Revamped GPO could host museum to attract Irish diaspora, says An Post chief
GPO
building on O'Connell Street in Dublin would be an ideal venue for a large museum of the Irish nation, according to An Post chief executive
David McRedmond
.
'I would be a big fan of a museum of the Irish nation,' he told The Irish Times in an extensive interview. 'A place of pilgrimage for the diaspora. It could be a massive attraction and get a lot of people in.'
Opened in 1818, the GPO was the headquarters of State-owned An Post until mid-2023 when it moved to a modern office building in the north docks, called Exo.
Some 200 employees of the company continue to be based at the GPO, including those working in the post office at the front of the building.
READ MORE
Mr McRedmond said the first 10-20 metres of the large complex could be retained, but the offices at the back were no longer useful and needed to be redeveloped.
The complex stretches from O'Connell Street west towards Arnotts and includes some surface car parking.
'The rest of it needs to be knocked down and rebuilt,' he said. 'It will be a huge job. We're not out of there because we want to be out of there. It's just not fit for purpose any more.'
However, Mr McRedmond said the GPO could have an exciting future if redeveloped.
'It will end up being some kind of national competition, I would imagine. Both in terms of what the use would be and the design. It's very exciting, it will be absolutely brilliant for the city.'
The An Post chief executive would also be in favour of RTÉ relocating its radio operations to the GPO, which previously housed radio broadcasts by 2RN, a predecessor of RTÉ. 'That would be fantastic for the city,' he said.
Mr McRedmond's views on the future of the GPO is his 'personal preferences' for the historic building and not linked to his role as chairman of the Dublin City Taskforce, which was set up by the Government to draw up proposals to reinvigorate the city centre in the wake of the riots in November 2023.
Among its 10 'Big Move' recommendations is a proposal to redevelop the GPO as a 'major public building'.
The Government last week approved the establishment of a new body to oversee the delivery of these recommendations, operating under
Dublin City Council
.
It is to have a role in supporting the Office of Public Works in the redevelopment of the GPO, while the surrounding area is also to receive investment.
Designed by Armagh-born architect Francis Johnston, the foundation stone was laid by Charles Whitworth, Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, in August 1814. The building opened its doors to the public in January 1818.
It was destroyed by fire during the 1916 Easter Rising, before being expanded and rebuilt. It reopened in 1929.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Lawless accused of shirking college fee responsibility in 'rant' to Sinn Fein
Higher Education Minister James Lawless has been told to 'take responsibility for his own actions' after a letter to Sinn Féin criticising its policies on student fees. Arguments over third-level fees dominated political discourse this week following Minister Lawless' interview on RTÉ in which he suggested that 'as things stand', college fees will revert to €3,000 a year from September. In recent years, fees have been discounted by € 1,000 as part of the Government's cost-of-living packages. However, the coalition has insisted that there will be no such package in Budget 2026. This has led to arguments between Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil, with a succession of Fine Gael politicians calling for clarity on student fees. Tánaiste Simon Harris insisted during the week that the Programme for Government committed to reducing and ultimately abolishing third-level fees. The opposition has also grasped upon the controversy, with Leaders' Questions dominated all week by questions on how much the student fees will be in September. On Friday, Minister Lawless wrote to Sinn Féin's spokesperson on Further and Higher Education, Donna McGettigan, to criticise the party's response to the controversy. In the letter, seen by the Irish Mirror, he called for Sinn Féin to 'publish their full budget strategy in the interests of transparency and to avoid generating uncertainty for parents and students'. He wrote: 'I note your comments that 'As a first step toward abolishing student fees, we are demanding a cost-of-living package in September that will reduce student fees by €1500.' 'This is an uncosted, on the hoof empty promise during dangerous and uncertain economic times. Parents and students need certainty and predictability. 'On the fly policy announcements do the exact opposite. 'In contrast the government is committed to reducing the student contribution fee over the lifetime of the government in a financially sustainable manner. This means as part of the budgetary process not in pursuit of headlines.' Mr Lawless questioned Ms McGettigan on whether the party's position has been costed by the 'Parliamentary Budget Office', suggesting that Sinn Féin has 'a poor track record on this issue', suggesting that 'Sinn Féin chronically underfunded any student fees reductions' in its alternative budget by allocating '€66m to a measure that costs up to double that amount'. He added: 'In a time of global uncertainty, this Swiss cheese budget approach is potentially disastrous.' Minister Lawless stated that he is 'working closely with my government colleagues as part of that process to fund our shared commitment' of reducing and abolishing the contribution fee. He argued that this would be done in the Budget, calling on Sinn Féin to outline how it would 'finance a cost of living package' as 'the public deserve better than cheap headlines and uncosted commitments.' Ms McGettigan stated that Minister Lawless needed to take 'responsibility for the mess he created this week and tell students if their fees are going up €1000 or not'. She continued: 'That would be a better use of his time than sending me a rant in a lengthy letter on a Friday night asking me to do his job for him. 'In the letter, he says that 'parents and students need certainty and predictability'. 'However, his letter does not provide either certainty or predictability. In fact he once again ignores the question everyone has been asking him for six days now. 'Instead, he accuses Sinn Féin of causing uncertainty and asks us to provide clarity. What an absolute cheek from a tone deaf minister. 'It is time that the Minister took responsibility for his own actions, instead of scrambling around blaming everyone else for the mess that he has created.'
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
After the Train: Irishwomen united – a book to be passed down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind
After the Train: Irishwomen United and a Network of Change Author : Evelyn Conlon and Rebecca Pelan editors ISBN-13 : 978-1068502309 Publisher : UCD Press Guideline Price : €30 From 1975 to 1977, Irishwomen United (IWU) – and the culture of change it generated – radically fed into the emancipation of Irish society that led to 2018's referendum to lift the constitutional abortion ban. In their deeds and words, IWU threw off much of the misogynistic, theocratic, social and mind control that was so oppressively exerted from 1922 with the formation of the postcolonial Irish 'Free' State. 'Lest they forget,' and as a blueprint for ongoing social justice transformation, After the Train has been durably designed and produced to weather many decades of reading and rereading: to be passed from hand to hand, and down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind. The 'train' of the title refers to the Irish Women's Liberation Movement 1971 stunt of bringing contraceptives from Belfast to Dublin's Connolly Station; a spark of civil disobedience which the IWU took up again in 1976 with its aptly named CAP (Contraception Action Programme). CAP openly and illegally distributed contraception, enacting the principle that women's control of their own fertility is the bedrock of female equality. Reading how inferior women's social and legal status was in Ireland in the early 1970s compared to now demonstrates the far-reaching impact of IWU and its cultural offshoots. Contributor Anne Speed writes: 'A wife was officially the property of her husband; rape was legal in marriage; contraceptives were banned since 1935; divorce was unconstitutional; a woman could not sit on juries; by law, children's allowances were paid to the husband, and it was legal to pay women less than men for the same job.' READ MORE IWU seized the narrative through the development of feminist publishing; set up organisations to tackle rape, the abortion ban and the plight of single mothers; and lobbied powerfully to affect equality through law reform and the trade union movement. [ From the archive: A history of Irish women in 50 objects Opens in new window ] Here's reader testimony to the revolutionary power of this skilfully edited collection: as the mother of a disabled adult son, I'm at the coalface of human rights travesties that have barely begun to be recognised as such by wider Irish society. My desire for disabled people's self-determination, inclusion and equality, and my understanding of how these might be achieved, feel turbocharged with After the Train on my shelf and in my heart.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?
With billions flowing into the Government's coffers from our corporation tax bonanza, there were some big winners from last year's pre-election budget. Among the biggest were the children of wealthy parents. While CSO statistics show that an average person receives about €100,000 in gifts or inheritances from their parents over a lifetime, Budget 2025 announced a €25,000 tax cut for the tiny fraction who receive more than €400,000. Such giveaways contrast sharply with below-inflation increases to most social welfare payments over recent years. This has left core rates of payments worth less today than they were in January 2020: a remarkable situation given the strength of economic growth and the tens of billions in new spending announced. These real-terms cuts have contributed to stagnating incomes for the poorest households as well as stubbornly persistent levels of child poverty. READ MORE Research published by the ESRI in partnership with Community Foundation Ireland has shown that 250,000 children live in households below the poverty line after accounting for housing costs: more than one in five children. A wealth of evidence shows this has enormous economic and social costs , with a lack of adequate resources compromising the ability of children to grow and thrive, even in adulthood. The importance of reducing child poverty has been recognised by successive governments, with ambitious targets set out in various plans, strategies and roadmaps since 1997. However, we have seen no real progress for the best part of two decades. Shockingly, the share of children below the poverty line after housing costs is no lower than during the worst years of the financial crisis. The reason child poverty persists is that whenever the opportunity comes to translate words into action there is always some higher priority. This year that higher priority looks to be the hospitality sector, which has engaged in a sustained, well-funded lobbying campaign for even more preferential VAT treatment than it currently enjoys. VAT is currently levied on accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent, compared with the standard rate of 23 per cent. Estimates by Revenue suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year. Cutting the rate further to 9 per cent would cost more than €800 million more a year, sucking up most of the space available for new measures in the forthcoming budget. This is despite the fact the sector is – by any objective measure – doing well. CSO data shows that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier, while figures from the Companies Registration Office show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector. Even if the sector were struggling, a VAT cut makes little economic sense. Rather than supporting struggling small restaurants or cafes, the biggest beneficiaries would be large operators with the highest turnover. On what grounds can a multimillion-euro tax cut for outlets such as McDonald's possibly be justified? Yet the Tánaiste's recent elevation of this expensive and economically illiterate tax cut to a 'solemn commitment' would seem to place it ahead of all other promises in the programme for government. This includes a pledge to 'lift more children out of poverty, giving them the futures they deserve'. Doing so would have immense benefits, but unavoidably requires spending money. The most effective way of spending this money is to introduce a second-tier of child benefit. This would leave the current universal child benefit payment as it stands but give an additional amount to lower-income families with children, replacing the inadequate patchwork of existing supports. Recent estimates from the ESRI suggest such a reform would reduce child poverty by more than a quarter. This amounts to lifting more than 50,000 children out of poverty at a cost of €772 million. While substantial, this cost is about a quarter of achieving the same reduction by increasing the universal child benefit payment. Strikingly, it is also less than that of the planned cut to VAT for the hospitality sector. This is the reason a second tier of child benefit has been called for since 2007 by a range of expert bodies, including the last government's Commission on Taxation and Welfare (which I was part of). A second tier of child benefit would mirror reforms implemented in the UK over the 2000s by then chancellor Gordon Brown. Writing in these pages last year, he described the approach as a 'progressive universalism' that ensures 'a floor of basic social rights for all, but with more support for those who need it most'. When Brown gave a keynote address to the Irish Government's inaugural Child Poverty Summit last year, he was introduced by then taoiseach Simon Harris, who declared that 'ending child poverty is a defining challenge for any leader' . After 20 years without progress in reducing – let alone ending – child poverty, it is a challenge our leaders are failing. Whether that failure defines their legacies depends on the decisions they take in the coming budgets. Dr Barra Roantree is director of the MSc in economic policy at Trinity College Dublin
