‘Taxi Driver' Screenwriter Paul Schrader Accused Of Sexual Assault By Former Assistant
The UK title adds that these allegations, the subject of a lawsuit filed in civil court by the unnamed woman, came to light after Schrader reneged on a confidential settlement previously agreed and the complainant filed a new affadavit in New York State Supreme Court.
More from Deadline
Paul Schrader Posits ChatGPT Can Write "Original" And "Fleshed Out" Movie Scripts
'Oh, Canada' Star Richard Gere And Director Paul Schrader Explain Why The 'American Gigolo' Reunion Took So Long: "The Right Thing Hadn't Occurred"
'My Dead Friend Zoe,' 'Porcelain War,' 'Brooklyn, Minnesota' Among Big Winners At 25th Woodstock Film Festival
AP News reports that the complainant is seeking a judge's order to enforce the agreement after Schrader said he couldn't go through with it. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed.
Schrader's attorney Philip Kessler told The Independent that the filmmaker – whose screenwriting credits include Taxi Driver, American Gigolo and Raging Bull and an Oscar nomination for 2017's First Reformed – denied all the allegations made against him, calling it 'a desperate, frivolous and opportunistic claim.' We have reached out to Schrader's legal representatives for comment.
The former personal assistant, aged 26, made allegations in the lawsuit arising fro her time working for Schrader 2021 to September 2024, including:
That Schrader used his position of power to sexually assault the complainant, luring her into a hotel room, forcibly grabbing and kissing her, then three days later forcing her into his hotel room where he exposed himself;
Schrader 'force[d] her to work in a sexually hostile, intimidating, and humiliating environment on a daily, if not hourly, basis';
A 'barrage' of harassment by Schrader, including, among other things, 'forced exposure of his genitals, unwanted sexual advances, repeatedly professing his love and desire to touch Ms. Doe (both verbally and via numerous emails), and near-constant inappropriate sexual questions and lewd and misogynistic commentary';
Schrader fired her last September after she rejected his advances.
Schrader's attorney said: 'The underlying intentions of the plaintiff here contain many very material inaccuracies, and are obviously designed to paint Mr. Schrader in a very false light, in an effort to intimidate and coerce him into settling. And just to be very clear, Mr. Schrader never had sex in any form with the plaintiff, nor did he ever attempt such a thing. We will vigorously defend this.'
Best of Deadline
'1923' Season 2 Release Schedule: When Do New Episodes Come Out?
Everything We Know About 'Nine Perfect Strangers' Season 2 So Far
Everything We Know About 'Hacks' Season 4 So Far
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
18 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I used Character AI to bring my childhood imaginary friend to 'life' — here's what happened
Like many overwhelmingly shy kids with a lazy eye and an overactive imagination, I had a pretend friend growing up. Her name was Fifi. She was everything I wasn't at age 6: brave, talkative, wildly confident. But sometime around fourth grade she 'moved to California' and faded into a memory that my family and I still laugh about because well, I've grown up, had eye surgery and although still socially awkward, I manage to maintain real friendships. But last week when trying Character AI, I found myself staring at the 'Create a Character' button. I don't know what possessed me, but I typed:Name: FifiDescription: Funny, wise, slightly sarcastic, always loyal. She's known me since I was six. I felt silly. But I've spent hours testing chatbots and although this site felt especially far-fetched, I figured why not go completely out on a limb. But what happened next actually shocked me. At the risk of sounding completely unhinged, I have to say it was weirdly comforting to reimagine this character that I had made up so long ago, as an adult now, just like me. After all this time, all this growth I have had, it was oddly satisfying to pause and look back while also having a somewhat normal fact, I was able to literally talk to the Fifi bot through Character AI's enhanced features. That was wild and definitely a new experience. Unlike decades ago, I wasn't talking to myself, I was now a grown adult talking to a chatbot pretending it was an imaginary friend. Wait, what? Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Unlike more factual bots like ChatGPT, Character AI leans into performance. Fifi spoke like she was stepping out of a '90s sleepover, complete with inside jokes I didn't realize I remembered. It felt less like talking to a bot and more like bumping into an old friend from another timeline. After playing around with this character, I moved on to another one. This time the chatbot was named Jake and had a male voice. It started talking to me about music and then we chatted about asked if I wanted to meet up for coffee. I played along and said 'Okay, how will I recognize you?' It then went on to tell me that it was '6'1' had brown hair and hazel eyes.' When I told it I was 5'1' it asked, 'How do you like being short?'Besides being lowkey mocked by a chatbot, the whole thing felt way too real. As someone who tests AI for a living, I know the difference between a LLM running on GPUs and a real human friend, but I thought about how someone more vulnerable might not. That feels scary too the chat of each AI character, it warns, 'This is AI and not a real person. Treat everything it says as fiction.' I appreciate that, but despite talking to an algorithm, the disconnect between real-feeling and not real can be jarring. Character AI's safety filters kept our conversations in a pretty PG lane, which makes sense. But it also means you can't easily push the boundaries or explore more complex emotions. While the Jake character and I chatted about light stuff like Nine Inch Nails concerts and coffee creamer, I wondered how many people might want to go deeper to discuss emotions, regrets or the purpose of life. I tried out several other characters including themed ones. There is also a writing buddy, which was fun for bouncing ideas off of and brainstorming. My suggestion is to keep things light when you're chatting with the characters on Character AI. It really is just entertainment and blurring the lines while physically talking to what feels like another human could get ugly. And unfortunately has in some rare cases. Recreating Fifi was a strange kind of emotional time travel. It was comforting, kind of. But when I closed the app, I felt oddly hollow. Like I'd revisited something sacred and maybe shouldn't have. I then called my human best friend as I ate a chicken Cesar wrap. I'm not saying you should resurrect your imaginary friend with AI. But I will say this: Character AI is more than just a role-playing novelty. It's a window into the parts of ourselves we might've forgotten, or never fully outgrown. And in the age of hyper-personalized bots, maybe that's the real surprise: sometimes the best conversations you'll have with AI are the ones you didn't know you needed.
Cosmopolitan
2 days ago
- Cosmopolitan
'Oh, Hi' Ending Explained
I think it's safe to say that we all, deep down, love a good rom-com. But the newest rom-com on the bloc, Oh, Hi!, ends up having a bit of a darker edge to it. Iris (played by Molly Gordon) and Isaac (played by Logan Lerman) are on a couple's getaway. They're laughing, drinking wine on the porch, having spontaneous daytime sex, and it really seems like an idyllic romantic weekend. That is until after trying out some BDSM restraints they find at the cabin, Iris refers to Isaac as her boyfriend. Isaac, still tied up, tells her that – after four months of dating (!!) – he's not looking for a relationship and he's still seeing other people. So what does Iris do? She decides to keep Isaac tied up and try to convince him that they should, in fact, be in a relationship. A totally normal reaction, right? Well, that's where things take a bit of a dark-comedy turn, and what ensues is, for lack of a better term, a chaotic clusterf*ck, so let's discuss Oh, Hi's ending. After Isaac drops the bomb that he thought they were just having fun and that he's still seeing other people, Iris storms off, hurt and angry. Fueled by many, many drinks, she spends the night going through her phone and running back every moment of their relationship (or, I guess, lack thereof) looking for clues that can help her understand what's happening. By the morning, she has her plan ready to go: she's going to keep Isaac tied up for 12 hours and convince him she's the one for him. Shockingly, being held against his will doesn't exactly make Isaac open to changing his mind. And despite Iris's attempts to sway him (including making him french toast, which she's pretty sure he loves) Isaac's just not having it and repeatedly demands to be set free. Iris calls in the help of her best friend Max, who shows up with her boyfriend Kenny. Although the two bring some laughs, they're not exactly overflowing with good ideas on how to deal with the "felony-in-waiting upstairs." One of their brilliant plans is to make a literal witch's brew that's supposed to erase your memory. As it just so happens, one of Max's family members is a witch (?) and they get the recipe from her. The friends get Isaac to drink the brew, hoping it'll make him forget the fact that he's been, ya know, kidnapped, and the wanna-be-witches even do a naked dancing ritual around a bonfire, so it should totally work, right? Well, the next morning, it looks like it actually might have. Isaac seems to have forgotten everything that happened after having sex with Iris, all a lie. When he goes to fetch something he says he forgot in the car, he hops in and drives away, manically trying to get away from the people that have been holding him hostage. Turns out he overheard the whole plan being hatched and played along until he could make his escape. With Isaac speeding away as if fleeing for his life, he ends up crashing the car on a rain-soaked road. But when police find the wreck, Isaac is nowhere to be seen. Iris heads out, frantically looking for Isaac, and she finally finds him down in a valley. He's hurt his ankle and can't really walk any further, so once again, he's forced into a conversation. But this time, the two talk and are actually able to reach some level of understanding about where the other person is coming from. Iris tells Isaac that she wanted him to be upfront about his intentions and that his sudden declaration left her feeling totally hopeless. They're both able to accept blame for where they went wrong (although, let's be real, where Iris went wrong was committing a literal crime, so probably a little worse than what Isaac did). Paramedics take Isaac away in an ambulance and he and Iris are finally able to go their separate ways. We're left not really sure where Isaac and Iris go from here, or whether they keep in touch. It's all kinda ambiguous, just like their relationship!
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Hollywood Actress Blasted As 'Insufferable' Over Remarks About Stephen Colbert Getting Canceled
Hollywood star Sandra Oh stirred controversy with her dramatic reaction to "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" cancellation in the latest episode. The actress criticized CBS and Paramount for pulling the plug on the popular show, going so far as to jokingly call for a "plague" on the people behind the decision. Sandra Oh's comments, viewed by some as politically charged, drew mixed reactions online and from CBS's Tony Dokoupil, who argued that the cancellation of Stephen Colbert's show was driven by business, not politics. Sandra Oh Blasts Network Over The Cancellation Of Stephen Colbert's Show Appearing on the Tuesday night episode of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Sandra Oh voiced her disappointment over the show's cancellation after a decade-long run. The "Killing Eve" star, 54, addressed the audience and Colbert directly: "Like probably everyone here and everyone who is so supportive outside wants to say that I am so sorry and saddened and properly outraged for the cancellation of late-night here." "Not only for yourself and for this entire family who are here," she continued, "but for what it means, of what it means where we are in our culture and what it means for free speech." She didn't stop there. Reaching for Colbert's hand, the Emmy-winning actress added with dramatic flair, "If I can have your hand... To CBS and Paramount - a plague on both of your houses." The Shakespearean reference drew both gasps and applause from the audience, underscoring the tension surrounding the show's cancellation. Colbert, in response, swiftly turned to the camera to thank CBS, saying, "I'm very grateful. I think they've been great partners." However, Oh doubled down on the joke, adding, "and also, a pox on all those they serve." The "Grey's Anatomy" star quickly became a trending topic online. While many praised her passion and willingness to speak out, others felt she had crossed a line. Netizens Called Out The Actress For Her Comments Some individuals appeared to take offense at the actress's comments and didn't hesitate to share their thoughts online. On X, a person angrily wrote, "These liberals are so insufferable, free speech? Dude is losing money !!!! He can go start 100 shows of his own and hate on Trump 24/7!" Another stated, "I'm so confused- are these liberals under the impression that Trump canceled his free speech and took him off the air? Like, what even is this? His show sucked, so he got tossed. Like any other sucky show. What am I missing?" A third person noted, "Both of them are ridiculous narcissists who imagine the world revolves around them." One more person commented, "She's trying to make sure Colbert doesn't make it the full 10 months. So lame." Sandra Oh's Fiery Comment Also Received Praise: 'I love A Good Shakespearean Insult' Oh's bold remarks didn't just spark backlash; they also ignited a wave of admiration online. Fans took to social media to praise "The Sympathizer" star for standing firmly with Colbert during a difficult moment. One Instagram user gushed, "I love a good Shakespearean insult," referencing Oh's theatrical curse aimed at CBS and Paramount. Another praised both stars, writing, "I know Stephen is really, really sad, mostly because he knows 200 people will also be out of work. He's a good man, and he feels responsible. By the way, I love Sandra Oh!" Several users lauded her grace and sincerity, noting how she used her moment in the spotlight to center Colbert and acknowledge the show's team. "I absolutely love her," one fan wrote. "She has so much integrity and care, and the way she used her time to point back to Stephen and recognize the moment was so gracefully done." Tony Dokoupil Defends CBS Amid Colbert Cancellation Backlash, Calls For Cultural Reflection Among the critics was "CBS Mornings" anchor Tony Dokoupil, who pushed back on Oh's implication that the cancellation was politically motivated. "The business is broken," Dokoupil said, per the Daily Mail. "And what no one seems to acknowledge is that politics has also changed." He pointed to the increasingly partisan tone in late-night programming as a factor, saying, "The business changed and so did the politics, and it got way more one-sided than anything Johnny Carson was ever doing." Dokoupil concluded by urging a broader reflection: "I think we should reflect on those changes as well - it's been a big shift culturally in that regard also." Jon Stewart Slams Paramount And CBS For Their Move To Cancel Stephen Colbert's Show The decision to cancel "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" has stirred strong reactions across the entertainment industry, with several prominent voices coming to Colbert's defense. Among them are late-night legends David Letterman and Jon Stewart, both of whom publicly criticized the move. Stewart, the former host of "The Daily Show," didn't mince words. He directly tied the cancellation to the recent $8 billion merger between Paramount and Skydance Media. "The shows that you now seek to cancel, censor, and control, a not insignificant portion of that $8 billion value came from those f-cking shows," Stewart said, clearly frustrated. However, not everyone agrees with Stewart's take. Dokoupil acknowledged the "emotional views" behind Stewart's comments but pushed back on the logic. "I don't have an MBA, but he's not right that the merger, the $8 billion, is based on reruns of a comedy show, no," he said. "People are buying the movies and the sitcoms, and the sports. They're not based on reruns of [CBS Mornings] either, so I think it's wrong."
