
VW ID 7 review: a compelling take on what a warmed-up EV can be
When the GTX badge was launched by Volkswagen in 2021, it was tipped as an electric equivalent of – and eventual successor to – the GTI line. But it has suffered by comparison: adding power and straight-line speed is easy on EVs and doesn't make for an everyday performance hero. Now, with new management in Wolfsburg committed to GTI, it's GTX that's being phased out. Some irony, then, that the Volkswagen ID 7 GTX showcases exactly what the badge could stand for: a compelling take on what a warmed-up VW EV can be, with a distinct nod towards grand tourers and a different feel to GTI cars.
It helps that this new model has an excellent base to work from: in entry-level Pro form, the Vokswagen ID 7 was named Autocar's Best Saloon of 2024 and the best in a competitive class that also includes the Tesla Model 3. It's a refined, understated and well-rounded car, a better base to create a GTX model from than the earlier ID 4 and ID 5 SUVs.
So is the ID 7 GTX a true electric performance car or, as is often the car with hot EVs, would you be better off sticking to the base model?
Verdict
Good
Effortless performance
Strong driving dynamics, even if it's no pure driver's car
Subtle but notable GTX styling cues
Bad
It's not a true driver's car in the spirit of the GTI brand
Extra performance means range takes a hit
Quite a price rise from lower versions of the ID 7
Pros
Dual motor set-up adds plenty of performance
GTX styling elements are subtle but notable
Modifications for GTX model extend beyond adding power
Cons
Extra motor does come at the expense of range
GTX upgrades are subtle, so this isn't a full-on performance car
The ID 7 GTX features a four-wheel-drive powertrain. At the rear is the same 282bhp Volkswagen Group APP550 permanent magnet synchronous electric motor as in the standard Pro and Pro S versions. That's twinned with a new 107bhp asynchronous motor (designated AKA150) mounted on the front axle.
The rear motor is the primary drive unit, with the front one called upon when needed. If you were wondering, Volkswagen chose to use an asynchronous unit on the front axle because it claims this is more efficient when not being called upon to provide power.
Despite the two motors offering 282bhp and 107bhp respectively, total system output is capped at 335bhp. That's 53bhp more than the standard version of the ID 7 but significantly down on the 460bhp Tesla Model 3 Performance.
Crucially, the modifications made for this GTX model extend beyond simply adding more power than you could sensibly enjoy. The progressive steering has been tuned to offer more feel, with the electronic differential lock system also reworked. There has also been extensive work to broaden the variance in dynamics enabled by the Dynamic Chassis Control (fitted as standard in the UK). Notably, Volkswagen engineers say the big advances have come from developments of the system software.
The other big technical change is in the battery: the 77kWh pack used in the Pro model has been switched for an 86kWh one (also found in the long-range Pro S). It's a different design, with the pack containing 13 cell modules instead of 12. It means that in saloon form, the GTX offers a range of 364 miles.
The exterior styling changes that mark out the GTX from standard versions of the ID 7 are subtle but notable.
There's a new front bumper design exclusive to the performance line, along with revamped daytime running lights and a gloss-black front air intake. The bumper is aerodynamically styled to aid efficiency, while the front-end design now features a light-up VW logo as standard.
At the rear, there's a bespoke horizontal light strip (the rear VW badge illuminates as well) and customisable 3D-effect LED clusters.
On the saloon version, the lower area of the rear bumper features a honeycomb grille pattern and there's a notable diffuser.
The GTX sits on 20in wheels as standard, with 21in versions available as an option. There are also custom GTX wheel rim designs.
The GTX is also offered in Tourer estate form, which has an identical footprint and wheelbase to the saloon version but a bulkier rear end to accommodate a usefully larger boot.
The two machines are visually identical at the front and share identical mechanicals, but because of the greater surface area, the Tourer has a reduced – but still substantial – range of 357 miles.
Pros
Maintains all the strengths of the regular ID 7
Excellent low-slung saloon driving position
Cons
GTX styling elements are somewhat subtle
Almost every control is touchscreen-based
The interior of the ID 7 GTX will be familiar to anyone who has sat in a regular ID 7. Although since this is a performance version, there are, of course, a range of styling upgrades designed to convey a dash of dynamism.
The custom Ergoactive front seats features a GTX-specific design, featuring a covering of a special microfibre material. There are also red decorative elements and GTX logos etched into the backrests. The steering wheel and other systems also feature red stitching elements.
Elsewhere, things are essentially the same as the regular ID 7, so there's a small digital cockpit with many of the displays moved to a large head-up display. Notably, Volkswagen has continued to work on the system, and so it can now display directions from Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
The 15in infotainment touchscreen also remains, and many of the key controls of the car have been shifted to it. But as you can read in our main ID 7 review, everything is well laid-out and relatively easy to use.
Essentially, this is a car designed for long-distance driving, and the interior supports that purpose. It feels plush and premium without being overly fussy, and the low-slung driving position is excellent – enough to remind you why there should always be a place for saloons in this age of SUVs.
Pros
Effortless performance with plenty of power
Smooth and consistent acceleration has a nice linear feel
Cons
Some rivals offer more power and better acceleration (not that you need it)
Lack of bite from the brake pedal dents your confidence
Under heavy acceleration, the GTX feels as quick as its claimed 0-62mph time of 5.4sec suggests – and unlike in many hot electric saloons or estates, enjoyment doesn't come only in a straight line.
While it wants for power compared to rivals such as the Model 3 Performance, you would be very unlikely to notice unless you actually took them to a track for a drag race. In the real world, there's more than enough pace.
It's very usable, too. You get a big whack of power when you step on the accelerator, but it never feels uneven, and even under heavy loads the power is well-modulated. And if you need extra power while at speed, the ID 7 GTX will never be lacking for response.
Because the car favours its rear wheels, it maintains a touch of rear-drive bias. This means you can have some fun on a British country road, with it feeling responsive.
Mind you, much of the above can also apply to the single-motor Pro and Pro S models, and while they don't offer the same level of ultimate performance, you would be hard-pressed to really exploit the difference in everyday driving.
Our one big criticism with regards to driving the GTX quickly is the feel of the brake pedal, or rather the lack thereof. Incredibly light, it brought to mind old cars whose brakes had faded, denting my confidence to push on.
Pros
Notably refined ride, especially given the car's heavy weight
Offers more driver engagement than many electric saloons
Retuned DCC system offers increased range between driving modes
Cons
It's not a huge step up from standard ID 7 models
The steering of the GTX doesn't offer hot hatch levels of engagement, but it's direct and responsive. To Volkswagen's credit, it isn't hammed up with extra weight or springiness to give a false impression of sportiness – a trap that makers of many warmed-up models have fallen into.
The car maintains its composure along fast, flowing roads, even when riding on big 21in wheels. It has an agility that belies its considerable 2328kg weight (which, by way of comparison it, makes it just 58kg lighter than the latest Volkswagen California camper van).
The Dynamic Chassis Control (DCC) system has been tuned to offer a wider margin between the various driving modes, yet even in Sport the GTX has strong ride quality and maintains its composure well.
The dynamic management system works away in the background, calculating things like how much power to draw from each motor. It can also take more regen from the front motor in order to help the car turn in.
While the GTX offers a level of engagement that many hot EVs lack, it's not an outright driver's car. It's an engaging GT that has plenty of appeal in the form of an executive saloon.
Again, a caveat would be that more standard ID 7 models run it closer. The GTX feels marginally sharper and more responsive, but it's not like the Pro and Pro S are dynamic slouches.
Instead of feeling like a true performance variant, such as the Golf GTI, this ultimately feels like a warmed-up range-topper for the regular ID 7 line-up.
Pros
Ability to charge at speeds of up to 200kW is welcome
Most of the kit you will want is included as standard
Official range of 364 miles is impressive
Cons
The ID 7 Pro S offers substantially more range
The GTX is quite a price hike from the rest of the ID 7 range
The GTX's 86kWh battery gives the saloon an official range of 364 miles and the estate a marginally inferior 357 miles. That's quite impressive in bare statistics, but in single-motor Pro S form, the ID 7 will achieve up to 440 miles.
Our experience suggests you should be able to achieve close to 300 miles in the real world – although doing so will obviously require you not exploiting the full potential of the powertrain.
The new battery also allows for faster charging, so you can top up the GTX at speeds of up to 200kW.
In the UK, the GTX is priced from £59,025, which is a substantial step up from the £51,005 for entry-level Pro and £54,490 for the Pro S, which shares the new 86kWh battery.
You can add about £750 to each of those prices if you want an estate body instead of a saloon one.
The GTX is at least well equipped for the outlay: standard equipment includes the adaptive chassis control, adaptive cruise control, a Harman Kardon sound system, an auto-dimming rear view mirror, 30-colour ambient lighting and the augmented reality head-up display.
An efficiency-boosting heat pump was originally a £1050 option in the UK, but since 2025 one has featured as standard.
Verdict
Good
Effortless performance
Strong driving dynamics, even if it's no pure driver's car
Subtle but notable GTX styling cues
Bad
It's not a true driver's car in the spirit of the GTI brand
Extra performance means range takes a hit
Quite a price rise from lower versions of the ID 7
Overall, the GTX is a fast, refined and compelling package – and a far more rounded electric performance car than many of its rivals.
It showcases what the GTX badge can be: a family EV with a welcome dash of added performance and dynamism. Volkswagen has taken an already excellent car and added further dashes of power, engagement and comfort.
But there is a catch, and it's one that is familiar with performance EVs: if were were looking to buy an ID 7, we would be tempted to shop lower down the line-up. In its single-motor Pro and Pro S forms, the ID 7 is still enjoyable to drive, plenty fast enough for the real world and up to £10,000 cheaper. While the GTX makes a reasonable case for itself, the Pro S is almost as well equipped and offers 65 miles of extra range.
That said, if you like the idea of a warmed-up electric Volkswagen that can be a practical, long-range family hauler and do a good impression of a super-saloon, there's much to like here.
Model tested:
Volkswagen ID 7 GTX
Electric motor/s:
1 x permanent maget synchronous (rear), 1 x asynchronous (front)
Drive battery:
Lithium-ion, NMC
Driveline layout:
Twin-motor; all-wheel-drive
Model tested
Volkswagen ID 7 GTX
View all specs and rivals
Electric motor/s
1 x permanent maget synchronous (rear), 1 x asynchronous (front)
Drive battery
Lithium-ion, NMC
Driveline layout
Twin-motor; all-wheel-drive
Battery size
86kWh (usable)
Energy efficiency
3.8mpkWh
Rivals BMW i4 Tesla Model 3
Battery size
86kWh (usable)
Energy efficiency
3.8mpkWh
Rivals BMW i4 Tesla Model 3

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Stella proud of Norris after 'best qualifying of the year'
SPIELBERG, Austria, June 28 (Reuters) - McLaren team boss Andrea Stella said he was proud of Lando Norris's performance after the Briton took a dominant pole position in Austria in what he called his best qualifying of the year. Norris led every phase, going fastest in Friday and Saturday practice, a decisive response to a poor qualifying in Canada and his collision with championship-leading teammate Oscar Piastri in that race two weeks ago. That incident, which he accepted blame for, left Norris 22 points behind Piastri. "Even in Canada, after reviewing the weekend with Lando and his engineers, we always said the speed was there," Stella told Sky Sports television. "When he had the little contact with the wall in qualifying, he was on track for a pole position. And in the race, he was one of the fastest, if not the fastest car. The speed was always there. We needed to polish the execution. "I'm really proud of Lando today. Not only he scored a pole position, but it's a dominant pole position, a pretty remarkable lap time." Norris was more than half a second faster than his closest rival, Ferrari's Charles Leclerc, on the shortest lap of the season. The Briton said the upgraded car felt strong and quick. Qualifying, a strong point last year, has become more of a problem this season, but Norris seemed to have rectified some of the issues. "It was easily my best qualifying of the year from a delivery point of view from every single lap I did. I still made a couple of mistakes here and there, but none that cost me a lap or anything," he said. "I think on deliveries, consistency and of course putting it in when it counts in Q3 (it) was easily the best lap I've done for this whole season, probably even better than Monaco, honestly. "Maybe not as exciting a lap as Monaco, but definitely a better put-together lap than I did there." Norris won from pole in Monaco, with the fastest lap, as he did in the Australian season-opener. "It shows that the feelings I've been requiring, the feelings that I've not been getting as easily, when they are more my way and more where I want them to be, I can put in better performances and have days like today," he said.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
‘It's so obvious' – Fans convinced Max Verstappen's Red Bull future is doomed after ominous Christian Horner interview
FANS are convinced Max Verstappen will jump ship from Red Bull to Mercedes after watching Christian Horner's gloomy interview. Merecedes boss Toto Wolff sensationally confirmed on Friday that his team have held behind closed doors talks with the four-time world champion. 3 And after Verstappen finished P7 in qualifying in Red Bull's home race in Austria, Horner was asked about Wolff's incredible admission. Horner, who promoted Verstappen to F1 in May 2016, tried to play-down the ongoing speculation linking the Dutchman with Mercedes. The British team principal told Sky Sports: "It's a lot of noise. I think Max gets quite annoyed by it and we're very clear with the contract that we have with Max until 2028. "Anything is entirely speculative that is being said, but yeah we tend not to pay too much attention to it." Wolff said ahead of qualifying, where George Russell secured fifth place, that there was 'very little probability' of Verstappen joining Mercedes – at least not for 2026. Russell, meanwhile, is still waiting for a contract extension, with the winner of the Canadian Grand Prix a fortnight ago having emerged as a reported target for Aston Martin. Horner cheekily added: "I can imagine that George is frustrated he hasn't been given a contract yet. But that's between him and his team. "But the situation with Max we know clearly where we're at and obviously as does Max, so everything is subject to noise and within any contract it remains confidential between the parties." CASINO SPECIAL - BEST CASINO BONUSES FROM £10 DEPOSITS But fans have been left unconvinced with Horner's attempts to dismiss Verstappen's exit rumours as baseless paddock gossip. One wrote on X: "After that interview with Horner, it's so obvious that Max is going to join Mercedes." Red Bull's Christian Horner gives low down on car before F1 season kicks off with Australian Grand Prix A second said: "Somehow this interview with Horner is not convincing me everything is well and jolly behind the RB curtain." Another added: "Horner sounds like a beaten man." Verstappen is contracted with the Milton Keynes-based outfit until 2028 but is understood to have clauses in his contract that could result in an earlier departure. Wolff has long targeted a move for Verstappen, before picking rookie Kimi Antonelli as Lewis Hamilton's replacement during the off-season. Russell, who is out of contract at the end of the season, was the first to say his team have been talking to Verstappen about signing a deal for 2026. The Brit, 27, also suggested on Thursday that his contract talks had been delayed by the ongoing talks with Dutchman. Pushed on whether he would set a deadline for Verstappen to decide on joining Mercedes, Wolff confirmed "conversations behind closed doors" were ongoing. Wolff said: "You make it sound like we have been asking, 'when do you want to join and what are the terms?' That's not how it is and how it works. "I want to just have the conversations behind closed doors, not town halls. "We have two drivers that have been in our programme a long time, drivers that I'm perfectly happy to have, drivers that will do great in the future of the team. So, it's a bit different a situation." Meanwhile, Horner could consider replacing Yuki Tsunoda with Racing Bulls youngster Isack Hadjar, as the Japanese star suffered Red Bull's worst-ever qualifying position at their home turf, after finishing 18th. Lando Norris took a dominant pole position in Austria, as late yellow flag drama left championship leader Oscar Piastri third, with Charles Leclerc making up the front row. 3 3


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Lando Norris storms to Austrian F1 GP pole as angry Verstappen slumps to seventh
Lando Norris claimed pole position for the Austrian Grand Prix by half a second at the Red Bull Ring, beating Ferrari's Charles Leclerc into second and his McLaren teammate Oscar Piastri into third. It was the perfect comeback for the British driver after his disappointment at having to retire when he crashed into Piastri at the last round in Canada. Red Bull's Max Verstappen was struggling for grip and finished in seventh. Lewis Hamilton was fourth for Ferrari and George Russell fifth for Mercedes. For Norris this was just the result he required after his title hopes took a battering when he made the misjudged move against Piastri in Montreal, dropping him to 22 points behind the Australian. At the Red Bull Ring this weekend Norris had insisted his error in Canada had ultimately resulted in a positive outcome, that he and the team emerged stronger now the seemingly unavoidable clash had finally happened. That is credible but it is inescapable that misjudgments like that in Canada could cost him the title. For all the psychological compartmentalising and rationalisations, that must weigh heavy. He said in Montreal he knew he had to make fewer errors, a theme he returned to in Austria. 'I've been making more mistakes and I've been behind,' he said. 'That's been clear. It's very close between us and Oscar's certainly been a bit more comfortable than I have this season, that's the way it is and I've had to try to improve and step up more.' Certainly he did so in qualifying with a lap that was all but untouchable. Notably the McLaren team principal, Andrea Stella, said the crash would have left Norris's confidence bruised and that the team would rally round him. They are still seeking to find a way to adjust the car to suit him and their upgrades this weekend to the front aero, rear aero and, crucially for Norris, the front suspension, to improve the feel he has for the front of the car, look to have paid off. Certainly Norris looked comfortable in qualifying, which has been his achilles heel this season. In Austria, it all appeared to come together and he looked in complete control from the off. Norris had dominated the first two sessions of qualifying and while Piastri opened the running for the first hot laps in Q3, he managed only a tidy lap that was swiftly eclipsed by his teammate. Norris was quicker in all three sectors and over two-tenths up on the Australian on top of the time sheetsin 1min 04.268sec, while Verstappen struggled a six-tenths back in sixth. For the final runs Russell improved, as did Leclerc, and Piastri knew he could do better but Norris once more looked confident. The British driver went quicker still through every sector with a lap of 1:03.971, half a second up on Leclerc, an absolute chasm. A late yellow flag when Pierre Gasly spun was costly for both Piastri and Verstappen, who both had to back off, with the Dutchman, struggling all afternoon, left almost a second back. An unhappy Verstappen described his car as so lacking in grip in every type of corner that it was 'completely undriveable'. The Dutchman will be dissatisfied by the result, especially after Red Bull brought what is likely to be their last major upgrade of the season to the race with a revision to the floor of the car it was hoped would help address the balance issues that have plagued it all year. 1. Lando Norris (McLaren) 1min 03.971sec 2. Charles Leclerc (Ferrari) 1:04.492 3. Oscar Piastri (McLaren) 1:04.554 4. Lewis Hamilton (Ferrari) 1:04.582 5. George Russell (Mercedes) 1:04.763 6. Liam Lawson (Racing Bulls) 1:04.926 7. Max Verstappen (Red Bull) 1:04.929 8. Gabriel Bortoleto (Sauber) 1:05.132 9. Kimi Antonelli (Mercedes) 1:05.276 10. Pierre Gasly (Alpine) 1:05.649 Q2 11. Fernando Alonso (Aston Martin) 1:05.128 12. Alex Albon (Williams) 1:05.205 13. Isack Hadjar (Racing Bulls) 1:05.226 14. Franco Colapinto (Alpine) 1:05.288 15. Oliver Bearman (Haas) 1:05.312 Q1 16. Lance Stroll (Aston Martin) 1:05.329 17. Esteban Ocon (Haas) 1:05.364 18. Yuki Tsunoda (Red Bull) 1:05.369 19. Carlos Sainz (Williams) 1:05.582 20. Nico Hülkenberg (Sauber) 1:05.606 All of which will also fuel further speculation about the Dutchman's future, which has already dominated this weekend, when the Mercedes team principal, Toto Wolff, confirmed that he was once more interested in persuading the world champion to leave Red Bull and join his team. The second session was red-flagged for 10 minutes when, as had occurred in Japan earlier this season, trackside grass caught fire, ignited by the sparks from the titanium skid blocks beneath the car.