Why Soup and Caleb Finn want to see better protections for the kids of family influencers
Yet the 18-million-plus followers of the 29-year-old and her partner Caleb Finn — who are some of the biggest creators in Australia — have never once seen the faces of their kids.
"We looked a lot into children that had grown up in [the influencer] industry and how it affected them mentally and socially," the Melbourne local told triple j Hack.
"We decided that we'd give our children fake names, we'd cover their faces, and very limitedly show them online."
But not everyone's drawing the line where Soup and Caleb are; social media is full of parents filming their kids 24/7, pranking them, using their real names and essentially creating a brand for themselves and their family.
It's a huge business and, despite the looming social media ban facing under-16s, it's an industry that still goes largely unregulated in Australia.
Crystal Abidin, Professor of Internet Studies at Curtin University and the author of an upcoming book about child influencers, says while there are "long-standing guidelines" for how child actors should be treated, it becomes "fuzzy territory" when influencers are involved.
For example, if a clothing brand was shooting their own ad campaign and wanted to cast a child in it, they'd need to work within state-based laws, which include limitations on working hours, and often require special licences.
But if that brand were to simply hire a parenting influencer to shoot their child in the same clothes at home, that child-actor legislation wouldn't necessarily apply.
Crystal says when it comes to contracting influencers, brands "aren't really clear on what the safeguards are behind the scenes".
"You merely trust [that] their manager, who's probably their mum or parent, acts in their best interest."
Sponsored content aside, Faith Gordon — an associate professor in Law at ANU, who specialises in youth justice — says family vlogging raises "immediate ethical concerns".
"There's a clear power dynamic … so consent really comes into play quite considerably.
"The family home is one of the most private spaces that we have in our lives, somewhere that one would hope to be relaxed … without someone observing them constantly, [let alone] millions of people."
And content creation at home makes working hours murky, too.
If a child's daily life is being filmed all day every day, when are they really playing, and when are they working?
"I definitely think there's a difference between exploitation and representation," Soup says.
"You're filming their tantrum, you're filming when they're going through puberty, their worst moments, and you're posting that for millions of people to see."
Overseas, some jurisdictions have begun to slowly implement measures to better protect child influencers and family creators.
The US states of California and Illinois expanded their child-labour laws last year, requiring parents to set aside a percentage of a child's earnings in a trust they can access as an adult.
France introduced similar protections in 2020, when it also regulated the working hours of social media stars and legislated a young influencer's "right to be forgotten".
This means platforms, including search engines, must remove all personal data at the child's request, which Gordon says is a key issue in Australia.
While it could be uncomfortable or fraught to ask your parent to take down content, she says approaching platforms themselves is often ineffective too, leaving young people "feeling really anxious about the delays and the time that it takes to get content removed".
Crystal says China has some of the most comprehensive laws in this area.
"It's not just the parent and child who face regulation, it's the brand that contracts them, as well as the platform that hosts that content.
"Everybody has a vested interest, whether out of love or fear of penalty, to ensure that the children involved in this industry are … protected and safe."
In Australia, if young people feel that content is sexual, harmful or incites violence towards them, they can make a complaint to the e-Safety Commissioner.
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner is also developing a Children's Online Privacy Code, which is currently in consultation and due to come into effect by December 2026.
The Code applies to social media services and will amend the Privacy Act and the Australian Privacy Principles to better protect young people online.
The Australian Influencer Marketing Council, a not-for-profit industry body, is creating an industry information sheet on working with child and family influencers, to help guide brands on best practice in the area.
In the meantime, Soup says it's up to sponsors and platforms to better regulate the booming industry. She says applying child-actor laws to influencer kids is step one.
"Brands should put these rules into contracts if they know children are going to be involved in videos.
"It's up to brands and social media platforms to … make sure that everyone is doing this in a safe way."
For Crystal, legislation and industry leadership will only be strengthened by contribution from online audiences themselves.
"[Followers] can spot immediately when something is out of place because they also tend to follow so many different creators," she says.
"They [know] when someone is a bit cheeky and trying to fly under the radar of guidelines and law."
While it may seem frivolous or fun to an outsider, Gordon stresses that for many of these young people, creating influencer content is a job — and they're entitled to protection.
"We're going to ban children 16 and under from many of the platforms where vlogging goes on," Gordon says.
"If they can't access these platforms but their content is being posted there, what do we do about that?
"It's not something we've heard about from the federal government … and I think it's something that's missing."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Astronomer HR chief resigns one week after being caught on Coldplay ‘kiss cam'
Astronomer's chief people officer, Kristin Cabot, has resigned a week after being caught on Coldplay's 'kiss cam' in an embrace with former Astronomer chief executive Andy Byron. In statements supplied to numerous media outlets in the United States, including Page Six and TMZ, a spokesperson for the New York-based company confirmed that Cabot, who joined its C-suite in late 2024, is 'no longer with Astronomer' and had 'resigned'. It comes days after Byron, who was appointed Astronomer's chief executive in 2023, resigned from his job leading the AI data orchestration software start-up. How 'Coldplaygate' unfolded It's usually an unremarkable segment of Coldplay's Music of the Spheres concerts, with frontman Chris Martin singing a line or two about the loved-up couples beamed up onto the Jumbotron by the band's 'kiss cam'. But when Byron, who was shown swaying to the music with his arms draped around Cabot at Gillette Stadium on the evening of July 16 (July 17 AEST), and the former HR executive realised they were on-screen, Byron quickly sunk to the floor, out of sight of the camera, while Cabot hid her face in her hands and turned around. 'The spotlight has been unusual and surreal for our team and, while I would never have wished for it to happen like this, Astronomer is now a household name.' Pete DeJoy, Astronomer interim chief executive Adding fuel to the fire was Martin's wry commentary from the stage, with the Yellow singer saying into the microphone: 'Oh, look at these two ... Either they're having an affair or they're very shy.' Both Byron and Cabot are believed to have been married to other people at the time, and neither Byron nor Cabot has publicly commented on the incident, their exits from Astronomer or the affair allegations. This masthead is not suggesting the allegations of an affair between Byron and Cabot are true, just that they have been made. No one could have predicted the sheer fervour with which the whole world would latch on to the seconds-long moment in Foxborough, Massachusetts that 28-year-old Grace Springer, from New Jersey, shared footage of on TikTok. It's been referenced beyond social media to Oasis concerts, comedy shows, breakfast television and sports games.

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Astronomer HR chief resigns one week after being caught on Coldplay ‘kiss cam'
Astronomer's chief people officer, Kristin Cabot, has resigned a week after being caught on Coldplay's 'kiss cam' in an embrace with former Astronomer chief executive Andy Byron. In statements supplied to numerous media outlets in the United States, including Page Six and TMZ, a spokesperson for the New York-based company confirmed that Cabot, who joined its C-suite in late 2024, is 'no longer with Astronomer' and had 'resigned'. It comes days after Byron, who was appointed Astronomer's chief executive in 2023, resigned from his job leading the AI data orchestration software start-up. How 'Coldplaygate' unfolded It's usually an unremarkable segment of Coldplay's Music of the Spheres concerts, with frontman Chris Martin singing a line or two about the loved-up couples beamed up onto the Jumbotron by the band's 'kiss cam'. But when Byron, who was shown swaying to the music with his arms draped around Cabot at Gillette Stadium on the evening of July 16 (July 17 AEST), and the former HR executive realised they were on-screen, Byron quickly sunk to the floor, out of sight of the camera, while Cabot hid her face in her hands and turned around. 'The spotlight has been unusual and surreal for our team and, while I would never have wished for it to happen like this, Astronomer is now a household name.' Pete DeJoy, Astronomer interim chief executive Adding fuel to the fire was Martin's wry commentary from the stage, with the Yellow singer saying into the microphone: 'Oh, look at these two ... Either they're having an affair or they're very shy.' Both Byron and Cabot are believed to have been married to other people at the time, and neither Byron nor Cabot has publicly commented on the incident, their exits from Astronomer or the affair allegations. This masthead is not suggesting the allegations of an affair between Byron and Cabot are true, just that they have been made. No one could have predicted the sheer fervour with which the whole world would latch on to the seconds-long moment in Foxborough, Massachusetts that 28-year-old Grace Springer, from New Jersey, shared footage of on TikTok. It's been referenced beyond social media to Oasis concerts, comedy shows, breakfast television and sports games.


West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
MITCHELL JOHNSON: Ben Stokes' warning to India about sledging should not scare Australia ahead of Ashes
There's noise coming out of England again. Apparently, they've decided that sledging is back in fashion. Harry Brook reckons it's fun not being 'nice guys' anymore. Ben Stokes is warning opponents — especially India — that if they dish it out, England will return fire. Good on them. But here's a bit of advice: be careful what you wish for. Ashes series are about mental edge, sure. There's always been chatter, always will be. But sledging without substance is like bowling bouncers with no pace — the batter just laughs at it. Right now, England sound like they're trying to sound intimidating rather than being intimidating. Let's not pretend Australia are choirboys. I had plenty to say when I played — and copped plenty back. But that came with purpose. Sledging only works when you're dominating. And to be honest, right now England aren't. They haven't won an Ashes series since in Australia since 2010-11. They still don't know what their best top six is. Their Bazball model has some punch, but it's flimsy when conditions swing or spin. So maybe talking tough is a cover. A bit of theatre while they figure out the actual cricket. Here's what England need to remember: the Ashes aren't won at press conferences. They're won in the heat. When the new ball is jagging around at the Gabba. When a Mitchell Starc inswinger nips past your front pad before you've even had a look. When a bloke like Josh Hazlewood bowls 25 overs on the same spot and you can't breathe. That's when the real battle starts, not in the media, not on social clips, but in those moments when the scoreboard pressure builds and the crowd is roaring. I actually love this from an Aussie point of view. Let England yap. Let them tell the world how hard they're going to be. All it does is give the Australians more fire. Trust me — if you try to poke the bear on our home turf, you'd better have the game to back it up. Because when the words dry up — and they will — it's all about execution. That's where Australia are so strong. Bowlers who do the job no matter the surface. Batters who absorb pressure and make you suffer. Fielders who don't give you an inch. That's real toughness. If England think sledging will rattle this Aussie side, they're living in dreamland. This is a team full of veterans who've seen it all — and young players who grew up in these conditions. You don't need to get personal. You just need to perform. In fact, the most painful thing you can do to a team that's chirping is shut them up with cricket. Silence is the loudest response there is. While Australia might be at their most vulnerable in years with this current batting line-up — a few question marks at the top, the middle still rebuilding — they're still incredibly hard to beat at home. Always have been. Conditions, crowds, our bowlers — they all make life hell for touring teams. Especially ones coming in swinging wildly with the bat and the tongue. Let's not forget what happened last time England came down under. All the chat, all the optimism, then bowled out for 147 in the first innings of the first Test and for just 68 in the Boxing Day Test a couple of weeks later. That was the sound of reality setting in. And no amount of sledging helped them then. I'm not saying Australia are immune to pressure. They're not. This Ashes series could be tight — maybe even a real scrap. But if England think mouthing off is the key to getting on top of us, they've already lost focus. So to England, I say: bring your best. Talk your talk. But when that first ball is bowled in Perth in November, you'll find out quickly what's real and what's just noise. Because in the Ashes, only one thing matters — and it's not the volume.