New Zealand enjoys GDP bump of 0.8 per cent in Q1
However, the Kiwi economy is still 1.1 per cent smaller than it was a year ago, such was the damage from a 2024 recession, with warnings of dire times and tough choices ahead.
On Thursday, Stats NZ revealed growth figures for Q1 2025, which improved on predictions from the Reserve Bank (RBNZ)of an 0.4 per cent uptick.
"Nine of the 16 industries increased, with the largest rises in business services and manufacturing," spokesperson Katrina Dewbery said.
The quarterly jump is the best result in almost two years, with GDP per capita was also up in the March quarter, growing by 0.5 per cent.
Acting prime minister David Seymour called the result "a tribute to New Zealanders" and Finance Minister Nicola Willis described it as "great news".
"Hard working people have knuckled down through a very challenging period and today's figure summarises that," Mr Seymour said.
While politicians were pleased at the result, there's little doubt New Zealand is in a tough spot economically.
Two particularly troubled industries - mining and construction - posted growth of 1.0 and 0.5 per cent in the quarter, but are down 11.2 and 9.3 per cent over the last year.
BNZ senior economist Doug Steel said more recent data on services (two-thirds of the Kiwi economy) and manufacturing looked "nothing short of disastrous".
"There are clear warnings that the New Zealand economy has hit a brick wall in Q2 and this is despite the substantial revenue growth flowing from the agricultural sector," he wrote.
"Many businesses noted reduced demand and falling revenues due to rising costs, economic uncertainty and low consumer confidence."
Mr Steel said it made a clear argument for further stimulus from the country's central bank, which has already eased the official cash rate from 5.5 per cent last August to the current position of 3.25 per cent.
However, other banks point to the above-expectations headline GDP data as a reason to hold fire at the bank's meeting next month.
"We think the RBNZ will pause in July. Beyond that, it's a tightrope walk of what seems to be stagflationary risks. We do not envy the hand our friends (at the RBNZ) have been dealt," ASB Chief Economist Nick Tuffley said.
Council of Trade Unions chief economist Craig Rennie said the GDP figures showed the government's failure to spark the economy.
The right-leaning coalition, led by Chris Luxon, took office in November 2023 and has reined in public spending at a time when many, including the CTU, argued for a fiscal boost.
"The economy is still smaller than at the election in real terms. With more recent data suggesting that the economy is struggling to grow, there is a real danger that we return to slow, no, or negative growth," Mr Rennie said.
"There are 23,000 more people on Jobseekers (benefit) this year. 48 per cent of workers in New Zealand got a pay cut in real terms. Business and consumer confidence are at levels associated with recessions.
"One quarter of data shouldn't blind the government of the need for change."
New Zealand's Q1 bump is healthy compared to Australia's 0.2 per cent increase in the same three months - though New Zealand's 1.1 per cent contraction over the last 12 months is well short of Australia's 1.3 per cent growth.
New Zealand's economy is rebounding towards better health, posting 0.8 per cent GDP growth in the first three months of the year.
However, the Kiwi economy is still 1.1 per cent smaller than it was a year ago, such was the damage from a 2024 recession, with warnings of dire times and tough choices ahead.
On Thursday, Stats NZ revealed growth figures for Q1 2025, which improved on predictions from the Reserve Bank (RBNZ)of an 0.4 per cent uptick.
"Nine of the 16 industries increased, with the largest rises in business services and manufacturing," spokesperson Katrina Dewbery said.
The quarterly jump is the best result in almost two years, with GDP per capita was also up in the March quarter, growing by 0.5 per cent.
Acting prime minister David Seymour called the result "a tribute to New Zealanders" and Finance Minister Nicola Willis described it as "great news".
"Hard working people have knuckled down through a very challenging period and today's figure summarises that," Mr Seymour said.
While politicians were pleased at the result, there's little doubt New Zealand is in a tough spot economically.
Two particularly troubled industries - mining and construction - posted growth of 1.0 and 0.5 per cent in the quarter, but are down 11.2 and 9.3 per cent over the last year.
BNZ senior economist Doug Steel said more recent data on services (two-thirds of the Kiwi economy) and manufacturing looked "nothing short of disastrous".
"There are clear warnings that the New Zealand economy has hit a brick wall in Q2 and this is despite the substantial revenue growth flowing from the agricultural sector," he wrote.
"Many businesses noted reduced demand and falling revenues due to rising costs, economic uncertainty and low consumer confidence."
Mr Steel said it made a clear argument for further stimulus from the country's central bank, which has already eased the official cash rate from 5.5 per cent last August to the current position of 3.25 per cent.
However, other banks point to the above-expectations headline GDP data as a reason to hold fire at the bank's meeting next month.
"We think the RBNZ will pause in July. Beyond that, it's a tightrope walk of what seems to be stagflationary risks. We do not envy the hand our friends (at the RBNZ) have been dealt," ASB Chief Economist Nick Tuffley said.
Council of Trade Unions chief economist Craig Rennie said the GDP figures showed the government's failure to spark the economy.
The right-leaning coalition, led by Chris Luxon, took office in November 2023 and has reined in public spending at a time when many, including the CTU, argued for a fiscal boost.
"The economy is still smaller than at the election in real terms. With more recent data suggesting that the economy is struggling to grow, there is a real danger that we return to slow, no, or negative growth," Mr Rennie said.
"There are 23,000 more people on Jobseekers (benefit) this year. 48 per cent of workers in New Zealand got a pay cut in real terms. Business and consumer confidence are at levels associated with recessions.
"One quarter of data shouldn't blind the government of the need for change."
New Zealand's Q1 bump is healthy compared to Australia's 0.2 per cent increase in the same three months - though New Zealand's 1.1 per cent contraction over the last 12 months is well short of Australia's 1.3 per cent growth.
New Zealand's economy is rebounding towards better health, posting 0.8 per cent GDP growth in the first three months of the year.
However, the Kiwi economy is still 1.1 per cent smaller than it was a year ago, such was the damage from a 2024 recession, with warnings of dire times and tough choices ahead.
On Thursday, Stats NZ revealed growth figures for Q1 2025, which improved on predictions from the Reserve Bank (RBNZ)of an 0.4 per cent uptick.
"Nine of the 16 industries increased, with the largest rises in business services and manufacturing," spokesperson Katrina Dewbery said.
The quarterly jump is the best result in almost two years, with GDP per capita was also up in the March quarter, growing by 0.5 per cent.
Acting prime minister David Seymour called the result "a tribute to New Zealanders" and Finance Minister Nicola Willis described it as "great news".
"Hard working people have knuckled down through a very challenging period and today's figure summarises that," Mr Seymour said.
While politicians were pleased at the result, there's little doubt New Zealand is in a tough spot economically.
Two particularly troubled industries - mining and construction - posted growth of 1.0 and 0.5 per cent in the quarter, but are down 11.2 and 9.3 per cent over the last year.
BNZ senior economist Doug Steel said more recent data on services (two-thirds of the Kiwi economy) and manufacturing looked "nothing short of disastrous".
"There are clear warnings that the New Zealand economy has hit a brick wall in Q2 and this is despite the substantial revenue growth flowing from the agricultural sector," he wrote.
"Many businesses noted reduced demand and falling revenues due to rising costs, economic uncertainty and low consumer confidence."
Mr Steel said it made a clear argument for further stimulus from the country's central bank, which has already eased the official cash rate from 5.5 per cent last August to the current position of 3.25 per cent.
However, other banks point to the above-expectations headline GDP data as a reason to hold fire at the bank's meeting next month.
"We think the RBNZ will pause in July. Beyond that, it's a tightrope walk of what seems to be stagflationary risks. We do not envy the hand our friends (at the RBNZ) have been dealt," ASB Chief Economist Nick Tuffley said.
Council of Trade Unions chief economist Craig Rennie said the GDP figures showed the government's failure to spark the economy.
The right-leaning coalition, led by Chris Luxon, took office in November 2023 and has reined in public spending at a time when many, including the CTU, argued for a fiscal boost.
"The economy is still smaller than at the election in real terms. With more recent data suggesting that the economy is struggling to grow, there is a real danger that we return to slow, no, or negative growth," Mr Rennie said.
"There are 23,000 more people on Jobseekers (benefit) this year. 48 per cent of workers in New Zealand got a pay cut in real terms. Business and consumer confidence are at levels associated with recessions.
"One quarter of data shouldn't blind the government of the need for change."
New Zealand's Q1 bump is healthy compared to Australia's 0.2 per cent increase in the same three months - though New Zealand's 1.1 per cent contraction over the last 12 months is well short of Australia's 1.3 per cent growth.
New Zealand's economy is rebounding towards better health, posting 0.8 per cent GDP growth in the first three months of the year.
However, the Kiwi economy is still 1.1 per cent smaller than it was a year ago, such was the damage from a 2024 recession, with warnings of dire times and tough choices ahead.
On Thursday, Stats NZ revealed growth figures for Q1 2025, which improved on predictions from the Reserve Bank (RBNZ)of an 0.4 per cent uptick.
"Nine of the 16 industries increased, with the largest rises in business services and manufacturing," spokesperson Katrina Dewbery said.
The quarterly jump is the best result in almost two years, with GDP per capita was also up in the March quarter, growing by 0.5 per cent.
Acting prime minister David Seymour called the result "a tribute to New Zealanders" and Finance Minister Nicola Willis described it as "great news".
"Hard working people have knuckled down through a very challenging period and today's figure summarises that," Mr Seymour said.
While politicians were pleased at the result, there's little doubt New Zealand is in a tough spot economically.
Two particularly troubled industries - mining and construction - posted growth of 1.0 and 0.5 per cent in the quarter, but are down 11.2 and 9.3 per cent over the last year.
BNZ senior economist Doug Steel said more recent data on services (two-thirds of the Kiwi economy) and manufacturing looked "nothing short of disastrous".
"There are clear warnings that the New Zealand economy has hit a brick wall in Q2 and this is despite the substantial revenue growth flowing from the agricultural sector," he wrote.
"Many businesses noted reduced demand and falling revenues due to rising costs, economic uncertainty and low consumer confidence."
Mr Steel said it made a clear argument for further stimulus from the country's central bank, which has already eased the official cash rate from 5.5 per cent last August to the current position of 3.25 per cent.
However, other banks point to the above-expectations headline GDP data as a reason to hold fire at the bank's meeting next month.
"We think the RBNZ will pause in July. Beyond that, it's a tightrope walk of what seems to be stagflationary risks. We do not envy the hand our friends (at the RBNZ) have been dealt," ASB Chief Economist Nick Tuffley said.
Council of Trade Unions chief economist Craig Rennie said the GDP figures showed the government's failure to spark the economy.
The right-leaning coalition, led by Chris Luxon, took office in November 2023 and has reined in public spending at a time when many, including the CTU, argued for a fiscal boost.
"The economy is still smaller than at the election in real terms. With more recent data suggesting that the economy is struggling to grow, there is a real danger that we return to slow, no, or negative growth," Mr Rennie said.
"There are 23,000 more people on Jobseekers (benefit) this year. 48 per cent of workers in New Zealand got a pay cut in real terms. Business and consumer confidence are at levels associated with recessions.
"One quarter of data shouldn't blind the government of the need for change."
New Zealand's Q1 bump is healthy compared to Australia's 0.2 per cent increase in the same three months - though New Zealand's 1.1 per cent contraction over the last 12 months is well short of Australia's 1.3 per cent growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
12 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
If the RBA has lost its way on interest rates, we'll suffer from its fumbling
Taken in isolation, the decision last week by the Reserve Bank's new interest-rate setting committee to defy all expectations and delay a cut in the official interest rate of a mere quarter of a percentage point, by a mere five weeks, is neither here nor there. Even so, the fuss it has caused damages the Reserve's credibility – 'do these guys know what they're doing?' – and thereby its ability to manage the economy successfully. And the coincidental timing with the first application of the new rule that the Reserve publish the numbers of committee members voting for and against – a supposed reform intended to encourage greater debate before such decisions are made – won't help the Reserve convey confidence that it's charting a steady course to peace and prosperity. It was obliged to reveal that while six board members wanted to delay a rate cut, the other three wanted to get on with it. I don't have any doubt that the six included governor Michele Bullock and her deputy, Andrew Hauser. And, though I have no inside information, it wouldn't surprise me if the new Treasury secretary, Jenny Wilkinson, was among the dissenters. Why? Because her predecessor, Dr Steven Kennedy, quietly made it clear in a succession of speeches that Treasury saw no reason for the Reserve's great fear that wage growth could explode at any moment. (In passing, note that the recent changes to the Reserve's Act make it clear that, while the Treasury secretary's seat on the board is 'ex officio', he or she acts in their individual capacity, and cannot be directed by the Treasurer.) The Reserve's insistence on delaying the next rate cut – based, apparently, on the flimsy argument that the inflation figures for the month of May may have somewhat overstated its rate of fall – came at a most inauspicious time. Loading While Trump's erratic pronouncements are adding greatly to uncertainty – prompting consumers and businesses to delay making big new spending commitments – the last thing the authorities should be doing is adding to it. By this silly decision, the Reserve has shaken the faith of the financial markets, businesses and households in its predictability and desire to steer a steady course to low inflation and higher growth. Not that this means I have much sympathy for the red-faced participants in the financial markets and the media. They're just playing their own games for their own commercial reasons. The reason the financial markets are so obsessed by predicting whether the Reserve will or won't jump at its next rate-setting meeting is that they place bets on the outcome. So a different headline for stories about the unpredictable decision is: 100-to-1 outsider wins the Reserve Bank Stakes at Martin Place on Tuesday.
The Age
12 hours ago
- The Age
If the RBA has lost its way on interest rates, we'll suffer from its fumbling
Taken in isolation, the decision last week by the Reserve Bank's new interest-rate setting committee to defy all expectations and delay a cut in the official interest rate of a mere quarter of a percentage point, by a mere five weeks, is neither here nor there. Even so, the fuss it has caused damages the Reserve's credibility – 'do these guys know what they're doing?' – and thereby its ability to manage the economy successfully. And the coincidental timing with the first application of the new rule that the Reserve publish the numbers of committee members voting for and against – a supposed reform intended to encourage greater debate before such decisions are made – won't help the Reserve convey confidence that it's charting a steady course to peace and prosperity. It was obliged to reveal that while six board members wanted to delay a rate cut, the other three wanted to get on with it. I don't have any doubt that the six included governor Michele Bullock and her deputy, Andrew Hauser. And, though I have no inside information, it wouldn't surprise me if the new Treasury secretary, Jenny Wilkinson, was among the dissenters. Why? Because her predecessor, Dr Steven Kennedy, quietly made it clear in a succession of speeches that Treasury saw no reason for the Reserve's great fear that wage growth could explode at any moment. (In passing, note that the recent changes to the Reserve's Act make it clear that, while the Treasury secretary's seat on the board is 'ex officio', he or she acts in their individual capacity, and cannot be directed by the Treasurer.) The Reserve's insistence on delaying the next rate cut – based, apparently, on the flimsy argument that the inflation figures for the month of May may have somewhat overstated its rate of fall – came at a most inauspicious time. Loading While Trump's erratic pronouncements are adding greatly to uncertainty – prompting consumers and businesses to delay making big new spending commitments – the last thing the authorities should be doing is adding to it. By this silly decision, the Reserve has shaken the faith of the financial markets, businesses and households in its predictability and desire to steer a steady course to low inflation and higher growth. Not that this means I have much sympathy for the red-faced participants in the financial markets and the media. They're just playing their own games for their own commercial reasons. The reason the financial markets are so obsessed by predicting whether the Reserve will or won't jump at its next rate-setting meeting is that they place bets on the outcome. So a different headline for stories about the unpredictable decision is: 100-to-1 outsider wins the Reserve Bank Stakes at Martin Place on Tuesday.
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Another economist warns about intergenerational wealth in Australia
Why are more economists talking about Australia's intergenerational wealth challenges? Guy Debelle, a former Reserve Bank deputy governor, joined the fray last week. In a speech in Sydney, he said one of Australia's big challenges, in the next decade or two, will be managing the huge transfer of wealth that will have to occur from older generations to younger. "Superannuation and housing are possibly the ultimate embodiment of intergenerational issues in this country," he said, as reported by the Australian Financial Review. Dr Debelle was talking about an issue the Productivity Commission raised in 2021. In its 2021 report, "Wealth transfers and their economic effects," the commission said Australian had experienced strong growth in household wealth over the last 20 years, but it had been very uneven. "The wealth of the average older Australian has grown remarkably since the turn of the century," it said. "Retirees in particular have seen disproportionately strong growth in their wealth relative to younger people. "Indeed, at a time where one would expect retirees to be drawing down on their wealth to fund consumption, their wealth has actually increased." The commission said housing wealth was driving the phenomenon, along with growth in superannuation balances. "Older age groups own more housing wealth, they draw down on that housing wealth slowly, and they inherit large housing wealth from their partners in old age," it said. The below graphic, from the commission's report, showed what happened to real house prices in Australia between 1970 and 2018, relative to incomes. The report said while trillions of dollars in wealth would transfer from older Australians to younger Australians in coming decades, the timing of the wealth transfer could create its own challenges. "By the time people receive an inheritance, they will be well into middle age — about 50 years old on average — already established in their careers and housing, and many will potentially be nearing retirement themselves," it said. It kickstarted a national conversation about the need for wealth transfers to take place sooner, about the social benefits of older Australians downsizing their homes in retirement, and about the tax system generally. But that was four years ago, and house prices have soared (again) in the meantime. So in July last year, JBWere updated the numbers in that 2021 commission report to account for the growth in asset values that has occurred since. The commission report had referenced research from 2017, estimating that older Australians would transfer $3.5 trillion to younger generations over the next 20 years. But according to JBWere, that figure now stands at $5.4 trillion over the next 20 years. Its report revived questions about Australians receiving large inheritances so late in life, and how our tax system and housing situation were contributing to the phenomenon. It said the value of inheritances, and the age of receipt of inheritances, both peaked about 60 years of age. "This increased age of receiving an inheritance can be traced back to the rise in the average age of having children and increased life expectancy," the JBWere report said. "It does, however, raise the question of the need of recipients at this stage of life, compared to either earlier years (Bank of Mum and Dad) or for some bequests being directed elsewhere where greater need exists." At the beginning of last year, the former Treasury secretary Ken Henry had also warned that our tax system had deteriorated to the point that he was worried about Australia's "social compact" holding together. He said housing, the state of climate policy, and the commonwealth's over-reliance on taxing workers' incomes were three areas of major policy failure. "It's an intergenerational tragedy that we have allowed this to happen," he lamented. And last week, Dr Debelle also linked Australia's housing and tax situation to global economic trends. He said the political problems we're seeing in so many countries, and the "quackery" that's underpinning some current economic policies (such as Donald Trump's tariff policies) were symptoms of a larger problem. "One of the root causes of where we are today — particularly in the US, but it's also true in many other countries — has been the failure to distribute the gains from economic policy changes," he warned. Then on Friday, Cotality released its latest "Housing Chart Pack" data. It showed property values in nearly half of Australia's suburbs were sitting at record highs at the end of June. In Brisbane, almost 80 per cent of its suburbs had record-high property prices. In Perth it was a similar story. CBA's economics team said the upward momentum in property prices since mid-February had been fuelled by the Reserve Bank's interest rate cuts this year. The latest Westpac-Melbourne Institute consumer sentiment survey also showed that house price expectations jumped by 7 per cent in June, to its highest level since 2013. It showed over three quarters of consumers now expect property prices to rise over the next 12 months, especially in Queensland and NSW. But it said those expectations for property price increases weren't exactly filling Australians with confidence. "Despite this positive outlook for house prices, consumers remain relatively averse to real estate as an investment option and to risk in general," Westpac's Matthew Hassan said. "Indeed, responses to our quarterly question on the 'wisest place for savings' suggest that the tariff-related turmoil this year has seen what was already a high level of risk aversion intensify even further. "Consumers still heavily favour 'safe options' with 55 per cent nominating either 'bank deposits' or 'pay down debt' as the wisest place of savings, up slightly from 52 per cent in March. "Interest rate cuts have done little to shift these views so far," he said. It's a familiar dynamic. The majority of people expect property values to keep rising, and those price increases will keep boosting Australia's household "wealth". But will it be good for the Australia's younger generations? What's the end-point in all of this?
