Donald Trump's 'devastating' bill passed by Senate GOP as warning issued
The Republican-dominated Senate has narrowly passed the centrepiece of President Donald Trump's legislative agenda, a bill that Democrats have labelled as "devastating".
The legislation, referred to by Trump as the "one big, beautiful bill," was approved with a 51-50 vote. Vice President JD Vance broke the tie after three Republicans, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, opposed the bill.
Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin expressed his condemnation of the budget being passed by the Senate in a statement.
" Donald Trump and Senate Republicans have sent a clear message to the American people: Your kids, your job, and your elderly relatives don't matter. This is one of the worst bills in the history of Congress," Martin said.
He described it as a "massive scheme to steal from working folks, struggling families, and hell, even from nursing homes - all to enrich the already rich with a tax giveaway.", reports the Mirror US.
His statement highlighted that nearly 17 million Americans, including Republican constituents, will lose their healthcare while 5 million Americans will lose their food assistance as the bill threatens sweeping cuts to SNAP benefits.
" I know firsthand how devastating this will be, because I grew up in a family that only made it because of these lifelines," Martin added.
"Billionaires don't need more help, working families do. Democrats will stand shoulder to shoulder with working families to kick these Republicans out of their seats in 2026," Martin concluded.
The bill is now set to return to the House where Speaker Mike Johnson is tasked with passing it before Trump's Fourth of July ultimatum.
On Monday, Johnson gave reporters a firm assurance, declaring they will pass the bill "one way or another."
Embodying an expansion of Trump's tax cut vision from his first term, the bill not only carries forward these reductions but also provisions for military funding and pursues his momentous deportation ambitions through cuts to Medicaid, energy finding, and various food aid initiatives.
Prior to its passage in the Senate, the Congressional Budget Office had projected a worrying $3.3 trillion surge in the national debt over ten years. The CBO further cautioned that should the law come into effect, healthcare coverage could be stripped from nearly 12 million people by 2034.
Senator Collins, breaking ranks with her Republican colleagues, voiced her opposition based on the "harmful impact it will have on Medicaid."
She highlighted that close to 400,000 Maine residents, roughly a third of the state's population, depend on Medicaid services.
"I strongly support extending the tax relief for families and small businesses. My vote against this bill stems primarily from the harmful impact it will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes," Collins explained in her public statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
8 minutes ago
- NBC News
Student loan borrowers will have fewer repayment options under GOP megabill
The Senate narrowly passed its spending megabill on Tuesday night. The House is aiming to vote on the bill and send it to President Donald Trump by July 4, but it's unclear whether Republicans have the votes to pass the bill in its current form. Among numerous provisions aimed at reducing federal spending and increasing tax revenue, the bill lays out some major changes for federal student loan borrowers. Most of the changes to student borrowing, such as lower limits on graduate loans, won't impact borrowers who are out of school and currently in repayment. But those taking out loans next summer and after, as well as an estimated 8 million borrowers awaiting further action on the Saving on a Valuable Education income-driven repayment plan, can expect fewer repayment options if the House passes the bill as is. The change to repayment plans could be one of the most impactful provisions of the bill for current and future federal student loan borrowers. Two years to choose from two plans The Senate's bill narrows the number of repayment options currently available to federal student loan borrowers down to just two plans: a standard repayment plan and a new income-driven plan known as the Repayment Assistance Plan. Borrowers on any of the currently existing repayment plans, except the SAVE plan, will be able to keep their plans and monthly payments the same. Borrowers whose loans are dispersed on or after July 1, 2026 and those currently enrolled in the SAVE plan — who are in an administrative forbearance since federal courts blocked the plan from going into effect in July 2024 — will have only the two repayment plan options. Borrowers on the SAVE plan would likely have to choose another plan anyway if federal courts retain the temporary injunction against it. Under the Republicans' legislation, those borrowers will have between July 2026 and July 2028 to choose a new plan. After July 1, 2028, borrowers will automatically be moved into the income-based repayment plan. The new standard plan will give borrowers a fixed monthly payment to have their loans paid off between 10 and 25 years, depending on the size of their loans. The current standard plan has a loan term of 10 years, regardless of the amount borrowed. The Repayment Assistance Plan will calculate monthly payments as between 1% and 10% of a borrower's discretionary income, down from the current offerings that set payments at 10%, 15% or 20% of a borrower's income.
.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
AOC blasts Trump's bill as ‘a deal with the devil' as she gives emotional floor speech trying to stop its passage
New York Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez slammed President Donald Trump's domestic megabill as a 'deal with the devil' in an emotional speech on the House floor. The House of Representatives returned to business on Wednesday to take up the Senate's version of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' In her speech, Ocasio-Cortez referred to one of Trump's top campaign promises included in the legislation, no taxes on tips, as a 'scam' as she referenced her own past work as a bartender. 'On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body who has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the scam of that text, a little bit of the fine print there,' said Ocasio-Cortez, before going on to note that the provision has a limit of $25,000 per year. The legislation doesn't include the tax break for those earning more than $150,000 a year. The congresswoman argued that the bill would be 'jacking up' taxes for lower-income Americans. The legislation extends tax cuts initially passed in 2017 during Trump's first stint in the White House. 'The cap on that is $25,000 while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the United States, while taking away their SNAP, while taking away their Medicaid, while kicking them off of the ACA and their health care extensions,' she said. 'So if you're at home and you're living off tips, you do the math. Is that worth it to you? Losing all your health care, not being able to feed your babies, not being able to put a diaper on their bottom in exchange for what? This bill is a deal with the devil.' According to a poll of 800 voters in Ocasio-Cortez's home state by Siena College, New York voters believe, by a 52 to 28 percent margin, that Trump's legislation would make life worse for a majority of Americans. Meanwhile, 61 percent supported removing income taxes on tips, while 21 percent opposed the measure. Empire State voters also backed requiring healthy adult Medicaid recipients to work to get benefits by a margin of 48 to 32 percent. They are also strongly opposed to cutting corporate taxes and cutting SNAP benefits for the poor. Ocasio-Cortez told members of the GOP on Wednesday that they should be 'ashamed.' 'It explodes our national debt. It militarizes our entire economy and it strips away healthcare and basic dignity of the American people — for what?' she added. 'To give Elon Musk a tax break and billionaires the greedy taking of our nation. We cannot stand for it, and we will not support it. You should be ashamed.'
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Planned Parenthood CEO warns Trump bill will lead to $700m loss and ‘backdoor abortion ban'
Planned Parenthood stands to lose roughly $700m in federal funding if the US House passes Republicans' massive spending-and-tax bill, the organization's CEO said on Wednesday, amounting to what abortion rights supporters and opponents alike have called a 'backdoor abortion ban'. 'We are facing down the reality that nearly 200 health centers are at risk of closure. We're facing a reality of the impact on shutting down almost half of abortion-providing health centers,' Alexis McGill Johnson, Planned Parenthood Federation of Americas's CEO, said in an interview Wednesday morning. 'It does feel existential. Not just for Planned Parenthood, but for communities that are relying on access to this care.' Anti-abortion activists have longed to 'defund' Planned Parenthood for decades. They are closer than ever to achieving their goal. That $700m figure represents the loss that Planned Parenthood would face from a provision in the spending bill that would impose a one-year Medicaid ban on healthcare non-profits that offer abortions and that received more than $800,000 in federal funding in 2023, as well as the funding that Planned Parenthood could lose from Title X, the nation's largest family-planning program. In late March, the Trump administration froze tens of millions of dollars of Title X funding that had been set aside for some Planned Parenthood and other family-planning clinics. 'Essentially what you are seeing is a gutting of a safety net,' said McGill Johnson, who characterized the bill as a 'backdoor abortion ban' in a statement. Medicaid is the US government's insurance program for low-income people, and about 80 million people use it. If the latest version of the spending-and-tax bill passes, nearly 12 million people are expected to lose their Medicaid coverage. Donald Trump has said that he would like the bill to be on his desk, ready for a signature, by 4 July. The provision attacking Planned Parenthood would primarily target clinics in blue states that have protected abortion rights since the overturning of Roe v Wade three years ago, because those blue states have larger numbers of people on Medicaid. Although not all Planned Parenthood clinics perform abortions, the reproductive healthcare giant provides 38% of US abortions, according to the latest data from Abortion Care Network, a membership group for independent abortion clinics. Among the clinics at risk of closure, Planned Parenthood estimated, more than 90% are in states that permit abortion. Sixty percent are located in areas that have been deemed 'medically underserved'. In total, more than 1.1 million Planned Parenthood patients could lose access to care. 'There's nowhere else for folks' to go, McGill Johnson said. 'The community health centers have said they cannot absorb the patients that Planned Parenthood sees. So I think that we do need to just call it a targeted attack because that's exactly how it is.' Nationally, 11% of female Medicaid beneficiaries between the ages of 15 and 49 and who receive family-planning services go to Planned Parenthood for a range of services, according to an analysis by the non-profit KFF, which tracks healthcare policy. Those numbers rise in blue states like Washington, Oregon and Connecticut. In California, that number soars to 29%. The impact on the state would be so devastating that Nichole Ramirez, senior vice-president of communication and donor relations at Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino counties, called the tax-and-spending package's provision 'a direct attack on us, really'. 'They haven't been able to figure out how to ban abortion nationwide and they haven't been able to figure out how to ban abortion in California specifically,' said Ramirez, who estimated that Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino counties stands to lose between $40m and $60m. Ramirez continued: 'This is their way to go about banning abortion. That is the entire goal here.' Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion In a post on X, the prominent anti-abortion group Live Action reposted an image of a Planned Parenthood graphic calling the provision 'backdoor abortion ban'. 'They might be onto us,' Live Action wrote. The Planned Parenthood network is overseen by Planned Parenthood Federation of America, but it also consists of dozens of independent regional affiliates that operate nearly 600 clinics across the country. In June, as the spending-and-tax bill moved through Congress, Autonomy News, an outlet that focuses on threats to bodily autonomy, reported that Planned Parenthood Federation of America's accreditation board had sent waivers out to affiliates to apply for approval to cease providing abortions in order to preserve access to Medicaid funding. On Wednesday, the New York Times reported that a memo sent to the leadership of one California affiliate suggests that leaders there had considered ending abortion services. McGill Johnson said that there have been discussions within Planned Parenthood's network about what it would mean to stop offering abortions. But no affiliates, to her knowledge, are moving forward with plans to stop performing the procedure. 'Educating our volunteers and teams around hard decisions to stand and understand the impact of that is different than weighing and considering a stoppage of abortion,' McGill Johnson said. The budget bill and Title X funding freeze aren't the only sources of pressure on the group. The US supreme court last week ruled in favor of South Carolina in a case involving the state's attempt to kick Planned Parenthood out of its state Medicaid reimbursement program – a ruling that will likely give a green light to other states that also want to defund Planned Parenthood. At least one other organization that provides abortion and family-planning services, Maine Family Planning, will be affected by the provision, according to the organization's CEO, George Hill. Maine Family Planning directly operates 18 clinics, including several that provide primary care or are in rural, medically underserved areas. If the provision takes effect, Hill estimates, the organization would lose 20% of its operating budget. 'It's dressed up as a budget provision, but it's not,' Hill said. 'They're basically taking the rug out from under our feet.'
