‘Abundance' Review: Supply-Side Liberalism
The latest in this genre is 'Abundance,' by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson. The book's overarching argument is that resources in a modern capitalist economy are not limited in the way liberal redistributionists assume them to be, and that liberal aims are achievable in ways the left hasn't appreciated.
Twentieth-century liberals' morally laudable goals—clean water and air, affordable housing, education and medical care—led them, the authors contend, to enact policies that, however effective at an earlier time, now prevent both government and the private sector from meeting the public's needs. Governmental grant-making procedures hobble scientific research with paperwork and delay; zoning regulations make housing in large cities hopelessly expensive and worsen the problem of homelessness; lawsuits filed by environmental groups make urban development more costly and time-consuming; and so on.
Messrs. Klein and Thompson—the former a columnist for the New York Times, the latter a staff writer for the Atlantic, both of them popular podcasters—favor scrapping outdated laws and regulations that hinder construction, retard innovation and stunt economic growth for no good reason. Here and there readers of a conservative disposition will scrawl 'duh' in the margins.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Dems and the media are still ‘at it' regarding Russia hoax: Miranda Devine
Panelists Miranda Devine, Jason Chaffetz and Devin Nunes discuss how the New York Times is attempting to spin the Durham annex as Russian disinformation on 'Hannity.'


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Sectarian violence claims hundreds of lives in Syrian province
Hosam Saraya and other members of his family were forced out of their house and executed. Saraya, 35, became an American citizen about two years ago and attended Oklahoma Christian University. 'Hosam and his family deserve justice, and those responsible for this atrocity must be held accountable,' a State Department spokesperson said.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Obama's Russiagate meddling: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 2, 2025
The Issue: Reports that ex-President Barack Obama advanced the Russian collusion narrative in 2016. Kudos for Martin Gurri's piece on 'Obamagate' ('From Russia with nothing to speak of,' July 29) It's ironic that the framing of President Trump as a 'threat to democracy' was a red herring for the actual harm being done to us by President Barack Obama and his acolytes. His abuse of his high office was even more egregious than President Richard Nixon's, and similarly has greatly discredited our nation. It's irrelevant that this treachery didn't rise to the crime of treason. The defamation is every bit as damaging and wrongful. And to top it off, the legacy media remained complicit throughout. 'Democracy dies in darkness,' indeed! James Evans Worcester, Mass. We, the 'democracy-threatening,' 'stupid,' 'racist' MAGA citizens, are finally breathing the rarefied air of truth. Thank you, Martin Gurri, for your detailed and revealing piece on the Russiagate hoax. From ancient times to the present, the lust for power has destroyed many cultures. Now, may free speech, strong advocates and honor protect us as we unravel a historic example of hubris run amok. The waxed wings of Icarus melted, and he died, but our democracy will survive. Abby Rudnick Farmingdale, NJ In 2020, the Senate Intelligence Committee, headed by Marco Rubio, stated that the committee unequivocally found absolutely no evidence that Donald Trump and/or his campaign colluded with the Russian government in the 2016 election. However, it did conclude that there was irrefutable evidence of Russian attempts at meddling. And that is exactly what President Obama went on television and told the American public. This new obfuscation is just another sophomoric Trump administration attempt at deflection from what he is doing to this country, and what he is hiding. Lou Maione Manhattan Mainstream media were enamored with Obama through all eight years of his presidency, without ever questioning his performance. This was a love affair, pure and simple. And it remains so to this day, even as we now know that Obama directed a false operation to discredit his successor's victory. History is written by the victors, except when a paper trail exposes their betrayals, as Trump is now revealing about Obama. Paul Bloustein Cincinnati, Ohio Now that we know more about what happened, it's not really surprising to learn of Obama's involvement in Russiagate. After all, he rose out of the corrupt Chicago machine, and then callously lied to millions of people about their health insurance and access to doctors, and now we learn about this. Michelle Obama told us that her mother didn't trust anyone who took more than they needed. Look at the harm Barack has done, and now he has a huge net worth, owning mansions in Martha's Vineyard and Hawaii. Michelle's mom was right after all, wasn't she? Gary Mottola Brooklyn So the legacy media now want the public to move on from the Russia collusion hoax perpetrated by them. They were even given awards for this scam. I say: No! Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel should now investigate what the Obama administration did in that meeting on Dec. 9, 2016 at the White House. Republicans can never forget what was done to their elected president. Andrew Franza Dallas, Pa. No one should be shocked about the recent revelations that Obama was the mastermind behind the Russia collusion hoax. In February 2017, Paul Sperry wrote a column for The Post ('Bam-lined lie,' Feb. 19, 2017) in which he revealed the existence of Obama's 'Organizing For Action' (OFA), which included the recruitment of thousands of footsoldiers to sabotage the Trump presidency. It is doubtful whether any American today has learned anything new. J. J. Crovatto Ramsey, NJ Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.