logo
BRICS leaders slam Trump tariffs & unilateral sanctions, US President promises additional tariffs

BRICS leaders slam Trump tariffs & unilateral sanctions, US President promises additional tariffs

The Print07-07-2025
'We condemn the imposition of unilateral coercive measures that are contrary to international law, and reiterate that such measures, inter alia in the form of unilateral economic sanctions and secondary sanctions, have far-reaching negative implications for the human rights, including the rights to development, health and food security, of the general population of targeted states, disproportionally affecting the poor and people in vulnerable situations, deepening the digital divide and exacerbating environmental challenges,' the BRICS Leaders' Statement said, in a clear reference to the sanctions against Russia imposed by the Western nations.
Subsequently, US President Donald Trump snapped back at the statement, promising additional tariffs of 10 percent on 'any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American' policies of the grouping.
New Delhi: From condemning 'unilateral' sanctions to slamming tariffs, condemning the use of 'starvation' as a method of warfare as well as calling the airstrikes on Iran as a 'violation of international law', the BRICS leaders' statement, which India is a part of, has taken aim at a number of ongoing challenges.
'We call for the elimination of such unlawful measures, which undermine international law and the principles and purposes of the UN Charter. We reaffirm that BRICS member states do not impose or support non-UN Security Council authorized sanctions that are contrary to international law,' said the statement published Sunday.
The Leaders' Statement was published on the first day of the BRICS summit, hosted in the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro. It is the first summit with Indonesia as a member of the grouping, which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Ethiopia, Egypt, Iran and the UAE.
The statement, which has found support from all 10 member-states, has commented on a number of current international issues, including the ongoing situation in West Asia, conflicts across the world, as well as economic matters.
The condemnation of the use of sanctions comes as both Russia and Iran–members of BRICS–are two of the most sanctioned countries in the world. The Western powers, particularly, the US and the European Union (EU), have imposed a number of sanctions on Moscow, following Russia's full-scale war with Ukraine. While the West has focused on reducing its dependence on Russian crude, India has become one of the largest buyers of energy from Moscow.
In the 2024-2025 financial year, India purchased roughly $56 billion worth of Russian energy, despite the prevailing Western sanctions on Moscow. New Delhi has maintained strong economic links with Russia, despite pressure from the US and the EU to cut off Moscow's economy due to the war with Ukraine.
Similarly China's own trade with Russia has grown since 2022. Iran, which faced a number of UN sanctions, saw the economic curbs lifted after it signed onto the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), with the permanent five members of the UN Security Council along with the EU. However, in 2018, the US decided to walk out of the deal and unilaterally imposed a number of sanctions on Iran.
Most recently, the US bombed three Iranian nuclear sites–Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan–joining Israel in the 12-day conflict in West Asia that began 13 June. While India maintained that it was 'deeply concerned' by the situation, it did not outright condemn either Israel or the US for its strikes on Iran. New Delhi distanced itself from a statement made by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) condemning the strikes. However, it signed onto the BRICS statement on the situation in West Asia, and accepted the strong language in the Leaders' Statement.
'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and express grave concern over the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East,' the statement said.
'We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under full safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the IAEA. Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm.'
Also Read: Trump says Israel has agreed to 60-day ceasefire on Gaza, urges Hamas to accept the deal
BRICS takes aim at Israel, condemns Pahalgam terrorist attack
Another area where the BRICS Leaders' Statement took strong exception to is the humanitarian situation in the Gaza strip. The roughly 20-month war between Israel and Hamas, has seen India defend Tel Aviv's right to self-defence, while maintaining its support for a two-state solution.
However, it has rarely commented on the humanitarian situation outside of sharing its deep concern. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had highlighted the situation in Gaza during his address to the summit.
'We reiterate our grave concern about the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, with the resumption of continuous Israeli attacks against Gaza and obstruction of the entry of humanitarian aid into the territory. We call for adherence to international law, in particular to international humanitarian law and international human rights law, and condemn all violations of IHL, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare. We also condemn attempts to politicize or militarize humanitarian assistance,' said the Leaders' Statement.
Israel blocked humanitarian aid from entering Gaza for roughly 11 weeks earlier this year, before attempting to set up its own humanitarian assistance programme through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The attempt to reroute aid through the GHF comes after Tel Aviv has asserted that the existing UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) was supporting Hamas, the group which carried out the 7 October 2023 attacks.
While Hamas' attacks left over 1,150 Israelis dead and a further 250 captured, Tel Aviv's retaliation has killed roughly 56,000 Palestinians according to latest reports. South Africa, one of the founding members of the BRICS, has taken the issue to the International Court of Justice, accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.
The BRICS leaders' have called for an 'unconditional ceasefire' in Gaza, which is a change in India's position, as it has in the past voted against UN resolutions calling for a ceasefire for various reasons, including the lack of language for the release of hostages held by Hamas.
The 10-member grouping also condemned in 'strongest terms' the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, which left 26 people dead on 22 April. The attack in India's Jammu and Kashmir, led to an 87-hour conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad. India has taken a number of punitive diplomatic measures against Pakistan, linking the Pahalgam attack to Islamabad. On 7 May, India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist complexes in Pakistan, including Bahawalpur and Muridke.
The grouping also voiced 'serious concerns' over the unilateral tariffs imposed by the US in April, as a part of President Donald Trump's attempt to reduce trade deficits in America. Trump and his administration have taken exception to BRICS, with the US President threatening to impose high tariffs on BRICS member-states if they attempt to 'de-dollarise'. However, the April tariffs, which have since been paused, saw some of the highest duties imposed on BRICS member-states, including China.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: Quad foreign ministers condemn Pahalgam attack, call for perpetrators to be brought to justice
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI171 crash: Probe pending in India, new US aviation regulator boss rules out fuel switch glitch
AI171 crash: Probe pending in India, new US aviation regulator boss rules out fuel switch glitch

First Post

timea few seconds ago

  • First Post

AI171 crash: Probe pending in India, new US aviation regulator boss rules out fuel switch glitch

Commenting on the devastating Air India plane crash, the new head of the US's Federal Aviation Authority (FAA), Bryan Bedford, dismissed the possibility of an inadvertent movement of the aircraft's fuel control switch. read more The wreckage of the Air India plane that crashed moments after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport, lies on a building, in Ahmedabad. Both switches feeding fuel to the two engines of Air India flight 171 were cut off followed before the plane crashed in Ahmedabad, seconds after taking off, the first investigation report into the crash has revealed. PTI As the investigation into the Air India 171 plane crash continues, the new head of the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ruled out mechanical issues as the cause behind the crash in Ahmedabad. The new FAA boss went on to suggest that the fuel control switches on the doomed AI 171 were manually moved, hinting at a pilot error. In a statement on the matter, FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford dismissed the possibility of an inadvertent movement of the aircraft's fuel control switch. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We can say with a high level of confidence it doesn't appear to be a mechanical issue with the Boeing fuel control unit. We feel very comfortable that this isn't an issue with inadvertent manipulation of fuel control,' Reuters quoted FAA administrator Bryan Bedford as saying. Meanwhile, Indian authorities, who are currently investigating the matter, requested patience for the final report. They urged both the public and experts to refrain from drawing conclusions and did not comment on Bedford's recent remarks. The matter is still under investigation As per the preliminary report released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner's fuel supply to engines had been cut off, causing it to crash. While it is not concluded what caused the fuel switches' position to change, soon after the report was released, Western media started alluding to a pilot error. In the report, it was also mentioned that the cockpit voice recording revealed that one pilot asked the other why he had moved the switches, to which the latter replied he hadn't. In light of this, several Western news outlets started speculating about the mental health of the pilots and started to report more about their personal lives. Amid the chaos, Boeing is maintaining a cautious stance on the matter. Reacting to Bedford's statement, Boeing said: 'We'll defer to the FAA for any comments on this.' According to Reuters, the FAA chief made the remarks while he was speaking to reporters on the sidelines of an air show in Wisconsin. In support of this assertion, Bedford cited an evaluation conducted by FAA employees who had 'taken the units out, tested them and had inspectors get on aircraft and review them'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

US data experts unite to save public statistics amid political interference
US data experts unite to save public statistics amid political interference

Business Standard

timea few seconds ago

  • Business Standard

US data experts unite to save public statistics amid political interference

The data nerds are fighting back. After watching data sets be altered or disappear from US government websites in unprecedented ways after President Donald Trump began his second term, an army of outside statisticians, demographers and computer scientists have joined forces to capture, preserve and share data sets, sometimes clandestinely. Their goal is to make sure they are available in the future, believing that democracy suffers when policymakers don't have reliable data and that national statistics should be above partisan politics. There are such smart, passionate people who care deeply about not only the Census Bureau, but all the statistical agencies, and ensuring the integrity of the statistical system. And that gives me hope, even during these challenging times, Mary Jo Mitchell, director of government and public affairs for the research nonprofit the Population Association of America, said this week during an online public data-users conference. The threats to the US data infrastructure since January have come not only from the disappearance or modification of data related to gender, sexual orientation, health, climate change and diversity, among other topics, but also from job cuts of workers and contractors who had been guardians of restricted-access data at statistical agencies, the data experts said. There are trillions of bytes of data files, and I can't even imagine how many public dollars were spent to collect those data. ... But right now, they're sitting someplace that is inaccessible because there are no staff to appropriately manage those data, Jennifer Park, a study director for the Committee on National Statistics, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, said during the conference hosted by the Association of Public Data Users (APDU). Gender' switched to sex In February, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's official public portal for health data, was taken down entirely but subsequently went back up. Around the same time, when a query was made to access certain public data from the US Census Bureau's most comprehensive survey of American life, users for several days got a response that said the area was unavailable due to maintenance before access was restored. Researchers Janet Freilich and Aaron Kesselheim examined 232 federal public health data sets that had been modified in the first quarter of this year and found that almost half had been substantially altered," with the majority having the word gender switched to sex, they wrote this month in The Lancet medical journal. One of the most difficult tasks has been figuring out what's been changed since many of the alterations weren't recorded in documentation. Beth Jarosz, senior program director at the Population Reference Bureau, thought she was in good shape since she had previously downloaded data she needed from the National Survey of Children's Health for a February conference where she was speaking, even though the data had become unavailable. But then she realized she had failed to download the questionnaire and later discovered that a question about discrimination based on gender or sexual identity had been removed. It's the one thing my team didn't have, Jarosz said at this week's APDU conference. And they edited the questionnaire document, which should have been a historical record. Among the groups that have formed this year to collect and preserve the federal data are which monitors changes to federal data sets; the University of Chicago Library's Data Mirror website, which backs up and hosts at-risk data sets; the Data Rescue Project, which serves as a clearinghouse for data rescue-related efforts; and the Federal Data Forum, which shares information about what federal statistics have gone missing or been modified a job also being done by the American Statistical Association. The outside data warriors also are quietly reaching out to workers at statistical agencies and urging them to back up any data that is restricted from the public. You can't trust that this data is going to be here tomorrow, said Lena Bohman, a founding member of the Data Rescue Project. Experts' committee unofficially revived Separately, a group of outside experts has unofficially revived a long-running US Census Bureau advisory committee that was killed by the Trump administration in March. Census Bureau officials won't be attending the Census Scientific Advisory Committee meeting in September, since the Commerce Department, which oversees the agency, eliminated it. But the advisory committee will forward its recommendations to the bureau, and demographer Allison Plyer said she has heard that some agency officials are excited by the committee's re-emergence, even if it's outside official channels. We will send them recommendations but we don't expect them to respond since that would be frowned upon, said Plyer, chief demographer at The Data Center in New Orleans. They just aren't getting any outside expertise ... and they want expertise, which is understandable from nerds. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store