The country of the brave is no more
Image: Supplied
There is no bravery anymore. Our politics is filled with sycophants who, without constitutional convictions, robotically regurgitate scripted monologues across every platform. When interviewed they say "Yes, but …" and then they go robotic. They bizarrely repeat the nonsense scripted for them.
Then they rinse and repeat for the next audience. They have been trained to ignore questions by saying "Well, did you know…" and then they regurgitate their robotic, scripted message. They don't answer questions.
Author Patric Mallet recently wrote a commentary that said something like 'It's no longer about 'We the people, it's about 'We the party.'' Individual conviction, intelligence, and bravery is no longer a requirement for political party membership. Enforced compliance or expulsion are the only choices. Political parties have become echo chambers, where factional beliefs are reinforced and where constitutional truths are either misinterpreted or not pondered at all.
The pursuit of our profound constitutional ideals has become too great a risk for our political parties. Having built their voter base on fears, corruption and perverse ideological obsessions, they can no longer find the exit sign. They have constructed an ideological prison for themselves, with the majority giving assent to their lies, while squirming in their seats.
South Africa is in an ideological crisis. We are a constitutional democracy, but we find ourselves in constant conflict about how to advance our constitution through effective policy development. From education to equal and equitable employment, to policies on energy, global human rights, as well as rogue states and trade, we have political agents who inflict ideological and constitutional confusion on the citizenry, and which an uneducated and ill-informed voter often accepts without testing its constitutionality.
Our constitution has become a mute piece of Africana, used mainly by political parties to conduct lawfare, and not to develop policy agendas to advance our people. The aspirations, ideals, and promises written in the constitution for the people's prosperity and advancement are often used by political parties to develop ideologically misdirected policies, for the party has become greater than the people and their constitution.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
While the need for equality and non-discrimination in the present is without dispute, how do we address historical discrimination and inequality? How do we address generational racial trauma? It seems that some believe that by waving a magic wand, everyone will be equal and no longer discriminated against.
I was walking in a Constantia mall recently. In my rush to get to a bookstore, I found myself walking behind an individual who was slowly pushing their trolley. I was trying to dodge patrons to get past the trolley pusher. My attempted overtaking manoeuvres caused the trolley pusher to turn around, and as they saw me, they stopped their trolley. My feeling was that they thought I was up to something bad.
Once inside the bookstore, I stood in a queue with my purchase. The person in front of me looked around to see who was behind them. They then moved their sling bag to the front of their body. My feeling was that they thought I could be up to something bad. Transfer the micro experiences of these parties – them and me - into our education, health and economic systems, and you will see how our mighty constitution is not used as a recourse to give us the power to overcome our stereotypes and fears. It gets binned to accommodate our apartheid perspectives – mine and theirs - of other people.
Unless political parties begin to make work of advancing our constitutional democracy with its central message of 'We, the People," they will never succeed in moving South Africa beyond "We, the white people' and 'We, the Black people." Our political parties have won votes by intentionally exploiting fears about "the other" to gain voter support. Fears win votes. They, lacking all bravery, have been unable to develop an ideological message that celebrates our constitutional aspirations as one nation.
Cape Argus
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
7 days ago
- IOL News
The country of the brave is no more
. Lorenzo Davids is the Executive Director of Urban Issues Consulting. Image: Supplied There is no bravery anymore. Our politics is filled with sycophants who, without constitutional convictions, robotically regurgitate scripted monologues across every platform. When interviewed they say "Yes, but …" and then they go robotic. They bizarrely repeat the nonsense scripted for them. Then they rinse and repeat for the next audience. They have been trained to ignore questions by saying "Well, did you know…" and then they regurgitate their robotic, scripted message. They don't answer questions. Author Patric Mallet recently wrote a commentary that said something like 'It's no longer about 'We the people, it's about 'We the party.'' Individual conviction, intelligence, and bravery is no longer a requirement for political party membership. Enforced compliance or expulsion are the only choices. Political parties have become echo chambers, where factional beliefs are reinforced and where constitutional truths are either misinterpreted or not pondered at all. The pursuit of our profound constitutional ideals has become too great a risk for our political parties. Having built their voter base on fears, corruption and perverse ideological obsessions, they can no longer find the exit sign. They have constructed an ideological prison for themselves, with the majority giving assent to their lies, while squirming in their seats. South Africa is in an ideological crisis. We are a constitutional democracy, but we find ourselves in constant conflict about how to advance our constitution through effective policy development. From education to equal and equitable employment, to policies on energy, global human rights, as well as rogue states and trade, we have political agents who inflict ideological and constitutional confusion on the citizenry, and which an uneducated and ill-informed voter often accepts without testing its constitutionality. Our constitution has become a mute piece of Africana, used mainly by political parties to conduct lawfare, and not to develop policy agendas to advance our people. The aspirations, ideals, and promises written in the constitution for the people's prosperity and advancement are often used by political parties to develop ideologically misdirected policies, for the party has become greater than the people and their constitution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ While the need for equality and non-discrimination in the present is without dispute, how do we address historical discrimination and inequality? How do we address generational racial trauma? It seems that some believe that by waving a magic wand, everyone will be equal and no longer discriminated against. I was walking in a Constantia mall recently. In my rush to get to a bookstore, I found myself walking behind an individual who was slowly pushing their trolley. I was trying to dodge patrons to get past the trolley pusher. My attempted overtaking manoeuvres caused the trolley pusher to turn around, and as they saw me, they stopped their trolley. My feeling was that they thought I was up to something bad. Once inside the bookstore, I stood in a queue with my purchase. The person in front of me looked around to see who was behind them. They then moved their sling bag to the front of their body. My feeling was that they thought I could be up to something bad. Transfer the micro experiences of these parties – them and me - into our education, health and economic systems, and you will see how our mighty constitution is not used as a recourse to give us the power to overcome our stereotypes and fears. It gets binned to accommodate our apartheid perspectives – mine and theirs - of other people. Unless political parties begin to make work of advancing our constitutional democracy with its central message of 'We, the People," they will never succeed in moving South Africa beyond "We, the white people' and 'We, the Black people." Our political parties have won votes by intentionally exploiting fears about "the other" to gain voter support. Fears win votes. They, lacking all bravery, have been unable to develop an ideological message that celebrates our constitutional aspirations as one nation. Cape Argus
IOL News
15-07-2025
- IOL News
A family meeting that became a divorce announcement
. Lorenzo Davids is the Executive Director of Urban Issues Consulting. Image: Supplied President Ramaphosa has just secured his recall by the ANC by December 2025 with this hapless 'family meeting' announcement. He failed to read the national room. He made the country wait 7 days to hold a 10-minute national briefing, for which he is always late, on a matter of grave national concern. He has no understanding of, nor appreciation for, the South African mood or need. He has no appreciation for how tired we are of his failed 'family meetings' and his lateness and tardiness with the urgent business at hand. He has no energy for the mountain of work to be done to fix this country, a country we love, and which he finally broke, after promising us in 2018 that he would love it too and fix it. His entire demeanour on Sunday night spoke of a President who hates his job. He was uninterested in what he had to say. He looked irritated. He spoke for about 10.5 minutes. He kept us waiting for 3 times longer than he spoke for. He has been in the Union Buildings for some 17 years now. He doesn't want to be there anymore. Why was he not in his office earlier to be ready to deliver his address on time? Why did we hear news channels announce to the public at about 7:15pm "The president has just arrived." He is staring a recall in the face. And the saddest part of it all? He would welcome it. Mbeki was recalled 9 months before his term ended when he interfered in judicial processes. Zuma was recalled a year before his term ended when the Constitutional Court found he had violated the Constitution. Cyril on Sunday begged the ANC to recall him. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The President will be recalled before year-end because he failed to lead the ANC to victory in April 2024. He is now certain, after Sunday night's middle finger showing to the citizens of South Africa, to the Police, to Parliament and to his own ANC, to cost the ANC the loss of even more votes in 2029. This is the end of the ANC as we knew it. The once great ANC is finally dead. It won't win an election ever again. The last throes of life of what was once a great ANC movement were encapsulated in a tiny 10-minute address to say to the people, "Stop complaining, can't you see how tired I am? Here's a Commission - it's all we have left to give you - and it will take 3 months, maybe 6 months, or more, I don't know. Anyway, ok bye." And then he left the stage. And with him, the entire ANC left the stage tonight. They had nothing to say to South Africa. The ANC lost a further 1 million votes tonight. I was going to write and say, 'Maybe they lost 100,000 votes tonight.' Reading the comments online across the platforms and listening to the news bulletins, the anger expressed by South Africans, coupled with a severe sadness, tells me the end has arrived. The voter has made up his mind. But more dangerously, Ramaphosa has set South Africa up for a potential coup. He has a very angry security cluster whose police, intelligence and law enforcement structures are all implicated by the allegations made against them. All that infighting will now play itself out on the national stage and will put a firm halt to any serious investigation into any of the real issues. In the absence of stable political leadership, the judiciary will increasingly be called upon to stabilise the sinking ship. But there are limits to what the judiciary can do. It does not interfere with the affairs of the legislative and executive branches of government. It rules on the interactions between these actors and the body of laws. The President and his politicians lead the legislative and executive branches of government. He has also pitted very powerful criminal syndicates and cartels against each other, all of whom are vying for their chosen captured political candidate to assume office so that their payday can begin. He has unleashed more political instability and deepened political opportunism in the wake of his weak and reckless leadership shown to South Africa on Sunday night. This was not a family meeting; it was a divorce announcement. The President divorced his citizens on Sunday night. And then he walked out the door. The ANC now needs a very competent President to replace Cyril Ramaphosa, who must have the skills, intelligence, love, backbone and energy to rebuild what was destroyed and lost under Cyril's presidency over the last 6 years. They don't have until 2029. And they don't have until 2027. The problem, however, is that the cupboard is bare. Cape Argus
IOL News
09-07-2025
- IOL News
National Dialogue or national crisis? You choose
. Lorenzo Davids is the Executive Director of Urban Issues Consulting. Image: Supplied Let me begin again. We need a national dialogue. We need Helen Zille to be the DA leader inside the GNU. My comrade friends have castigated me for the latter. And about the former, I have heard media shows informing their listeners that South Africa doesn't need a national dialogue "because we know what people need." If there has ever been an insight into the psyche of untransformed power in South Africa, these two moments are it. Since the dawn of colonialism, those with power have always made it their business to make the misery of people the cost of doing business. In 2021, 'Unite 4 Mzanzi' and Stellenbosch University's Centre for Complex Systems in Transition estimated that South Africa lost about R1.5 trillion to corruption between 2014 and 2019. Others, such as Corruption Watch, report that we lost approximately R650 billion over the past 30 years since 1994. Imagine, for a moment, being black and born in 1960. You experienced the worst of Apartheid for 34 years. Then you experience the worst of the ANC government and its coalition partners for another 30 years. You are now 64. You still don't have an education, a house or any wealth for your future. You still live in a shack. At 64, you are still unemployed. But you are told you can't speak. You will be asked to vote for these destroyers of dreams till the day you die. Helen Zille is the most competent government administrator to get the public service to work. I don't agree with her on several policy issues. I have condemned her colonial statements. But I know that she has a mind that is focused on fixing things. The comrades find that hard to accept. They are content with poor people becoming the cost of them maintaining their political power and opulent benefits. The Police Minister announced on Friday that eighteen people were killed in Cape Town between June 22 and July 4. There was nothing in the news bulletins that conveyed crisis or concern. Because those in power and those behind microphones tell us they know what people need. The black voice has been silenced by those who believe they know what black youth need. Or what mothers with drug addicted sons need. I gave a hitchhiking grandmother a ride once from Swellendam to Barrydale. She was with her two grandchildren. We spoke politics. She told me, 'The politicians only want my vote, but not my voice.' The same mistake is being made by the politicians and media commentators today. The ANC fakes listening to people's voices. The DA has withdrawn from the national dialogue. The neuropathways of the brain that do these things tend to say 'these people just need more police. There, fixed it.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ As the votes become less, the voices will become louder. We either let the people talk now, or we will hear them scream at us amidst the flames that will burn our democracy to the ground. If eighteen people were violently killed in any city, its leaders would have reflected. Three people died in the Boston Marathon bombings. Six people died in the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing. Both events made world news for days. Eighteen people died violently in Cape Town over a few days, and already, the media has moved on. As politicians and media commentators, we often assume that we know what people need. But we make a grave error: We fail to value our opposition. We castigate them to eternal damnation, when perhaps in them is part of what we need to fix our future. We have hogged the microphone or column space for so long and fail to give others a chance to speak. Our blind spots are exposing our shallowness at a time when we need to make room for each other. Perhaps they have something we don't know we need. Cape Argus
