaterally imposed a number of sanctions on Iran.
Most recently, the US bombed three Iranian nuclear sites–Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan–joining Israel in the 12-day conflict in West Asia that began 13 June. While India maintained that it was 'deeply concerned' by the situation, it did not outright condemn either Israel or the US for its strikes on Iran. New Delhi distanced itself from a statement made by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) condemning the strikes. However, it signed onto the BRICS statement on the situation in West Asia, and accepted the strong language in the Leaders' Statement.
'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and express grave concern over the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East,' the statement said.
'We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under full safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the IAEA. Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm.'
Also Read: Trump says Israel has agreed to 60-day ceasefire on Gaza, urges Hamas to accept the deal
BRICS takes aim at Israel, condemns Pahalgam terrorist attack
Another area where the BRICS Leaders' Statement took strong exception to is the humanitarian situation in the Gaza strip. The roughly 20-month war between Israel and Hamas, has seen India defend Tel Aviv's right to self-defence, while maintaining its support for a two-state solution.
However, it has rarely commented on the humanitarian situation outside of sharing its deep concern. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had highlighted the situation in Gaza during his address to the summit.
'We reiterate our grave concern about the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, with the resumption of continuous Israeli attacks against Gaza and obstruction of the entry of humanitarian aid into the territory. We call for adherence to international law, in particular to international humanitarian law and international human rights law, and condemn all violations of IHL, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare. We also condemn attempts to politicize or militarize humanitarian assistance,' said the Leaders' Statement.
Israel blocked humanitarian aid from entering Gaza for roughly 11 weeks earlier this year, before attempting to set up its own humanitarian assistance programme through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The attempt to reroute aid through the GHF comes after Tel Aviv has asserted that the existing UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) was supporting Hamas, the group which carried out the 7 October 2023 attacks.
While Hamas' attacks left over 1,150 Israelis dead and a further 250 captured, Tel Aviv's retaliation has killed roughly 56,000 Palestinians according to latest reports. South Africa, one of the founding members of the BRICS, has taken the issue to the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.
The BRICS leaders' have called for an 'unconditional ceasefire' in Gaza, which is a change in India's position, as it has in the past voted against UN resolutions calling for a ceasefire for various reasons, including the lack of language for the release of hostages held by Hamas.
The 10-member grouping also condemned in 'strongest terms' the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, which left 26 people dead on 22 April. The attack in India's Jammu and Kashmir, led to an 87-hour conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad. India has taken a number of punitive diplomatic measures against Pakistan, linking the Pahalgam attack to Islamabad. On 7 May, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist complexes in Pakistan, including Bahawalpur and Muridke.
The grouping also voiced 'serious concerns' over the unilateral tariffs imposed by the US in April, as a part of President Donald Trump's attempt to reduce trade deficits in America. Trump and his administration have taken exception to BRICS, with the US President threatening to impose high tariffs on BRICS member-states if they attempt to 'de-dollarise'. However, the April tariffs, which have since been paused, saw some of the highest duties imposed on BRICS member-states, including China.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: Quad foreign ministers condemn Pahalgam attack, call for perpetrators to be brought to justice
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

From aspiration to agency: India redefines its global role
From aspiration to agency: India redefines its global role

First Post

time7 minutes ago

  • First Post

From aspiration to agency: India redefines its global role

India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy without submission, trade without compromising sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology read more It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. File image/ AP In the rapidly shifting global political architecture, few nations stand at as pivotal a juncture as India, caught in the confluence of normative aspirations, strategic autonomy, economic opportunity, and diplomatic realignment. From international tech rule‑setting to high‑stakes trade negotiations, from balancing sanctions pressure to recalibrating relations with China, the past few weeks have made clear that it's India's real moment. This is not mere reactivity but about India stepping forward to set the narrative, even under the weight of great power tensions and domestic imperatives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Take the sharp warning from Nato Secretary‑General Mark Rutte, a diplomatic salvo that carries real consequences. In statements delivered in Washington and to Congress, Rutte emphasised that 'secondary sanctions', including tariffs up to 100 per cent, could be deployed against major economies like India, China, and Brazil should they continue to trade with Russia. The intent: leverage global economic ties to pressure Moscow toward a peace settlement over Ukraine. The declaration is a clear signal that India's commercial engagements are being scrutinised through the lens of Western security priorities. Delhi's swift rebuke, citing 'double standards' and asserting its sovereign right to conduct its trade, reveals India's determination to resist external dictates, even as it shoulders the complexity of geopolitical entanglements. Yet, this episode does not simply reflect Indian defiance. Rather, it underscores a rare and consequential exercise of normative sovereignty. India is not tethered to any bloc; it takes pride in being a multi-aligned and principled actor. Domestic energy security demands, its long‑standing commitment to global South solidarity, and cautious calibration with both West and East place it in a strategic sweet spot or jeopardy, depending on perspective. When Rutte urged these countries to 'make the phone call to Vladimir Putin' or face sanctions, he emphasised pressure, but India refused to be boxed into Western frameworks, opting instead for a calibrated diplomacy. This is not a retreat; this is self‑definition in action. World Trade Organisation (WTO) reform, gaining traction ahead of the Cameroon Ministerial, is another arena where India is quietly influencing multilateral rules. Talks now hinge on thorny compromises: easing 'consensus' gridlocks, demanding proof for industrial subsidies, and revisiting the special status of countries like India and China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pushed by the US and Europe to revive a stalled WTO, these shifts could undermine developing country carve-outs. While India remains restrained, its backroom diplomacy is active. The challenge lies in securing meaningful exceptions without stalling reform, testing not just India's trade stance but also its broader role in global rule-making. This is more about realigning trade with development than resistance. At the same time, New Delhi finds itself on the cusp of a potentially transformative bilateral trade agreement with the US, ahead of a hard August 1 US tariff deadline. An article of faith in India's political economy has been bilateralism as an antidote to protectionism, and Washington has signalled expansiveness: from high‑tech to supply‑chain resilience. Yet this is no yawning liberal fixture; it is a negotiation circumscribed by domestic concerns on both fronts. For India, offering tariff concessions or regulatory liberalisation might invite debate around industrial policy and food sovereignty; for the US, access to Indian markets must be matched by deeper procurement commitments and intellectual property standards. If last week's Nato‑sanctions episode underscores Indian autonomy, this trade narrative highlights its readiness to play a constructive, collaborative role, so long as reciprocity and national interest underpin any deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, India's pivot toward China, marked by Jaishankar's first visit to Beijing since the 2020 standoff, is a calculated move. At the SCO summit, his meeting with Wang Yi focused on de-escalation, a border resolution, and reviving trade minus 'restrictive measures'. China called normalisation 'hard-won', underscoring mutual interest in quiet diplomacy and regional stability. Beneath the optics, India is asserting agency: addressing boundary disputes, restoring critical supply chains, and preserving open trade. It's a calibrated framework—friendship without illusion, cooperation without compulsion. Now, juxtapose these developments with India's stealth campaign in global AI norm‑setting. While less visible to the world's press, New Delhi has been earnest, partaking actively in the Unesco‑led 2025 AI Action Summit and championing inclusive, transparent, and sustainable AI frameworks. Internally, the government's Shinrin hush, its hallmark IndiaAI mission, has enabled the creation of the India AI Safety Institute and the public‑sector BharatGen model, announced earlier this year. This reflects a coherent, outward‑looking narrative: one where India is not merely a consumer of Western AI but a producer and ethical interlocutor in its own right, framing a normative trajectory for the Global South. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This junction of AI, trade, sanctions, and diplomacy reveals an Indian posture defined by complexity rather than simplification. India is neither a protectable emerging market nor a fearful collateral of competition; it is instead a multifaceted actor shaping its lane, steering norms, and anticipating friction. If India is being squeezed by trade reform at the WTO, by diplomatic pressure over Russia, and by bilateral negotiations with large economies, it is responding with a choreography of normative offers, negotiation discipline, and diplomatic nuance. Strategic autonomy is no longer a slogan; it is a tactical posture. India's message comes across loud and clear: we will trade responsibly, not opportunistically; we will engage in global initiatives, not deflect them; we will assert our interests, not surrender them. This posture is especially critical because India's multilateral footprint is expanding with institution‑shaping spaces. In 2025, it has convinced even sceptics that its voice is consequential and its initiatives, from AI safety to trade alliances, are worth centralising. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD None of this is without strain. The geo‑economic environment is a maze of competing pressures: pressure to align with Western sanctions regimes, to commit to bilateral trade deals, to accelerate AI governance, and to stabilise border diplomacies. But India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy that does not buy influence with submission, trade that does not cost sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology. The key test lies ahead: can India engineer a degree of coherence across ministries, Commerce, Finance, External Affairs, and IT? Can it manage stakeholder friction between business communities aligned to greenhouse tech corridors and those tied to legacy energy relations with Russia? Can it maintain credibility on the world stage while cultivating domestic legitimacy? These questions are not rhetorical; they are strategic deadlines directed at policymaking systems, where alignment and execution define success. Ultimately, this is more than policy choreography; it is India redefining its global centre of gravity. When the US Congress debates whether India is aligned enough to merit exemption from sanctions, Delhi's internal coordination across diplomatic, economic, and strategic lines becomes part of its national security calculus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When WTO multilateralism teeters, India can offer constructive reform, leadership or resistance. When AI norm debates emerge, India doesn't merely have a seat; it has proposals. India projects the kind of policy confidence few states of its standing enjoy. India stands assertive, multi‑alignment‑centric, normatively engaged, and institutionally responsive. It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. Amal Chandra is an author, political analyst and columnist. He posts on 'X' at @ens_socialis. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

China stuns US, NATO, Japan, Taiwan with its latest hypersonic air-to-air missile, its range is..., big matter of concern for India as...
China stuns US, NATO, Japan, Taiwan with its latest hypersonic air-to-air missile, its range is..., big matter of concern for India as...

India.com

time7 minutes ago

  • India.com

China stuns US, NATO, Japan, Taiwan with its latest hypersonic air-to-air missile, its range is..., big matter of concern for India as...

(Representational image: New Delhi: Face-to-face war between fighter planes is a thing of the past. Air-to-air missiles (AAM) have become the new face of air dominance. These have become the primary weapons for air-to-air warfare, which can bring down a plane from hundreds of kilometers away. Beyond Visual Range i.e. BVR missiles, also known as AAM missiles, have now become the biggest weapon in modern warfare. What does China claim? China has claimed to have taken the biggest leap in this direction. China has claimed that it has tested an air-to-air missile with a range of up to 1000 kilometers in the air. If China's claim is correct, then it means that the definition of air warfare has changed forever. Having a range of one thousand kilometers means that enemy fighter jets will not be able to fly. China can wreak havoc from Japan to Taiwan with these missiles. How powerful is the new Chinese air-to-air missile? Reports in the South China Morning Post say that the Chinese army is developing a new hypersonic air to air missile, which will have a range of between 800 and 1000 kilometers. Experts believe that if this is not China's propaganda and if the report is correct, then it means that this missile can also shoot down the world's most advanced fighter jets like the American F-22 Raptor, B-21 Raider and F-35 stealth fighter jet. According to the report, the speed of this air to air missile can be Mach 5 (6174 kmph) or even more. Why is the world concerned by China's latest air to air missile? The hypersonic speed and such a high range of the air-to-air missile means that it will be the most dangerous missile in the world. In such a situation, the air combat doctrine of America, India, Japan, Taiwan and other countries may need to be redesigned. At present, India is close to developing the Astra-3 air-to-air missile, whose range is expected to be around 400 kilometers. While the range of America's AIM-174B is also around 400 kilometers. The range of Russia's R-37M missile is also between 350 to 400 kilometers. That is, the maximum range of the existing air-to-air missiles in the world is around 400 kilometers, but this one thousand kilometer missile of China can change every strategy and equation. Why is it a matter of concern for India? Indian Air Force currently has Astra Mk-1 and soon, it will have Astra Mk-2 and Mk-3 missiles. But the range of these missiles is between 200 and 400 kilometers. Given the Chinese claim of having a 1000-kilometer hypersonic missile, India will not only have to speed up the development of Astra series missiles but also develop hypersonic air to air missiles. Apart from this, ISRO and DRDO will have to jointly develop such sensors and radar systems that can track hypersonic missiles flying at such a distance in time. Air to air missiles are usually made to shoot down enemy fighter planes as well as surveillance aircraft AWACS, AEW&CS, in such a situation India will have to keep its AWACS, AEW&CS aircraft under security cover.

Trump in Scotland: US President on 'working trip'; golf business, bid for British Open and more
Trump in Scotland: US President on 'working trip'; golf business, bid for British Open and more

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump in Scotland: US President on 'working trip'; golf business, bid for British Open and more

President Donald Trump has begun his fourth overseas visit of his second term, heading to Scotland, his mother's birthplace, where he plans to spend several days at his family-owned golf resorts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He is expected to visit the Trump Organization's two existing Scottish golf courses, in Turnberry and Aberdeenshire, with a third course at the Aberdeenshire site set to open soon. This will be Trump's second presidential visit to Turnberry, following his first in 2018. In 2020, ABC News reported that then-US Ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, told colleagues he had been asked by Trump to urge the British government to hold the British Open at Turnberry. While the UK government said no such request was made to Scottish officials, Trump also denied having made the request. Following the January 6 Capitol attack, the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews, organisers of the world's oldest golf tournament, the Open, announced it had "no plans" to bring the event back to Turnberry and "will not do so in the foreseeable future." 'We will not return until we are convinced that the focus will be on the championship, the players and the course itself and we do not believe that is achievable in the current circumstances,' the R&A's chief executive said in a statement at the time. During a 2023 interview at Turnberry with British politician and media personality Nigel Farage, Trump claimed, 'Everyone wants to see the Open Championship here. The players, it's their favorite course, number one rated in Europe.' More recently, R&A chair Mark Darbon admitted there are 'logistical challenges' to holding the tournament at Turnberry, which last hosted the Open prior to Trump's purchase of the property in 2014. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He also confirmed that the organisation met with Eric Trump and other Trump Golf executives a few months ago to explore the possibility. Earlier this year in May, Trump visited Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates on his first overseas visit of his second term, aiming to strengthen ties with Gulf nations. His family's business interests have also expanded in the region, with partnerships on new projects in Saudi Arabia, Doha and the UAE, and involvement in a cryptocurrency venture linked to an Emirati government-affiliated fund. According to his latest financial disclosure, Trump reported hundreds of millions in income from his businesses, including golf clubs and the Mar-a-Lago estate, as well as from products such as watches and fragrances. Despite this, his Aberdeenshire resort reportedly lost £1.4 million last year, per BBC reports. Ethics experts have raised concerns over Trump's overseas travel, suggesting potential conflicts between his presidential duties and private business. Trump's assets are placed in a trust overseen by his children, and officials in his administration have repeatedly dismissed claims of any conflict of interest. 'At this point, he's essentially using the White House as an extension of the Trump Organization and letting the taxpayers pick up the bill,' said Jordan Libowitz, Vice President for Communications at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, speaking to ABC News. The White House described Trump's trip to Scotland as a 'working trip.' The president is expected to hold a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and may address the press during his stay. 'President Trump's working trip to Scotland will include a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the historic US-UK trade deal. Donald J Trump has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport,' said White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers in a statement to ABC News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store